A comparative prospective study of splinted and unsplinted Brånemark implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: a preliminary report.
Identifieur interne : 004449 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 004448; suivant : 004450A comparative prospective study of splinted and unsplinted Brånemark implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: a preliminary report.
Auteurs : I. Naert ; M. Quirynen ; M. Hooghe ; D. Van SteenbergheSource :
- The Journal of prosthetic dentistry [ 0022-3913 ] ; 1994.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dental Implants, Denture Retention (methods), Denture, Complete, Denture, Overlay, Female, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (surgery), Male, Mandible (surgery), Middle Aged, Osseointegration (physiology), Patient Satisfaction, Periodontal Index, Prospective Studies.
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- methods : Denture Retention.
- physiology : Osseointegration.
- surgery : Jaw, Edentulous, Mandible.
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Denture, Complete, Denture, Overlay, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction, Periodontal Index, Prospective Studies.
Abstract
Thirty-six edentulous patients, each provided with two Bränemark implants in the mandible to anchor an overdenture, were selected for this study and randomly divided into three groups of 12 patients each. In each group a different attachment system was used: (1) magnets, (2) ball attachments, and (3) straight bars with clips (control). The mean loading time was 12.4 months (range 3 to 24 months). This study investigated (1) the clinical behavior of loaded implants by means of overdentures related to their connection system (splinted versus unsplinted) and (2) the clinical performance of prosthetic treatment. Preliminary results indicate no differences; no failures occurred and the level of marginal bone height, as well as the probing attachment level, changed similarly in the three groups. Although splinted bar-retained overdentures scored better objectively, subjective satisfaction ratings did not differ. It was concluded that for the short follow-up period, the state of connection did not influence the clinical success of implants. However, no definite conclusions may be drawn until long-term data become available.
PubMed: 8006845
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:8006845Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A comparative prospective study of splinted and unsplinted Brånemark implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: a preliminary report.</title><author><name sortKey="Naert, I" sort="Naert, I" uniqKey="Naert I" first="I" last="Naert">I. Naert</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, M" sort="Quirynen, M" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="M" last="Quirynen">M. Quirynen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hooghe, M" sort="Hooghe, M" uniqKey="Hooghe M" first="M" last="Hooghe">M. Hooghe</name></author><author><name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, D" sort="Van Steenberghe, D" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D" first="D" last="Van Steenberghe">D. Van Steenberghe</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="1994">1994</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:8006845</idno><idno type="pmid">8006845</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">004449</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">004449</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">A comparative prospective study of splinted and unsplinted Brånemark implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: a preliminary report.</title><author><name sortKey="Naert, I" sort="Naert, I" uniqKey="Naert I" first="I" last="Naert">I. Naert</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, M" sort="Quirynen, M" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="M" last="Quirynen">M. Quirynen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hooghe, M" sort="Hooghe, M" uniqKey="Hooghe M" first="M" last="Hooghe">M. Hooghe</name></author><author><name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, D" sort="Van Steenberghe, D" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D" first="D" last="Van Steenberghe">D. Van Steenberghe</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</title><idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno><imprint><date when="1994" type="published">1994</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Denture Retention (methods)</term><term>Denture, Complete</term><term>Denture, Overlay</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (surgery)</term><term>Male</term><term>Mandible (surgery)</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Osseointegration (physiology)</term><term>Patient Satisfaction</term><term>Periodontal Index</term><term>Prospective Studies</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Denture Retention</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Osseointegration</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Mandible</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Denture, Complete</term><term>Denture, Overlay</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Patient Satisfaction</term><term>Periodontal Index</term><term>Prospective Studies</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Thirty-six edentulous patients, each provided with two Bränemark implants in the mandible to anchor an overdenture, were selected for this study and randomly divided into three groups of 12 patients each. In each group a different attachment system was used: (1) magnets, (2) ball attachments, and (3) straight bars with clips (control). The mean loading time was 12.4 months (range 3 to 24 months). This study investigated (1) the clinical behavior of loaded implants by means of overdentures related to their connection system (splinted versus unsplinted) and (2) the clinical performance of prosthetic treatment. Preliminary results indicate no differences; no failures occurred and the level of marginal bone height, as well as the probing attachment level, changed similarly in the three groups. Although splinted bar-retained overdentures scored better objectively, subjective satisfaction ratings did not differ. It was concluded that for the short follow-up period, the state of connection did not influence the clinical success of implants. However, no definite conclusions may be drawn until long-term data become available.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">8006845</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>1994</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>21</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2006</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>15</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0022-3913</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>71</Volume><Issue>5</Issue><PubDate><Year>1994</Year><Month>May</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Prosthet Dent</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>A comparative prospective study of splinted and unsplinted Brånemark implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: a preliminary report.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>486-92</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>Thirty-six edentulous patients, each provided with two Bränemark implants in the mandible to anchor an overdenture, were selected for this study and randomly divided into three groups of 12 patients each. In each group a different attachment system was used: (1) magnets, (2) ball attachments, and (3) straight bars with clips (control). The mean loading time was 12.4 months (range 3 to 24 months). This study investigated (1) the clinical behavior of loaded implants by means of overdentures related to their connection system (splinted versus unsplinted) and (2) the clinical performance of prosthetic treatment. Preliminary results indicate no differences; no failures occurred and the level of marginal bone height, as well as the probing attachment level, changed similarly in the three groups. Although splinted bar-retained overdentures scored better objectively, subjective satisfaction ratings did not differ. It was concluded that for the short follow-up period, the state of connection did not influence the clinical success of implants. However, no definite conclusions may be drawn until long-term data become available.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Naert</LastName><ForeName>I</ForeName><Initials>I</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Quirynen</LastName><ForeName>M</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Hooghe</LastName><ForeName>M</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>van Steenberghe</LastName><ForeName>D</ForeName><Initials>D</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016430">Clinical Trial</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016449">Randomized Controlled Trial</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>J Prosthet Dent</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0376364</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0022-3913</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000369" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged, 80 and over</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003781" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture Retention</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003824" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture, Complete</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003828" MajorTopicYN="Y">Denture, Overlay</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016348" MajorTopicYN="N">Osseointegration</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017060" MajorTopicYN="N">Patient Satisfaction</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010512" MajorTopicYN="N">Periodontal Index</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011446" MajorTopicYN="N">Prospective Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>1994</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>1</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>1994</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>1994</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8006845</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">0022-3913(94)90188-0</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004449 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 004449 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:8006845
|texte= A comparative prospective study of splinted and unsplinted Brånemark implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: a preliminary report.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:8006845" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |