A comparative prospective study of splinted and unsplinted Brȧnemark implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: A preliminary report
Identifieur interne : 00AA71 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 00AA70; suivant : 00AA72A comparative prospective study of splinted and unsplinted Brȧnemark implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: A preliminary report
Auteurs : I. Naert [Belgique] ; M. Quirynen [Belgique] ; M. Hooghe [Belgique] ; D. Van Steenberghe [Belgique]Source :
- The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry [ 0022-3913 ] ; 1994.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Femelle, Humains, Implants dentaires, Indice parodontal, Mandibule (), Mâchoire édentée (), Mâle, Ostéo-intégration (physiologie), Overdenture, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux, Prothèse dentaire complète, Rétention d'appareil de prothèse dentaire (), Satisfaction du patient, Sujet âgé, Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus, Études prospectives.
- MESH :
- physiologie : Ostéo-intégration.
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Femelle, Humains, Implants dentaires, Indice parodontal, Mandibule, Mâchoire édentée, Mâle, Overdenture, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux, Prothèse dentaire complète, Rétention d'appareil de prothèse dentaire, Satisfaction du patient, Sujet âgé, Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus, Études prospectives.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Abutment connection, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Angle class, Attachment, Attachment components, Attachment system, Attachment systems, Ball attachments, Baseline, Bone loss, Branemark, Branemark implants, Branemark system, Clinical dentistry, Connection system, Definite conclusions, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dental Implants, Dentistry, Denture, Denture Retention (methods), Denture, Complete, Denture, Overlay, Different attachment systems, Different periods, Dyna magnets, Edentulous patients, Entire period, Failure rate, Female, First year, Fixture, Food remnants, Frequency distribution, Functional benefits, Humans, Implant, Jaw, Edentulous (surgery), Loading time, Magnet, Main reason, Male, Mandible, Mandible (surgery), Marginal bone height, Marginal bone level, Marginal bone loss, Marginal tissue reactions, Maxillofac, Middle Aged, Naert, Observation periods, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral maxillofac surg, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated fixtures, Osseointegrated implants, Osseointegrated titanium fixtures, Osseointegration (physiology), Overdentures, Patient Satisfaction, Periodontal Index, Periodontal parameters, Periodontal probe, Periotest value, Preliminary results, Prospective Studies, Prospective study, Prosthet dent, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Prosthetic parameters, Quintessence publishing, Quirynen, Retrospective study, Single fixtures, Sixth edition, Steenberghe, Unconnected implants, Year report.
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- methods : Denture Retention.
- physiology : Osseointegration.
- surgery : Jaw, Edentulous, Mandible.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Abutment connection, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Angle class, Attachment, Attachment components, Attachment system, Attachment systems, Ball attachments, Baseline, Bone loss, Branemark, Branemark implants, Branemark system, Clinical dentistry, Connection system, Definite conclusions, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dentistry, Denture, Denture, Complete, Denture, Overlay, Different attachment systems, Different periods, Dyna magnets, Edentulous patients, Entire period, Failure rate, Female, First year, Fixture, Food remnants, Frequency distribution, Functional benefits, Humans, Implant, Loading time, Magnet, Main reason, Male, Mandible, Marginal bone height, Marginal bone level, Marginal bone loss, Marginal tissue reactions, Maxillofac, Middle Aged, Naert, Observation periods, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral maxillofac surg, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated fixtures, Osseointegrated implants, Osseointegrated titanium fixtures, Overdentures, Patient Satisfaction, Periodontal Index, Periodontal parameters, Periodontal probe, Periotest value, Preliminary results, Prospective Studies, Prospective study, Prosthet dent, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Prosthetic parameters, Quintessence publishing, Quirynen, Retrospective study, Single fixtures, Sixth edition, Steenberghe, Unconnected implants, Year report.
Abstract
Abstract: Thirty-six edentulous patients, each provided with two Brȧnemark implants in the mandible to anchor an overdenture, were selected for this study and randomly divided into three groups of 12 patients each. In each group a different attachment system was used: (1) magnets, (2) ball attachments, and (3) straight bars with clips (control). The mean loading time was 12.4 months (range 3 to 24 months). This study investigated (1) the clinical behavior of loaded implants by means of overdentures related to their connection system (splinted versus unsplinted) and (2) the clinical performance of prosthetic treatment. Preliminary results indicate no differences; no failures occurred and the level of marginal bone height, as well as the probing attachment level, changed similarly in the three groups. Although splinted bar-retained overdentures scored better objectively, subjective satisfaction ratings did not differ. It was concluded that for the short follow-up period, the state of connection did not influence the clinical success of implants. However, no definite conclusions may be drawn until long-term data become available.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(94)90188-0
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 003719
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 003719
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 004F33
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 00B113
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: 004449
- to stream PubMed, to step Curation: 004449
- to stream PubMed, to step Checkpoint: 004449
- to stream Ncbi, to step Merge: 009376
- to stream Ncbi, to step Curation: 009376
- to stream Ncbi, to step Checkpoint: 009376
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 00B057
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 00AA71
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>A comparative prospective study of splinted and unsplinted Brȧnemark implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: A preliminary report</title>
<author><name sortKey="Naert, I" sort="Naert, I" uniqKey="Naert I" first="I." last="Naert">I. Naert</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Quirynen, M" sort="Quirynen, M" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="M." last="Quirynen">M. Quirynen</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Hooghe, M" sort="Hooghe, M" uniqKey="Hooghe M" first="M." last="Hooghe">M. Hooghe</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, D" sort="Van Steenberghe, D" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D" first="D." last="Van Steenberghe">D. Van Steenberghe</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:6F83CC2B8806E56A2E00C09E9AB3A5D60F4A7829</idno>
<date when="1994" year="1994">1994</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/0022-3913(94)90188-0</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/6F83CC2B8806E56A2E00C09E9AB3A5D60F4A7829/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">003719</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">003719</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">003719</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">004F33</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">004F33</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0022-3913:1994:Naert I:a:comparative:prospective</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">00B113</idno>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:8006845</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">004449</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">004449</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">004449</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">004449</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">004449</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">004449</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">009376</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">009376</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">009376</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0022-3913:1994:Naert I:a:comparative:prospective</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">00B057</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">00AA71</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">00AA71</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">A comparative prospective study of splinted and unsplinted Brȧnemark implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: A preliminary report</title>
<author><name sortKey="Naert, I" sort="Naert, I" uniqKey="Naert I" first="I." last="Naert">I. Naert</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Belgique</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Leuven</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Quirynen, M" sort="Quirynen, M" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="M." last="Quirynen">M. Quirynen</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Belgique</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Leuven</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Hooghe, M" sort="Hooghe, M" uniqKey="Hooghe M" first="M." last="Hooghe">M. Hooghe</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Belgique</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Leuven</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, D" sort="Van Steenberghe, D" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D" first="D." last="Van Steenberghe">D. Van Steenberghe</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Belgique</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Leuven</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j">The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">YMPR</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno>
<imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<date type="published" when="1994">1994</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">71</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="486">486</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="492">492</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term>
<term>Abutment connection</term>
<term>Adult</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Aged, 80 and over</term>
<term>Angle class</term>
<term>Attachment</term>
<term>Attachment components</term>
<term>Attachment system</term>
<term>Attachment systems</term>
<term>Ball attachments</term>
<term>Baseline</term>
<term>Bone loss</term>
<term>Branemark</term>
<term>Branemark implants</term>
<term>Branemark system</term>
<term>Clinical dentistry</term>
<term>Connection system</term>
<term>Definite conclusions</term>
<term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term>
<term>Dental Implants</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Denture Retention (methods)</term>
<term>Denture, Complete</term>
<term>Denture, Overlay</term>
<term>Different attachment systems</term>
<term>Different periods</term>
<term>Dyna magnets</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Entire period</term>
<term>Failure rate</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>First year</term>
<term>Fixture</term>
<term>Food remnants</term>
<term>Frequency distribution</term>
<term>Functional benefits</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous (surgery)</term>
<term>Loading time</term>
<term>Magnet</term>
<term>Main reason</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Mandible (surgery)</term>
<term>Marginal bone height</term>
<term>Marginal bone level</term>
<term>Marginal bone loss</term>
<term>Marginal tissue reactions</term>
<term>Maxillofac</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Naert</term>
<term>Observation periods</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac surg</term>
<term>Osseointegrated</term>
<term>Osseointegrated fixtures</term>
<term>Osseointegrated implants</term>
<term>Osseointegrated titanium fixtures</term>
<term>Osseointegration (physiology)</term>
<term>Overdentures</term>
<term>Patient Satisfaction</term>
<term>Periodontal Index</term>
<term>Periodontal parameters</term>
<term>Periodontal probe</term>
<term>Periotest value</term>
<term>Preliminary results</term>
<term>Prospective Studies</term>
<term>Prospective study</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthetic</term>
<term>Prosthetic dentistry</term>
<term>Prosthetic parameters</term>
<term>Quintessence publishing</term>
<term>Quirynen</term>
<term>Retrospective study</term>
<term>Single fixtures</term>
<term>Sixth edition</term>
<term>Steenberghe</term>
<term>Unconnected implants</term>
<term>Year report</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term>
<term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Implants dentaires</term>
<term>Indice parodontal</term>
<term>Mandibule ()</term>
<term>Mâchoire édentée ()</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Ostéo-intégration (physiologie)</term>
<term>Overdenture</term>
<term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term>
<term>Prothèse dentaire complète</term>
<term>Rétention d'appareil de prothèse dentaire ()</term>
<term>Satisfaction du patient</term>
<term>Sujet âgé</term>
<term>Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus</term>
<term>Études prospectives</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Denture Retention</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Ostéo-intégration</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Osseointegration</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term>
<term>Abutment connection</term>
<term>Adult</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Aged, 80 and over</term>
<term>Angle class</term>
<term>Attachment</term>
<term>Attachment components</term>
<term>Attachment system</term>
<term>Attachment systems</term>
<term>Ball attachments</term>
<term>Baseline</term>
<term>Bone loss</term>
<term>Branemark</term>
<term>Branemark implants</term>
<term>Branemark system</term>
<term>Clinical dentistry</term>
<term>Connection system</term>
<term>Definite conclusions</term>
<term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Denture, Complete</term>
<term>Denture, Overlay</term>
<term>Different attachment systems</term>
<term>Different periods</term>
<term>Dyna magnets</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Entire period</term>
<term>Failure rate</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>First year</term>
<term>Fixture</term>
<term>Food remnants</term>
<term>Frequency distribution</term>
<term>Functional benefits</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Loading time</term>
<term>Magnet</term>
<term>Main reason</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Marginal bone height</term>
<term>Marginal bone level</term>
<term>Marginal bone loss</term>
<term>Marginal tissue reactions</term>
<term>Maxillofac</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Naert</term>
<term>Observation periods</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac surg</term>
<term>Osseointegrated</term>
<term>Osseointegrated fixtures</term>
<term>Osseointegrated implants</term>
<term>Osseointegrated titanium fixtures</term>
<term>Overdentures</term>
<term>Patient Satisfaction</term>
<term>Periodontal Index</term>
<term>Periodontal parameters</term>
<term>Periodontal probe</term>
<term>Periotest value</term>
<term>Preliminary results</term>
<term>Prospective Studies</term>
<term>Prospective study</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthetic</term>
<term>Prosthetic dentistry</term>
<term>Prosthetic parameters</term>
<term>Quintessence publishing</term>
<term>Quirynen</term>
<term>Retrospective study</term>
<term>Single fixtures</term>
<term>Sixth edition</term>
<term>Steenberghe</term>
<term>Unconnected implants</term>
<term>Year report</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term>
<term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Implants dentaires</term>
<term>Indice parodontal</term>
<term>Mandibule</term>
<term>Mâchoire édentée</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Overdenture</term>
<term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term>
<term>Prothèse dentaire complète</term>
<term>Rétention d'appareil de prothèse dentaire</term>
<term>Satisfaction du patient</term>
<term>Sujet âgé</term>
<term>Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus</term>
<term>Études prospectives</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: Thirty-six edentulous patients, each provided with two Brȧnemark implants in the mandible to anchor an overdenture, were selected for this study and randomly divided into three groups of 12 patients each. In each group a different attachment system was used: (1) magnets, (2) ball attachments, and (3) straight bars with clips (control). The mean loading time was 12.4 months (range 3 to 24 months). This study investigated (1) the clinical behavior of loaded implants by means of overdentures related to their connection system (splinted versus unsplinted) and (2) the clinical performance of prosthetic treatment. Preliminary results indicate no differences; no failures occurred and the level of marginal bone height, as well as the probing attachment level, changed similarly in the three groups. Although splinted bar-retained overdentures scored better objectively, subjective satisfaction ratings did not differ. It was concluded that for the short follow-up period, the state of connection did not influence the clinical success of implants. However, no definite conclusions may be drawn until long-term data become available.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations><list><country><li>Belgique</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree><country name="Belgique"><noRegion><name sortKey="Naert, I" sort="Naert, I" uniqKey="Naert I" first="I." last="Naert">I. Naert</name>
</noRegion>
<name sortKey="Hooghe, M" sort="Hooghe, M" uniqKey="Hooghe M" first="M." last="Hooghe">M. Hooghe</name>
<name sortKey="Quirynen, M" sort="Quirynen, M" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="M." last="Quirynen">M. Quirynen</name>
<name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, D" sort="Van Steenberghe, D" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D" first="D." last="Van Steenberghe">D. Van Steenberghe</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 00AA71 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 00AA71 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= Main |étape= Exploration |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:6F83CC2B8806E56A2E00C09E9AB3A5D60F4A7829 |texte= A comparative prospective study of splinted and unsplinted Brȧnemark implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: A preliminary report }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |