EdenteV2, Istex, Corpus, bibRecord, 003719

A comparative prospective study of splinted and unsplinted Brȧnemark implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: A preliminary report

Identifieur interne : 003719 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 003718; suivant : 003720

A comparative prospective study of splinted and unsplinted Brȧnemark implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: A preliminary report

Auteurs : I. Naert ; M. Quirynen ; M. Hooghe ; D. Van Steenberghe

Source :

The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry [ 0022-3913 ] ; 1994.

RBID : ISTEX:6F83CC2B8806E56A2E00C09E9AB3A5D60F4A7829

English descriptors

Abstract

Abstract: Thirty-six edentulous patients, each provided with two Brȧnemark implants in the mandible to anchor an overdenture, were selected for this study and randomly divided into three groups of 12 patients each. In each group a different attachment system was used: (1) magnets, (2) ball attachments, and (3) straight bars with clips (control). The mean loading time was 12.4 months (range 3 to 24 months). This study investigated (1) the clinical behavior of loaded implants by means of overdentures related to their connection system (splinted versus unsplinted) and (2) the clinical performance of prosthetic treatment. Preliminary results indicate no differences; no failures occurred and the level of marginal bone height, as well as the probing attachment level, changed similarly in the three groups. Although splinted bar-retained overdentures scored better objectively, subjective satisfaction ratings did not differ. It was concluded that for the short follow-up period, the state of connection did not influence the clinical success of implants. However, no definite conclusions may be drawn until long-term data become available.

Url:

https://api.istex.fr/document/6F83CC2B8806E56A2E00C09E9AB3A5D60F4A7829/fulltext/pdf

DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(94)90188-0

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:6F83CC2B8806E56A2E00C09E9AB3A5D60F4A7829

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>A comparative prospective study of splinted and unsplinted Brȧnemark implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: A preliminary report</title>
<author><name sortKey="Naert, I" sort="Naert, I" uniqKey="Naert I" first="I." last="Naert">I. Naert</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Quirynen, M" sort="Quirynen, M" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="M." last="Quirynen">M. Quirynen</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Hooghe, M" sort="Hooghe, M" uniqKey="Hooghe M" first="M." last="Hooghe">M. Hooghe</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, D" sort="Van Steenberghe, D" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D" first="D." last="Van Steenberghe">D. Van Steenberghe</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:6F83CC2B8806E56A2E00C09E9AB3A5D60F4A7829</idno>
<date when="1994" year="1994">1994</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/0022-3913(94)90188-0</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/6F83CC2B8806E56A2E00C09E9AB3A5D60F4A7829/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">003719</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">003719</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">A comparative prospective study of splinted and unsplinted Brȧnemark implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: A preliminary report</title>
<author><name sortKey="Naert, I" sort="Naert, I" uniqKey="Naert I" first="I." last="Naert">I. Naert</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Quirynen, M" sort="Quirynen, M" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="M." last="Quirynen">M. Quirynen</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Hooghe, M" sort="Hooghe, M" uniqKey="Hooghe M" first="M." last="Hooghe">M. Hooghe</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, D" sort="Van Steenberghe, D" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D" first="D." last="Van Steenberghe">D. Van Steenberghe</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j">The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">YMPR</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno>
<imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<date type="published" when="1994">1994</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">71</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="486">486</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="492">492</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term>
<term>Abutment connection</term>
<term>Angle class</term>
<term>Attachment</term>
<term>Attachment components</term>
<term>Attachment system</term>
<term>Attachment systems</term>
<term>Ball attachments</term>
<term>Baseline</term>
<term>Bone loss</term>
<term>Branemark</term>
<term>Branemark implants</term>
<term>Branemark system</term>
<term>Clinical dentistry</term>
<term>Connection system</term>
<term>Definite conclusions</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Different attachment systems</term>
<term>Different periods</term>
<term>Dyna magnets</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Entire period</term>
<term>Failure rate</term>
<term>First year</term>
<term>Fixture</term>
<term>Food remnants</term>
<term>Frequency distribution</term>
<term>Functional benefits</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Loading time</term>
<term>Magnet</term>
<term>Main reason</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Marginal bone height</term>
<term>Marginal bone level</term>
<term>Marginal bone loss</term>
<term>Marginal tissue reactions</term>
<term>Maxillofac</term>
<term>Naert</term>
<term>Observation periods</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac surg</term>
<term>Osseointegrated</term>
<term>Osseointegrated fixtures</term>
<term>Osseointegrated implants</term>
<term>Osseointegrated titanium fixtures</term>
<term>Overdentures</term>
<term>Periodontal parameters</term>
<term>Periodontal probe</term>
<term>Periotest value</term>
<term>Preliminary results</term>
<term>Prospective study</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthetic</term>
<term>Prosthetic dentistry</term>
<term>Prosthetic parameters</term>
<term>Quintessence publishing</term>
<term>Quirynen</term>
<term>Retrospective study</term>
<term>Single fixtures</term>
<term>Sixth edition</term>
<term>Steenberghe</term>
<term>Unconnected implants</term>
<term>Year report</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term>
<term>Abutment connection</term>
<term>Angle class</term>
<term>Attachment</term>
<term>Attachment components</term>
<term>Attachment system</term>
<term>Attachment systems</term>
<term>Ball attachments</term>
<term>Baseline</term>
<term>Bone loss</term>
<term>Branemark</term>
<term>Branemark implants</term>
<term>Branemark system</term>
<term>Clinical dentistry</term>
<term>Connection system</term>
<term>Definite conclusions</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Different attachment systems</term>
<term>Different periods</term>
<term>Dyna magnets</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Entire period</term>
<term>Failure rate</term>
<term>First year</term>
<term>Fixture</term>
<term>Food remnants</term>
<term>Frequency distribution</term>
<term>Functional benefits</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Loading time</term>
<term>Magnet</term>
<term>Main reason</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Marginal bone height</term>
<term>Marginal bone level</term>
<term>Marginal bone loss</term>
<term>Marginal tissue reactions</term>
<term>Maxillofac</term>
<term>Naert</term>
<term>Observation periods</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac surg</term>
<term>Osseointegrated</term>
<term>Osseointegrated fixtures</term>
<term>Osseointegrated implants</term>
<term>Osseointegrated titanium fixtures</term>
<term>Overdentures</term>
<term>Periodontal parameters</term>
<term>Periodontal probe</term>
<term>Periotest value</term>
<term>Preliminary results</term>
<term>Prospective study</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthetic</term>
<term>Prosthetic dentistry</term>
<term>Prosthetic parameters</term>
<term>Quintessence publishing</term>
<term>Quirynen</term>
<term>Retrospective study</term>
<term>Single fixtures</term>
<term>Sixth edition</term>
<term>Steenberghe</term>
<term>Unconnected implants</term>
<term>Year report</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: Thirty-six edentulous patients, each provided with two Brȧnemark implants in the mandible to anchor an overdenture, were selected for this study and randomly divided into three groups of 12 patients each. In each group a different attachment system was used: (1) magnets, (2) ball attachments, and (3) straight bars with clips (control). The mean loading time was 12.4 months (range 3 to 24 months). This study investigated (1) the clinical behavior of loaded implants by means of overdentures related to their connection system (splinted versus unsplinted) and (2) the clinical performance of prosthetic treatment. Preliminary results indicate no differences; no failures occurred and the level of marginal bone height, as well as the probing attachment level, changed similarly in the three groups. Although splinted bar-retained overdentures scored better objectively, subjective satisfaction ratings did not differ. It was concluded that for the short follow-up period, the state of connection did not influence the clinical success of implants. However, no definite conclusions may be drawn until long-term data become available.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex><corpusName>elsevier</corpusName>
<keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string>
<json:string>prosthetic</json:string>
<json:string>naert</json:string>
<json:string>denture</json:string>
<json:string>abutment</json:string>
<json:string>osseointegrated</json:string>
<json:string>mandible</json:string>
<json:string>branemark</json:string>
<json:string>maxillofac</json:string>
<json:string>steenberghe</json:string>
<json:string>quirynen</json:string>
<json:string>overdentures</json:string>
<json:string>ball attachments</json:string>
<json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string>
<json:string>frequency distribution</json:string>
<json:string>loading time</json:string>
<json:string>prosthetic dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>attachment system</json:string>
<json:string>baseline</json:string>
<json:string>dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>attachment systems</json:string>
<json:string>connection system</json:string>
<json:string>marginal bone height</json:string>
<json:string>marginal bone level</json:string>
<json:string>prospective study</json:string>
<json:string>different attachment systems</json:string>
<json:string>prosthetic parameters</json:string>
<json:string>first year</json:string>
<json:string>osseointegrated fixtures</json:string>
<json:string>prosthet dent</json:string>
<json:string>quintessence publishing</json:string>
<json:string>attachment</json:string>
<json:string>magnet</json:string>
<json:string>preliminary results</json:string>
<json:string>definite conclusions</json:string>
<json:string>unconnected implants</json:string>
<json:string>different periods</json:string>
<json:string>periotest value</json:string>
<json:string>bone loss</json:string>
<json:string>periodontal parameters</json:string>
<json:string>periodontal probe</json:string>
<json:string>main reason</json:string>
<json:string>abutment connection</json:string>
<json:string>functional benefits</json:string>
<json:string>attachment components</json:string>
<json:string>entire period</json:string>
<json:string>observation periods</json:string>
<json:string>marginal bone loss</json:string>
<json:string>food remnants</json:string>
<json:string>failure rate</json:string>
<json:string>branemark system</json:string>
<json:string>angle class</json:string>
<json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string>
<json:string>oral maxillofac surg</json:string>
<json:string>dyna magnets</json:string>
<json:string>branemark implants</json:string>
<json:string>single fixtures</json:string>
<json:string>year report</json:string>
<json:string>retrospective study</json:string>
<json:string>clinical dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>edentulous patients</json:string>
<json:string>marginal tissue reactions</json:string>
<json:string>osseointegrated titanium fixtures</json:string>
<json:string>sixth edition</json:string>
<json:string>fixture</json:string>
</teeft>
</keywords>
<author><json:item><name>I. Naert DDS, PhD</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item><name>M. Quirynen DDS, PhD</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item><name>M. Hooghe DDS</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item><name>D. van Steenberghe MD, PhD</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
</author>
<subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>Clinical sciences Maxillofacial prosthetics and dental implants</value>
</json:item>
</subject>
<arkIstex>ark:/67375/6H6-S188H53T-C</arkIstex>
<language><json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<originalGenre><json:string>Short communication</json:string>
</originalGenre>
<abstract>Abstract: Thirty-six edentulous patients, each provided with two Brȧnemark implants in the mandible to anchor an overdenture, were selected for this study and randomly divided into three groups of 12 patients each. In each group a different attachment system was used: (1) magnets, (2) ball attachments, and (3) straight bars with clips (control). The mean loading time was 12.4 months (range 3 to 24 months). This study investigated (1) the clinical behavior of loaded implants by means of overdentures related to their connection system (splinted versus unsplinted) and (2) the clinical performance of prosthetic treatment. Preliminary results indicate no differences; no failures occurred and the level of marginal bone height, as well as the probing attachment level, changed similarly in the three groups. Although splinted bar-retained overdentures scored better objectively, subjective satisfaction ratings did not differ. It was concluded that for the short follow-up period, the state of connection did not influence the clinical success of implants. However, no definite conclusions may be drawn until long-term data become available.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators><score>7.386</score>
<pdfWordCount>3358</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>21076</pdfCharCount>
<pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageCount>7</pdfPageCount>
<pdfPageSize>576.12 x 827.84 pts</pdfPageSize>
<refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative>
<abstractWordCount>169</abstractWordCount>
<abstractCharCount>1145</abstractCharCount>
<keywordCount>1</keywordCount>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>A comparative prospective study of splinted and unsplinted Brȧnemark implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: A preliminary report</title>
<pmid><json:string>8006845</json:string>
</pmid>
<pii><json:string>0022-3913(94)90188-0</json:string>
</pii>
<genre><json:string>brief-communication</json:string>
</genre>
<serie><title>(in Dutch)</title>
<language><json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
</serie>
<host><title>The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</title>
<language><json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<publicationDate>1994</publicationDate>
<issn><json:string>0022-3913</json:string>
</issn>
<pii><json:string>S0022-3913(00)X0137-0</json:string>
</pii>
<volume>71</volume>
<issue>5</issue>
<pages><first>486</first>
<last>492</last>
</pages>
<genre><json:string>journal</json:string>
</genre>
</host>
<namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1994</json:string>
<json:string>From January 1996 to November 1991</json:string>
</date>
<geogName></geogName>
<orgName><json:string>University of Leuven, Belgium</json:string>
<json:string>Department of Periodontology</json:string>
<json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>Bergen</json:string>
<json:string>Dyna Dental Engineering Company</json:string>
</orgName>
<orgName_funder><json:string>Bergen</json:string>
<json:string>Dyna Dental Engineering Company</json:string>
</orgName_funder>
<orgName_provider></orgName_provider>
<persName><json:string>TIME Fig</json:string>
<json:string>B. Ofrictin</json:string>
<json:string>M. Hooghe</json:string>
<json:string>D. van Steenberghe</json:string>
<json:string>AL Patients</json:string>
</persName>
<placeName><json:string>Switzerland</json:string>
<json:string>Germany</json:string>
<json:string>Heidelberg</json:string>
<json:string>Bern</json:string>
<json:string>Bergen op Zoom</json:string>
<json:string>Gothenburg</json:string>
<json:string>Leuven</json:string>
<json:string>Sweden</json:string>
<json:string>Biel</json:string>
<json:string>Belgium</json:string>
<json:string>Netherlands</json:string>
</placeName>
<ref_url></ref_url>
<ref_bibl></ref_bibl>
<bibl></bibl>
</unitex>
</namedEntities>
<ark><json:string>ark:/67375/6H6-S188H53T-C</json:string>
</ark>
<categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string>
<json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string>
</wos>
<scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string>
<json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string>
</scienceMetrix>
<scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string>
</scopus>
<inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string>
<json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string>
<json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string>
<json:string>4 - otorhinolaryngologie. stomatologie</json:string>
</inist>
</categories>
<publicationDate>1994</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>1994</copyrightDate>
<doi><json:string>10.1016/0022-3913(94)90188-0</json:string>
</doi>
<id>6F83CC2B8806E56A2E00C09E9AB3A5D60F4A7829</id>
<score>1</score>
<fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension>
<original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/6F83CC2B8806E56A2E00C09E9AB3A5D60F4A7829/fulltext/pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item><extension>zip</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/6F83CC2B8806E56A2E00C09E9AB3A5D60F4A7829/fulltext/zip</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/6F83CC2B8806E56A2E00C09E9AB3A5D60F4A7829/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a">A comparative prospective study of splinted and unsplinted Brȧnemark implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: A preliminary report</title>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<availability><p>ELSEVIER</p>
</availability>
<date>1994</date>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a">A comparative prospective study of splinted and unsplinted Brȧnemark implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: A preliminary report</title>
<author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">I.</forename>
<surname>Naert</surname>
</persName>
<roleName type="degree">DDS, PhD</roleName>
<note type="biography">Reprint requests to:, Dr. I. Naert Faculty of Medicine Catholic University of Leuven Capucijnenvoer 7 B3000 Leuven, Belgium.</note>
<note type="biography">Associate Professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry.</note>
<affiliation>Reprint requests to:, Dr. I. Naert Faculty of Medicine Catholic University of Leuven Capucijnenvoer 7 B3000 Leuven, Belgium.</affiliation>
<affiliation>Associate Professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry.</affiliation>
<affiliation>Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">M.</forename>
<surname>Quirynen</surname>
</persName>
<roleName type="degree">DDS, PhD</roleName>
<note type="biography">Associate Professor, Department of Periodontology.</note>
<affiliation>Associate Professor, Department of Periodontology.</affiliation>
<affiliation>Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">M.</forename>
<surname>Hooghe</surname>
</persName>
<roleName type="degree">DDS</roleName>
<note type="biography">Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry.</note>
<affiliation>Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry.</affiliation>
<affiliation>Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">D.</forename>
<surname>van Steenberghe</surname>
</persName>
<roleName type="degree">MD, PhD</roleName>
<note type="biography">Professor and Head, Department of Periodontology.</note>
<affiliation>Professor and Head, Department of Periodontology.</affiliation>
<affiliation>Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation>
</author>
<idno type="istex">6F83CC2B8806E56A2E00C09E9AB3A5D60F4A7829</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1016/0022-3913(94)90188-0</idno>
<idno type="PII">0022-3913(94)90188-0</idno>
</analytic>
<monogr><title level="j">The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">YMPR</title>
<idno type="pISSN">0022-3913</idno>
<idno type="PII">S0022-3913(00)X0137-0</idno>
<imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<date type="published" when="1994"></date>
<biblScope unit="volume">71</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="486">486</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="492">492</biblScope>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><creation><date>1994</date>
</creation>
<langUsage><language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
<abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Thirty-six edentulous patients, each provided with two Brȧnemark implants in the mandible to anchor an overdenture, were selected for this study and randomly divided into three groups of 12 patients each. In each group a different attachment system was used: (1) magnets, (2) ball attachments, and (3) straight bars with clips (control). The mean loading time was 12.4 months (range 3 to 24 months). This study investigated (1) the clinical behavior of loaded implants by means of overdentures related to their connection system (splinted versus unsplinted) and (2) the clinical performance of prosthetic treatment. Preliminary results indicate no differences; no failures occurred and the level of marginal bone height, as well as the probing attachment level, changed similarly in the three groups. Although splinted bar-retained overdentures scored better objectively, subjective satisfaction ratings did not differ. It was concluded that for the short follow-up period, the state of connection did not influence the clinical success of implants. However, no definite conclusions may be drawn until long-term data become available.</p>
</abstract>
<textClass><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>article-category</head>
<item><term>Clinical sciences Maxillofacial prosthetics and dental implants</term>
</item>
</list>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
<revisionDesc><change when="1994">Published</change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
<json:item><extension>txt</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/6F83CC2B8806E56A2E00C09E9AB3A5D60F4A7829/fulltext/txt</uri>
</json:item>
</fulltext>
<metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Elsevier, elements deleted: tail"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:docType PUBLIC="-//ES//DTD journal article DTD version 4.5.2//EN//XML" URI="art452.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType>
<istex:document><converted-article version="4.5.2" docsubtype="sco"><item-info><jid>YMPR</jid>
<aid>94901880</aid>
<ce:pii>0022-3913(94)90188-0</ce:pii>
<ce:doi>10.1016/0022-3913(94)90188-0</ce:doi>
<ce:copyright type="unknown" year="1994"></ce:copyright>
<ce:doctopics><ce:doctopic><ce:text>Clinical sciences Maxillofacial prosthetics and dental implants</ce:text>
</ce:doctopic>
</ce:doctopics>
</item-info>
<head><ce:title>A comparative prospective study of splinted and unsplinted Brȧnemark implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: A preliminary report</ce:title>
<ce:author-group><ce:author><ce:given-name>I.</ce:given-name>
<ce:surname>Naert</ce:surname>
<ce:degrees>DDS, PhD</ce:degrees>
<ce:cross-ref refid="COR1"><ce:sup>∗</ce:sup>
</ce:cross-ref>
<ce:cross-ref refid="FN1"><ce:sup>a</ce:sup>
</ce:cross-ref>
</ce:author>
<ce:author><ce:given-name>M.</ce:given-name>
<ce:surname>Quirynen</ce:surname>
<ce:degrees>DDS, PhD</ce:degrees>
<ce:cross-ref refid="FN2"><ce:sup>b</ce:sup>
</ce:cross-ref>
</ce:author>
<ce:author><ce:given-name>M.</ce:given-name>
<ce:surname>Hooghe</ce:surname>
<ce:degrees>DDS</ce:degrees>
<ce:cross-ref refid="FN3"><ce:sup>c</ce:sup>
</ce:cross-ref>
</ce:author>
<ce:author><ce:given-name>D.</ce:given-name>
<ce:surname>van Steenberghe</ce:surname>
<ce:degrees>MD, PhD</ce:degrees>
<ce:cross-ref refid="FN4"><ce:sup>d</ce:sup>
</ce:cross-ref>
</ce:author>
<ce:affiliation><ce:textfn>Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</ce:textfn>
</ce:affiliation>
<ce:correspondence id="COR1"><ce:label>∗</ce:label>
<ce:text><ce:italic>Reprint requests to:</ce:italic>
, <ce:small-caps>Dr. I. Naert Faculty of Medicine Catholic University of Leuven Capucijnenvoer</ce:small-caps>
 7 B3000 Leuven, Belgium.</ce:text>
</ce:correspondence>
<ce:footnote id="FN1"><ce:label>a</ce:label>
<ce:note-para>Associate Professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry.</ce:note-para>
</ce:footnote>
<ce:footnote id="FN2"><ce:label>b</ce:label>
<ce:note-para>Associate Professor, Department of Periodontology.</ce:note-para>
</ce:footnote>
<ce:footnote id="FN3"><ce:label>c</ce:label>
<ce:note-para>Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry.</ce:note-para>
</ce:footnote>
<ce:footnote id="FN4"><ce:label>d</ce:label>
<ce:note-para>Professor and Head, Department of Periodontology.</ce:note-para>
</ce:footnote>
</ce:author-group>
<ce:abstract><ce:section-title>Abstract</ce:section-title>
<ce:abstract-sec><ce:simple-para>Thirty-six edentulous patients, each provided with two Brȧnemark implants in the mandible to anchor an overdenture, were selected for this study and randomly divided into three groups of 12 patients each. In each group a different attachment system was used: (1) magnets, (2) ball attachments, and (3) straight bars with clips (control). The mean loading time was 12.4 months (range 3 to 24 months). This study investigated (1) the clinical behavior of loaded implants by means of overdentures related to their connection system (splinted versus unsplinted) and (2) the clinical performance of prosthetic treatment. Preliminary results indicate no differences; no failures occurred and the level of marginal bone height, as well as the probing attachment level, changed similarly in the three groups. Although splinted bar-retained overdentures scored better objectively, subjective satisfaction ratings did not differ. It was concluded that for the short follow-up period, the state of connection did not influence the clinical success of implants. However, no definite conclusions may be drawn until long-term data become available.</ce:simple-para>
</ce:abstract-sec>
</ce:abstract>
</head>
</converted-article>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6"><titleInfo><title>A comparative prospective study of splinted and unsplinted Brȧnemark implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: A preliminary report</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA"><title>A comparative prospective study of splinted and unsplinted Brȧnemark implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: A preliminary report</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">I.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Naert</namePart>
<namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, PhD</namePart>
<affiliation>Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation>
<description>Reprint requests to:, Dr. I. Naert Faculty of Medicine Catholic University of Leuven Capucijnenvoer 7 B3000 Leuven, Belgium.</description>
<description>Associate Professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry.</description>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">M.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Quirynen</namePart>
<namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, PhD</namePart>
<affiliation>Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation>
<description>Associate Professor, Department of Periodontology.</description>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">M.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Hooghe</namePart>
<namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS</namePart>
<affiliation>Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation>
<description>Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry.</description>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">D.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">van Steenberghe</namePart>
<namePart type="termsOfAddress">MD, PhD</namePart>
<affiliation>Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation>
<description>Professor and Head, Department of Periodontology.</description>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="brief-communication" displayLabel="Short communication" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-S9SX2MFS-0">brief-communication</genre>
<originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1994</dateIssued>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1994</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
</language>
<abstract lang="en">Abstract: Thirty-six edentulous patients, each provided with two Brȧnemark implants in the mandible to anchor an overdenture, were selected for this study and randomly divided into three groups of 12 patients each. In each group a different attachment system was used: (1) magnets, (2) ball attachments, and (3) straight bars with clips (control). The mean loading time was 12.4 months (range 3 to 24 months). This study investigated (1) the clinical behavior of loaded implants by means of overdentures related to their connection system (splinted versus unsplinted) and (2) the clinical performance of prosthetic treatment. Preliminary results indicate no differences; no failures occurred and the level of marginal bone height, as well as the probing attachment level, changed similarly in the three groups. Although splinted bar-retained overdentures scored better objectively, subjective satisfaction ratings did not differ. It was concluded that for the short follow-up period, the state of connection did not influence the clinical success of implants. However, no definite conclusions may be drawn until long-term data become available.</abstract>
<subject><genre>article-category</genre>
<topic>Clinical sciences Maxillofacial prosthetics and dental implants</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>YMPR</title>
</titleInfo>
<genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre>
<originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">199405</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<identifier type="ISSN">0022-3913</identifier>
<identifier type="PII">S0022-3913(00)X0137-0</identifier>
<part><date>199405</date>
<detail type="volume"><number>71</number>
<caption>vol.</caption>
</detail>
<detail type="issue"><number>5</number>
<caption>no.</caption>
</detail>
<extent unit="issue-pages"><start>A19</start>
</extent>
<extent unit="issue-pages"><start>A3</start>
<end>A18</end>
</extent>
<extent unit="issue-pages"><start>435</start>
<end>546</end>
</extent>
<extent unit="pages"><start>486</start>
<end>492</end>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">6F83CC2B8806E56A2E00C09E9AB3A5D60F4A7829</identifier>
<identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/6H6-S188H53T-C</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1016/0022-3913(94)90188-0</identifier>
<identifier type="PII">0022-3913(94)90188-0</identifier>
<recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-HKKZVM7B-M">elsevier</recordContentSource>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
<json:item><extension>json</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/json</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/6F83CC2B8806E56A2E00C09E9AB3A5D60F4A7829/metadata/json</uri>
</json:item>
</metadata>
</istex>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003719 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003719 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:6F83CC2B8806E56A2E00C09E9AB3A5D60F4A7829
   |texte=   A comparative prospective study of splinted and unsplinted Brȧnemark implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: A preliminary report
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022

	Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

A comparative prospective study of splinted and unsplinted Brȧnemark implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: A preliminary report

A comparative prospective study of splinted and unsplinted Brȧnemark implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: A preliminary report

Source :

English descriptors

Abstract

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri