Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Patient‐generated aspects in oral rehabilitation decision making I. Comparison of traditional history taking and an individual systematic interview method

Identifieur interne : 005A91 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 005A90; suivant : 005A92

Patient‐generated aspects in oral rehabilitation decision making I. Comparison of traditional history taking and an individual systematic interview method

Auteurs : E. B. Özhayat [Danemark] ; K. Gotfredsen [Danemark] ; B. Elverdam [Danemark] ; B. Öwall [Danemark]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:1B690FB6A8DD1873A89C55CF970F48CC550B596C

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Summary  Decision making in oral rehabilitation is often based on diagnoses related to impairment of different oral functions. In making the decision when to treat, the dentist must work in cooperation with the patient. By incorporating patient‐generated aspects into the decision making process, the dentist finds it easier to decide if and why treatment should be undertaken and what treatment modality to use. The purpose of this study was to describe the potential of an interview method, the ‘Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life‐Direct Weighting’ (SEIQoL‐DW), and compare it with a traditional history taking, in generating information to be used in decision making in oral rehabilitation. Fifty‐seven participants in need of oral rehabilitation were enrolled in the study. The participants underwent a traditional history taking and were interviewed using the SEIQoL‐DW method. The SEIQoL‐DW generated a high number of cues for all participants. Significantly more cues and additional information were generated by the SEIQoL‐DW than by the traditional history taking. The additional information concerned consultation and dentist issues, psychological aspects and treatment preferences. A high percentage of the participants were positive towards the use of the SEIQoL‐DW method in their treatment planning. The SEIQoL‐DW was considered to be a viable tool for decision making in oral rehabilitation.

Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01983.x


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Patient‐generated aspects in oral rehabilitation decision making I. Comparison of traditional history taking and an individual systematic interview method</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ozhayat, E B" sort="Ozhayat, E B" uniqKey="Ozhayat E" first="E. B." last="Özhayat">E. B. Özhayat</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gotfredsen, K" sort="Gotfredsen, K" uniqKey="Gotfredsen K" first="K." last="Gotfredsen">K. Gotfredsen</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Elverdam, B" sort="Elverdam, B" uniqKey="Elverdam B" first="B." last="Elverdam">B. Elverdam</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Owall, B" sort="Owall, B" uniqKey="Owall B" first="B." last="Öwall">B. Öwall</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:1B690FB6A8DD1873A89C55CF970F48CC550B596C</idno>
<date when="2009" year="2009">2009</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01983.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/1B690FB6A8DD1873A89C55CF970F48CC550B596C/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000D58</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000D58</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000D58</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">002168</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">002168</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0305-182X:2009:Ozhayat E:patient:generated:aspects</idno>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:19664009</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001C03</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001C03</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">001C03</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">001C03</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">001C03</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">001C03</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">002866</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">002866</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">002866</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">005B55</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">005A91</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">005A91</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main">Patient‐generated aspects in oral rehabilitation decision making I. Comparison of traditional history taking and an individual systematic interview method</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ozhayat, E B" sort="Ozhayat, E B" uniqKey="Ozhayat E" first="E. B." last="Özhayat">E. B. Özhayat</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3">
<country>Danemark</country>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Copenhague</settlement>
<region type="région" nuts="2">Hovedstaden</region>
</placeName>
<wicri:orgArea>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science, Institute of Odontology, University of Copenhagen</wicri:orgArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gotfredsen, K" sort="Gotfredsen, K" uniqKey="Gotfredsen K" first="K." last="Gotfredsen">K. Gotfredsen</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3">
<country>Danemark</country>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Copenhague</settlement>
<region type="région" nuts="2">Hovedstaden</region>
</placeName>
<wicri:orgArea>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science, Institute of Odontology, University of Copenhagen</wicri:orgArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Elverdam, B" sort="Elverdam, B" uniqKey="Elverdam B" first="B." last="Elverdam">B. Elverdam</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">Danemark</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Odense</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Owall, B" sort="Owall, B" uniqKey="Owall B" first="B." last="Öwall">B. Öwall</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3">
<country>Danemark</country>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Copenhague</settlement>
<region type="région" nuts="2">Hovedstaden</region>
</placeName>
<wicri:orgArea>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science, Institute of Odontology, University of Copenhagen</wicri:orgArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno>
<imprint>
<biblScope unit="vol">36</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">10</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="726">726</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="736">736</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">11</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2009-10">2009-10</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Adult</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Anterior tooth spaces</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>Categorization</term>
<term>Clinical examination</term>
<term>Clinical method</term>
<term>Cue</term>
<term>Decision Making</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis (methods)</term>
<term>Dental patients</term>
<term>Dental status variables</term>
<term>Dental treatment</term>
<term>Dentist issues</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Feedback, Psychological</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>History takings</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Important cues</term>
<term>Individual quality</term>
<term>Interview method</term>
<term>Interview technique</term>
<term>Interviews as Topic</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (psychology)</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation)</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Management strategies</term>
<term>Median number</term>
<term>Medical History Taking (methods)</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>More cues</term>
<term>Oral health</term>
<term>Oral quality</term>
<term>Oral rehabilitation</term>
<term>Oral situation</term>
<term>Overall score</term>
<term>Pain Measurement (methods)</term>
<term>Participant</term>
<term>Patient Satisfaction (statistics & numerical data)</term>
<term>Physical issues</term>
<term>Present study</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthodontics</term>
<term>Psychological issues</term>
<term>Qualitative analysis</term>
<term>Qualitative difference</term>
<term>Quality of Life (psychology)</term>
<term>Relative importance</term>
<term>Reliability</term>
<term>Sample size</term>
<term>Seiqoldw</term>
<term>Surveys and Questionnaires</term>
<term>Takings</term>
<term>Traditional history</term>
<term>Traditional history takings</term>
<term>Treatment planning</term>
<term>Weighting</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Adulte</term>
<term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Anamnèse ()</term>
<term>Enquêtes et questionnaires</term>
<term>Entretiens comme sujet</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Mesure de la douleur ()</term>
<term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée (psychologie)</term>
<term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Prise de décision</term>
<term>Prothèses dentaires ()</term>
<term>Qualité de vie (psychologie)</term>
<term>Rétroaction psychologique</term>
<term>Satisfaction du patient ()</term>
<term>Sujet âgé</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en">
<term>Dental Prosthesis</term>
<term>Medical History Taking</term>
<term>Pain Measurement</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychologie" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term>
<term>Qualité de vie</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychology" xml:lang="en">
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term>
<term>Quality of Life</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en">
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="statistics & numerical data" xml:lang="en">
<term>Patient Satisfaction</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Adult</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Anterior tooth spaces</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>Categorization</term>
<term>Clinical examination</term>
<term>Clinical method</term>
<term>Cue</term>
<term>Decision Making</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dental patients</term>
<term>Dental status variables</term>
<term>Dental treatment</term>
<term>Dentist issues</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Feedback, Psychological</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>History takings</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Important cues</term>
<term>Individual quality</term>
<term>Interview method</term>
<term>Interview technique</term>
<term>Interviews as Topic</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Management strategies</term>
<term>Median number</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>More cues</term>
<term>Oral health</term>
<term>Oral quality</term>
<term>Oral rehabilitation</term>
<term>Oral situation</term>
<term>Overall score</term>
<term>Participant</term>
<term>Physical issues</term>
<term>Present study</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthodontics</term>
<term>Psychological issues</term>
<term>Qualitative analysis</term>
<term>Qualitative difference</term>
<term>Relative importance</term>
<term>Reliability</term>
<term>Sample size</term>
<term>Seiqoldw</term>
<term>Surveys and Questionnaires</term>
<term>Takings</term>
<term>Traditional history</term>
<term>Traditional history takings</term>
<term>Treatment planning</term>
<term>Weighting</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Adulte</term>
<term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Analyse qualitative</term>
<term>Anamnèse</term>
<term>Enquêtes et questionnaires</term>
<term>Entretiens comme sujet</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Mesure de la douleur</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Prise de décision</term>
<term>Prothèses dentaires</term>
<term>Rétroaction psychologique</term>
<term>Satisfaction du patient</term>
<term>Sujet âgé</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract">Summary  Decision making in oral rehabilitation is often based on diagnoses related to impairment of different oral functions. In making the decision when to treat, the dentist must work in cooperation with the patient. By incorporating patient‐generated aspects into the decision making process, the dentist finds it easier to decide if and why treatment should be undertaken and what treatment modality to use. The purpose of this study was to describe the potential of an interview method, the ‘Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life‐Direct Weighting’ (SEIQoL‐DW), and compare it with a traditional history taking, in generating information to be used in decision making in oral rehabilitation. Fifty‐seven participants in need of oral rehabilitation were enrolled in the study. The participants underwent a traditional history taking and were interviewed using the SEIQoL‐DW method. The SEIQoL‐DW generated a high number of cues for all participants. Significantly more cues and additional information were generated by the SEIQoL‐DW than by the traditional history taking. The additional information concerned consultation and dentist issues, psychological aspects and treatment preferences. A high percentage of the participants were positive towards the use of the SEIQoL‐DW method in their treatment planning. The SEIQoL‐DW was considered to be a viable tool for decision making in oral rehabilitation.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>Danemark</li>
</country>
<region>
<li>Hovedstaden</li>
</region>
<settlement>
<li>Copenhague</li>
</settlement>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="Danemark">
<region name="Hovedstaden">
<name sortKey="Ozhayat, E B" sort="Ozhayat, E B" uniqKey="Ozhayat E" first="E. B." last="Özhayat">E. B. Özhayat</name>
</region>
<name sortKey="Elverdam, B" sort="Elverdam, B" uniqKey="Elverdam B" first="B." last="Elverdam">B. Elverdam</name>
<name sortKey="Gotfredsen, K" sort="Gotfredsen, K" uniqKey="Gotfredsen K" first="K." last="Gotfredsen">K. Gotfredsen</name>
<name sortKey="Owall, B" sort="Owall, B" uniqKey="Owall B" first="B." last="Öwall">B. Öwall</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005A91 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 005A91 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:1B690FB6A8DD1873A89C55CF970F48CC550B596C
   |texte=   Patient‐generated aspects in oral rehabilitation decision making I. Comparison of traditional history taking and an individual systematic interview method
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022