Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part II—patient satisfaction and preference
Identifieur interne : 007550 ( Istex/Curation ); précédent : 007549; suivant : 007551Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part II—patient satisfaction and preference
Auteurs : David R. Burns [États-Unis] ; John W. Unger [États-Unis] ; Ronald K. Elswick Jr. [États-Unis] ; James A. Giglio [États-Unis]Source :
- The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry [ 0022-3913 ] ; 1995.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Anterior mandible, Attachment, Attachment comparison, Attachment system, Attachment systems, Baseline, Best denture retention, Conventional denture, Conventional dentures, Dentistry, Denture, Denture retention, Greatest amount, Implant, Implant fixture, Implant treatment, Intraoral placement, Lower denture, Magnet, Magnet attachment, Mandibular, Mandibular prosthesis, Maxillofacial surgery, Notice odor, Oral maxillofac implants, Osseointegrated implants, Patient preference data, Patient satisfaction, Patient satisfaction questionnaire, Prosthesis, Prosthet dent, Pulpal healing, Several questions, Significant difference, Significant increase, Social situations, Subject name, Tissue response, Treatment outcome, Upper denture, Virginia commonwealth university, Vital dentin.
- Teeft :
- Anterior mandible, Attachment, Attachment comparison, Attachment system, Attachment systems, Baseline, Best denture retention, Conventional denture, Conventional dentures, Dentistry, Denture, Denture retention, Greatest amount, Implant, Implant fixture, Implant treatment, Intraoral placement, Lower denture, Magnet, Magnet attachment, Mandibular, Mandibular prosthesis, Maxillofacial surgery, Notice odor, Oral maxillofac implants, Osseointegrated implants, Patient preference data, Patient satisfaction, Patient satisfaction questionnaire, Prosthesis, Prosthet dent, Pulpal healing, Several questions, Significant difference, Significant increase, Social situations, Subject name, Tissue response, Treatment outcome, Upper denture, Virginia commonwealth university, Vital dentin.
Abstract
In a crossover experimental design, a prospective clinical study was performed with 17 subjects with existing complete dentures. After data collection, two implants were placed bilaterally in the anterior mandible. Conventional dentures were modified into implant overdentures by use of O-ring and magnet attachments. Each attachment was maintained with each subject for 6 months. Subjects responded to patient satisfaction and preference questionnaires about the conventional denture and each attachment. Subjects were satisfied with both attachment overdentures but showed a strong preference for the O-ring. Both attachments resulted in a significant increase in patient satisfaction when compared with the conventional denture.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80332-4
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :007550
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:ECD99C62FD9ACCF04B88BC5D01A162915AB02BE2Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part II—patient satisfaction and preference</title><author><name sortKey="Burns, David R" sort="Burns, David R" uniqKey="Burns D" first="David R." last="Burns">David R. Burns</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Dentistry, Richmond, Va., USA</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Dentistry, Richmond, Va.</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Unger, John W" sort="Unger, John W" uniqKey="Unger J" first="John W." last="Unger">John W. Unger</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Dentistry, Richmond, Va., USA</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Dentistry, Richmond, Va.</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Elswick Jr, Ronald K" sort="Elswick Jr, Ronald K" uniqKey="Elswick Jr R" first="Ronald K." last="Elswick Jr.">Ronald K. Elswick Jr.</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Dentistry, Richmond, Va., USA</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Dentistry, Richmond, Va.</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Giglio, James A" sort="Giglio, James A" uniqKey="Giglio J" first="James A." last="Giglio">James A. Giglio</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Dentistry, Richmond, Va., USA</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Dentistry, Richmond, Va.</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:ECD99C62FD9ACCF04B88BC5D01A162915AB02BE2</idno><date when="1995" year="1995">1995</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80332-4</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/ECD99C62FD9ACCF04B88BC5D01A162915AB02BE2/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">007550</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">007550</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">007550</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part II—patient satisfaction and preference</title><author><name sortKey="Burns, David R" sort="Burns, David R" uniqKey="Burns D" first="David R." last="Burns">David R. Burns</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Dentistry, Richmond, Va., USA</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Dentistry, Richmond, Va.</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Unger, John W" sort="Unger, John W" uniqKey="Unger J" first="John W." last="Unger">John W. Unger</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Dentistry, Richmond, Va., USA</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Dentistry, Richmond, Va.</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Elswick Jr, Ronald K" sort="Elswick Jr, Ronald K" uniqKey="Elswick Jr R" first="Ronald K." last="Elswick Jr.">Ronald K. Elswick Jr.</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Dentistry, Richmond, Va., USA</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Dentistry, Richmond, Va.</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Giglio, James A" sort="Giglio, James A" uniqKey="Giglio J" first="James A." last="Giglio">James A. Giglio</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Dentistry, Richmond, Va., USA</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Dentistry, Richmond, Va.</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">YMPR</title><idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1995">1995</date><biblScope unit="volume">73</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="364">364</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="369">369</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Anterior mandible</term><term>Attachment</term><term>Attachment comparison</term><term>Attachment system</term><term>Attachment systems</term><term>Baseline</term><term>Best denture retention</term><term>Conventional denture</term><term>Conventional dentures</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture retention</term><term>Greatest amount</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant fixture</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Intraoral placement</term><term>Lower denture</term><term>Magnet</term><term>Magnet attachment</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular prosthesis</term><term>Maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Notice odor</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Patient preference data</term><term>Patient satisfaction</term><term>Patient satisfaction questionnaire</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Pulpal healing</term><term>Several questions</term><term>Significant difference</term><term>Significant increase</term><term>Social situations</term><term>Subject name</term><term>Tissue response</term><term>Treatment outcome</term><term>Upper denture</term><term>Virginia commonwealth university</term><term>Vital dentin</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Anterior mandible</term><term>Attachment</term><term>Attachment comparison</term><term>Attachment system</term><term>Attachment systems</term><term>Baseline</term><term>Best denture retention</term><term>Conventional denture</term><term>Conventional dentures</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture retention</term><term>Greatest amount</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant fixture</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Intraoral placement</term><term>Lower denture</term><term>Magnet</term><term>Magnet attachment</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular prosthesis</term><term>Maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Notice odor</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Patient preference data</term><term>Patient satisfaction</term><term>Patient satisfaction questionnaire</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Pulpal healing</term><term>Several questions</term><term>Significant difference</term><term>Significant increase</term><term>Social situations</term><term>Subject name</term><term>Tissue response</term><term>Treatment outcome</term><term>Upper denture</term><term>Virginia commonwealth university</term><term>Vital dentin</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In a crossover experimental design, a prospective clinical study was performed with 17 subjects with existing complete dentures. After data collection, two implants were placed bilaterally in the anterior mandible. Conventional dentures were modified into implant overdentures by use of O-ring and magnet attachments. Each attachment was maintained with each subject for 6 months. Subjects responded to patient satisfaction and preference questionnaires about the conventional denture and each attachment. Subjects were satisfied with both attachment overdentures but showed a strong preference for the O-ring. Both attachments resulted in a significant increase in patient satisfaction when compared with the conventional denture.</div></front></TEI></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 007550 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 007550 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:ECD99C62FD9ACCF04B88BC5D01A162915AB02BE2
|texte= Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part II—patient satisfaction and preference
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |