The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review.
Identifieur interne : 001351 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 001350; suivant : 001352The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review.
Auteurs : O A J. Van Der Meijden [Pays-Bas] ; M P SchijvenSource :
- Surgical endoscopy [ 1432-2218 ] ; 2009.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
Abstract
Virtual reality (VR) as surgical training tool has become a state-of-the-art technique in training and teaching skills for minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Although intuitively appealing, the true benefits of haptic (VR training) platforms are unknown. Many questions about haptic feedback in the different areas of surgical skills (training) need to be answered before adding costly haptic feedback in VR simulation for MIS training. This study was designed to review the current status and value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted MIS and training by using virtual reality simulation.
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-0298-x
PubMed: 19118414
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :001351
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:19118414Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Van Der Meijden, O A J" sort="Van Der Meijden, O A J" uniqKey="Van Der Meijden O" first="O A J" last="Van Der Meijden">O A J. Van Der Meijden</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands. oliviervandermeijden@hotmail.com</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Schijven, M P" sort="Schijven, M P" uniqKey="Schijven M" first="M P" last="Schijven">M P Schijven</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2009">2009</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1007/s00464-008-0298-x</idno>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:19118414</idno>
<idno type="pmid">19118414</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001351</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">001351</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Van Der Meijden, O A J" sort="Van Der Meijden, O A J" uniqKey="Van Der Meijden O" first="O A J" last="Van Der Meijden">O A J. Van Der Meijden</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands. oliviervandermeijden@hotmail.com</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Schijven, M P" sort="Schijven, M P" uniqKey="Schijven M" first="M P" last="Schijven">M P Schijven</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Surgical endoscopy</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1432-2218</idno>
<imprint><date when="2009" type="published">2009</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Clinical Competence</term>
<term>Education, Medical, Continuing (methods)</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures (education)</term>
<term>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures (methods)</term>
<term>Psychomotor Performance</term>
<term>Robotics (methods)</term>
<term>User-Computer Interface</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="education" xml:lang="en"><term>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Education, Medical, Continuing</term>
<term>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures</term>
<term>Robotics</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Clinical Competence</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Psychomotor Performance</term>
<term>User-Computer Interface</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Virtual reality (VR) as surgical training tool has become a state-of-the-art technique in training and teaching skills for minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Although intuitively appealing, the true benefits of haptic (VR training) platforms are unknown. Many questions about haptic feedback in the different areas of surgical skills (training) need to be answered before adding costly haptic feedback in VR simulation for MIS training. This study was designed to review the current status and value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted MIS and training by using virtual reality simulation.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">19118414</PMID>
<DateCreated><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>05</Month>
<Day>27</Day>
</DateCreated>
<DateCompleted><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>08</Month>
<Day>18</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2014</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>20</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1432-2218</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>23</Volume>
<Issue>6</Issue>
<PubDate><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>Jun</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Surgical endoscopy</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Surg Endosc</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>1180-90</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1007/s00464-008-0298-x</ELocationID>
<Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">Virtual reality (VR) as surgical training tool has become a state-of-the-art technique in training and teaching skills for minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Although intuitively appealing, the true benefits of haptic (VR training) platforms are unknown. Many questions about haptic feedback in the different areas of surgical skills (training) need to be answered before adding costly haptic feedback in VR simulation for MIS training. This study was designed to review the current status and value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted MIS and training by using virtual reality simulation.</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">A systematic review of the literature was undertaken using PubMed and MEDLINE. The following search terms were used: Haptic feedback OR Haptics OR Force feedback AND/OR Minimal Invasive Surgery AND/OR Minimal Access Surgery AND/OR Robotics AND/OR Robotic Surgery AND/OR Endoscopic Surgery AND/OR Virtual Reality AND/OR Simulation OR Surgical Training/Education.</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">The results were assessed according to level of evidence as reflected by the Oxford Centre of Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence.</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">In the current literature, no firm consensus exists on the importance of haptic feedback in performing minimally invasive surgery. Although the majority of the results show positive assessment of the benefits of force feedback, results are ambivalent and not unanimous on the subject. Benefits are least disputed when related to surgery using robotics, because there is no haptic feedback in currently used robotics. The addition of haptics is believed to reduce surgical errors resulting from a lack of it, especially in knot tying. Little research has been performed in the area of robot-assisted endoscopic surgical training, but results seem promising. Concerning VR training, results indicate that haptic feedback is important during the early phase of psychomotor skill acquisition.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>van der Meijden</LastName>
<ForeName>O A J</ForeName>
<Initials>OA</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands. oliviervandermeijden@hotmail.com</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Schijven</LastName>
<ForeName>M P</ForeName>
<Initials>MP</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D016454">Review</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>01</Month>
<Day>01</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Germany</Country>
<MedlineTA>Surg Endosc</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>8806653</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0930-2794</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Surg Endosc. 2001 Nov;15(11):1282-8</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11727134</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Am J Surg. 2007 Apr;193(4):519-22</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17368303</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002 Jul;84(4):223-6</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12215022</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Surg Endosc. 2002 Sep;16(9):1329-31</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11988799</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Ann Surg. 2002 Oct;236(4):458-63; discussion 463-4</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12368674</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Dis Colon Rectum. 2003 Dec;46(12):1633-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">14668588</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Ann Surg. 2004 Jan;239(1):14-21</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">14685095</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Br J Surg. 2004 Feb;91(2):146-50</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">14760660</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Surg Endosc. 2004 Jun;18(6):980-5</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15108104</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2004 Jun;14(3):191-5</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15245675</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>IEEE Comput Graph Appl. 2004 Mar-Apr;24(2):56-64</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15387229</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Stud Health Technol Inform. 2002;85:304-10</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15458106</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Surg Endosc. 1993 May-Jun;7(3):203-5</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">8503081</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1997 Nov;79(6):403-4</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">9422863</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 1998 May-Jun;17(3):45-8</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">9604700</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Am J Surg. 1999 Jan;177(1):28-32</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">10037304</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Stud Health Technol Inform. 1999;62:62-6</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">10538400</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Surg Endosc. 1999 Sep;13(9):869-73</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">10449841</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Am Coll Surg. 1999 Oct;189(4):349-55</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">10509459</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1999 Oct;46(10):1212-21</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">10513126</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Ann Chir. 1999;53(7):587-97</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">10520498</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Ann Surg. 2005 Jan;241(1):102-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15621997</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Surg Endosc. 2005 Jan;19(1):95-100</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15772876</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Surg Endosc. 2005 Sep;19(9):1220-6</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16132332</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Endourol. 2005 Dec;19(10):1212-5</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16359218</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Am J Surg. 2006 Jan;191(1):128-33</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16399123</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Br J Surg. 2006 May;93(5):553-8</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16552744</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>World J Surg. 2006 May;30(5):721-31</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16547619</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>World J Gastroenterol. 2006 May 28;12(20):3219-24</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16718842</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2006 Jun;391(3):216-21</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16733761</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>World J Surg. 2006 Jun;30(6):1050-4</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16736336</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Ann Surg. 2006 Aug;244(2):310-4</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16858196</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Pediatr Surg. 2006 Aug;41(8):1392-6</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16863843</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Surg Endosc. 2006 Oct;20(10):1565-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16902750</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Surg Endosc. 2006 Sep;20(9):1383-8</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16823652</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Surg Endosc. 2006 Sep;20(9):1368-75</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16858535</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(4):CD004788</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17054215</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(4):CD006231</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17054285</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>BJOG. 2006 Dec;113(12):1382-7</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17081183</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Surg Endosc. 2007 Mar;21(3):357-66</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17180270</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Surg Endosc. 2007 Apr;21(4):665-8</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17285374</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007 Mar-Apr;14(2):145-52</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17368247</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;125:127-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17377249</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;125:217-22</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17377270</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>World J Surg. 2007 Apr;31(4):764-72</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17361356</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Endourol. 2007 Mar;21(3):285-7</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17444773</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Med Robot. 2004 Jun;1(1):36-42</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17520595</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Med Robot. 2005 Jan;1(2):53-63</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17518379</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>JSLS. 2007 Jan-Mar;11(1):76-80</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17651561</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Surg Endosc. 2007 Aug;21(8):1338-43</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17165115</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Sep;50(9):1324-31</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17665258</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007 Oct;17(5):402-6</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">18049401</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2008;17(1):3-16</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">18270873</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Surg Endosc. 2008 Oct;22(10):2140-8</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">18443868</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>ANZ J Surg. 2002 Jan;72(1):30-4</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11906421</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
</CommentsCorrectionsList>
<MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D002983">Clinical Competence</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D004502">Education, Medical, Continuing</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000379">methods</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D019060">Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000193">education</QualifierName>
<QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000379">methods</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011597">Psychomotor Performance</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D012371">Robotics</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000379">methods</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D014584">User-Computer Interface</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
<NumberOfReferences>65</NumberOfReferences>
<OtherID Source="NLM">PMC2686803</OtherID>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2008</Year>
<Month>8</Month>
<Day>23</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2008</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>4</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2008</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>16</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="aheadofprint"><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>1</Month>
<Day>1</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>1</Month>
<Day>2</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>1</Month>
<Day>2</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>8</Month>
<Day>19</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s00464-008-0298-x</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19118414</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC2686803</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001351 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 001351 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Ticri/CIDE |area= HapticV1 |flux= PubMed |étape= Curation |type= RBID |clé= pubmed:19118414 |texte= The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review. }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:19118414" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |