Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Patient-generated aspects in oral rehabilitation decision making I. Comparison of traditional history taking and an individual systematic interview method.

Identifieur interne : 002866 ( Ncbi/Curation ); précédent : 002865; suivant : 002867

Patient-generated aspects in oral rehabilitation decision making I. Comparison of traditional history taking and an individual systematic interview method.

Auteurs : E B Ozhayat [Danemark] ; K. Gotfredsen ; B. Elverdam ; B. Owall

Source :

RBID : pubmed:19664009

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Decision making in oral rehabilitation is often based on diagnoses related to impairment of different oral functions. In making the decision when to treat, the dentist must work in cooperation with the patient. By incorporating patient-generated aspects into the decision making process, the dentist finds it easier to decide if and why treatment should be undertaken and what treatment modality to use. The purpose of this study was to describe the potential of an interview method, the 'Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life-Direct Weighting' (SEIQoL-DW), and compare it with a traditional history taking, in generating information to be used in decision making in oral rehabilitation. Fifty-seven participants in need of oral rehabilitation were enrolled in the study. The participants underwent a traditional history taking and were interviewed using the SEIQoL-DW method. The SEIQoL-DW generated a high number of cues for all participants. Significantly more cues and additional information were generated by the SEIQoL-DW than by the traditional history taking. The additional information concerned consultation and dentist issues, psychological aspects and treatment preferences. A high percentage of the participants were positive towards the use of the SEIQoL-DW method in their treatment planning. The SEIQoL-DW was considered to be a viable tool for decision making in oral rehabilitation.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01983.x
PubMed: 19664009

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

pubmed:19664009

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Patient-generated aspects in oral rehabilitation decision making I. Comparison of traditional history taking and an individual systematic interview method.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ozhayat, E B" sort="Ozhayat, E B" uniqKey="Ozhayat E" first="E B" last="Ozhayat">E B Ozhayat</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science, Institute of Odontology, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark. ebo@odont.ku.dk</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Danemark</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science, Institute of Odontology, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Copenhague</settlement>
<region type="région" nuts="2">Hovedstaden</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gotfredsen, K" sort="Gotfredsen, K" uniqKey="Gotfredsen K" first="K" last="Gotfredsen">K. Gotfredsen</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Elverdam, B" sort="Elverdam, B" uniqKey="Elverdam B" first="B" last="Elverdam">B. Elverdam</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Owall, B" sort="Owall, B" uniqKey="Owall B" first="B" last="Owall">B. Owall</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2009">2009</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:19664009</idno>
<idno type="pmid">19664009</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01983.x</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001C03</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001C03</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">001C03</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">001C03</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">001C03</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">001C03</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">002866</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">002866</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">Patient-generated aspects in oral rehabilitation decision making I. Comparison of traditional history taking and an individual systematic interview method.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ozhayat, E B" sort="Ozhayat, E B" uniqKey="Ozhayat E" first="E B" last="Ozhayat">E B Ozhayat</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science, Institute of Odontology, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark. ebo@odont.ku.dk</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Danemark</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science, Institute of Odontology, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Copenhague</settlement>
<region type="région" nuts="2">Hovedstaden</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gotfredsen, K" sort="Gotfredsen, K" uniqKey="Gotfredsen K" first="K" last="Gotfredsen">K. Gotfredsen</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Elverdam, B" sort="Elverdam, B" uniqKey="Elverdam B" first="B" last="Elverdam">B. Elverdam</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Owall, B" sort="Owall, B" uniqKey="Owall B" first="B" last="Owall">B. Owall</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Journal of oral rehabilitation</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2009" type="published">2009</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Adult</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Decision Making</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis (methods)</term>
<term>Feedback, Psychological</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Interviews as Topic</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (psychology)</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation)</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Medical History Taking (methods)</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Pain Measurement (methods)</term>
<term>Patient Satisfaction (statistics & numerical data)</term>
<term>Quality of Life (psychology)</term>
<term>Surveys and Questionnaires</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Adulte</term>
<term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Anamnèse ()</term>
<term>Enquêtes et questionnaires</term>
<term>Entretiens comme sujet</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Mesure de la douleur ()</term>
<term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée (psychologie)</term>
<term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Prise de décision</term>
<term>Prothèses dentaires ()</term>
<term>Qualité de vie (psychologie)</term>
<term>Rétroaction psychologique</term>
<term>Satisfaction du patient ()</term>
<term>Sujet âgé</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en">
<term>Dental Prosthesis</term>
<term>Medical History Taking</term>
<term>Pain Measurement</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychologie" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term>
<term>Qualité de vie</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychology" xml:lang="en">
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term>
<term>Quality of Life</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en">
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="statistics & numerical data" xml:lang="en">
<term>Patient Satisfaction</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en">
<term>Adult</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Decision Making</term>
<term>Feedback, Psychological</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Interviews as Topic</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Surveys and Questionnaires</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Adulte</term>
<term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Anamnèse</term>
<term>Enquêtes et questionnaires</term>
<term>Entretiens comme sujet</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Mesure de la douleur</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Prise de décision</term>
<term>Prothèses dentaires</term>
<term>Rétroaction psychologique</term>
<term>Satisfaction du patient</term>
<term>Sujet âgé</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Decision making in oral rehabilitation is often based on diagnoses related to impairment of different oral functions. In making the decision when to treat, the dentist must work in cooperation with the patient. By incorporating patient-generated aspects into the decision making process, the dentist finds it easier to decide if and why treatment should be undertaken and what treatment modality to use. The purpose of this study was to describe the potential of an interview method, the 'Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life-Direct Weighting' (SEIQoL-DW), and compare it with a traditional history taking, in generating information to be used in decision making in oral rehabilitation. Fifty-seven participants in need of oral rehabilitation were enrolled in the study. The participants underwent a traditional history taking and were interviewed using the SEIQoL-DW method. The SEIQoL-DW generated a high number of cues for all participants. Significantly more cues and additional information were generated by the SEIQoL-DW than by the traditional history taking. The additional information concerned consultation and dentist issues, psychological aspects and treatment preferences. A high percentage of the participants were positive towards the use of the SEIQoL-DW method in their treatment planning. The SEIQoL-DW was considered to be a viable tool for decision making in oral rehabilitation.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Ncbi/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002866 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 002866 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Ncbi
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:19664009
   |texte=   Patient-generated aspects in oral rehabilitation decision making I. Comparison of traditional history taking and an individual systematic interview method.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Curation/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:19664009" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Curation/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022