HapticV1, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 000770

The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review

Identifieur interne : 000770 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000769; suivant : 000771

The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review

Auteurs : O. A. J. Van Der Meijden ; M. P. Schijven

Source :

Surgical endoscopy [ 0930-2794 ] ; 2009.

RBID : Pascal:09-0293492

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Méthode non invasive, Revue bibliographique, Médecine, Chirurgie endoscopique, Traitement.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Bibliographic review, Endoscopic surgery, Medicine, Non invasive method, Treatment.

Abstract

Background Virtual reality (VR) as surgical training tool has become a state-of-the-art technique in training and teaching skills for minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Although intuitively appealing, the true benefits of haptic (VR training) platforms are unknown. Many questions about haptic feedback in the different areas of surgical skills (training) need to be answered before adding costly haptic feedback in VR simulation for MIS training. This study was designed to review the current status and value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted MIS and training by using virtual reality simulation. Methods A systematic review of the literature was undertaken using PubMed and MEDLINE. The following search terms were used: Haptic feedback OR Haptics OR Force feedback AND/OR Minimal Invasive Surgery AND/ OR Minimal Access Surgery AND/OR Robotics AND/OR Robotic Surgery AND/OR Endoscopic Surgery AND/OR Virtual Reality AND/OR Simulation OR Surgical Training/ Education. Results The results were assessed according to level of evidence as reflected by the Oxford Centre of Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence. Conclusions In the current literature, no firm consensus exists on the importance of haptic feedback in performing minimally invasive surgery. Although the majority of the results show positive assessment of the benefits of force feedback, results are ambivalent and not unanimous on the subject. Benefits are least disputed when related to surgery using robotics, because there is no haptic feedback in currently used robotics. The addition of haptics is believed to reduce surgical errors resulting from a lack of it, especially in knot tying. Little research has been performed in the area of robot-assisted endoscopic surgical training, but results seem promising. Concerning VR training, results indicate that haptic feedback is important during the early phase of psychomotor skill acquisition.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0930-2794`
A02	`01`			`@0 SUREEX`
A03		`1`		`@0 Surg. endosc.`
A05				`@2 23`
A06				`@2 6`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 VAN DER MEIJDEN (O. A. J.)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 SCHIJVEN (M. P.)`
A14	`01`			`@1 Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500 @2 3508 GA Utrecht @3 NLD @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut.`
A20				`@1 1180-1190`
A21				`@1 2009`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 21220 @5 354000187095510010`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2009 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 65 ref.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 09-0293492`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Surgical endoscopy`
A66	`01`			`@0 USA`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 Background Virtual reality (VR) as surgical training tool has become a state-of-the-art technique in training and teaching skills for minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Although intuitively appealing, the true benefits of haptic (VR training) platforms are unknown. Many questions about haptic feedback in the different areas of surgical skills (training) need to be answered before adding costly haptic feedback in VR simulation for MIS training. This study was designed to review the current status and value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted MIS and training by using virtual reality simulation. Methods A systematic review of the literature was undertaken using PubMed and MEDLINE. The following search terms were used: Haptic feedback OR Haptics OR Force feedback AND/OR Minimal Invasive Surgery AND/ OR Minimal Access Surgery AND/OR Robotics AND/OR Robotic Surgery AND/OR Endoscopic Surgery AND/OR Virtual Reality AND/OR Simulation OR Surgical Training/ Education. Results The results were assessed according to level of evidence as reflected by the Oxford Centre of Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence. Conclusions In the current literature, no firm consensus exists on the importance of haptic feedback in performing minimally invasive surgery. Although the majority of the results show positive assessment of the benefits of force feedback, results are ambivalent and not unanimous on the subject. Benefits are least disputed when related to surgery using robotics, because there is no haptic feedback in currently used robotics. The addition of haptics is believed to reduce surgical errors resulting from a lack of it, especially in knot tying. Little research has been performed in the area of robot-assisted endoscopic surgical training, but results seem promising. Concerning VR training, results indicate that haptic feedback is important during the early phase of psychomotor skill acquisition.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 002B01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Méthode non invasive @5 04`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Non invasive method @5 04`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Método no invasivo @5 04`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Revue bibliographique @5 07`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Bibliographic review @5 07`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Revista bibliográfica @5 07`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Médecine @5 08`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Medicine @5 08`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Medicina @5 08`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Chirurgie endoscopique @5 30`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Endoscopic surgery @5 30`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cirugía endoscópica @5 30`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Traitement @5 31`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Treatment @5 31`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Tratamiento @5 31`
N21				`@1 215`
N44	`01`			`@1 OTO`
N82				`@1 OTO`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	PASCAL 09-0293492 INIST
ET :	The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review
AU :	VAN DER MEIJDEN (O. A. J.); SCHIJVEN (M. P.)
AF :	Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500/3508 GA Utrecht/Pays-Bas (1 aut., 2 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO :	Surgical endoscopy; ISSN 0930-2794; Coden SUREEX; Etats-Unis; Da. 2009; Vol. 23; No. 6; Pp. 1180-1190; Bibl. 65 ref.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	Background Virtual reality (VR) as surgical training tool has become a state-of-the-art technique in training and teaching skills for minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Although intuitively appealing, the true benefits of haptic (VR training) platforms are unknown. Many questions about haptic feedback in the different areas of surgical skills (training) need to be answered before adding costly haptic feedback in VR simulation for MIS training. This study was designed to review the current status and value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted MIS and training by using virtual reality simulation. Methods A systematic review of the literature was undertaken using PubMed and MEDLINE. The following search terms were used: Haptic feedback OR Haptics OR Force feedback AND/OR Minimal Invasive Surgery AND/ OR Minimal Access Surgery AND/OR Robotics AND/OR Robotic Surgery AND/OR Endoscopic Surgery AND/OR Virtual Reality AND/OR Simulation OR Surgical Training/ Education. Results The results were assessed according to level of evidence as reflected by the Oxford Centre of Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence. Conclusions In the current literature, no firm consensus exists on the importance of haptic feedback in performing minimally invasive surgery. Although the majority of the results show positive assessment of the benefits of force feedback, results are ambivalent and not unanimous on the subject. Benefits are least disputed when related to surgery using robotics, because there is no haptic feedback in currently used robotics. The addition of haptics is believed to reduce surgical errors resulting from a lack of it, especially in knot tying. Little research has been performed in the area of robot-assisted endoscopic surgical training, but results seem promising. Concerning VR training, results indicate that haptic feedback is important during the early phase of psychomotor skill acquisition.
CC :	002B01
FD :	Méthode non invasive; Revue bibliographique; Médecine; Chirurgie endoscopique; Traitement
ED :	Non invasive method; Bibliographic review; Medicine; Endoscopic surgery; Treatment
SD :	Método no invasivo; Revista bibliográfica; Medicina; Cirugía endoscópica; Tratamiento
LO :	INIST-21220.354000187095510010
ID :	09-0293492

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:09-0293492

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review</title>
<author><name sortKey="Van Der Meijden, O A J" sort="Van Der Meijden, O A J" uniqKey="Van Der Meijden O" first="O. A. J." last="Van Der Meijden">O. A. J. Van Der Meijden</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500</s1>
<s2>3508 GA Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Schijven, M P" sort="Schijven, M P" uniqKey="Schijven M" first="M. P." last="Schijven">M. P. Schijven</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500</s1>
<s2>3508 GA Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">09-0293492</idno>
<date when="2009">2009</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 09-0293492 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:09-0293492</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000770</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review</title>
<author><name sortKey="Van Der Meijden, O A J" sort="Van Der Meijden, O A J" uniqKey="Van Der Meijden O" first="O. A. J." last="Van Der Meijden">O. A. J. Van Der Meijden</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500</s1>
<s2>3508 GA Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Schijven, M P" sort="Schijven, M P" uniqKey="Schijven M" first="M. P." last="Schijven">M. P. Schijven</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500</s1>
<s2>3508 GA Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Surgical endoscopy</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Surg. endosc.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0930-2794</idno>
<imprint><date when="2009">2009</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Surgical endoscopy</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Surg. endosc.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0930-2794</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Bibliographic review</term>
<term>Endoscopic surgery</term>
<term>Medicine</term>
<term>Non invasive method</term>
<term>Treatment</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Méthode non invasive</term>
<term>Revue bibliographique</term>
<term>Médecine</term>
<term>Chirurgie endoscopique</term>
<term>Traitement</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Background Virtual reality (VR) as surgical training tool has become a state-of-the-art technique in training and teaching skills for minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Although intuitively appealing, the true benefits of haptic (VR training) platforms are unknown. Many questions about haptic feedback in the different areas of surgical skills (training) need to be answered before adding costly haptic feedback in VR simulation for MIS training. This study was designed to review the current status and value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted MIS and training by using virtual reality simulation. Methods A systematic review of the literature was undertaken using PubMed and MEDLINE. The following search terms were used: Haptic feedback OR Haptics OR Force feedback AND/OR Minimal Invasive Surgery AND/ OR Minimal Access Surgery AND/OR Robotics AND/OR Robotic Surgery AND/OR Endoscopic Surgery AND/OR Virtual Reality AND/OR Simulation OR Surgical Training/ Education. Results The results were assessed according to level of evidence as reflected by the Oxford Centre of Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence. Conclusions In the current literature, no firm consensus exists on the importance of haptic feedback in performing minimally invasive surgery. Although the majority of the results show positive assessment of the benefits of force feedback, results are ambivalent and not unanimous on the subject. Benefits are least disputed when related to surgery using robotics, because there is no haptic feedback in currently used robotics. The addition of haptics is believed to reduce surgical errors resulting from a lack of it, especially in knot tying. Little research has been performed in the area of robot-assisted endoscopic surgical training, but results seem promising. Concerning VR training, results indicate that haptic feedback is important during the early phase of psychomotor skill acquisition.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0930-2794</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>SUREEX</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Surg. endosc.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>23</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>6</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>VAN DER MEIJDEN (O. A. J.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>SCHIJVEN (M. P.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500</s1>
<s2>3508 GA Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>1180-1190</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2009</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>21220</s2>
<s5>354000187095510010</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2009 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>65 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>09-0293492</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Surgical endoscopy</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Background Virtual reality (VR) as surgical training tool has become a state-of-the-art technique in training and teaching skills for minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Although intuitively appealing, the true benefits of haptic (VR training) platforms are unknown. Many questions about haptic feedback in the different areas of surgical skills (training) need to be answered before adding costly haptic feedback in VR simulation for MIS training. This study was designed to review the current status and value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted MIS and training by using virtual reality simulation. Methods A systematic review of the literature was undertaken using PubMed and MEDLINE. The following search terms were used: Haptic feedback OR Haptics OR Force feedback AND/OR Minimal Invasive Surgery AND/ OR Minimal Access Surgery AND/OR Robotics AND/OR Robotic Surgery AND/OR Endoscopic Surgery AND/OR Virtual Reality AND/OR Simulation OR Surgical Training/ Education. Results The results were assessed according to level of evidence as reflected by the Oxford Centre of Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence. Conclusions In the current literature, no firm consensus exists on the importance of haptic feedback in performing minimally invasive surgery. Although the majority of the results show positive assessment of the benefits of force feedback, results are ambivalent and not unanimous on the subject. Benefits are least disputed when related to surgery using robotics, because there is no haptic feedback in currently used robotics. The addition of haptics is believed to reduce surgical errors resulting from a lack of it, especially in knot tying. Little research has been performed in the area of robot-assisted endoscopic surgical training, but results seem promising. Concerning VR training, results indicate that haptic feedback is important during the early phase of psychomotor skill acquisition.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B01</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Méthode non invasive</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Non invasive method</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Método no invasivo</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Revue bibliographique</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Bibliographic review</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Revista bibliográfica</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Médecine</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Medicine</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Medicina</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Chirurgie endoscopique</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Endoscopic surgery</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cirugía endoscópica</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Traitement</s0>
<s5>31</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Treatment</s0>
<s5>31</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Tratamiento</s0>
<s5>31</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21><s1>215</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 09-0293492 INIST</NO>
<ET>The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review</ET>
<AU>VAN DER MEIJDEN (O. A. J.); SCHIJVEN (M. P.)</AU>
<AF>Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500/3508 GA Utrecht/Pays-Bas (1 aut., 2 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Surgical endoscopy; ISSN 0930-2794; Coden SUREEX; Etats-Unis; Da. 2009; Vol. 23; No. 6; Pp. 1180-1190; Bibl. 65 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Background Virtual reality (VR) as surgical training tool has become a state-of-the-art technique in training and teaching skills for minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Although intuitively appealing, the true benefits of haptic (VR training) platforms are unknown. Many questions about haptic feedback in the different areas of surgical skills (training) need to be answered before adding costly haptic feedback in VR simulation for MIS training. This study was designed to review the current status and value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted MIS and training by using virtual reality simulation. Methods A systematic review of the literature was undertaken using PubMed and MEDLINE. The following search terms were used: Haptic feedback OR Haptics OR Force feedback AND/OR Minimal Invasive Surgery AND/ OR Minimal Access Surgery AND/OR Robotics AND/OR Robotic Surgery AND/OR Endoscopic Surgery AND/OR Virtual Reality AND/OR Simulation OR Surgical Training/ Education. Results The results were assessed according to level of evidence as reflected by the Oxford Centre of Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence. Conclusions In the current literature, no firm consensus exists on the importance of haptic feedback in performing minimally invasive surgery. Although the majority of the results show positive assessment of the benefits of force feedback, results are ambivalent and not unanimous on the subject. Benefits are least disputed when related to surgery using robotics, because there is no haptic feedback in currently used robotics. The addition of haptics is believed to reduce surgical errors resulting from a lack of it, especially in knot tying. Little research has been performed in the area of robot-assisted endoscopic surgical training, but results seem promising. Concerning VR training, results indicate that haptic feedback is important during the early phase of psychomotor skill acquisition.</EA>
<CC>002B01</CC>
<FD>Méthode non invasive; Revue bibliographique; Médecine; Chirurgie endoscopique; Traitement</FD>
<ED>Non invasive method; Bibliographic review; Medicine; Endoscopic surgery; Treatment</ED>
<SD>Método no invasivo; Revista bibliográfica; Medicina; Cirugía endoscópica; Tratamiento</SD>
<LO>INIST-21220.354000187095510010</LO>
<ID>09-0293492</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000770 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000770 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:09-0293492
   |texte=   The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024

	Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review

The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri