12 year results of a prospective trial comparing poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) intraocular lenses
Identifieur interne : 008365 ( Main/Curation ); précédent : 008364; suivant : 00836612 year results of a prospective trial comparing poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) intraocular lenses
Auteurs : A. Jabbar Khan [Royaume-Uni] ; S. Piers B. Percival [Royaume-Uni]Source :
- Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery [ 0886-3350 ] ; 1999.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
- Wicri :
- topic : Homme.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Biocompatible Materials, Cataract, Cataract Extraction, Comparative study, Evolution, Female, Human, Humans, Hydroxyethyl methacrylate polymer, Intraocular lens, Lens Capsule, Crystalline (pathology), Lens Implantation, Intraocular, Lenses, Intraocular, Long term, Male, Methyl methacrylate polymer, Middle Aged, Polyhydroxyethyl Methacrylate, Polymethyl Methacrylate, Postoperative, Postoperative Complications, Prospective Studies, Slitlamp, Surgical implantation, Visual Acuity, Visual acuity.
- MESH :
- chemical : Biocompatible Materials, Polyhydroxyethyl Methacrylate, Polymethyl Methacrylate.
- pathology : Lens Capsule, Crystalline.
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cataract Extraction, Female, Humans, Lens Implantation, Intraocular, Lenses, Intraocular, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Prospective Studies, Visual Acuity.
Abstract
Purpose To compare long-term biocompatibility of single-piece poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (P-HEMA) intraocular lenses (IOLs).Setting District General Hospital, United Kingdom.Methods In a prospective trial of 250 eyes that had uncomplicated extracapsular cataract extraction, 2 groups of 125 eyes each were matched for age and sex. One group received single-piece looped PMMA IOLs and the other, single-piece solid-hapticP-HEMA IOLs. In all eyes, the IOLs were implanted in the capsular bag at the time of surgery using the envelope technique.Results Twelve years after surgery, 75 eyes were available for examination. In the PMMA group (40 eyes), 50% had a visual acuity of 20/20 and 50% had intact capsules, many of them with a degree of fibrosis. In the P-HEMA group (35 eyes), 71% had an acuity of 20/20 and 80% had intact capsules (P = .0085).Conclusion In the long term, biocompatibility was better in the P-HEMA group than in the PMMA group.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/S0886-3350(99)00199-6
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :001561
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :001561
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :003643
- to stream Main, to step Merge: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :008B14
- to stream PascalFrancis, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :001514
- to stream PascalFrancis, to step Curation: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :001606
- to stream PascalFrancis, to step Checkpoint: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :001310
- to stream Main, to step Merge: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :008B86
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :001E86
- to stream PubMed, to step Curation: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :001E86
- to stream PubMed, to step Checkpoint: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :001C56
- to stream Ncbi, to step Merge: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000067
- to stream Ncbi, to step Curation: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000067
- to stream Ncbi, to step Checkpoint: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000067
- to stream Main, to step Merge: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :008770
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:DB23752781D15C9F3ABC899D78B90BDD91A604F3Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">12 year results of a prospective trial comparing poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) intraocular lenses</title><author><name sortKey="Khan, A Jabbar" sort="Khan, A Jabbar" uniqKey="Khan A" first="A. Jabbar" last="Khan">A. Jabbar Khan</name></author><author><name sortKey="Percival, S Piers B" sort="Percival, S Piers B" uniqKey="Percival S" first="S. Piers B" last="Percival">S. Piers B. Percival</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:DB23752781D15C9F3ABC899D78B90BDD91A604F3</idno><date when="1999" year="1999">1999</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/S0886-3350(99)00199-6</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/DB23752781D15C9F3ABC899D78B90BDD91A604F3/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001561</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001561</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">003643</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0886-3350:1999:Khan A:year:results:of</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">008B14</idno><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno><idno type="RBID">Pascal:99-0538184</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">001514</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Curation">001606</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Checkpoint">001310</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0886-3350:1999:Khan A:year:results:of</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">008B86</idno><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><idno type="RBID">pubmed:10511944</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001E86</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">001E86</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">001C56</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">000067</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">000067</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">000067</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0886-3350:1999:Khan A:year:results:of</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">008770</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">008365</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">12 year results of a prospective trial comparing poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) intraocular lenses</title><author><name sortKey="Khan, A Jabbar" sort="Khan, A Jabbar" uniqKey="Khan A" first="A. Jabbar" last="Khan">A. Jabbar Khan</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Ophthalmology, Scarborough Hospital, Scarborough, England</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>England</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Percival, S Piers B" sort="Percival, S Piers B" uniqKey="Percival S" first="S. Piers B" last="Percival">S. Piers B. Percival</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Ophthalmology, Scarborough Hospital, Scarborough, England</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>England</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">JCRS</title><idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1999">1999</date><biblScope unit="volume">25</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">10</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1404">1404</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1407">1407</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno></series><idno type="istex">DB23752781D15C9F3ABC899D78B90BDD91A604F3</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/S0886-3350(99)00199-6</idno><idno type="PII">S0886-3350(99)00199-6</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Biocompatible Materials</term><term>Cataract</term><term>Cataract Extraction</term><term>Comparative study</term><term>Evolution</term><term>Female</term><term>Human</term><term>Humans</term><term>Hydroxyethyl methacrylate polymer</term><term>Intraocular lens</term><term>Lens Capsule, Crystalline (pathology)</term><term>Lens Implantation, Intraocular</term><term>Lenses, Intraocular</term><term>Long term</term><term>Male</term><term>Methyl methacrylate polymer</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Polyhydroxyethyl Methacrylate</term><term>Polymethyl Methacrylate</term><term>Postoperative</term><term>Postoperative Complications</term><term>Prospective Studies</term><term>Slitlamp</term><term>Surgical implantation</term><term>Visual Acuity</term><term>Visual acuity</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Biocompatible Materials</term><term>Polyhydroxyethyl Methacrylate</term><term>Polymethyl Methacrylate</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="pathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Lens Capsule, Crystalline</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Cataract Extraction</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Lens Implantation, Intraocular</term><term>Lenses, Intraocular</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Postoperative Complications</term><term>Prospective Studies</term><term>Visual Acuity</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Acuité visuelle</term><term>Cataracte</term><term>Etude comparative</term><term>Evolution</term><term>Homme</term><term>Implantation chirurgicale</term><term>Lampe fente</term><term>Lentille intraoculaire</term><term>Long terme</term><term>Méthacrylate d'hydroxyéthyle polymère</term><term>Méthacrylate de méthyle polymère</term><term>Postopératoire</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Homme</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Purpose To compare long-term biocompatibility of single-piece poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (P-HEMA) intraocular lenses (IOLs).Setting District General Hospital, United Kingdom.Methods In a prospective trial of 250 eyes that had uncomplicated extracapsular cataract extraction, 2 groups of 125 eyes each were matched for age and sex. One group received single-piece looped PMMA IOLs and the other, single-piece solid-hapticP-HEMA IOLs. In all eyes, the IOLs were implanted in the capsular bag at the time of surgery using the envelope technique.Results Twelve years after surgery, 75 eyes were available for examination. In the PMMA group (40 eyes), 50% had a visual acuity of 20/20 and 50% had intact capsules, many of them with a degree of fibrosis. In the P-HEMA group (35 eyes), 71% had an acuity of 20/20 and 80% had intact capsules (P = .0085).Conclusion In the long term, biocompatibility was better in the P-HEMA group than in the PMMA group.</div></front></TEI><double idat="0886-3350:1999:Khan A:year:results:of"><INIST><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">12 year results of a prospective trial comparing poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) intraocular lenses</title><author><name sortKey="Khan, A J" sort="Khan, A J" uniqKey="Khan A" first="A. J." last="Khan">A. J. Khan</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Scarborough Hospital</s1><s2>Scarborough</s2><s3>GBR</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:noRegion>Scarborough</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Percival, S P B" sort="Percival, S P B" uniqKey="Percival S" first="S. P. B." last="Percival">S. P. B. Percival</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Scarborough Hospital</s1><s2>Scarborough</s2><s3>GBR</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:noRegion>Scarborough</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno><idno type="inist">99-0538184</idno><date when="1999">1999</date><idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 99-0538184 INIST</idno><idno type="RBID">Pascal:99-0538184</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">001514</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Curation">001606</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Checkpoint">001310</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0886-3350:1999:Khan A:year:results:of</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">008B86</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">12 year results of a prospective trial comparing poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) intraocular lenses</title><author><name sortKey="Khan, A J" sort="Khan, A J" uniqKey="Khan A" first="A. J." last="Khan">A. J. Khan</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Scarborough Hospital</s1><s2>Scarborough</s2><s3>GBR</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:noRegion>Scarborough</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Percival, S P B" sort="Percival, S P B" uniqKey="Percival S" first="S. P. B." last="Percival">S. P. B. Percival</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Scarborough Hospital</s1><s2>Scarborough</s2><s3>GBR</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:noRegion>Scarborough</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</title><title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. cataract refractive surg.</title><idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno><imprint><date when="1999">1999</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</title><title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. cataract refractive surg.</title><idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Cataract</term><term>Comparative study</term><term>Evolution</term><term>Human</term><term>Hydroxyethyl methacrylate polymer</term><term>Intraocular lens</term><term>Long term</term><term>Methyl methacrylate polymer</term><term>Postoperative</term><term>Slitlamp</term><term>Surgical implantation</term><term>Visual acuity</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Cataracte</term><term>Implantation chirurgicale</term><term>Lentille intraoculaire</term><term>Méthacrylate de méthyle polymère</term><term>Méthacrylate d'hydroxyéthyle polymère</term><term>Acuité visuelle</term><term>Lampe fente</term><term>Etude comparative</term><term>Evolution</term><term>Postopératoire</term><term>Homme</term><term>Long terme</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Homme</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Purpose: To compare long-term biocompatibility of single-piece poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (P-HEMA) intraocular lenses (IOLS). Setting: District General Hospital, United Kingdom. Methods: In a prospective trial of 250 eyes that had uncomplicated extracapsular cataract extraction, 2 groups of 125 eyes each were matched for age and sex. One group received single-piece looped PMMA IOLs and the other, single-piece solid-haptic P-HEMA lOLs. In all eyes, the lOLs were implanted in the capsular bag at the time of surgery using the envelope technique. Results: Twelve years after surgery, 75 eyes were available for examination. In the PMMA group (40 eyes), 50% had a visual acuity of 20/20 and 50% had intact capsules, many of them with a degree of fibrosis. In the P-HEMA group (35 eyes), 71% had an acuity of 20/20 and 80% had intact capsules (P = .0085). Conclusion: In the long term, biocompatibility was better in the P-HEMA group than in the PMMA group.</div></front></TEI></INIST><ISTEX><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">12 year results of a prospective trial comparing poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) intraocular lenses</title><author><name sortKey="Khan, A Jabbar" sort="Khan, A Jabbar" uniqKey="Khan A" first="A. Jabbar" last="Khan">A. Jabbar Khan</name></author><author><name sortKey="Percival, S Piers B" sort="Percival, S Piers B" uniqKey="Percival S" first="S. Piers B" last="Percival">S. Piers B. Percival</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:DB23752781D15C9F3ABC899D78B90BDD91A604F3</idno><date when="1999" year="1999">1999</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/S0886-3350(99)00199-6</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/DB23752781D15C9F3ABC899D78B90BDD91A604F3/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001561</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001561</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">003643</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0886-3350:1999:Khan A:year:results:of</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">008B14</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">12 year results of a prospective trial comparing poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) intraocular lenses</title><author><name sortKey="Khan, A Jabbar" sort="Khan, A Jabbar" uniqKey="Khan A" first="A. Jabbar" last="Khan">A. Jabbar Khan</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Ophthalmology, Scarborough Hospital, Scarborough, England</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>England</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Percival, S Piers B" sort="Percival, S Piers B" uniqKey="Percival S" first="S. Piers B" last="Percival">S. Piers B. Percival</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Ophthalmology, Scarborough Hospital, Scarborough, England</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>England</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">JCRS</title><idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1999">1999</date><biblScope unit="volume">25</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">10</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1404">1404</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1407">1407</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno></series><idno type="istex">DB23752781D15C9F3ABC899D78B90BDD91A604F3</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/S0886-3350(99)00199-6</idno><idno type="PII">S0886-3350(99)00199-6</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Purpose To compare long-term biocompatibility of single-piece poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (P-HEMA) intraocular lenses (IOLs).Setting District General Hospital, United Kingdom.Methods In a prospective trial of 250 eyes that had uncomplicated extracapsular cataract extraction, 2 groups of 125 eyes each were matched for age and sex. One group received single-piece looped PMMA IOLs and the other, single-piece solid-hapticP-HEMA IOLs. In all eyes, the IOLs were implanted in the capsular bag at the time of surgery using the envelope technique.Results Twelve years after surgery, 75 eyes were available for examination. In the PMMA group (40 eyes), 50% had a visual acuity of 20/20 and 50% had intact capsules, many of them with a degree of fibrosis. In the P-HEMA group (35 eyes), 71% had an acuity of 20/20 and 80% had intact capsules (P = .0085).Conclusion In the long term, biocompatibility was better in the P-HEMA group than in the PMMA group.</div></front></TEI></ISTEX><PubMed><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">12 year results of a prospective trial comparing poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) intraocular lenses.</title><author><name sortKey="Khan, A J" sort="Khan, A J" uniqKey="Khan A" first="A J" last="Khan">A J Khan</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, Scarborough Hospital, England.</nlm:affiliation><country>Royaume-Uni</country><placeName><region type="country">Angleterre</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>Department of Ophthalmology, Scarborough Hospital</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Percival, S P" sort="Percival, S P" uniqKey="Percival S" first="S P" last="Percival">S P Percival</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="1999">1999</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:10511944</idno><idno type="pmid">10511944</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001E86</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">001E86</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">001C56</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">000067</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">000067</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">000067</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0886-3350:1999:Khan A:year:results:of</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">008770</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">12 year results of a prospective trial comparing poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) intraocular lenses.</title><author><name sortKey="Khan, A J" sort="Khan, A J" uniqKey="Khan A" first="A J" last="Khan">A J Khan</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, Scarborough Hospital, England.</nlm:affiliation><country>Royaume-Uni</country><placeName><region type="country">Angleterre</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>Department of Ophthalmology, Scarborough Hospital</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Percival, S P" sort="Percival, S P" uniqKey="Percival S" first="S P" last="Percival">S P Percival</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</title><idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno><imprint><date when="1999" type="published">1999</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Biocompatible Materials</term><term>Cataract Extraction</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Lens Capsule, Crystalline (pathology)</term><term>Lens Implantation, Intraocular</term><term>Lenses, Intraocular</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Polyhydroxyethyl Methacrylate</term><term>Polymethyl Methacrylate</term><term>Postoperative Complications</term><term>Prospective Studies</term><term>Visual Acuity</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Biocompatible Materials</term><term>Polyhydroxyethyl Methacrylate</term><term>Polymethyl Methacrylate</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="pathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Lens Capsule, Crystalline</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Cataract Extraction</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Lens Implantation, Intraocular</term><term>Lenses, Intraocular</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Postoperative Complications</term><term>Prospective Studies</term><term>Visual Acuity</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">To compare long-term biocompatibility of single-piece poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (P-HEMA) intraocular lenses (IOLs).</div></front></TEI></PubMed></double></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/Main/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 008365 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 008365 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:DB23752781D15C9F3ABC899D78B90BDD91A604F3
|texte= 12 year results of a prospective trial comparing poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) intraocular lenses
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |