Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part I—retention, stability, and tissue response

Identifieur interne : 004D54 ( Istex/Checkpoint ); précédent : 004D53; suivant : 004D55

Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part I—retention, stability, and tissue response

Auteurs : David R. Burns [États-Unis] ; John W. Unger [États-Unis] ; Ronald K. Elswick Jr. [États-Unis] ; David A. Beck [États-Unis]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:E4CFA16A051A7FFA8AF0B4BF6DCAA435C64F57E8

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Seventeen subjects with preexisting conventional complete dentures were evaluatedin this prospective clinical study. Two implants were placed bilaterally in the anterior mandible. In a crossover experimental design, the conventional dentures were modified, and the retention, stability, and tissue response for conventional dentures were compared with implant overdentures that had O-ring and magnet overdenture attachments for all subjects. The study indicated statistical superiority of the implant overdenture to the conventional denture. The O-ring attachment proved significantly better than the magnet attachment for retention and stability. The soft tissue response showed a slight but significant improvement with implant overdenture therapy.

Url:
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80331-2


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:E4CFA16A051A7FFA8AF0B4BF6DCAA435C64F57E8

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part I—retention, stability, and tissue response</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Burns, David R" sort="Burns, David R" uniqKey="Burns D" first="David R." last="Burns">David R. Burns</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Unger, John W" sort="Unger, John W" uniqKey="Unger J" first="John W." last="Unger">John W. Unger</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Elswick Jr, Ronald K" sort="Elswick Jr, Ronald K" uniqKey="Elswick Jr R" first="Ronald K." last="Elswick Jr.">Ronald K. Elswick Jr.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Beck, David A" sort="Beck, David A" uniqKey="Beck D" first="David A." last="Beck">David A. Beck</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:E4CFA16A051A7FFA8AF0B4BF6DCAA435C64F57E8</idno>
<date when="1995" year="1995">1995</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80331-2</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/E4CFA16A051A7FFA8AF0B4BF6DCAA435C64F57E8/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">007170</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">007170</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">007170</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">004D54</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">004D54</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part I—retention, stability, and tissue response</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Burns, David R" sort="Burns, David R" uniqKey="Burns D" first="David R." last="Burns">David R. Burns</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va.</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Va.</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Unger, John W" sort="Unger, John W" uniqKey="Unger J" first="John W." last="Unger">John W. Unger</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va.</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Va.</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Elswick Jr, Ronald K" sort="Elswick Jr, Ronald K" uniqKey="Elswick Jr R" first="Ronald K." last="Elswick Jr.">Ronald K. Elswick Jr.</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va.</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Va.</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Beck, David A" sort="Beck, David A" uniqKey="Beck D" first="David A." last="Beck">David A. Beck</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va.</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Va.</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">YMPR</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<date type="published" when="1995">1995</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">73</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="354">354</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="363">363</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Additional months</term>
<term>Anterior mandible</term>
<term>Appointment name</term>
<term>Attachment</term>
<term>Attachment placement</term>
<term>Baseline</term>
<term>Baseline comparison</term>
<term>Baseline values baseline</term>
<term>Bone loss</term>
<term>Clinical evaluation</term>
<term>Complete denture</term>
<term>Conventional denture</term>
<term>Conventional dentures</term>
<term>Crossover design</term>
<term>Crossover model</term>
<term>Data collection</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Denture base</term>
<term>Denture retention</term>
<term>Denture treatment</term>
<term>Force gauge</term>
<term>Greater retention</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant overdenture</term>
<term>Implant placement</term>
<term>Independent implants</term>
<term>Intraoral placement</term>
<term>Lateral force</term>
<term>Magnet</term>
<term>Magnet attachments</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Mandibular denture</term>
<term>Mandibular dentures</term>
<term>Mandibular implant</term>
<term>Mandibular prosthesis</term>
<term>Maxillary score mandibular score</term>
<term>Maxillofacial surgery</term>
<term>Months period</term>
<term>Movable tissue</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Overdenture</term>
<term>Overdenture attachments</term>
<term>Overdentures</term>
<term>Period sequence</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthetic dentistry</term>
<term>Real change</term>
<term>Residual ridge resorption</term>
<term>Retention</term>
<term>Retention stability retention score stability score</term>
<term>Retrospective study</term>
<term>Shiner magnet</term>
<term>Significant difference</term>
<term>Soft tissue</term>
<term>Stability</term>
<term>Stability score</term>
<term>Time sequences</term>
<term>Tissue condition</term>
<term>Tissue response</term>
<term>Tissue score data</term>
<term>Tissue scores</term>
<term>Tissue surface</term>
<term>Virginia commonwealth university</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Additional months</term>
<term>Anterior mandible</term>
<term>Appointment name</term>
<term>Attachment</term>
<term>Attachment placement</term>
<term>Baseline</term>
<term>Baseline comparison</term>
<term>Baseline values baseline</term>
<term>Bone loss</term>
<term>Clinical evaluation</term>
<term>Complete denture</term>
<term>Conventional denture</term>
<term>Conventional dentures</term>
<term>Crossover design</term>
<term>Crossover model</term>
<term>Data collection</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Denture base</term>
<term>Denture retention</term>
<term>Denture treatment</term>
<term>Force gauge</term>
<term>Greater retention</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant overdenture</term>
<term>Implant placement</term>
<term>Independent implants</term>
<term>Intraoral placement</term>
<term>Lateral force</term>
<term>Magnet</term>
<term>Magnet attachments</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Mandibular denture</term>
<term>Mandibular dentures</term>
<term>Mandibular implant</term>
<term>Mandibular prosthesis</term>
<term>Maxillary score mandibular score</term>
<term>Maxillofacial surgery</term>
<term>Months period</term>
<term>Movable tissue</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Overdenture</term>
<term>Overdenture attachments</term>
<term>Overdentures</term>
<term>Period sequence</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthetic dentistry</term>
<term>Real change</term>
<term>Residual ridge resorption</term>
<term>Retention</term>
<term>Retention stability retention score stability score</term>
<term>Retrospective study</term>
<term>Shiner magnet</term>
<term>Significant difference</term>
<term>Soft tissue</term>
<term>Stability</term>
<term>Stability score</term>
<term>Time sequences</term>
<term>Tissue condition</term>
<term>Tissue response</term>
<term>Tissue score data</term>
<term>Tissue scores</term>
<term>Tissue surface</term>
<term>Virginia commonwealth university</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Collecte de données</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Seventeen subjects with preexisting conventional complete dentures were evaluatedin this prospective clinical study. Two implants were placed bilaterally in the anterior mandible. In a crossover experimental design, the conventional dentures were modified, and the retention, stability, and tissue response for conventional dentures were compared with implant overdentures that had O-ring and magnet overdenture attachments for all subjects. The study indicated statistical superiority of the implant overdenture to the conventional denture. The O-ring attachment proved significantly better than the magnet attachment for retention and stability. The soft tissue response showed a slight but significant improvement with implant overdenture therapy.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>États-Unis</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="États-Unis">
<noRegion>
<name sortKey="Burns, David R" sort="Burns, David R" uniqKey="Burns D" first="David R." last="Burns">David R. Burns</name>
</noRegion>
<name sortKey="Beck, David A" sort="Beck, David A" uniqKey="Beck D" first="David A." last="Beck">David A. Beck</name>
<name sortKey="Elswick Jr, Ronald K" sort="Elswick Jr, Ronald K" uniqKey="Elswick Jr R" first="Ronald K." last="Elswick Jr.">Ronald K. Elswick Jr.</name>
<name sortKey="Unger, John W" sort="Unger, John W" uniqKey="Unger J" first="John W." last="Unger">John W. Unger</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004D54 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 004D54 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Checkpoint
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:E4CFA16A051A7FFA8AF0B4BF6DCAA435C64F57E8
   |texte=   Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part I—retention, stability, and tissue response
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022