Roughness perception of unfamiliar dot pattern textures
Identifieur interne : 000198 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000197; suivant : 000199Roughness perception of unfamiliar dot pattern textures
Auteurs : Judith Eck ; Amanda L. Kaas ; Joost L. J. Mulders ; Rainer GoebelSource :
- Acta psychologica [ 0001-6918 ] ; 2013.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Both vision and touch yield comparable results in terms of roughness estimation of familiar textures as was shown in earlier studies. To our knowledge, no research has been conducted on the effect of sensory familiarity with the stimulus material on roughness estimation of unfamiliar textures. The influence of sensory modality and familiarity on roughness perception of dot pattern textures was investigated in a series of five experiments. Participants estimated the roughness of textures varying in mean center-to-center dot spacing in experimental conditions providing visual, haptic and visual-haptic combined information. The findings indicate that roughness perception of unfamiliar dot pattern textures is well described by a bi-exponential function of inter-dot spacing, regardless of the sensory modality used. However, sensory modality appears to affect the maximum of the psychophysical roughness function, with visually perceived roughness peaking for a smaller inter-dot spacing than haptic roughness. We propose that this might be due to the better spatial acuity of the visual modality. Individuals appeared to use different visual roughness estimation strategies depending on their first sensory experience (visual vs. haptic) with the stimulus material, primarily in an experimental context which required the combination of visual and haptic information in a single bimodal roughness estimate. Furthermore, the similarity of findings in experimental settings using real and virtual visual textures indicates the suitability of the experimental setup for neuroimaging studies, creating a more direct link between behavioral and neuroimaging results.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
pA |
|
---|
Format Inist (serveur)
NO : | PASCAL 13-0186886 INIST |
---|---|
ET : | Roughness perception of unfamiliar dot pattern textures |
AU : | ECK (Judith); KAAS (Amanda L.); MULDERS (Joost L. J.); GOEBEL (Rainer) |
AF : | Maastricht University, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience/6229 ER Maastricht/Pays-Bas (1 aut., 2 aut., 4 aut.); Brain Innovation B.V./6229 EV Maastricht/Pays-Bas (1 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut.) |
DT : | Publication en série; Niveau analytique |
SO : | Acta psychologica; ISSN 0001-6918; Coden APSOAZ; Royaume-Uni; Da. 2013; Vol. 143; No. 1; Pp. 20-34; Bibl. 3/4 p. |
LA : | Anglais |
EA : | Both vision and touch yield comparable results in terms of roughness estimation of familiar textures as was shown in earlier studies. To our knowledge, no research has been conducted on the effect of sensory familiarity with the stimulus material on roughness estimation of unfamiliar textures. The influence of sensory modality and familiarity on roughness perception of dot pattern textures was investigated in a series of five experiments. Participants estimated the roughness of textures varying in mean center-to-center dot spacing in experimental conditions providing visual, haptic and visual-haptic combined information. The findings indicate that roughness perception of unfamiliar dot pattern textures is well described by a bi-exponential function of inter-dot spacing, regardless of the sensory modality used. However, sensory modality appears to affect the maximum of the psychophysical roughness function, with visually perceived roughness peaking for a smaller inter-dot spacing than haptic roughness. We propose that this might be due to the better spatial acuity of the visual modality. Individuals appeared to use different visual roughness estimation strategies depending on their first sensory experience (visual vs. haptic) with the stimulus material, primarily in an experimental context which required the combination of visual and haptic information in a single bimodal roughness estimate. Furthermore, the similarity of findings in experimental settings using real and virtual visual textures indicates the suitability of the experimental setup for neuroimaging studies, creating a more direct link between behavioral and neuroimaging results. |
CC : | 002A26E03; 002A26E05 |
FD : | Rugosité; Texture stimulus; Familiarité stimulus; Modalité stimulus; Etude expérimentale; Vision; Sensibilité tactile; Homme |
FG : | Perception; Cognition |
ED : | Roughness; Stimulus texture; Stimulus familiarity; Stimulus modality; Experimental study; Vision; Tactile sensitivity; Human |
EG : | Perception; Cognition |
SD : | Rugosidad; Textura estímulo; Familiaridad estímulo; Modalidad estímulo; Estudio experimental; Visión; Sensibilidad tactil; Hombre |
LO : | INIST-2174.354000504116290040 |
ID : | 13-0186886 |
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:13-0186886Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Roughness perception of unfamiliar dot pattern textures</title>
<author><name sortKey="Eck, Judith" sort="Eck, Judith" uniqKey="Eck J" first="Judith" last="Eck">Judith Eck</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Maastricht University, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience</s1>
<s2>6229 ER Maastricht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Brain Innovation B.V.</s1>
<s2>6229 EV Maastricht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Kaas, Amanda L" sort="Kaas, Amanda L" uniqKey="Kaas A" first="Amanda L." last="Kaas">Amanda L. Kaas</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Maastricht University, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience</s1>
<s2>6229 ER Maastricht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Mulders, Joost L J" sort="Mulders, Joost L J" uniqKey="Mulders J" first="Joost L. J." last="Mulders">Joost L. J. Mulders</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Brain Innovation B.V.</s1>
<s2>6229 EV Maastricht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Goebel, Rainer" sort="Goebel, Rainer" uniqKey="Goebel R" first="Rainer" last="Goebel">Rainer Goebel</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Maastricht University, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience</s1>
<s2>6229 ER Maastricht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Brain Innovation B.V.</s1>
<s2>6229 EV Maastricht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">13-0186886</idno>
<date when="2013">2013</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 13-0186886 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:13-0186886</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000198</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Roughness perception of unfamiliar dot pattern textures</title>
<author><name sortKey="Eck, Judith" sort="Eck, Judith" uniqKey="Eck J" first="Judith" last="Eck">Judith Eck</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Maastricht University, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience</s1>
<s2>6229 ER Maastricht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Brain Innovation B.V.</s1>
<s2>6229 EV Maastricht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Kaas, Amanda L" sort="Kaas, Amanda L" uniqKey="Kaas A" first="Amanda L." last="Kaas">Amanda L. Kaas</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Maastricht University, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience</s1>
<s2>6229 ER Maastricht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Mulders, Joost L J" sort="Mulders, Joost L J" uniqKey="Mulders J" first="Joost L. J." last="Mulders">Joost L. J. Mulders</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Brain Innovation B.V.</s1>
<s2>6229 EV Maastricht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Goebel, Rainer" sort="Goebel, Rainer" uniqKey="Goebel R" first="Rainer" last="Goebel">Rainer Goebel</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Maastricht University, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience</s1>
<s2>6229 ER Maastricht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Brain Innovation B.V.</s1>
<s2>6229 EV Maastricht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Acta psychologica</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Acta psychol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0001-6918</idno>
<imprint><date when="2013">2013</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Acta psychologica</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Acta psychol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0001-6918</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Experimental study</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Roughness</term>
<term>Stimulus familiarity</term>
<term>Stimulus modality</term>
<term>Stimulus texture</term>
<term>Tactile sensitivity</term>
<term>Vision</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Rugosité</term>
<term>Texture stimulus</term>
<term>Familiarité stimulus</term>
<term>Modalité stimulus</term>
<term>Etude expérimentale</term>
<term>Vision</term>
<term>Sensibilité tactile</term>
<term>Homme</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Both vision and touch yield comparable results in terms of roughness estimation of familiar textures as was shown in earlier studies. To our knowledge, no research has been conducted on the effect of sensory familiarity with the stimulus material on roughness estimation of unfamiliar textures. The influence of sensory modality and familiarity on roughness perception of dot pattern textures was investigated in a series of five experiments. Participants estimated the roughness of textures varying in mean center-to-center dot spacing in experimental conditions providing visual, haptic and visual-haptic combined information. The findings indicate that roughness perception of unfamiliar dot pattern textures is well described by a bi-exponential function of inter-dot spacing, regardless of the sensory modality used. However, sensory modality appears to affect the maximum of the psychophysical roughness function, with visually perceived roughness peaking for a smaller inter-dot spacing than haptic roughness. We propose that this might be due to the better spatial acuity of the visual modality. Individuals appeared to use different visual roughness estimation strategies depending on their first sensory experience (visual vs. haptic) with the stimulus material, primarily in an experimental context which required the combination of visual and haptic information in a single bimodal roughness estimate. Furthermore, the similarity of findings in experimental settings using real and virtual visual textures indicates the suitability of the experimental setup for neuroimaging studies, creating a more direct link between behavioral and neuroimaging results.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0001-6918</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>APSOAZ</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Acta psychol.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>143</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>1</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Roughness perception of unfamiliar dot pattern textures</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>ECK (Judith)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>KAAS (Amanda L.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>MULDERS (Joost L. J.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>GOEBEL (Rainer)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Maastricht University, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience</s1>
<s2>6229 ER Maastricht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>Brain Innovation B.V.</s1>
<s2>6229 EV Maastricht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>20-34</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2013</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>2174</s2>
<s5>354000504116290040</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2013 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>3/4 p.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>13-0186886</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Acta psychologica</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>GBR</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Both vision and touch yield comparable results in terms of roughness estimation of familiar textures as was shown in earlier studies. To our knowledge, no research has been conducted on the effect of sensory familiarity with the stimulus material on roughness estimation of unfamiliar textures. The influence of sensory modality and familiarity on roughness perception of dot pattern textures was investigated in a series of five experiments. Participants estimated the roughness of textures varying in mean center-to-center dot spacing in experimental conditions providing visual, haptic and visual-haptic combined information. The findings indicate that roughness perception of unfamiliar dot pattern textures is well described by a bi-exponential function of inter-dot spacing, regardless of the sensory modality used. However, sensory modality appears to affect the maximum of the psychophysical roughness function, with visually perceived roughness peaking for a smaller inter-dot spacing than haptic roughness. We propose that this might be due to the better spatial acuity of the visual modality. Individuals appeared to use different visual roughness estimation strategies depending on their first sensory experience (visual vs. haptic) with the stimulus material, primarily in an experimental context which required the combination of visual and haptic information in a single bimodal roughness estimate. Furthermore, the similarity of findings in experimental settings using real and virtual visual textures indicates the suitability of the experimental setup for neuroimaging studies, creating a more direct link between behavioral and neuroimaging results.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002A26E03</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X"><s0>002A26E05</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Rugosité</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Roughness</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Rugosidad</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Texture stimulus</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Stimulus texture</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Textura estímulo</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Familiarité stimulus</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Stimulus familiarity</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Familiaridad estímulo</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Modalité stimulus</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Stimulus modality</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Modalidad estímulo</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etude expérimentale</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Experimental study</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudio experimental</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Vision</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Vision</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Visión</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Sensibilité tactile</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Tactile sensitivity</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Sensibilidad tactil</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Perception</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Perception</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Percepción</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cognición</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>168</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 13-0186886 INIST</NO>
<ET>Roughness perception of unfamiliar dot pattern textures</ET>
<AU>ECK (Judith); KAAS (Amanda L.); MULDERS (Joost L. J.); GOEBEL (Rainer)</AU>
<AF>Maastricht University, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience/6229 ER Maastricht/Pays-Bas (1 aut., 2 aut., 4 aut.); Brain Innovation B.V./6229 EV Maastricht/Pays-Bas (1 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Acta psychologica; ISSN 0001-6918; Coden APSOAZ; Royaume-Uni; Da. 2013; Vol. 143; No. 1; Pp. 20-34; Bibl. 3/4 p.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Both vision and touch yield comparable results in terms of roughness estimation of familiar textures as was shown in earlier studies. To our knowledge, no research has been conducted on the effect of sensory familiarity with the stimulus material on roughness estimation of unfamiliar textures. The influence of sensory modality and familiarity on roughness perception of dot pattern textures was investigated in a series of five experiments. Participants estimated the roughness of textures varying in mean center-to-center dot spacing in experimental conditions providing visual, haptic and visual-haptic combined information. The findings indicate that roughness perception of unfamiliar dot pattern textures is well described by a bi-exponential function of inter-dot spacing, regardless of the sensory modality used. However, sensory modality appears to affect the maximum of the psychophysical roughness function, with visually perceived roughness peaking for a smaller inter-dot spacing than haptic roughness. We propose that this might be due to the better spatial acuity of the visual modality. Individuals appeared to use different visual roughness estimation strategies depending on their first sensory experience (visual vs. haptic) with the stimulus material, primarily in an experimental context which required the combination of visual and haptic information in a single bimodal roughness estimate. Furthermore, the similarity of findings in experimental settings using real and virtual visual textures indicates the suitability of the experimental setup for neuroimaging studies, creating a more direct link between behavioral and neuroimaging results.</EA>
<CC>002A26E03; 002A26E05</CC>
<FD>Rugosité; Texture stimulus; Familiarité stimulus; Modalité stimulus; Etude expérimentale; Vision; Sensibilité tactile; Homme</FD>
<FG>Perception; Cognition</FG>
<ED>Roughness; Stimulus texture; Stimulus familiarity; Stimulus modality; Experimental study; Vision; Tactile sensitivity; Human</ED>
<EG>Perception; Cognition</EG>
<SD>Rugosidad; Textura estímulo; Familiaridad estímulo; Modalidad estímulo; Estudio experimental; Visión; Sensibilidad tactil; Hombre</SD>
<LO>INIST-2174.354000504116290040</LO>
<ID>13-0186886</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000198 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000198 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Ticri/CIDE |area= HapticV1 |flux= PascalFrancis |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= Pascal:13-0186886 |texte= Roughness perception of unfamiliar dot pattern textures }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |