Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part II—patient satisfaction and preference
Identifieur interne : 00A713 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 00A712; suivant : 00A714Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part II—patient satisfaction and preference
Auteurs : David R. Burns [États-Unis] ; John W. Unger [États-Unis] ; Ronald K. Elswick Jr. [États-Unis] ; James A. Giglio [États-Unis]Source :
- The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry [ 0022-3913 ] ; 1995.
Descripteurs français
- Wicri :
- topic : Collecte de données.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Additional months, Anterior mandible, Appointment name, Attachment, Attachment comparison, Attachment placement, Attachment system, Attachment systems, Baseline, Baseline comparison, Baseline values baseline, Best denture retention, Bone loss, Clinical evaluation, Complete denture, Conventional denture, Conventional dentures, Crossover design, Crossover model, Data collection, Dent, Dentistry, Denture, Denture base, Denture retention, Denture treatment, Force gauge, Greater retention, Greatest amount, Implant, Implant fixture, Implant overdenture, Implant placement, Implant treatment, Independent implants, Intraoral placement, Lateral force, Lower denture, Magnet, Magnet attachment, Magnet attachments, Mandibular, Mandibular denture, Mandibular dentures, Mandibular implant, Mandibular prosthesis, Maxillary score mandibular score, Maxillofacial surgery, Months period, Movable tissue, Notice odor, Oral maxillofac implants, Osseointegrated implants, Overdenture, Overdenture attachments, Overdentures, Patient preference data, Patient satisfaction, Patient satisfaction questionnaire, Period sequence, Prosthesis, Prosthet dent, Prosthetic dentistry, Pulpal healing, Real change, Residual ridge resorption, Retention, Retention stability retention score stability score, Retrospective study, Several questions, Shiner magnet, Significant difference, Significant increase, Social situations, Soft tissue, Stability, Stability score, Subject name, Time sequences, Tissue condition, Tissue response, Tissue score data, Tissue scores, Tissue surface, Treatment outcome, Upper denture, Virginia commonwealth university, Vital dentin.
- Teeft :
- Additional months, Anterior mandible, Appointment name, Attachment, Attachment comparison, Attachment placement, Attachment system, Attachment systems, Baseline, Baseline comparison, Baseline values baseline, Best denture retention, Bone loss, Clinical evaluation, Complete denture, Conventional denture, Conventional dentures, Crossover design, Crossover model, Data collection, Dent, Dentistry, Denture, Denture base, Denture retention, Denture treatment, Force gauge, Greater retention, Greatest amount, Implant, Implant fixture, Implant overdenture, Implant placement, Implant treatment, Independent implants, Intraoral placement, Lateral force, Lower denture, Magnet, Magnet attachment, Magnet attachments, Mandibular, Mandibular denture, Mandibular dentures, Mandibular implant, Mandibular prosthesis, Maxillary score mandibular score, Maxillofacial surgery, Months period, Movable tissue, Notice odor, Oral maxillofac implants, Osseointegrated implants, Overdenture, Overdenture attachments, Overdentures, Patient preference data, Patient satisfaction, Patient satisfaction questionnaire, Period sequence, Prosthesis, Prosthet dent, Prosthetic dentistry, Pulpal healing, Real change, Residual ridge resorption, Retention, Retention stability retention score stability score, Retrospective study, Several questions, Shiner magnet, Significant difference, Significant increase, Social situations, Soft tissue, Stability, Stability score, Subject name, Time sequences, Tissue condition, Tissue response, Tissue score data, Tissue scores, Tissue surface, Treatment outcome, Upper denture, Virginia commonwealth university, Vital dentin.
Abstract
In a crossover experimental design, a prospective clinical study was performed with 17 subjects with existing complete dentures. After data collection, two implants were placed bilaterally in the anterior mandible. Conventional dentures were modified into implant overdentures by use of O-ring and magnet attachments. Each attachment was maintained with each subject for 6 months. Subjects responded to patient satisfaction and preference questionnaires about the conventional denture and each attachment. Subjects were satisfied with both attachment overdentures but showed a strong preference for the O-ring. Both attachments resulted in a significant increase in patient satisfaction when compared with the conventional denture.
Url:
- https://api.istex.fr/document/ECD99C62FD9ACCF04B88BC5D01A162915AB02BE2/fulltext/pdf
- https://api.istex.fr/document/E4CFA16A051A7FFA8AF0B4BF6DCAA435C64F57E8/fulltext/pdf
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80332-4
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 007550
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 007550
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 004D55
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 00AD21
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 007170
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 007170
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 004D54
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 00AD20
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 00A713
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part II—patient satisfaction and preference</title>
<author><name sortKey="Burns, David R" sort="Burns, David R" uniqKey="Burns D" first="David R." last="Burns">David R. Burns</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Unger, John W" sort="Unger, John W" uniqKey="Unger J" first="John W." last="Unger">John W. Unger</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Elswick Jr, Ronald K" sort="Elswick Jr, Ronald K" uniqKey="Elswick Jr R" first="Ronald K." last="Elswick Jr.">Ronald K. Elswick Jr.</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Giglio, James A" sort="Giglio, James A" uniqKey="Giglio J" first="James A." last="Giglio">James A. Giglio</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:ECD99C62FD9ACCF04B88BC5D01A162915AB02BE2</idno>
<date when="1995" year="1995">1995</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80332-4</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/ECD99C62FD9ACCF04B88BC5D01A162915AB02BE2/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">007550</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">007550</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">007550</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">004D55</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">004D55</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0022-3913:1995:Burns D:prospective:clinical:evaluation</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">00AD21</idno>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:E4CFA16A051A7FFA8AF0B4BF6DCAA435C64F57E8</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/E4CFA16A051A7FFA8AF0B4BF6DCAA435C64F57E8/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">007170</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">007170</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">007170</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">004D54</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">004D54</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0022-3913:1995:Burns D:prospective:clinical:evaluation</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">00AD20</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">00A713</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">00A713</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part II—patient satisfaction and preference</title>
<author><name sortKey="Burns, David R" sort="Burns, David R" uniqKey="Burns D" first="David R." last="Burns">David R. Burns</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Dentistry, Richmond, Va.</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Va.</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Unger, John W" sort="Unger, John W" uniqKey="Unger J" first="John W." last="Unger">John W. Unger</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Dentistry, Richmond, Va.</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Va.</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Elswick Jr, Ronald K" sort="Elswick Jr, Ronald K" uniqKey="Elswick Jr R" first="Ronald K." last="Elswick Jr.">Ronald K. Elswick Jr.</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Dentistry, Richmond, Va.</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Va.</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Giglio, James A" sort="Giglio, James A" uniqKey="Giglio J" first="James A." last="Giglio">James A. Giglio</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Dentistry, Richmond, Va.</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Va.</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j">The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">YMPR</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno>
<imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<date type="published" when="1995">1995</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">73</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="364">364</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="369">369</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Additional months</term>
<term>Anterior mandible</term>
<term>Appointment name</term>
<term>Attachment</term>
<term>Attachment comparison</term>
<term>Attachment placement</term>
<term>Attachment system</term>
<term>Attachment systems</term>
<term>Baseline</term>
<term>Baseline comparison</term>
<term>Baseline values baseline</term>
<term>Best denture retention</term>
<term>Bone loss</term>
<term>Clinical evaluation</term>
<term>Complete denture</term>
<term>Conventional denture</term>
<term>Conventional dentures</term>
<term>Crossover design</term>
<term>Crossover model</term>
<term>Data collection</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Denture base</term>
<term>Denture retention</term>
<term>Denture treatment</term>
<term>Force gauge</term>
<term>Greater retention</term>
<term>Greatest amount</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant fixture</term>
<term>Implant overdenture</term>
<term>Implant placement</term>
<term>Implant treatment</term>
<term>Independent implants</term>
<term>Intraoral placement</term>
<term>Lateral force</term>
<term>Lower denture</term>
<term>Magnet</term>
<term>Magnet attachment</term>
<term>Magnet attachments</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Mandibular denture</term>
<term>Mandibular dentures</term>
<term>Mandibular implant</term>
<term>Mandibular prosthesis</term>
<term>Maxillary score mandibular score</term>
<term>Maxillofacial surgery</term>
<term>Months period</term>
<term>Movable tissue</term>
<term>Notice odor</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Osseointegrated implants</term>
<term>Overdenture</term>
<term>Overdenture attachments</term>
<term>Overdentures</term>
<term>Patient preference data</term>
<term>Patient satisfaction</term>
<term>Patient satisfaction questionnaire</term>
<term>Period sequence</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthetic dentistry</term>
<term>Pulpal healing</term>
<term>Real change</term>
<term>Residual ridge resorption</term>
<term>Retention</term>
<term>Retention stability retention score stability score</term>
<term>Retrospective study</term>
<term>Several questions</term>
<term>Shiner magnet</term>
<term>Significant difference</term>
<term>Significant increase</term>
<term>Social situations</term>
<term>Soft tissue</term>
<term>Stability</term>
<term>Stability score</term>
<term>Subject name</term>
<term>Time sequences</term>
<term>Tissue condition</term>
<term>Tissue response</term>
<term>Tissue score data</term>
<term>Tissue scores</term>
<term>Tissue surface</term>
<term>Treatment outcome</term>
<term>Upper denture</term>
<term>Virginia commonwealth university</term>
<term>Vital dentin</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Additional months</term>
<term>Anterior mandible</term>
<term>Appointment name</term>
<term>Attachment</term>
<term>Attachment comparison</term>
<term>Attachment placement</term>
<term>Attachment system</term>
<term>Attachment systems</term>
<term>Baseline</term>
<term>Baseline comparison</term>
<term>Baseline values baseline</term>
<term>Best denture retention</term>
<term>Bone loss</term>
<term>Clinical evaluation</term>
<term>Complete denture</term>
<term>Conventional denture</term>
<term>Conventional dentures</term>
<term>Crossover design</term>
<term>Crossover model</term>
<term>Data collection</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Denture base</term>
<term>Denture retention</term>
<term>Denture treatment</term>
<term>Force gauge</term>
<term>Greater retention</term>
<term>Greatest amount</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant fixture</term>
<term>Implant overdenture</term>
<term>Implant placement</term>
<term>Implant treatment</term>
<term>Independent implants</term>
<term>Intraoral placement</term>
<term>Lateral force</term>
<term>Lower denture</term>
<term>Magnet</term>
<term>Magnet attachment</term>
<term>Magnet attachments</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Mandibular denture</term>
<term>Mandibular dentures</term>
<term>Mandibular implant</term>
<term>Mandibular prosthesis</term>
<term>Maxillary score mandibular score</term>
<term>Maxillofacial surgery</term>
<term>Months period</term>
<term>Movable tissue</term>
<term>Notice odor</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Osseointegrated implants</term>
<term>Overdenture</term>
<term>Overdenture attachments</term>
<term>Overdentures</term>
<term>Patient preference data</term>
<term>Patient satisfaction</term>
<term>Patient satisfaction questionnaire</term>
<term>Period sequence</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthetic dentistry</term>
<term>Pulpal healing</term>
<term>Real change</term>
<term>Residual ridge resorption</term>
<term>Retention</term>
<term>Retention stability retention score stability score</term>
<term>Retrospective study</term>
<term>Several questions</term>
<term>Shiner magnet</term>
<term>Significant difference</term>
<term>Significant increase</term>
<term>Social situations</term>
<term>Soft tissue</term>
<term>Stability</term>
<term>Stability score</term>
<term>Subject name</term>
<term>Time sequences</term>
<term>Tissue condition</term>
<term>Tissue response</term>
<term>Tissue score data</term>
<term>Tissue scores</term>
<term>Tissue surface</term>
<term>Treatment outcome</term>
<term>Upper denture</term>
<term>Virginia commonwealth university</term>
<term>Vital dentin</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Collecte de données</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In a crossover experimental design, a prospective clinical study was performed with 17 subjects with existing complete dentures. After data collection, two implants were placed bilaterally in the anterior mandible. Conventional dentures were modified into implant overdentures by use of O-ring and magnet attachments. Each attachment was maintained with each subject for 6 months. Subjects responded to patient satisfaction and preference questionnaires about the conventional denture and each attachment. Subjects were satisfied with both attachment overdentures but showed a strong preference for the O-ring. Both attachments resulted in a significant increase in patient satisfaction when compared with the conventional denture.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations><list><country><li>États-Unis</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree><country name="États-Unis"><noRegion><name sortKey="Burns, David R" sort="Burns, David R" uniqKey="Burns D" first="David R." last="Burns">David R. Burns</name>
</noRegion>
<name sortKey="Elswick Jr, Ronald K" sort="Elswick Jr, Ronald K" uniqKey="Elswick Jr R" first="Ronald K." last="Elswick Jr.">Ronald K. Elswick Jr.</name>
<name sortKey="Giglio, James A" sort="Giglio, James A" uniqKey="Giglio J" first="James A." last="Giglio">James A. Giglio</name>
<name sortKey="Unger, John W" sort="Unger, John W" uniqKey="Unger J" first="John W." last="Unger">John W. Unger</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 00A713 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 00A713 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= Main |étape= Exploration |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:ECD99C62FD9ACCF04B88BC5D01A162915AB02BE2 |texte= Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part II—patient satisfaction and preference }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |