A comparative prospective study of splinted and unsplinted Brånemark implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: a preliminary report.
Identifieur interne : 00B057 ( Main/Merge ); précédent : 00B056; suivant : 00B058A comparative prospective study of splinted and unsplinted Brånemark implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: a preliminary report.
Auteurs : I. Naert [Belgique] ; M. Quirynen ; M. Hooghe ; D. Van SteenbergheSource :
- The Journal of prosthetic dentistry [ 0022-3913 ] ; 1994.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Femelle, Humains, Implants dentaires, Indice parodontal, Mandibule (), Mâchoire édentée (), Mâle, Ostéo-intégration (physiologie), Overdenture, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux, Prothèse dentaire complète, Rétention d'appareil de prothèse dentaire (), Satisfaction du patient, Sujet âgé, Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus, Études prospectives.
- MESH :
- physiologie : Ostéo-intégration.
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Femelle, Humains, Implants dentaires, Indice parodontal, Mandibule, Mâchoire édentée, Mâle, Overdenture, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux, Prothèse dentaire complète, Rétention d'appareil de prothèse dentaire, Satisfaction du patient, Sujet âgé, Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus, Études prospectives.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dental Implants, Denture Retention (methods), Denture, Complete, Denture, Overlay, Female, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (surgery), Male, Mandible (surgery), Middle Aged, Osseointegration (physiology), Patient Satisfaction, Periodontal Index, Prospective Studies.
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- methods : Denture Retention.
- physiology : Osseointegration.
- surgery : Jaw, Edentulous, Mandible.
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Denture, Complete, Denture, Overlay, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction, Periodontal Index, Prospective Studies.
Abstract
Thirty-six edentulous patients, each provided with two Bränemark implants in the mandible to anchor an overdenture, were selected for this study and randomly divided into three groups of 12 patients each. In each group a different attachment system was used: (1) magnets, (2) ball attachments, and (3) straight bars with clips (control). The mean loading time was 12.4 months (range 3 to 24 months). This study investigated (1) the clinical behavior of loaded implants by means of overdentures related to their connection system (splinted versus unsplinted) and (2) the clinical performance of prosthetic treatment. Preliminary results indicate no differences; no failures occurred and the level of marginal bone height, as well as the probing attachment level, changed similarly in the three groups. Although splinted bar-retained overdentures scored better objectively, subjective satisfaction ratings did not differ. It was concluded that for the short follow-up period, the state of connection did not influence the clinical success of implants. However, no definite conclusions may be drawn until long-term data become available.
PubMed: 8006845
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: 004449
- to stream PubMed, to step Curation: 004449
- to stream PubMed, to step Checkpoint: 004449
- to stream Ncbi, to step Merge: 009376
- to stream Ncbi, to step Curation: 009376
- to stream Ncbi, to step Checkpoint: 009376
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:8006845Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A comparative prospective study of splinted and unsplinted Brånemark implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: a preliminary report.</title><author><name sortKey="Naert, I" sort="Naert, I" uniqKey="Naert I" first="I" last="Naert">I. Naert</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Belgique</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Catholic University of Leuven</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, M" sort="Quirynen, M" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="M" last="Quirynen">M. Quirynen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hooghe, M" sort="Hooghe, M" uniqKey="Hooghe M" first="M" last="Hooghe">M. Hooghe</name></author><author><name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, D" sort="Van Steenberghe, D" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D" first="D" last="Van Steenberghe">D. Van Steenberghe</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="1994">1994</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:8006845</idno><idno type="pmid">8006845</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">004449</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">004449</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">004449</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">004449</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">004449</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">004449</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">009376</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">009376</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">009376</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0022-3913:1994:Naert I:a:comparative:prospective</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">00B057</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">A comparative prospective study of splinted and unsplinted Brånemark implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: a preliminary report.</title><author><name sortKey="Naert, I" sort="Naert, I" uniqKey="Naert I" first="I" last="Naert">I. Naert</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Belgique</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Catholic University of Leuven</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, M" sort="Quirynen, M" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="M" last="Quirynen">M. Quirynen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hooghe, M" sort="Hooghe, M" uniqKey="Hooghe M" first="M" last="Hooghe">M. Hooghe</name></author><author><name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, D" sort="Van Steenberghe, D" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D" first="D" last="Van Steenberghe">D. Van Steenberghe</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</title><idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno><imprint><date when="1994" type="published">1994</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Denture Retention (methods)</term><term>Denture, Complete</term><term>Denture, Overlay</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (surgery)</term><term>Male</term><term>Mandible (surgery)</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Osseointegration (physiology)</term><term>Patient Satisfaction</term><term>Periodontal Index</term><term>Prospective Studies</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Indice parodontal</term><term>Mandibule ()</term><term>Mâchoire édentée ()</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Ostéo-intégration (physiologie)</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term><term>Prothèse dentaire complète</term><term>Rétention d'appareil de prothèse dentaire ()</term><term>Satisfaction du patient</term><term>Sujet âgé</term><term>Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus</term><term>Études prospectives</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Denture Retention</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Ostéo-intégration</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Osseointegration</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Mandible</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Denture, Complete</term><term>Denture, Overlay</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Patient Satisfaction</term><term>Periodontal Index</term><term>Prospective Studies</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Indice parodontal</term><term>Mandibule</term><term>Mâchoire édentée</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term><term>Prothèse dentaire complète</term><term>Rétention d'appareil de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Satisfaction du patient</term><term>Sujet âgé</term><term>Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus</term><term>Études prospectives</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Thirty-six edentulous patients, each provided with two Bränemark implants in the mandible to anchor an overdenture, were selected for this study and randomly divided into three groups of 12 patients each. In each group a different attachment system was used: (1) magnets, (2) ball attachments, and (3) straight bars with clips (control). The mean loading time was 12.4 months (range 3 to 24 months). This study investigated (1) the clinical behavior of loaded implants by means of overdentures related to their connection system (splinted versus unsplinted) and (2) the clinical performance of prosthetic treatment. Preliminary results indicate no differences; no failures occurred and the level of marginal bone height, as well as the probing attachment level, changed similarly in the three groups. Although splinted bar-retained overdentures scored better objectively, subjective satisfaction ratings did not differ. It was concluded that for the short follow-up period, the state of connection did not influence the clinical success of implants. However, no definite conclusions may be drawn until long-term data become available.</div></front></TEI></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 00B057 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 00B057 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Main
|étape= Merge
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:8006845
|texte= A comparative prospective study of splinted and unsplinted Brånemark implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: a preliminary report.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:8006845" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |