Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part I—retention, stability, and tissue response
Identifieur interne : 007170 ( Istex/Curation ); précédent : 007169; suivant : 007171Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part I—retention, stability, and tissue response
Auteurs : David R. Burns [États-Unis] ; John W. Unger [États-Unis] ; Ronald K. Elswick Jr. [États-Unis] ; David A. Beck [États-Unis]Source :
- The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry [ 0022-3913 ] ; 1995.
Descripteurs français
- Wicri :
- topic : Collecte de données.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Additional months, Anterior mandible, Appointment name, Attachment, Attachment placement, Baseline, Baseline comparison, Baseline values baseline, Bone loss, Clinical evaluation, Complete denture, Conventional denture, Conventional dentures, Crossover design, Crossover model, Data collection, Dent, Dentistry, Denture, Denture base, Denture retention, Denture treatment, Force gauge, Greater retention, Implant, Implant overdenture, Implant placement, Independent implants, Intraoral placement, Lateral force, Magnet, Magnet attachments, Mandibular, Mandibular denture, Mandibular dentures, Mandibular implant, Mandibular prosthesis, Maxillary score mandibular score, Maxillofacial surgery, Months period, Movable tissue, Oral maxillofac implants, Overdenture, Overdenture attachments, Overdentures, Period sequence, Prosthesis, Prosthet dent, Prosthetic dentistry, Real change, Residual ridge resorption, Retention, Retention stability retention score stability score, Retrospective study, Shiner magnet, Significant difference, Soft tissue, Stability, Stability score, Time sequences, Tissue condition, Tissue response, Tissue score data, Tissue scores, Tissue surface, Virginia commonwealth university.
- Teeft :
- Additional months, Anterior mandible, Appointment name, Attachment, Attachment placement, Baseline, Baseline comparison, Baseline values baseline, Bone loss, Clinical evaluation, Complete denture, Conventional denture, Conventional dentures, Crossover design, Crossover model, Data collection, Dent, Dentistry, Denture, Denture base, Denture retention, Denture treatment, Force gauge, Greater retention, Implant, Implant overdenture, Implant placement, Independent implants, Intraoral placement, Lateral force, Magnet, Magnet attachments, Mandibular, Mandibular denture, Mandibular dentures, Mandibular implant, Mandibular prosthesis, Maxillary score mandibular score, Maxillofacial surgery, Months period, Movable tissue, Oral maxillofac implants, Overdenture, Overdenture attachments, Overdentures, Period sequence, Prosthesis, Prosthet dent, Prosthetic dentistry, Real change, Residual ridge resorption, Retention, Retention stability retention score stability score, Retrospective study, Shiner magnet, Significant difference, Soft tissue, Stability, Stability score, Time sequences, Tissue condition, Tissue response, Tissue score data, Tissue scores, Tissue surface, Virginia commonwealth university.
Abstract
Seventeen subjects with preexisting conventional complete dentures were evaluatedin this prospective clinical study. Two implants were placed bilaterally in the anterior mandible. In a crossover experimental design, the conventional dentures were modified, and the retention, stability, and tissue response for conventional dentures were compared with implant overdentures that had O-ring and magnet overdenture attachments for all subjects. The study indicated statistical superiority of the implant overdenture to the conventional denture. The O-ring attachment proved significantly better than the magnet attachment for retention and stability. The soft tissue response showed a slight but significant improvement with implant overdenture therapy.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80331-2
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :007170
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:E4CFA16A051A7FFA8AF0B4BF6DCAA435C64F57E8Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part I—retention, stability, and tissue response</title>
<author><name sortKey="Burns, David R" sort="Burns, David R" uniqKey="Burns D" first="David R." last="Burns">David R. Burns</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va., USA</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va.</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Unger, John W" sort="Unger, John W" uniqKey="Unger J" first="John W." last="Unger">John W. Unger</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va., USA</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va.</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Elswick Jr, Ronald K" sort="Elswick Jr, Ronald K" uniqKey="Elswick Jr R" first="Ronald K." last="Elswick Jr.">Ronald K. Elswick Jr.</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va., USA</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va.</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Beck, David A" sort="Beck, David A" uniqKey="Beck D" first="David A." last="Beck">David A. Beck</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va., USA</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va.</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:E4CFA16A051A7FFA8AF0B4BF6DCAA435C64F57E8</idno>
<date when="1995" year="1995">1995</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80331-2</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/E4CFA16A051A7FFA8AF0B4BF6DCAA435C64F57E8/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">007170</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">007170</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">007170</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part I—retention, stability, and tissue response</title>
<author><name sortKey="Burns, David R" sort="Burns, David R" uniqKey="Burns D" first="David R." last="Burns">David R. Burns</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va., USA</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va.</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Unger, John W" sort="Unger, John W" uniqKey="Unger J" first="John W." last="Unger">John W. Unger</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va., USA</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va.</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Elswick Jr, Ronald K" sort="Elswick Jr, Ronald K" uniqKey="Elswick Jr R" first="Ronald K." last="Elswick Jr.">Ronald K. Elswick Jr.</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va., USA</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va.</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Beck, David A" sort="Beck, David A" uniqKey="Beck D" first="David A." last="Beck">David A. Beck</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va., USA</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va.</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j">The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">YMPR</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno>
<imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<date type="published" when="1995">1995</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">73</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="354">354</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="363">363</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Additional months</term>
<term>Anterior mandible</term>
<term>Appointment name</term>
<term>Attachment</term>
<term>Attachment placement</term>
<term>Baseline</term>
<term>Baseline comparison</term>
<term>Baseline values baseline</term>
<term>Bone loss</term>
<term>Clinical evaluation</term>
<term>Complete denture</term>
<term>Conventional denture</term>
<term>Conventional dentures</term>
<term>Crossover design</term>
<term>Crossover model</term>
<term>Data collection</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Denture base</term>
<term>Denture retention</term>
<term>Denture treatment</term>
<term>Force gauge</term>
<term>Greater retention</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant overdenture</term>
<term>Implant placement</term>
<term>Independent implants</term>
<term>Intraoral placement</term>
<term>Lateral force</term>
<term>Magnet</term>
<term>Magnet attachments</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Mandibular denture</term>
<term>Mandibular dentures</term>
<term>Mandibular implant</term>
<term>Mandibular prosthesis</term>
<term>Maxillary score mandibular score</term>
<term>Maxillofacial surgery</term>
<term>Months period</term>
<term>Movable tissue</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Overdenture</term>
<term>Overdenture attachments</term>
<term>Overdentures</term>
<term>Period sequence</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthetic dentistry</term>
<term>Real change</term>
<term>Residual ridge resorption</term>
<term>Retention</term>
<term>Retention stability retention score stability score</term>
<term>Retrospective study</term>
<term>Shiner magnet</term>
<term>Significant difference</term>
<term>Soft tissue</term>
<term>Stability</term>
<term>Stability score</term>
<term>Time sequences</term>
<term>Tissue condition</term>
<term>Tissue response</term>
<term>Tissue score data</term>
<term>Tissue scores</term>
<term>Tissue surface</term>
<term>Virginia commonwealth university</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Additional months</term>
<term>Anterior mandible</term>
<term>Appointment name</term>
<term>Attachment</term>
<term>Attachment placement</term>
<term>Baseline</term>
<term>Baseline comparison</term>
<term>Baseline values baseline</term>
<term>Bone loss</term>
<term>Clinical evaluation</term>
<term>Complete denture</term>
<term>Conventional denture</term>
<term>Conventional dentures</term>
<term>Crossover design</term>
<term>Crossover model</term>
<term>Data collection</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Denture base</term>
<term>Denture retention</term>
<term>Denture treatment</term>
<term>Force gauge</term>
<term>Greater retention</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant overdenture</term>
<term>Implant placement</term>
<term>Independent implants</term>
<term>Intraoral placement</term>
<term>Lateral force</term>
<term>Magnet</term>
<term>Magnet attachments</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Mandibular denture</term>
<term>Mandibular dentures</term>
<term>Mandibular implant</term>
<term>Mandibular prosthesis</term>
<term>Maxillary score mandibular score</term>
<term>Maxillofacial surgery</term>
<term>Months period</term>
<term>Movable tissue</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Overdenture</term>
<term>Overdenture attachments</term>
<term>Overdentures</term>
<term>Period sequence</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthetic dentistry</term>
<term>Real change</term>
<term>Residual ridge resorption</term>
<term>Retention</term>
<term>Retention stability retention score stability score</term>
<term>Retrospective study</term>
<term>Shiner magnet</term>
<term>Significant difference</term>
<term>Soft tissue</term>
<term>Stability</term>
<term>Stability score</term>
<term>Time sequences</term>
<term>Tissue condition</term>
<term>Tissue response</term>
<term>Tissue score data</term>
<term>Tissue scores</term>
<term>Tissue surface</term>
<term>Virginia commonwealth university</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Collecte de données</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Seventeen subjects with preexisting conventional complete dentures were evaluatedin this prospective clinical study. Two implants were placed bilaterally in the anterior mandible. In a crossover experimental design, the conventional dentures were modified, and the retention, stability, and tissue response for conventional dentures were compared with implant overdentures that had O-ring and magnet overdenture attachments for all subjects. The study indicated statistical superiority of the implant overdenture to the conventional denture. The O-ring attachment proved significantly better than the magnet attachment for retention and stability. The soft tissue response showed a slight but significant improvement with implant overdenture therapy.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 007170 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 007170 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= Istex |étape= Curation |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:E4CFA16A051A7FFA8AF0B4BF6DCAA435C64F57E8 |texte= Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part I—retention, stability, and tissue response }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |