HapticV1, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 001358

Visual-auditory events: Cross-modal perceptual priming and recognition memory

Identifieur interne : 001358 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 001357; suivant : 001359

Visual-auditory events: Cross-modal perceptual priming and recognition memory

Auteurs : Anthony J. Greene ; Randolph D. Easton ; Lisa S. R. Lashell

Source :

Consciousness and cognition [ 1053-8100 ] ; 2001.

RBID : Pascal:01-0432213

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Etude expérimentale, Effet amorçage, Modalité stimulus, Vision, Audition, Perception intermodale, Mémoire, Reconnaissance mnémonique, Perception, Cognition, Homme.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Cognition, Experimental study, Hearing, Human, Intermodal perception, Memory, Perception, Priming effect, Recognition memory, Stimulus modality, Vision.

Abstract

Modality specificity in priming is taken as evidence for independent perceptual systems. However, Easton, Greene, and Srinivas (1997) showed that visual and haptic cross-modal priming is comparable in magnitude to within-modal priming. Where appropriate, perceptual systems might share like information. To test this, we assessed priming and recognition for visual and auditory events, within- and across- modalities. On the visual test, auditory study resulted in no priming. On the auditory priming test, visual study resulted in priming that was only marginally less than within-modal priming. The priming results show that visual study facilitates identification on both visual and auditory tests, hut auditory study only facilitates performance on the auditory test. For both recognition tests, within-modal recognition exceeded cross-modal recognition. The results have two novel implications for the understanding of perceptual priming: First, we introduce visual and auditory priming for spatio-temporal events as a new priming paradigm chosen for its ecological validity and potential for information exchange. Second, we propose that the asymmetry of the cross-modal priming observed here may reflect the capacity of these perceptual modalities to provide cross-modal constraints on ambiguity. We argue that visual perception might inform and constrain auditory processing, while auditory perception corresponds to too many potential visual events to usefully inform and constrain visual perception.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 1053-8100`
A03		`1`		`@0 Conscious. cogn.`
A05				`@2 10`
A06				`@2 3`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Visual-auditory events: Cross-modal perceptual priming and recognition memory`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 GREENE (Anthony J.)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 EASTON (Randolph D.)`
A11	`03`	`1`		`@1 LASHELL (Lisa S. R.)`
A14	`01`			`@1 Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, HSC Box 420 @2 Charlottesville, Virginia 22908 @3 USA @Z 1 aut.`
A14	`02`			`@1 Department of Psychology, Boston College @2 Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts 02167 @3 USA @Z 2 aut.`
A20				`@1 425-435`
A21				`@1 2001`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 22612 @5 354000099504040070`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2001 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 2 p.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 01-0432213`
A60				`@1 P @3 CC`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Consciousness and cognition`
A66	`01`			`@0 USA`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 Modality specificity in priming is taken as evidence for independent perceptual systems. However, Easton, Greene, and Srinivas (1997) showed that visual and haptic cross-modal priming is comparable in magnitude to within-modal priming. Where appropriate, perceptual systems might share like information. To test this, we assessed priming and recognition for visual and auditory events, within- and across- modalities. On the visual test, auditory study resulted in no priming. On the auditory priming test, visual study resulted in priming that was only marginally less than within-modal priming. The priming results show that visual study facilitates identification on both visual and auditory tests, hut auditory study only facilitates performance on the auditory test. For both recognition tests, within-modal recognition exceeded cross-modal recognition. The results have two novel implications for the understanding of perceptual priming: First, we introduce visual and auditory priming for spatio-temporal events as a new priming paradigm chosen for its ecological validity and potential for information exchange. Second, we propose that the asymmetry of the cross-modal priming observed here may reflect the capacity of these perceptual modalities to provide cross-modal constraints on ambiguity. We argue that visual perception might inform and constrain auditory processing, while auditory perception corresponds to too many potential visual events to usefully inform and constrain visual perception.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 002A26F05A`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Etude expérimentale @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Experimental study @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estudio experimental @5 01`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Effet amorçage @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Priming effect @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Efecto priming @5 02`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Modalité stimulus @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Stimulus modality @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Modalidad estímulo @5 03`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Vision @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Vision @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Visión @5 04`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Audition @5 05`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Hearing @5 05`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Audición @5 05`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Perception intermodale @5 06`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Intermodal perception @5 06`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Percepción intermodal @5 06`
C03	`07`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Mémoire @5 07`
C03	`07`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Memory @5 07`
C03	`07`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Memoria @5 07`
C03	`08`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Reconnaissance mnémonique @5 10`
C03	`08`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Recognition memory @5 10`
C03	`08`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Reconocimiento mnemónico @5 10`
C03	`09`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Perception @5 17`
C03	`09`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Perception @5 17`
C03	`09`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Percepción @5 17`
C03	`10`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Cognition @5 18`
C03	`10`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Cognition @5 18`
C03	`10`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cognición @5 18`
C03	`11`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Homme @5 19`
C03	`11`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Human @5 19`
C03	`11`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Hombre @5 19`
N21				`@1 302`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	PASCAL 01-0432213 INIST
ET :	Visual-auditory events: Cross-modal perceptual priming and recognition memory
AU :	GREENE (Anthony J.); EASTON (Randolph D.); LASHELL (Lisa S. R.)
AF :	Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, HSC Box 420/Charlottesville, Virginia 22908/Etats-Unis (1 aut.); Department of Psychology, Boston College/Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts 02167/Etats-Unis (2 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Courte communication, note brève; Niveau analytique
SO :	Consciousness and cognition; ISSN 1053-8100; Etats-Unis; Da. 2001; Vol. 10; No. 3; Pp. 425-435; Bibl. 2 p.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	Modality specificity in priming is taken as evidence for independent perceptual systems. However, Easton, Greene, and Srinivas (1997) showed that visual and haptic cross-modal priming is comparable in magnitude to within-modal priming. Where appropriate, perceptual systems might share like information. To test this, we assessed priming and recognition for visual and auditory events, within- and across- modalities. On the visual test, auditory study resulted in no priming. On the auditory priming test, visual study resulted in priming that was only marginally less than within-modal priming. The priming results show that visual study facilitates identification on both visual and auditory tests, hut auditory study only facilitates performance on the auditory test. For both recognition tests, within-modal recognition exceeded cross-modal recognition. The results have two novel implications for the understanding of perceptual priming: First, we introduce visual and auditory priming for spatio-temporal events as a new priming paradigm chosen for its ecological validity and potential for information exchange. Second, we propose that the asymmetry of the cross-modal priming observed here may reflect the capacity of these perceptual modalities to provide cross-modal constraints on ambiguity. We argue that visual perception might inform and constrain auditory processing, while auditory perception corresponds to too many potential visual events to usefully inform and constrain visual perception.
CC :	002A26F05A
FD :	Etude expérimentale; Effet amorçage; Modalité stimulus; Vision; Audition; Perception intermodale; Mémoire; Reconnaissance mnémonique; Perception; Cognition; Homme
ED :	Experimental study; Priming effect; Stimulus modality; Vision; Hearing; Intermodal perception; Memory; Recognition memory; Perception; Cognition; Human
SD :	Estudio experimental; Efecto priming; Modalidad estímulo; Visión; Audición; Percepción intermodal; Memoria; Reconocimiento mnemónico; Percepción; Cognición; Hombre
LO :	INIST-22612.354000099504040070
ID :	01-0432213

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:01-0432213

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Visual-auditory events: Cross-modal perceptual priming and recognition memory</title>
<author><name sortKey="Greene, Anthony J" sort="Greene, Anthony J" uniqKey="Greene A" first="Anthony J." last="Greene">Anthony J. Greene</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, HSC Box 420</s1>
<s2>Charlottesville, Virginia 22908</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Easton, Randolph D" sort="Easton, Randolph D" uniqKey="Easton R" first="Randolph D." last="Easton">Randolph D. Easton</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Psychology, Boston College</s1>
<s2>Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts 02167</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Lashell, Lisa S R" sort="Lashell, Lisa S R" uniqKey="Lashell L" first="Lisa S. R." last="Lashell">Lisa S. R. Lashell</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">01-0432213</idno>
<date when="2001">2001</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 01-0432213 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:01-0432213</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">001358</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Visual-auditory events: Cross-modal perceptual priming and recognition memory</title>
<author><name sortKey="Greene, Anthony J" sort="Greene, Anthony J" uniqKey="Greene A" first="Anthony J." last="Greene">Anthony J. Greene</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, HSC Box 420</s1>
<s2>Charlottesville, Virginia 22908</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Easton, Randolph D" sort="Easton, Randolph D" uniqKey="Easton R" first="Randolph D." last="Easton">Randolph D. Easton</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Psychology, Boston College</s1>
<s2>Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts 02167</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Lashell, Lisa S R" sort="Lashell, Lisa S R" uniqKey="Lashell L" first="Lisa S. R." last="Lashell">Lisa S. R. Lashell</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Consciousness and cognition</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Conscious. cogn.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1053-8100</idno>
<imprint><date when="2001">2001</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Consciousness and cognition</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Conscious. cogn.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1053-8100</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Cognition</term>
<term>Experimental study</term>
<term>Hearing</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Intermodal perception</term>
<term>Memory</term>
<term>Perception</term>
<term>Priming effect</term>
<term>Recognition memory</term>
<term>Stimulus modality</term>
<term>Vision</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Etude expérimentale</term>
<term>Effet amorçage</term>
<term>Modalité stimulus</term>
<term>Vision</term>
<term>Audition</term>
<term>Perception intermodale</term>
<term>Mémoire</term>
<term>Reconnaissance mnémonique</term>
<term>Perception</term>
<term>Cognition</term>
<term>Homme</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Modality specificity in priming is taken as evidence for independent perceptual systems. However, Easton, Greene, and Srinivas (1997) showed that visual and haptic cross-modal priming is comparable in magnitude to within-modal priming. Where appropriate, perceptual systems might share like information. To test this, we assessed priming and recognition for visual and auditory events, within- and across- modalities. On the visual test, auditory study resulted in no priming. On the auditory priming test, visual study resulted in priming that was only marginally less than within-modal priming. The priming results show that visual study facilitates identification on both visual and auditory tests, hut auditory study only facilitates performance on the auditory test. For both recognition tests, within-modal recognition exceeded cross-modal recognition. The results have two novel implications for the understanding of perceptual priming: First, we introduce visual and auditory priming for spatio-temporal events as a new priming paradigm chosen for its ecological validity and potential for information exchange. Second, we propose that the asymmetry of the cross-modal priming observed here may reflect the capacity of these perceptual modalities to provide cross-modal constraints on ambiguity. We argue that visual perception might inform and constrain auditory processing, while auditory perception corresponds to too many potential visual events to usefully inform and constrain visual perception.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>1053-8100</s0>
</fA01>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Conscious. cogn.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>10</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>3</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Visual-auditory events: Cross-modal perceptual priming and recognition memory</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>GREENE (Anthony J.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>EASTON (Randolph D.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>LASHELL (Lisa S. R.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, HSC Box 420</s1>
<s2>Charlottesville, Virginia 22908</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Psychology, Boston College</s1>
<s2>Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts 02167</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>425-435</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2001</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>22612</s2>
<s5>354000099504040070</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2001 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>2 p.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>01-0432213</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
<s3>CC</s3>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Consciousness and cognition</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Modality specificity in priming is taken as evidence for independent perceptual systems. However, Easton, Greene, and Srinivas (1997) showed that visual and haptic cross-modal priming is comparable in magnitude to within-modal priming. Where appropriate, perceptual systems might share like information. To test this, we assessed priming and recognition for visual and auditory events, within- and across- modalities. On the visual test, auditory study resulted in no priming. On the auditory priming test, visual study resulted in priming that was only marginally less than within-modal priming. The priming results show that visual study facilitates identification on both visual and auditory tests, hut auditory study only facilitates performance on the auditory test. For both recognition tests, within-modal recognition exceeded cross-modal recognition. The results have two novel implications for the understanding of perceptual priming: First, we introduce visual and auditory priming for spatio-temporal events as a new priming paradigm chosen for its ecological validity and potential for information exchange. Second, we propose that the asymmetry of the cross-modal priming observed here may reflect the capacity of these perceptual modalities to provide cross-modal constraints on ambiguity. We argue that visual perception might inform and constrain auditory processing, while auditory perception corresponds to too many potential visual events to usefully inform and constrain visual perception.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002A26F05A</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etude expérimentale</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Experimental study</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudio experimental</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Effet amorçage</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Priming effect</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Efecto priming</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Modalité stimulus</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Stimulus modality</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Modalidad estímulo</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Vision</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Vision</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Visión</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Audition</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Hearing</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Audición</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Perception intermodale</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Intermodal perception</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Percepción intermodal</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Mémoire</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Memory</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Memoria</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Reconnaissance mnémonique</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Recognition memory</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Reconocimiento mnemónico</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Perception</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Perception</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Percepción</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cognición</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21><s1>302</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 01-0432213 INIST</NO>
<ET>Visual-auditory events: Cross-modal perceptual priming and recognition memory</ET>
<AU>GREENE (Anthony J.); EASTON (Randolph D.); LASHELL (Lisa S. R.)</AU>
<AF>Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, HSC Box 420/Charlottesville, Virginia 22908/Etats-Unis (1 aut.); Department of Psychology, Boston College/Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts 02167/Etats-Unis (2 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Courte communication, note brève; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Consciousness and cognition; ISSN 1053-8100; Etats-Unis; Da. 2001; Vol. 10; No. 3; Pp. 425-435; Bibl. 2 p.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Modality specificity in priming is taken as evidence for independent perceptual systems. However, Easton, Greene, and Srinivas (1997) showed that visual and haptic cross-modal priming is comparable in magnitude to within-modal priming. Where appropriate, perceptual systems might share like information. To test this, we assessed priming and recognition for visual and auditory events, within- and across- modalities. On the visual test, auditory study resulted in no priming. On the auditory priming test, visual study resulted in priming that was only marginally less than within-modal priming. The priming results show that visual study facilitates identification on both visual and auditory tests, hut auditory study only facilitates performance on the auditory test. For both recognition tests, within-modal recognition exceeded cross-modal recognition. The results have two novel implications for the understanding of perceptual priming: First, we introduce visual and auditory priming for spatio-temporal events as a new priming paradigm chosen for its ecological validity and potential for information exchange. Second, we propose that the asymmetry of the cross-modal priming observed here may reflect the capacity of these perceptual modalities to provide cross-modal constraints on ambiguity. We argue that visual perception might inform and constrain auditory processing, while auditory perception corresponds to too many potential visual events to usefully inform and constrain visual perception.</EA>
<CC>002A26F05A</CC>
<FD>Etude expérimentale; Effet amorçage; Modalité stimulus; Vision; Audition; Perception intermodale; Mémoire; Reconnaissance mnémonique; Perception; Cognition; Homme</FD>
<ED>Experimental study; Priming effect; Stimulus modality; Vision; Hearing; Intermodal perception; Memory; Recognition memory; Perception; Cognition; Human</ED>
<SD>Estudio experimental; Efecto priming; Modalidad estímulo; Visión; Audición; Percepción intermodal; Memoria; Reconocimiento mnemónico; Percepción; Cognición; Hombre</SD>
<LO>INIST-22612.354000099504040070</LO>
<ID>01-0432213</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001358 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001358 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:01-0432213
   |texte=   Visual-auditory events: Cross-modal perceptual priming and recognition memory
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024

	Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Visual-auditory events: Cross-modal perceptual priming and recognition memory

Visual-auditory events: Cross-modal perceptual priming and recognition memory

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri