Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part I—retention, stability, and tissue response
Identifieur interne : 007170 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 007169; suivant : 007171Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part I—retention, stability, and tissue response
Auteurs : David R. Burns ; John W. Unger ; Ronald K. Elswick Jr. ; David A. BeckSource :
- The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry [ 0022-3913 ] ; 1995.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Additional months, Anterior mandible, Appointment name, Attachment, Attachment placement, Baseline, Baseline comparison, Baseline values baseline, Bone loss, Clinical evaluation, Complete denture, Conventional denture, Conventional dentures, Crossover design, Crossover model, Data collection, Dent, Dentistry, Denture, Denture base, Denture retention, Denture treatment, Force gauge, Greater retention, Implant, Implant overdenture, Implant placement, Independent implants, Intraoral placement, Lateral force, Magnet, Magnet attachments, Mandibular, Mandibular denture, Mandibular dentures, Mandibular implant, Mandibular prosthesis, Maxillary score mandibular score, Maxillofacial surgery, Months period, Movable tissue, Oral maxillofac implants, Overdenture, Overdenture attachments, Overdentures, Period sequence, Prosthesis, Prosthet dent, Prosthetic dentistry, Real change, Residual ridge resorption, Retention, Retention stability retention score stability score, Retrospective study, Shiner magnet, Significant difference, Soft tissue, Stability, Stability score, Time sequences, Tissue condition, Tissue response, Tissue score data, Tissue scores, Tissue surface, Virginia commonwealth university.
- Teeft :
- Additional months, Anterior mandible, Appointment name, Attachment, Attachment placement, Baseline, Baseline comparison, Baseline values baseline, Bone loss, Clinical evaluation, Complete denture, Conventional denture, Conventional dentures, Crossover design, Crossover model, Data collection, Dent, Dentistry, Denture, Denture base, Denture retention, Denture treatment, Force gauge, Greater retention, Implant, Implant overdenture, Implant placement, Independent implants, Intraoral placement, Lateral force, Magnet, Magnet attachments, Mandibular, Mandibular denture, Mandibular dentures, Mandibular implant, Mandibular prosthesis, Maxillary score mandibular score, Maxillofacial surgery, Months period, Movable tissue, Oral maxillofac implants, Overdenture, Overdenture attachments, Overdentures, Period sequence, Prosthesis, Prosthet dent, Prosthetic dentistry, Real change, Residual ridge resorption, Retention, Retention stability retention score stability score, Retrospective study, Shiner magnet, Significant difference, Soft tissue, Stability, Stability score, Time sequences, Tissue condition, Tissue response, Tissue score data, Tissue scores, Tissue surface, Virginia commonwealth university.
Abstract
Seventeen subjects with preexisting conventional complete dentures were evaluatedin this prospective clinical study. Two implants were placed bilaterally in the anterior mandible. In a crossover experimental design, the conventional dentures were modified, and the retention, stability, and tissue response for conventional dentures were compared with implant overdentures that had O-ring and magnet overdenture attachments for all subjects. The study indicated statistical superiority of the implant overdenture to the conventional denture. The O-ring attachment proved significantly better than the magnet attachment for retention and stability. The soft tissue response showed a slight but significant improvement with implant overdenture therapy.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80331-2
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:E4CFA16A051A7FFA8AF0B4BF6DCAA435C64F57E8Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part I—retention, stability, and tissue response</title><author><name sortKey="Burns, David R" sort="Burns, David R" uniqKey="Burns D" first="David R." last="Burns">David R. Burns</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va., USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Unger, John W" sort="Unger, John W" uniqKey="Unger J" first="John W." last="Unger">John W. Unger</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va., USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Elswick Jr, Ronald K" sort="Elswick Jr, Ronald K" uniqKey="Elswick Jr R" first="Ronald K." last="Elswick Jr.">Ronald K. Elswick Jr.</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va., USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Beck, David A" sort="Beck, David A" uniqKey="Beck D" first="David A." last="Beck">David A. Beck</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va., USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:E4CFA16A051A7FFA8AF0B4BF6DCAA435C64F57E8</idno><date when="1995" year="1995">1995</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80331-2</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/E4CFA16A051A7FFA8AF0B4BF6DCAA435C64F57E8/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">007170</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">007170</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part I—retention, stability, and tissue response</title><author><name sortKey="Burns, David R" sort="Burns, David R" uniqKey="Burns D" first="David R." last="Burns">David R. Burns</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va., USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Unger, John W" sort="Unger, John W" uniqKey="Unger J" first="John W." last="Unger">John W. Unger</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va., USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Elswick Jr, Ronald K" sort="Elswick Jr, Ronald K" uniqKey="Elswick Jr R" first="Ronald K." last="Elswick Jr.">Ronald K. Elswick Jr.</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va., USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Beck, David A" sort="Beck, David A" uniqKey="Beck D" first="David A." last="Beck">David A. Beck</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va., USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">YMPR</title><idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1995">1995</date><biblScope unit="volume">73</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="354">354</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="363">363</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Additional months</term><term>Anterior mandible</term><term>Appointment name</term><term>Attachment</term><term>Attachment placement</term><term>Baseline</term><term>Baseline comparison</term><term>Baseline values baseline</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Clinical evaluation</term><term>Complete denture</term><term>Conventional denture</term><term>Conventional dentures</term><term>Crossover design</term><term>Crossover model</term><term>Data collection</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture base</term><term>Denture retention</term><term>Denture treatment</term><term>Force gauge</term><term>Greater retention</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant overdenture</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Independent implants</term><term>Intraoral placement</term><term>Lateral force</term><term>Magnet</term><term>Magnet attachments</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular denture</term><term>Mandibular dentures</term><term>Mandibular implant</term><term>Mandibular prosthesis</term><term>Maxillary score mandibular score</term><term>Maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Months period</term><term>Movable tissue</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Overdenture attachments</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Period sequence</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Real change</term><term>Residual ridge resorption</term><term>Retention</term><term>Retention stability retention score stability score</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Shiner magnet</term><term>Significant difference</term><term>Soft tissue</term><term>Stability</term><term>Stability score</term><term>Time sequences</term><term>Tissue condition</term><term>Tissue response</term><term>Tissue score data</term><term>Tissue scores</term><term>Tissue surface</term><term>Virginia commonwealth university</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Additional months</term><term>Anterior mandible</term><term>Appointment name</term><term>Attachment</term><term>Attachment placement</term><term>Baseline</term><term>Baseline comparison</term><term>Baseline values baseline</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Clinical evaluation</term><term>Complete denture</term><term>Conventional denture</term><term>Conventional dentures</term><term>Crossover design</term><term>Crossover model</term><term>Data collection</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture base</term><term>Denture retention</term><term>Denture treatment</term><term>Force gauge</term><term>Greater retention</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant overdenture</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Independent implants</term><term>Intraoral placement</term><term>Lateral force</term><term>Magnet</term><term>Magnet attachments</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular denture</term><term>Mandibular dentures</term><term>Mandibular implant</term><term>Mandibular prosthesis</term><term>Maxillary score mandibular score</term><term>Maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Months period</term><term>Movable tissue</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Overdenture attachments</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Period sequence</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Real change</term><term>Residual ridge resorption</term><term>Retention</term><term>Retention stability retention score stability score</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Shiner magnet</term><term>Significant difference</term><term>Soft tissue</term><term>Stability</term><term>Stability score</term><term>Time sequences</term><term>Tissue condition</term><term>Tissue response</term><term>Tissue score data</term><term>Tissue scores</term><term>Tissue surface</term><term>Virginia commonwealth university</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Seventeen subjects with preexisting conventional complete dentures were evaluatedin this prospective clinical study. Two implants were placed bilaterally in the anterior mandible. In a crossover experimental design, the conventional dentures were modified, and the retention, stability, and tissue response for conventional dentures were compared with implant overdentures that had O-ring and magnet overdenture attachments for all subjects. The study indicated statistical superiority of the implant overdenture to the conventional denture. The O-ring attachment proved significantly better than the magnet attachment for retention and stability. The soft tissue response showed a slight but significant improvement with implant overdenture therapy.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>elsevier</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>mandibular</json:string><json:string>overdenture</json:string><json:string>baseline</json:string><json:string>force gauge</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>overdentures</json:string><json:string>magnet</json:string><json:string>denture base</json:string><json:string>prosthet dent</json:string><json:string>time sequences</json:string><json:string>magnet attachments</json:string><json:string>conventional denture</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>conventional dentures</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string><json:string>virginia commonwealth university</json:string><json:string>mandibular denture</json:string><json:string>attachment</json:string><json:string>tissue scores</json:string><json:string>denture treatment</json:string><json:string>denture retention</json:string><json:string>data collection</json:string><json:string>lateral force</json:string><json:string>months period</json:string><json:string>maxillary score mandibular score</json:string><json:string>independent implants</json:string><json:string>tissue response</json:string><json:string>tissue score data</json:string><json:string>implant overdenture</json:string><json:string>retention</json:string><json:string>greater retention</json:string><json:string>additional months</json:string><json:string>mandibular dentures</json:string><json:string>attachment placement</json:string><json:string>appointment name</json:string><json:string>stability score</json:string><json:string>intraoral placement</json:string><json:string>tissue condition</json:string><json:string>significant difference</json:string><json:string>crossover design</json:string><json:string>crossover model</json:string><json:string>mandibular prosthesis</json:string><json:string>movable tissue</json:string><json:string>complete denture</json:string><json:string>retention stability retention score stability score</json:string><json:string>baseline values baseline</json:string><json:string>shiner magnet</json:string><json:string>real change</json:string><json:string>prosthetic dentistry</json:string><json:string>tissue surface</json:string><json:string>retrospective study</json:string><json:string>soft tissue</json:string><json:string>overdenture attachments</json:string><json:string>baseline comparison</json:string><json:string>period sequence</json:string><json:string>mandibular implant</json:string><json:string>residual ridge resorption</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>anterior mandible</json:string><json:string>clinical evaluation</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial surgery</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string><json:string>stability</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>David R. Burns DMD</name><affiliations><json:string>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va., USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>John W. Unger DDS</name><affiliations><json:string>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va., USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Ronald K. Elswick, Jr. PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va., USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>David A. Beck DDS</name><affiliations><json:string>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va., USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Clinical sciences</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>05803312</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/6H6-RCKH35HH-Z</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>Full-length article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Seventeen subjects with preexisting conventional complete dentures were evaluatedin this prospective clinical study. Two implants were placed bilaterally in the anterior mandible. In a crossover experimental design, the conventional dentures were modified, and the retention, stability, and tissue response for conventional dentures were compared with implant overdentures that had O-ring and magnet overdenture attachments for all subjects. The study indicated statistical superiority of the implant overdenture to the conventional denture. The O-ring attachment proved significantly better than the magnet attachment for retention and stability. The soft tissue response showed a slight but significant improvement with implant overdenture therapy.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.176</score><pdfWordCount>5074</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>27736</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>10</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>576 x 785 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>98</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>750</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>1</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part I—retention, stability, and tissue response</title><pmid><json:string>7783014</json:string></pmid><pii><json:string>S0022-3913(05)80331-2</json:string></pii><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><title>The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><publicationDate>1995</publicationDate><issn><json:string>0022-3913</json:string></issn><pii><json:string>S0022-3913(05)X8326-3</json:string></pii><volume>73</volume><issue>4</issue><pages><first>354</first><last>363</last></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>10/1/61681</json:string><json:string>1995</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>National Institute for Dental Research</json:string><json:string>Calcitek Inc.</json:string><json:string>Department of Prosthodontics</json:string><json:string>Virginia Commonwealth University</json:string><json:string>Department of Biostatistics</json:string><json:string>Preat Corp.</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>V. Analysis</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Carlsbad</json:string><json:string>San Mateo</json:string><json:string>Calif.</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Rayson et al.</json:string><json:string>Engquist et al.</json:string><json:string>Quirynen et al.</json:string><json:string>von Wowern et al.</json:string><json:string>Naert et al.</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/6H6-RCKH35HH-Z</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string><json:string>4 - otorhinolaryngologie. stomatologie</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>1995</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1995</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80331-2</json:string></doi><id>E4CFA16A051A7FFA8AF0B4BF6DCAA435C64F57E8</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E4CFA16A051A7FFA8AF0B4BF6DCAA435C64F57E8/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E4CFA16A051A7FFA8AF0B4BF6DCAA435C64F57E8/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/E4CFA16A051A7FFA8AF0B4BF6DCAA435C64F57E8/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part I—retention, stability, and tissue response</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><availability><p>©1995 The Editorial Council of The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</p></availability><date>1995</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note>Supported in part by the National Institute for Dental Research(grant No. 1 RO3 DE09106-01A1) and Calcitek Inc., Carlsbad, Calif.</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part I—retention, stability, and tissue response</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">David R.</forename><surname>Burns</surname></persName><roleName type="degree">DMD</roleName><note type="biography">Associate Professor</note><note type="biography">Reprint requests to: Dr. David R. Burns Department of Prosthodontics School of Dentistry Virginia Commonwealth University P.O. Box 566 Richmond, VA 23298</note><note type="biography">Department of Prosthodontics.</note><affiliation>Associate Professor</affiliation><affiliation>Reprint requests to: Dr. David R. Burns Department of Prosthodontics School of Dentistry Virginia Commonwealth University P.O. Box 566 Richmond, VA 23298</affiliation><affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics.</affiliation><affiliation>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va., USA</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">John W.</forename><surname>Unger</surname></persName><roleName type="degree">DDS</roleName><note type="biography">Associate Professor and Chairman</note><note type="biography">Department of Prosthodontics.</note><affiliation>Associate Professor and Chairman</affiliation><affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics.</affiliation><affiliation>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va., USA</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Ronald K.</forename><surname>Elswick, Jr.</surname></persName><roleName type="degree">PhD</roleName><note type="biography">Assistant Professor</note><note type="biography">Department of Biostatistics.</note><affiliation>Assistant Professor</affiliation><affiliation>Department of Biostatistics.</affiliation><affiliation>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va., USA</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">David A.</forename><surname>Beck</surname></persName><roleName type="degree">DDS</roleName><note type="biography">Department of Prosthodontics.</note><affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics.</affiliation><affiliation>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va., USA</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">E4CFA16A051A7FFA8AF0B4BF6DCAA435C64F57E8</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80331-2</idno><idno type="PII">S0022-3913(05)80331-2</idno><idno type="ArticleID">05803312</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j">The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">YMPR</title><idno type="pISSN">0022-3913</idno><idno type="PII">S0022-3913(05)X8326-3</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1995"></date><biblScope unit="volume">73</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="354">354</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="363">363</biblScope></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1995</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Seventeen subjects with preexisting conventional complete dentures were evaluatedin this prospective clinical study. Two implants were placed bilaterally in the anterior mandible. In a crossover experimental design, the conventional dentures were modified, and the retention, stability, and tissue response for conventional dentures were compared with implant overdentures that had O-ring and magnet overdenture attachments for all subjects. The study indicated statistical superiority of the implant overdenture to the conventional denture. The O-ring attachment proved significantly better than the magnet attachment for retention and stability. The soft tissue response showed a slight but significant improvement with implant overdenture therapy.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>article-category</head><item><term>Clinical sciences</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1995">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E4CFA16A051A7FFA8AF0B4BF6DCAA435C64F57E8/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Elsevier doc found" wicri:toSee="Elsevier, no converted or simple article"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//ES//DTD journal article DTD version 5.0.1//EN//XML" URI="art501.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><article version="5.0" xml:lang="en" docsubtype="fla"><item-info><jid>YMPR</jid><aid>05803312</aid><ce:pii>S0022-3913(05)80331-2</ce:pii><ce:doi>10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80331-2</ce:doi><ce:copyright type="unknown" year="1995">The Editorial Council of The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</ce:copyright><ce:doctopics><ce:doctopic><ce:text>Clinical sciences</ce:text><ce:doctopic><ce:text>Maxillofacial prosthetics and dental implants</ce:text></ce:doctopic></ce:doctopic></ce:doctopics></item-info><head><ce:article-footnote><ce:label>†</ce:label><ce:note-para>Supported in part by the National Institute for Dental Research(grant No. 1 RO3 DE09106-01A1) and Calcitek Inc., Carlsbad, Calif.</ce:note-para></ce:article-footnote><ce:title>Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part I—retention, stability, and tissue response</ce:title><ce:author-group><ce:author><ce:degrees>DMD</ce:degrees><ce:given-name>David R.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Burns</ce:surname><ce:roles>Associate Professor</ce:roles><ce:cross-ref refid="cor1"><ce:sup>*</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="fn1"><ce:sup>a</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:degrees>DDS</ce:degrees><ce:given-name>John W.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Unger</ce:surname><ce:roles>Associate Professor and Chairman</ce:roles><ce:cross-ref refid="fn1"><ce:sup>a</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:degrees>PhD</ce:degrees><ce:given-name>Ronald K.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Elswick</ce:surname><ce:suffix>Jr.</ce:suffix><ce:roles>Assistant Professor</ce:roles><ce:cross-ref refid="fn2"><ce:sup>b</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:degrees>DDS</ce:degrees><ce:given-name>David A.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Beck</ce:surname><ce:cross-ref refid="fn1"><ce:sup>a</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:affiliation id="aff1"><ce:textfn>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va., USA</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation><ce:correspondence id="cor1"><ce:label>*</ce:label><ce:text><ce:italic>Reprint requests to</ce:italic>: <ce:small-caps>Dr. David R. Burns Department of Prosthodontics School of Dentistry Virginia Commonwealth University P.O. Box 566 Richmond</ce:small-caps>, VA 23298</ce:text></ce:correspondence><ce:footnote id="fn1"><ce:label>a</ce:label><ce:note-para>Department of Prosthodontics.</ce:note-para></ce:footnote><ce:footnote id="fn2"><ce:label>b</ce:label><ce:note-para>Department of Biostatistics.</ce:note-para></ce:footnote></ce:author-group><ce:abstract id="ab1" class="author" xml:lang="en"><ce:abstract-sec><ce:simple-para>Seventeen subjects with preexisting conventional complete dentures were evaluatedin this prospective clinical study. Two implants were placed bilaterally in the anterior mandible. In a crossover experimental design, the conventional dentures were modified, and the retention, stability, and tissue response for conventional dentures were compared with implant overdentures that had O-ring and magnet overdenture attachments for all subjects. The study indicated statistical superiority of the implant overdenture to the conventional denture. The O-ring attachment proved significantly better than the magnet attachment for retention and stability. The soft tissue response showed a slight but significant improvement with implant overdenture therapy.</ce:simple-para></ce:abstract-sec></ce:abstract></head><tail><ce:bibliography><ce:section-title>References</ce:section-title><ce:bibliography-sec><ce:bib-reference id="bib1"><ce:label>1.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution langtype="en"><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Brill</ce:surname><ce:given-name>N</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Full denture retention: factors in the mechanism of full denture retention—a discussion of selected papers</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Dent Practit Dent Rec</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>18</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1967</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>9</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>19</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib2"><ce:label>2.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution langtype="en"><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Mack</ce:surname><ce:given-name>AO</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Full dentures</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:edited-book><sb:date>1971</sb:date><sb:publisher><sb:name>John Wright and Sons, Ltd</sb:name><sb:location>Bristol</sb:location></sb:publisher></sb:edited-book><sb:pages><sb:first-page>94</sb:first-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib3"><ce:label>3.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution langtype="en"><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Ostlund</ce:surname><ce:given-name>SG</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Saliva and denture retention</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Prosthet Dent</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>10</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1960</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>658</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>663</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib4"><ce:label>4.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution langtype="en"><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Tarbet</ce:surname><ce:given-name>WJ</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Boone</ce:surname><ce:given-name>M</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Schmidt</ce:surname><ce:given-name>NF</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Effect of a denture adhesive on complete denture dislodgement during mastication</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Prosthet Dent</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>44</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1980</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>374</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>378</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib5"><ce:label>5.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:host><sb:edited-book><sb:editors><sb:editor><ce:surname>Branemark</ce:surname><ce:given-name>P</ce:given-name></sb:editor><sb:editor><ce:surname>Zarb</ce:surname><ce:given-name>GA</ce:given-name></sb:editor><sb:editor><ce:surname>Albrektsson</ce:surname><ce:given-name>T</ce:given-name></sb:editor></sb:editors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Tissue integrated prosthesis</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:edition>1st ed</sb:edition><sb:date>1985</sb:date><sb:publisher><sb:name>Quintessence Publishing Co.</sb:name><sb:location>Chicago</sb:location></sb:publisher></sb:edited-book><sb:pages><sb:first-page>211</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>232</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib6"><ce:label>6.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution langtype="en"><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Kapur</ce:surname><ce:given-name>KK</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>A clinical evaluation of denture adhesives</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Prosthet Dent</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>18</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1967</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>550</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>558</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib7"><ce:label>7.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution langtype="en"><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Schmitz</ce:surname><ce:given-name>JF</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Measurement of the efficiency of the platinum-cobalt magnetic implant</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Prosthet Dent</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>16</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1966</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>1151</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>1158</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib8"><ce:label>8.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution langtype="en"><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Rayson</ce:surname><ce:given-name>JH</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Rahn</ce:surname><ce:given-name>AO</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Ellinger</ce:surname><ce:given-name>CW</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:et-al></sb:et-al></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>The value of subjective evaluation in clinical research</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Prosthet Dent</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>26</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1971</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>111</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>118</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib9"><ce:label>9.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution langtype="en"><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Grizzle</ce:surname><ce:given-name>JE</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>The two-period change-over design and its use in clinical trials</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Biometrics</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>21</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1965</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>467</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>480</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib10"><ce:label>10.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution langtype="en"><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Engquist</ce:surname><ce:given-name>B</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Bergendal</ce:surname><ce:given-name>T</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Kallus</ce:surname><ce:given-name>T</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Linden</ce:surname><ce:given-name>U</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>A retrospective multicenter evaluation of osseintegrated implants supporting overdentures</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>3</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1988</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>129</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>134</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib11"><ce:label>11.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution langtype="en"><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Naert</ce:surname><ce:given-name>I</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Quirynen</ce:surname><ce:given-name>M</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Theuniers</ce:surname><ce:given-name>G</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>van Steengerghe</ce:surname><ce:given-name>D</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Prosthetic aspects of osseointegrated fixtures supporting overdentures. A 4-year report</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Prosthet Dent</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>65</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1991</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>671</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>680</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib12"><ce:label>12.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution langtype="en"><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Mericske-Stern</ce:surname><ce:given-name>R</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Clinical evaluation of overdenture restorations supported by osseointegrated titanium implants: a retrospective study</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>5</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1990</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>375</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>383</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib13"><ce:label>13.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution langtype="en"><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Quirynen</ce:surname><ce:given-name>M</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Naert</ce:surname><ce:given-name>I</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>van Steenberghe</ce:surname><ce:given-name>D</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Teerlinck</ce:surname><ce:given-name>J</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Dekeyser</ce:surname><ce:given-name>C</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Theuniers</ce:surname><ce:given-name>G</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Periodontal aspects of osseointegrated fixtures supporting an overdenture. A four-year retrospective study</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Clin Periodontol</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>18</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1991</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>719</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>728</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib14"><ce:label>14.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution langtype="en"><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Parel</ce:surname><ce:given-name>SM</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Implants and overdentures: the osseointegrated approach with conventional and compromised applications</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>2</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1986</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>93</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>99</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib15"><ce:label>15.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution langtype="en"><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Johns</ce:surname><ce:given-name>RB</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Jemt</ce:surname><ce:given-name>T</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Heath</ce:surname><ce:given-name>MR</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:et-al></sb:et-al></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>A multicenter study of overdentures supported by Branemark implants</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>7</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1992</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>513</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>522</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib16"><ce:label>16.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution langtype="en"><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Naert</ce:surname><ce:given-name>I</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Quirynen</ce:surname><ce:given-name>M</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>van Steenberghe</ce:surname><ce:given-name>D</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Darius</ce:surname><ce:given-name>P</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>A six-year prosthodontic study of 509 consecutively inserted implants for the treatment of partial edentulism</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Prosthet Dent</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>67</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1992</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>236</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>245</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib17"><ce:label>17.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution langtype="en"><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Atwood</ce:surname><ce:given-name>DA</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Coy</ce:surname><ce:given-name>WA</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Clinical, cephalometric, and densitometric study of reduction of residual ridges</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Prosthet Dent</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>26</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1971</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>280</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>295</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib18"><ce:label>18.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution langtype="en"><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Tallgren</ce:surname><ce:given-name>A</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers: a mixed longitudinal study covering 25 years</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Prosthet Dent</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>27</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1972</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>120</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>132</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib19"><ce:label>19.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution langtype="en"><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Naert</ce:surname><ce:given-name>I</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Quirynen</ce:surname><ce:given-name>M</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Hooghe</ce:surname><ce:given-name>M</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>van Steenberghe</ce:surname><ce:given-name>D</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>A comparative prospective study of splinted and unsplinted Brаnemark implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: a preliminary report</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Prosthet Dent</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>71</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1994</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>486</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>492</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib20"><ce:label>20.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution langtype="en"><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>von Wowern</ce:surname><ce:given-name>N</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Harder</ce:surname><ce:given-name>F</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Hjorting-Hansen</ce:surname><ce:given-name>E</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Gotfredsen</ce:surname><ce:given-name>K</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>ITI implants with overdentures: a prevention of bone loss in edentulous mandibles?</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>5</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1990</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>135</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>139</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference></ce:bibliography-sec></ce:bibliography></tail></article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part I—retention, stability, and tissue response</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" lang="en" contentType="CDATA"><title>Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part I—retention, stability, and tissue response</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">David R.</namePart><namePart type="family">Burns</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DMD</namePart><affiliation>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va., USA</affiliation><description>Associate Professor</description><description>Reprint requests to: Dr. David R. Burns Department of Prosthodontics School of Dentistry Virginia Commonwealth University P.O. Box 566 Richmond, VA 23298</description><description>Department of Prosthodontics.</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">John W.</namePart><namePart type="family">Unger</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS</namePart><affiliation>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va., USA</affiliation><description>Associate Professor and Chairman</description><description>Department of Prosthodontics.</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Ronald K.</namePart><namePart type="family">Elswick, Jr.</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">PhD</namePart><affiliation>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va., USA</affiliation><description>Assistant Professor</description><description>Department of Biostatistics.</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">David A.</namePart><namePart type="family">Beck</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS</namePart><affiliation>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va., USA</affiliation><description>Department of Prosthodontics.</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="Full-length article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1995</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1995</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><abstract lang="en">Seventeen subjects with preexisting conventional complete dentures were evaluatedin this prospective clinical study. Two implants were placed bilaterally in the anterior mandible. In a crossover experimental design, the conventional dentures were modified, and the retention, stability, and tissue response for conventional dentures were compared with implant overdentures that had O-ring and magnet overdenture attachments for all subjects. The study indicated statistical superiority of the implant overdenture to the conventional denture. The O-ring attachment proved significantly better than the magnet attachment for retention and stability. The soft tissue response showed a slight but significant improvement with implant overdenture therapy.</abstract><note>Supported in part by the National Institute for Dental Research(grant No. 1 RO3 DE09106-01A1) and Calcitek Inc., Carlsbad, Calif.</note><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Clinical sciences</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>YMPR</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">199504</dateIssued></originInfo><identifier type="ISSN">0022-3913</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0022-3913(05)X8326-3</identifier><part><date>199504</date><detail type="volume"><number>73</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="issue"><number>4</number><caption>no.</caption></detail><extent unit="issue-pages"><start>329</start><end>404</end></extent><extent unit="issue-pages"><start>20A</start><end>404</end></extent><extent unit="pages"><start>354</start><end>363</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">E4CFA16A051A7FFA8AF0B4BF6DCAA435C64F57E8</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/6H6-RCKH35HH-Z</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80331-2</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0022-3913(05)80331-2</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">05803312</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">©1995 The Editorial Council of The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-HKKZVM7B-M">elsevier</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>The Editorial Council of The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, ©1995</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E4CFA16A051A7FFA8AF0B4BF6DCAA435C64F57E8/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 007170 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 007170 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:E4CFA16A051A7FFA8AF0B4BF6DCAA435C64F57E8
|texte= Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part I—retention, stability, and tissue response
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |