The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review
Identifieur interne : 004832 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 004831; suivant : 004833The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review
Auteurs : O. A. J. Van Der Meijden [Pays-Bas] ; M. P. Schijven [Pays-Bas]Source :
- Surgical endoscopy [ 0930-2794 ] ; 2009.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
- Wicri :
- topic : Médecine.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Bibliographic review, Clinical Competence, Education, Medical, Continuing (methods), Endoscopic surgery, Humans, Medicine, Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures (education), Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures (methods), Non invasive method, Psychomotor Performance, Robotics (methods), Treatment, User-Computer Interface.
- MESH :
Abstract
Background Virtual reality (VR) as surgical training tool has become a state-of-the-art technique in training and teaching skills for minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Although intuitively appealing, the true benefits of haptic (VR training) platforms are unknown. Many questions about haptic feedback in the different areas of surgical skills (training) need to be answered before adding costly haptic feedback in VR simulation for MIS training. This study was designed to review the current status and value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted MIS and training by using virtual reality simulation. Methods A systematic review of the literature was undertaken using PubMed and MEDLINE. The following search terms were used: Haptic feedback OR Haptics OR Force feedback AND/OR Minimal Invasive Surgery AND/ OR Minimal Access Surgery AND/OR Robotics AND/OR Robotic Surgery AND/OR Endoscopic Surgery AND/OR Virtual Reality AND/OR Simulation OR Surgical Training/ Education. Results The results were assessed according to level of evidence as reflected by the Oxford Centre of Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence. Conclusions In the current literature, no firm consensus exists on the importance of haptic feedback in performing minimally invasive surgery. Although the majority of the results show positive assessment of the benefits of force feedback, results are ambivalent and not unanimous on the subject. Benefits are least disputed when related to surgery using robotics, because there is no haptic feedback in currently used robotics. The addition of haptics is believed to reduce surgical errors resulting from a lack of it, especially in knot tying. Little research has been performed in the area of robot-assisted endoscopic surgical training, but results seem promising. Concerning VR training, results indicate that haptic feedback is important during the early phase of psychomotor skill acquisition.
Url:
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PascalFrancis, to step Corpus: 000770
- to stream PascalFrancis, to step Curation: 000C62
- to stream PascalFrancis, to step Checkpoint: 000523
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 004916
- to stream Pmc, to step Corpus: 000C04
- to stream Pmc, to step Curation: 000C04
- to stream Pmc, to step Checkpoint: 002013
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: 001351
- to stream PubMed, to step Curation: 001351
- to stream PubMed, to step Checkpoint: 001028
- to stream Ncbi, to step Merge: 001003
- to stream Ncbi, to step Curation: 001003
- to stream Ncbi, to step Checkpoint: 001003
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 004090
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 004832
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review</title><author><name sortKey="Van Der Meijden, O A J" sort="Van Der Meijden, O A J" uniqKey="Van Der Meijden O" first="O. A. J." last="Van Der Meijden">O. A. J. Van Der Meijden</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500</s1><s2>3508 GA Utrecht</s2><s3>NLD</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Pays-Bas</country><wicri:noRegion>3508 GA Utrecht</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schijven, M P" sort="Schijven, M P" uniqKey="Schijven M" first="M. P." last="Schijven">M. P. Schijven</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500</s1><s2>3508 GA Utrecht</s2><s3>NLD</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Pays-Bas</country><wicri:noRegion>3508 GA Utrecht</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno><idno type="inist">09-0293492</idno><date when="2009">2009</date><idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 09-0293492 INIST</idno><idno type="RBID">Pascal:09-0293492</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000770</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Curation">000C62</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Checkpoint">000523</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0930-2794:2009:Van Der Meijden O:the:value:of</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">004916</idno><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2686803</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:2686803</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000C04</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">000C04</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Checkpoint">002013</idno><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001351</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">001351</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">001028</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">001003</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">001003</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">001003</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0930-2794:2009:Van Der Meijden O:the:value:of</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">004090</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">004832</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">004832</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review</title><author><name sortKey="Van Der Meijden, O A J" sort="Van Der Meijden, O A J" uniqKey="Van Der Meijden O" first="O. A. J." last="Van Der Meijden">O. A. J. Van Der Meijden</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500</s1><s2>3508 GA Utrecht</s2><s3>NLD</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Pays-Bas</country><wicri:noRegion>3508 GA Utrecht</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schijven, M P" sort="Schijven, M P" uniqKey="Schijven M" first="M. P." last="Schijven">M. P. Schijven</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500</s1><s2>3508 GA Utrecht</s2><s3>NLD</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Pays-Bas</country><wicri:noRegion>3508 GA Utrecht</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j" type="main">Surgical endoscopy</title><title level="j" type="abbreviated">Surg. endosc.</title><idno type="ISSN">0930-2794</idno><imprint><date when="2009">2009</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Surgical endoscopy</title><title level="j" type="abbreviated">Surg. endosc.</title><idno type="ISSN">0930-2794</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Bibliographic review</term><term>Clinical Competence</term><term>Education, Medical, Continuing (methods)</term><term>Endoscopic surgery</term><term>Humans</term><term>Medicine</term><term>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures (education)</term><term>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures (methods)</term><term>Non invasive method</term><term>Psychomotor Performance</term><term>Robotics (methods)</term><term>Treatment</term><term>User-Computer Interface</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="education" xml:lang="en"><term>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Education, Medical, Continuing</term><term>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures</term><term>Robotics</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Clinical Competence</term><term>Humans</term><term>Psychomotor Performance</term><term>User-Computer Interface</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Méthode non invasive</term><term>Revue bibliographique</term><term>Médecine</term><term>Chirurgie endoscopique</term><term>Traitement</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Médecine</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Background Virtual reality (VR) as surgical training tool has become a state-of-the-art technique in training and teaching skills for minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Although intuitively appealing, the true benefits of haptic (VR training) platforms are unknown. Many questions about haptic feedback in the different areas of surgical skills (training) need to be answered before adding costly haptic feedback in VR simulation for MIS training. This study was designed to review the current status and value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted MIS and training by using virtual reality simulation. Methods A systematic review of the literature was undertaken using PubMed and MEDLINE. The following search terms were used: Haptic feedback OR Haptics OR Force feedback AND/OR Minimal Invasive Surgery AND/ OR Minimal Access Surgery AND/OR Robotics AND/OR Robotic Surgery AND/OR Endoscopic Surgery AND/OR Virtual Reality AND/OR Simulation OR Surgical Training/ Education. Results The results were assessed according to level of evidence as reflected by the Oxford Centre of Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence. Conclusions In the current literature, no firm consensus exists on the importance of haptic feedback in performing minimally invasive surgery. Although the majority of the results show positive assessment of the benefits of force feedback, results are ambivalent and not unanimous on the subject. Benefits are least disputed when related to surgery using robotics, because there is no haptic feedback in currently used robotics. The addition of haptics is believed to reduce surgical errors resulting from a lack of it, especially in knot tying. Little research has been performed in the area of robot-assisted endoscopic surgical training, but results seem promising. Concerning VR training, results indicate that haptic feedback is important during the early phase of psychomotor skill acquisition.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>Pays-Bas</li></country></list><tree><country name="Pays-Bas"><noRegion><name sortKey="Van Der Meijden, O A J" sort="Van Der Meijden, O A J" uniqKey="Van Der Meijden O" first="O. A. J." last="Van Der Meijden">O. A. J. Van Der Meijden</name></noRegion><name sortKey="Schijven, M P" sort="Schijven, M P" uniqKey="Schijven M" first="M. P." last="Schijven">M. P. Schijven</name></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004832 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 004832 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= Pascal:09-0293492
|texte= The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |