Patient‐generated aspects in oral rehabilitation decision making I. Comparison of traditional history taking and an individual systematic interview method
Identifieur interne : 005B55 ( Main/Merge ); précédent : 005B54; suivant : 005B56Patient‐generated aspects in oral rehabilitation decision making I. Comparison of traditional history taking and an individual systematic interview method
Auteurs : E. B. Özhayat [Danemark] ; K. Gotfredsen [Danemark] ; B. Elverdam [Danemark] ; B. Öwall [Danemark]Source :
- Journal of Oral Rehabilitation [ 0305-182X ] ; 2009-10.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Anamnèse (), Enquêtes et questionnaires, Entretiens comme sujet, Femelle, Humains, Mesure de la douleur (), Mâchoire partiellement édentée (psychologie), Mâchoire partiellement édentée (rééducation et réadaptation), Mâle, Prise de décision, Prothèses dentaires (), Qualité de vie (psychologie), Rétroaction psychologique, Satisfaction du patient (), Sujet âgé.
- MESH :
- psychologie : Mâchoire partiellement édentée, Qualité de vie.
- rééducation et réadaptation : Mâchoire partiellement édentée.
- Wicri :
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Aged, Anterior tooth spaces, Blackwell publishing, Categorization, Clinical examination, Clinical method, Cue, Decision Making, Dent, Dental Prosthesis (methods), Dental patients, Dental status variables, Dental treatment, Dentist issues, Dentistry, Feedback, Psychological, Female, History takings, Humans, Important cues, Individual quality, Interview method, Interview technique, Interviews as Topic, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (psychology), Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation), Male, Management strategies, Median number, Medical History Taking (methods), Middle Aged, More cues, Oral health, Oral quality, Oral rehabilitation, Oral situation, Overall score, Pain Measurement (methods), Participant, Patient Satisfaction (statistics & numerical data), Physical issues, Present study, Prosthesis, Prosthodontics, Psychological issues, Qualitative analysis, Qualitative difference, Quality of Life (psychology), Relative importance, Reliability, Sample size, Seiqoldw, Surveys and Questionnaires, Takings, Traditional history, Traditional history takings, Treatment planning, Weighting.
- MESH :
- methods : Dental Prosthesis, Medical History Taking, Pain Measurement.
- psychology : Jaw, Edentulous, Partially, Quality of Life.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous, Partially.
- statistics & numerical data : Patient Satisfaction.
- Teeft :
- Adult, Aged, Anterior tooth spaces, Blackwell publishing, Categorization, Clinical examination, Clinical method, Cue, Decision Making, Dent, Dental patients, Dental status variables, Dental treatment, Dentist issues, Dentistry, Feedback, Psychological, Female, History takings, Humans, Important cues, Individual quality, Interview method, Interview technique, Interviews as Topic, Male, Management strategies, Median number, Middle Aged, More cues, Oral health, Oral quality, Oral rehabilitation, Oral situation, Overall score, Participant, Physical issues, Present study, Prosthesis, Prosthodontics, Psychological issues, Qualitative analysis, Qualitative difference, Relative importance, Reliability, Sample size, Seiqoldw, Surveys and Questionnaires, Takings, Traditional history, Traditional history takings, Treatment planning, Weighting.
Abstract
Summary Decision making in oral rehabilitation is often based on diagnoses related to impairment of different oral functions. In making the decision when to treat, the dentist must work in cooperation with the patient. By incorporating patient‐generated aspects into the decision making process, the dentist finds it easier to decide if and why treatment should be undertaken and what treatment modality to use. The purpose of this study was to describe the potential of an interview method, the ‘Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life‐Direct Weighting’ (SEIQoL‐DW), and compare it with a traditional history taking, in generating information to be used in decision making in oral rehabilitation. Fifty‐seven participants in need of oral rehabilitation were enrolled in the study. The participants underwent a traditional history taking and were interviewed using the SEIQoL‐DW method. The SEIQoL‐DW generated a high number of cues for all participants. Significantly more cues and additional information were generated by the SEIQoL‐DW than by the traditional history taking. The additional information concerned consultation and dentist issues, psychological aspects and treatment preferences. A high percentage of the participants were positive towards the use of the SEIQoL‐DW method in their treatment planning. The SEIQoL‐DW was considered to be a viable tool for decision making in oral rehabilitation.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01983.x
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 000D58
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 000D58
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 002168
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: 001C03
- to stream PubMed, to step Curation: 001C03
- to stream PubMed, to step Checkpoint: 001C03
- to stream Ncbi, to step Merge: 002866
- to stream Ncbi, to step Curation: 002866
- to stream Ncbi, to step Checkpoint: 002866
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:1B690FB6A8DD1873A89C55CF970F48CC550B596CLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Patient‐generated aspects in oral rehabilitation decision making I. Comparison of traditional history taking and an individual systematic interview method</title>
<author><name sortKey="Ozhayat, E B" sort="Ozhayat, E B" uniqKey="Ozhayat E" first="E. B." last="Özhayat">E. B. Özhayat</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Gotfredsen, K" sort="Gotfredsen, K" uniqKey="Gotfredsen K" first="K." last="Gotfredsen">K. Gotfredsen</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Elverdam, B" sort="Elverdam, B" uniqKey="Elverdam B" first="B." last="Elverdam">B. Elverdam</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Owall, B" sort="Owall, B" uniqKey="Owall B" first="B." last="Öwall">B. Öwall</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:1B690FB6A8DD1873A89C55CF970F48CC550B596C</idno>
<date when="2009" year="2009">2009</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01983.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/1B690FB6A8DD1873A89C55CF970F48CC550B596C/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000D58</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000D58</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000D58</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">002168</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">002168</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0305-182X:2009:Ozhayat E:patient:generated:aspects</idno>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:19664009</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001C03</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001C03</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">001C03</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">001C03</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">001C03</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">001C03</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">002866</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">002866</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">002866</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">005B55</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Patient‐generated aspects in oral rehabilitation decision making I. Comparison of traditional history taking and an individual systematic interview method</title>
<author><name sortKey="Ozhayat, E B" sort="Ozhayat, E B" uniqKey="Ozhayat E" first="E. B." last="Özhayat">E. B. Özhayat</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3"><country>Danemark</country>
<placeName><settlement type="city">Copenhague</settlement>
<region type="région" nuts="2">Hovedstaden</region>
</placeName>
<wicri:orgArea>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science, Institute of Odontology, University of Copenhagen</wicri:orgArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Gotfredsen, K" sort="Gotfredsen, K" uniqKey="Gotfredsen K" first="K." last="Gotfredsen">K. Gotfredsen</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3"><country>Danemark</country>
<placeName><settlement type="city">Copenhague</settlement>
<region type="région" nuts="2">Hovedstaden</region>
</placeName>
<wicri:orgArea>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science, Institute of Odontology, University of Copenhagen</wicri:orgArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Elverdam, B" sort="Elverdam, B" uniqKey="Elverdam B" first="B." last="Elverdam">B. Elverdam</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Danemark</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Odense</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Owall, B" sort="Owall, B" uniqKey="Owall B" first="B." last="Öwall">B. Öwall</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3"><country>Danemark</country>
<placeName><settlement type="city">Copenhague</settlement>
<region type="région" nuts="2">Hovedstaden</region>
</placeName>
<wicri:orgArea>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science, Institute of Odontology, University of Copenhagen</wicri:orgArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">36</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">10</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="726">726</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="736">736</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">11</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2009-10">2009-10</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Anterior tooth spaces</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>Categorization</term>
<term>Clinical examination</term>
<term>Clinical method</term>
<term>Cue</term>
<term>Decision Making</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis (methods)</term>
<term>Dental patients</term>
<term>Dental status variables</term>
<term>Dental treatment</term>
<term>Dentist issues</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Feedback, Psychological</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>History takings</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Important cues</term>
<term>Individual quality</term>
<term>Interview method</term>
<term>Interview technique</term>
<term>Interviews as Topic</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (psychology)</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation)</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Management strategies</term>
<term>Median number</term>
<term>Medical History Taking (methods)</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>More cues</term>
<term>Oral health</term>
<term>Oral quality</term>
<term>Oral rehabilitation</term>
<term>Oral situation</term>
<term>Overall score</term>
<term>Pain Measurement (methods)</term>
<term>Participant</term>
<term>Patient Satisfaction (statistics & numerical data)</term>
<term>Physical issues</term>
<term>Present study</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthodontics</term>
<term>Psychological issues</term>
<term>Qualitative analysis</term>
<term>Qualitative difference</term>
<term>Quality of Life (psychology)</term>
<term>Relative importance</term>
<term>Reliability</term>
<term>Sample size</term>
<term>Seiqoldw</term>
<term>Surveys and Questionnaires</term>
<term>Takings</term>
<term>Traditional history</term>
<term>Traditional history takings</term>
<term>Treatment planning</term>
<term>Weighting</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term>
<term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Anamnèse ()</term>
<term>Enquêtes et questionnaires</term>
<term>Entretiens comme sujet</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Mesure de la douleur ()</term>
<term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée (psychologie)</term>
<term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Prise de décision</term>
<term>Prothèses dentaires ()</term>
<term>Qualité de vie (psychologie)</term>
<term>Rétroaction psychologique</term>
<term>Satisfaction du patient ()</term>
<term>Sujet âgé</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Prosthesis</term>
<term>Medical History Taking</term>
<term>Pain Measurement</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term>
<term>Qualité de vie</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychology" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term>
<term>Quality of Life</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="statistics & numerical data" xml:lang="en"><term>Patient Satisfaction</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Anterior tooth spaces</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>Categorization</term>
<term>Clinical examination</term>
<term>Clinical method</term>
<term>Cue</term>
<term>Decision Making</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dental patients</term>
<term>Dental status variables</term>
<term>Dental treatment</term>
<term>Dentist issues</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Feedback, Psychological</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>History takings</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Important cues</term>
<term>Individual quality</term>
<term>Interview method</term>
<term>Interview technique</term>
<term>Interviews as Topic</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Management strategies</term>
<term>Median number</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>More cues</term>
<term>Oral health</term>
<term>Oral quality</term>
<term>Oral rehabilitation</term>
<term>Oral situation</term>
<term>Overall score</term>
<term>Participant</term>
<term>Physical issues</term>
<term>Present study</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthodontics</term>
<term>Psychological issues</term>
<term>Qualitative analysis</term>
<term>Qualitative difference</term>
<term>Relative importance</term>
<term>Reliability</term>
<term>Sample size</term>
<term>Seiqoldw</term>
<term>Surveys and Questionnaires</term>
<term>Takings</term>
<term>Traditional history</term>
<term>Traditional history takings</term>
<term>Treatment planning</term>
<term>Weighting</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term>
<term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Analyse qualitative</term>
<term>Anamnèse</term>
<term>Enquêtes et questionnaires</term>
<term>Entretiens comme sujet</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Mesure de la douleur</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Prise de décision</term>
<term>Prothèses dentaires</term>
<term>Rétroaction psychologique</term>
<term>Satisfaction du patient</term>
<term>Sujet âgé</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract">Summary Decision making in oral rehabilitation is often based on diagnoses related to impairment of different oral functions. In making the decision when to treat, the dentist must work in cooperation with the patient. By incorporating patient‐generated aspects into the decision making process, the dentist finds it easier to decide if and why treatment should be undertaken and what treatment modality to use. The purpose of this study was to describe the potential of an interview method, the ‘Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life‐Direct Weighting’ (SEIQoL‐DW), and compare it with a traditional history taking, in generating information to be used in decision making in oral rehabilitation. Fifty‐seven participants in need of oral rehabilitation were enrolled in the study. The participants underwent a traditional history taking and were interviewed using the SEIQoL‐DW method. The SEIQoL‐DW generated a high number of cues for all participants. Significantly more cues and additional information were generated by the SEIQoL‐DW than by the traditional history taking. The additional information concerned consultation and dentist issues, psychological aspects and treatment preferences. A high percentage of the participants were positive towards the use of the SEIQoL‐DW method in their treatment planning. The SEIQoL‐DW was considered to be a viable tool for decision making in oral rehabilitation.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<double doi="10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01983.x"><ISTEX><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Patient‐generated aspects in oral rehabilitation decision making I. Comparison of traditional history taking and an individual systematic interview method</title>
<author><name sortKey="Ozhayat, E B" sort="Ozhayat, E B" uniqKey="Ozhayat E" first="E. B." last="Özhayat">E. B. Özhayat</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Gotfredsen, K" sort="Gotfredsen, K" uniqKey="Gotfredsen K" first="K." last="Gotfredsen">K. Gotfredsen</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Elverdam, B" sort="Elverdam, B" uniqKey="Elverdam B" first="B." last="Elverdam">B. Elverdam</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Owall, B" sort="Owall, B" uniqKey="Owall B" first="B." last="Öwall">B. Öwall</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:1B690FB6A8DD1873A89C55CF970F48CC550B596C</idno>
<date when="2009" year="2009">2009</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01983.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/1B690FB6A8DD1873A89C55CF970F48CC550B596C/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000D58</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000D58</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000D58</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">002168</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">002168</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0305-182X:2009:Ozhayat E:patient:generated:aspects</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Patient‐generated aspects in oral rehabilitation decision making I. Comparison of traditional history taking and an individual systematic interview method</title>
<author><name sortKey="Ozhayat, E B" sort="Ozhayat, E B" uniqKey="Ozhayat E" first="E. B." last="Özhayat">E. B. Özhayat</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3"><country>Danemark</country>
<placeName><settlement type="city">Copenhague</settlement>
<region type="région" nuts="2">Hovedstaden</region>
</placeName>
<wicri:orgArea>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science, Institute of Odontology, University of Copenhagen</wicri:orgArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Gotfredsen, K" sort="Gotfredsen, K" uniqKey="Gotfredsen K" first="K." last="Gotfredsen">K. Gotfredsen</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3"><country>Danemark</country>
<placeName><settlement type="city">Copenhague</settlement>
<region type="région" nuts="2">Hovedstaden</region>
</placeName>
<wicri:orgArea>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science, Institute of Odontology, University of Copenhagen</wicri:orgArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Elverdam, B" sort="Elverdam, B" uniqKey="Elverdam B" first="B." last="Elverdam">B. Elverdam</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Danemark</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Odense</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Owall, B" sort="Owall, B" uniqKey="Owall B" first="B." last="Öwall">B. Öwall</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3"><country>Danemark</country>
<placeName><settlement type="city">Copenhague</settlement>
<region type="région" nuts="2">Hovedstaden</region>
</placeName>
<wicri:orgArea>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science, Institute of Odontology, University of Copenhagen</wicri:orgArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">36</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">10</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="726">726</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="736">736</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">11</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2009-10">2009-10</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Anterior tooth spaces</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>Categorization</term>
<term>Clinical examination</term>
<term>Clinical method</term>
<term>Cue</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dental patients</term>
<term>Dental status variables</term>
<term>Dental treatment</term>
<term>Dentist issues</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>History takings</term>
<term>Important cues</term>
<term>Individual quality</term>
<term>Interview method</term>
<term>Interview technique</term>
<term>Management strategies</term>
<term>Median number</term>
<term>More cues</term>
<term>Oral health</term>
<term>Oral quality</term>
<term>Oral rehabilitation</term>
<term>Oral situation</term>
<term>Overall score</term>
<term>Participant</term>
<term>Physical issues</term>
<term>Present study</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthodontics</term>
<term>Psychological issues</term>
<term>Qualitative analysis</term>
<term>Qualitative difference</term>
<term>Relative importance</term>
<term>Reliability</term>
<term>Sample size</term>
<term>Seiqoldw</term>
<term>Takings</term>
<term>Traditional history</term>
<term>Traditional history takings</term>
<term>Treatment planning</term>
<term>Weighting</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Anterior tooth spaces</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>Categorization</term>
<term>Clinical examination</term>
<term>Clinical method</term>
<term>Cue</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dental patients</term>
<term>Dental status variables</term>
<term>Dental treatment</term>
<term>Dentist issues</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>History takings</term>
<term>Important cues</term>
<term>Individual quality</term>
<term>Interview method</term>
<term>Interview technique</term>
<term>Management strategies</term>
<term>Median number</term>
<term>More cues</term>
<term>Oral health</term>
<term>Oral quality</term>
<term>Oral rehabilitation</term>
<term>Oral situation</term>
<term>Overall score</term>
<term>Participant</term>
<term>Physical issues</term>
<term>Present study</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthodontics</term>
<term>Psychological issues</term>
<term>Qualitative analysis</term>
<term>Qualitative difference</term>
<term>Relative importance</term>
<term>Reliability</term>
<term>Sample size</term>
<term>Seiqoldw</term>
<term>Takings</term>
<term>Traditional history</term>
<term>Traditional history takings</term>
<term>Treatment planning</term>
<term>Weighting</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Analyse qualitative</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract">Summary Decision making in oral rehabilitation is often based on diagnoses related to impairment of different oral functions. In making the decision when to treat, the dentist must work in cooperation with the patient. By incorporating patient‐generated aspects into the decision making process, the dentist finds it easier to decide if and why treatment should be undertaken and what treatment modality to use. The purpose of this study was to describe the potential of an interview method, the ‘Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life‐Direct Weighting’ (SEIQoL‐DW), and compare it with a traditional history taking, in generating information to be used in decision making in oral rehabilitation. Fifty‐seven participants in need of oral rehabilitation were enrolled in the study. The participants underwent a traditional history taking and were interviewed using the SEIQoL‐DW method. The SEIQoL‐DW generated a high number of cues for all participants. Significantly more cues and additional information were generated by the SEIQoL‐DW than by the traditional history taking. The additional information concerned consultation and dentist issues, psychological aspects and treatment preferences. A high percentage of the participants were positive towards the use of the SEIQoL‐DW method in their treatment planning. The SEIQoL‐DW was considered to be a viable tool for decision making in oral rehabilitation.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</ISTEX>
<PubMed><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Patient-generated aspects in oral rehabilitation decision making I. Comparison of traditional history taking and an individual systematic interview method.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Ozhayat, E B" sort="Ozhayat, E B" uniqKey="Ozhayat E" first="E B" last="Ozhayat">E B Ozhayat</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science, Institute of Odontology, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark. ebo@odont.ku.dk</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Danemark</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science, Institute of Odontology, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName><settlement type="city">Copenhague</settlement>
<region type="région" nuts="2">Hovedstaden</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Gotfredsen, K" sort="Gotfredsen, K" uniqKey="Gotfredsen K" first="K" last="Gotfredsen">K. Gotfredsen</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Elverdam, B" sort="Elverdam, B" uniqKey="Elverdam B" first="B" last="Elverdam">B. Elverdam</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Owall, B" sort="Owall, B" uniqKey="Owall B" first="B" last="Owall">B. Owall</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2009">2009</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:19664009</idno>
<idno type="pmid">19664009</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01983.x</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001C03</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001C03</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">001C03</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">001C03</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">001C03</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">001C03</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">002866</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">002866</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">002866</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Patient-generated aspects in oral rehabilitation decision making I. Comparison of traditional history taking and an individual systematic interview method.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Ozhayat, E B" sort="Ozhayat, E B" uniqKey="Ozhayat E" first="E B" last="Ozhayat">E B Ozhayat</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science, Institute of Odontology, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark. ebo@odont.ku.dk</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Danemark</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science, Institute of Odontology, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName><settlement type="city">Copenhague</settlement>
<region type="région" nuts="2">Hovedstaden</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Gotfredsen, K" sort="Gotfredsen, K" uniqKey="Gotfredsen K" first="K" last="Gotfredsen">K. Gotfredsen</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Elverdam, B" sort="Elverdam, B" uniqKey="Elverdam B" first="B" last="Elverdam">B. Elverdam</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Owall, B" sort="Owall, B" uniqKey="Owall B" first="B" last="Owall">B. Owall</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Journal of oral rehabilitation</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno>
<imprint><date when="2009" type="published">2009</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Decision Making</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis (methods)</term>
<term>Feedback, Psychological</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Interviews as Topic</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (psychology)</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation)</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Medical History Taking (methods)</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Pain Measurement (methods)</term>
<term>Patient Satisfaction (statistics & numerical data)</term>
<term>Quality of Life (psychology)</term>
<term>Surveys and Questionnaires</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term>
<term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Anamnèse ()</term>
<term>Enquêtes et questionnaires</term>
<term>Entretiens comme sujet</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Mesure de la douleur ()</term>
<term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée (psychologie)</term>
<term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Prise de décision</term>
<term>Prothèses dentaires ()</term>
<term>Qualité de vie (psychologie)</term>
<term>Rétroaction psychologique</term>
<term>Satisfaction du patient ()</term>
<term>Sujet âgé</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Prosthesis</term>
<term>Medical History Taking</term>
<term>Pain Measurement</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term>
<term>Qualité de vie</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychology" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term>
<term>Quality of Life</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="statistics & numerical data" xml:lang="en"><term>Patient Satisfaction</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Decision Making</term>
<term>Feedback, Psychological</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Interviews as Topic</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Surveys and Questionnaires</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term>
<term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Anamnèse</term>
<term>Enquêtes et questionnaires</term>
<term>Entretiens comme sujet</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Mesure de la douleur</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Prise de décision</term>
<term>Prothèses dentaires</term>
<term>Rétroaction psychologique</term>
<term>Satisfaction du patient</term>
<term>Sujet âgé</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Decision making in oral rehabilitation is often based on diagnoses related to impairment of different oral functions. In making the decision when to treat, the dentist must work in cooperation with the patient. By incorporating patient-generated aspects into the decision making process, the dentist finds it easier to decide if and why treatment should be undertaken and what treatment modality to use. The purpose of this study was to describe the potential of an interview method, the 'Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life-Direct Weighting' (SEIQoL-DW), and compare it with a traditional history taking, in generating information to be used in decision making in oral rehabilitation. Fifty-seven participants in need of oral rehabilitation were enrolled in the study. The participants underwent a traditional history taking and were interviewed using the SEIQoL-DW method. The SEIQoL-DW generated a high number of cues for all participants. Significantly more cues and additional information were generated by the SEIQoL-DW than by the traditional history taking. The additional information concerned consultation and dentist issues, psychological aspects and treatment preferences. A high percentage of the participants were positive towards the use of the SEIQoL-DW method in their treatment planning. The SEIQoL-DW was considered to be a viable tool for decision making in oral rehabilitation.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</PubMed>
</double>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005B55 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 005B55 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= Main |étape= Merge |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:1B690FB6A8DD1873A89C55CF970F48CC550B596C |texte= Patient‐generated aspects in oral rehabilitation decision making I. Comparison of traditional history taking and an individual systematic interview method }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. | ![]() |