The Influence of Dental Insurance on Institutionalized Older Adults in Ranking Their Oral Health Status
Identifieur interne : 003F28 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 003F27; suivant : 003F29The Influence of Dental Insurance on Institutionalized Older Adults in Ranking Their Oral Health Status
Auteurs : Albert O. Adegbembo ; James L. Leake ; Patricia A. Main ; Herenia P. Lawrence ; Mary L. ChipmanSource :
- Special Care in Dentistry [ 0275-1879 ] ; 2005-11.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Assoc, Cognitively, Community dent, Community dent health, Confidence interval, Confidence limits, Dent, Dent assoc, Dent educ, Dental, Dental care, Dental coverage, Dental health, Dental insurance, Dental insurance coverage, Dental insurance influence, Dental insurance plan, Dental pain, Dental problem, Dental services, Dental status, Dental treatment, Dental visit, Dentate, Dentate participants, Durham, Durham region, Edentulous, Edentulous participants, Epidemiol, Food items, General health status, Global rating, Health belief, Health outcomes, Health status, Last year, Leake, Likert scale, Municipal homes, Null hypothesis, Older adults, Ontario, Oral, Oral health, Oral health behavior, Oral health impact profile, Oral health need, Oral health outcomes, Oral health status, Oral quality, Other studies, Participant, Percent confidence interval, Public health, Public health dent, Regular source, Slade, Spec, Spec care dentist, Uninsured, Uninsured counterparts, Years column.
- Teeft :
- Assoc, Cognitively, Community dent, Community dent health, Confidence interval, Confidence limits, Dent, Dent assoc, Dent educ, Dental, Dental care, Dental coverage, Dental health, Dental insurance, Dental insurance coverage, Dental insurance influence, Dental insurance plan, Dental pain, Dental problem, Dental services, Dental status, Dental treatment, Dental visit, Dentate, Dentate participants, Durham, Durham region, Edentulous, Edentulous participants, Epidemiol, Food items, General health status, Global rating, Health belief, Health outcomes, Health status, Last year, Leake, Likert scale, Municipal homes, Null hypothesis, Older adults, Ontario, Oral, Oral health, Oral health behavior, Oral health impact profile, Oral health need, Oral health outcomes, Oral health status, Oral quality, Other studies, Participant, Percent confidence interval, Public health, Public health dent, Regular source, Slade, Spec, Spec care dentist, Uninsured, Uninsured counterparts, Years column.
Abstract
To assess whether dental insurance influences how institutionalized older adults ages 65 and older rank their oral health status, a census survey was designed for residents of Durham's (Canada) Municipal Homes for the Aged. The odds ratio (OR) and the Cochran & Mantel‐Haenszel's OR were used to estimate the crude and adjusted effect of dental insurance on oral health status, respectively. Overall, 64 percent participated in the interview. Oral health status was ranked as “good,”“very good” or “excellent” by 57 percent of the participants. This ranking was clearly unrelated to the residents having dental insurance, as only 28 percent had dental coverage. Significant effect modifiers included age, dental status and whether the participant had visited the dentist within the last year. Dental insurance positively influenced how dentate participants ranked their oral health status (OR = 2.26; 95 percent CI 1.19; 4.28). In edentulous participants, age and visiting the dentist within the last year modified the effect of dental insurance on oral health status. Having dental insurance reduced the odds of reporting “good,”“very good” or “excellent” oral health (OR = 0.20; 95 percent CI = 0.08; 0.49) among the participants ages 85 and older who did not visit the dentist within the last year; however, the opposite was true for their younger counterparts who visited the dentist within the last year (OR = 7.20; 95 percent CI = 1.08; 47.96). In this population, therefore, dental insurance was associated with higher oral health status rank among the dentate, but its effect on the edentulous population depended on age and the pattern of visiting the dentist.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-4505.2005.tb01401.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:7F9D982BDC29218CCE426E333DE0B7F1EF86911FLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The Influence of Dental Insurance on Institutionalized Older Adults in Ranking Their Oral Health Status</title><author><name sortKey="Adegbembo, Albert O" sort="Adegbembo, Albert O" uniqKey="Adegbembo A" first="Albert O." last="Adegbembo">Albert O. Adegbembo</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Division of Public Health Services and Research, College of Dentistry University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla.</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence address: *Corresponding author:aadegbembodental.ufl.edu</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Leake, James L" sort="Leake, James L" uniqKey="Leake J" first="James L." last="Leake">James L. Leake</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Main, Patricia A" sort="Main, Patricia A" uniqKey="Main P" first="Patricia A." last="Main">Patricia A. Main</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lawrence, Herenia P" sort="Lawrence, Herenia P" uniqKey="Lawrence H" first="Herenia P." last="Lawrence">Herenia P. Lawrence</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Chipman, Mary L" sort="Chipman, Mary L" uniqKey="Chipman M" first="Mary L." last="Chipman">Mary L. Chipman</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Graduate Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:7F9D982BDC29218CCE426E333DE0B7F1EF86911F</idno><date when="2005" year="2005">2005</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1754-4505.2005.tb01401.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/7F9D982BDC29218CCE426E333DE0B7F1EF86911F/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">003F28</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">003F28</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The Influence of Dental Insurance on Institutionalized Older Adults in Ranking Their Oral Health Status</title><author><name sortKey="Adegbembo, Albert O" sort="Adegbembo, Albert O" uniqKey="Adegbembo A" first="Albert O." last="Adegbembo">Albert O. Adegbembo</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Division of Public Health Services and Research, College of Dentistry University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla.</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence address: *Corresponding author:aadegbembodental.ufl.edu</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Leake, James L" sort="Leake, James L" uniqKey="Leake J" first="James L." last="Leake">James L. Leake</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Main, Patricia A" sort="Main, Patricia A" uniqKey="Main P" first="Patricia A." last="Main">Patricia A. Main</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lawrence, Herenia P" sort="Lawrence, Herenia P" uniqKey="Lawrence H" first="Herenia P." last="Lawrence">Herenia P. Lawrence</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Chipman, Mary L" sort="Chipman, Mary L" uniqKey="Chipman M" first="Mary L." last="Chipman">Mary L. Chipman</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Graduate Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Special Care in Dentistry</title><title level="j" type="alt">SPECIAL CARE IN DENTISTRY</title><idno type="ISSN">0275-1879</idno><idno type="eISSN">1754-4505</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">25</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="275">275</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="285">285</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">11</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2005-11">2005-11</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0275-1879</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0275-1879</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Assoc</term><term>Cognitively</term><term>Community dent</term><term>Community dent health</term><term>Confidence interval</term><term>Confidence limits</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dent assoc</term><term>Dent educ</term><term>Dental</term><term>Dental care</term><term>Dental coverage</term><term>Dental health</term><term>Dental insurance</term><term>Dental insurance coverage</term><term>Dental insurance influence</term><term>Dental insurance plan</term><term>Dental pain</term><term>Dental problem</term><term>Dental services</term><term>Dental status</term><term>Dental treatment</term><term>Dental visit</term><term>Dentate</term><term>Dentate participants</term><term>Durham</term><term>Durham region</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous participants</term><term>Epidemiol</term><term>Food items</term><term>General health status</term><term>Global rating</term><term>Health belief</term><term>Health outcomes</term><term>Health status</term><term>Last year</term><term>Leake</term><term>Likert scale</term><term>Municipal homes</term><term>Null hypothesis</term><term>Older adults</term><term>Ontario</term><term>Oral</term><term>Oral health</term><term>Oral health behavior</term><term>Oral health impact profile</term><term>Oral health need</term><term>Oral health outcomes</term><term>Oral health status</term><term>Oral quality</term><term>Other studies</term><term>Participant</term><term>Percent confidence interval</term><term>Public health</term><term>Public health dent</term><term>Regular source</term><term>Slade</term><term>Spec</term><term>Spec care dentist</term><term>Uninsured</term><term>Uninsured counterparts</term><term>Years column</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Assoc</term><term>Cognitively</term><term>Community dent</term><term>Community dent health</term><term>Confidence interval</term><term>Confidence limits</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dent assoc</term><term>Dent educ</term><term>Dental</term><term>Dental care</term><term>Dental coverage</term><term>Dental health</term><term>Dental insurance</term><term>Dental insurance coverage</term><term>Dental insurance influence</term><term>Dental insurance plan</term><term>Dental pain</term><term>Dental problem</term><term>Dental services</term><term>Dental status</term><term>Dental treatment</term><term>Dental visit</term><term>Dentate</term><term>Dentate participants</term><term>Durham</term><term>Durham region</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous participants</term><term>Epidemiol</term><term>Food items</term><term>General health status</term><term>Global rating</term><term>Health belief</term><term>Health outcomes</term><term>Health status</term><term>Last year</term><term>Leake</term><term>Likert scale</term><term>Municipal homes</term><term>Null hypothesis</term><term>Older adults</term><term>Ontario</term><term>Oral</term><term>Oral health</term><term>Oral health behavior</term><term>Oral health impact profile</term><term>Oral health need</term><term>Oral health outcomes</term><term>Oral health status</term><term>Oral quality</term><term>Other studies</term><term>Participant</term><term>Percent confidence interval</term><term>Public health</term><term>Public health dent</term><term>Regular source</term><term>Slade</term><term>Spec</term><term>Spec care dentist</term><term>Uninsured</term><term>Uninsured counterparts</term><term>Years column</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">To assess whether dental insurance influences how institutionalized older adults ages 65 and older rank their oral health status, a census survey was designed for residents of Durham's (Canada) Municipal Homes for the Aged. The odds ratio (OR) and the Cochran & Mantel‐Haenszel's OR were used to estimate the crude and adjusted effect of dental insurance on oral health status, respectively. Overall, 64 percent participated in the interview. Oral health status was ranked as “good,”“very good” or “excellent” by 57 percent of the participants. This ranking was clearly unrelated to the residents having dental insurance, as only 28 percent had dental coverage. Significant effect modifiers included age, dental status and whether the participant had visited the dentist within the last year. Dental insurance positively influenced how dentate participants ranked their oral health status (OR = 2.26; 95 percent CI 1.19; 4.28). In edentulous participants, age and visiting the dentist within the last year modified the effect of dental insurance on oral health status. Having dental insurance reduced the odds of reporting “good,”“very good” or “excellent” oral health (OR = 0.20; 95 percent CI = 0.08; 0.49) among the participants ages 85 and older who did not visit the dentist within the last year; however, the opposite was true for their younger counterparts who visited the dentist within the last year (OR = 7.20; 95 percent CI = 1.08; 47.96). In this population, therefore, dental insurance was associated with higher oral health status rank among the dentate, but its effect on the edentulous population depended on age and the pattern of visiting the dentist.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>oral health status</json:string><json:string>dental insurance</json:string><json:string>oral health</json:string><json:string>last year</json:string><json:string>dentate</json:string><json:string>older adults</json:string><json:string>dental care</json:string><json:string>cognitively</json:string><json:string>dental status</json:string><json:string>dental services</json:string><json:string>epidemiol</json:string><json:string>uninsured</json:string><json:string>community dent</json:string><json:string>health belief</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>dentate participants</json:string><json:string>leake</json:string><json:string>public health dent</json:string><json:string>durham</json:string><json:string>health status</json:string><json:string>slade</json:string><json:string>assoc</json:string><json:string>dent assoc</json:string><json:string>dental health</json:string><json:string>global rating</json:string><json:string>participant</json:string><json:string>dental</json:string><json:string>dental visit</json:string><json:string>null hypothesis</json:string><json:string>edentulous participants</json:string><json:string>dental insurance influence</json:string><json:string>dental insurance coverage</json:string><json:string>general health status</json:string><json:string>dent educ</json:string><json:string>spec</json:string><json:string>health outcomes</json:string><json:string>oral health behavior</json:string><json:string>regular source</json:string><json:string>percent confidence interval</json:string><json:string>oral quality</json:string><json:string>dental treatment</json:string><json:string>food items</json:string><json:string>dental coverage</json:string><json:string>dental problem</json:string><json:string>other studies</json:string><json:string>oral health impact profile</json:string><json:string>community dent health</json:string><json:string>confidence limits</json:string><json:string>dental insurance plan</json:string><json:string>dental pain</json:string><json:string>uninsured counterparts</json:string><json:string>public health</json:string><json:string>years column</json:string><json:string>confidence interval</json:string><json:string>municipal homes</json:string><json:string>oral health need</json:string><json:string>spec care dentist</json:string><json:string>oral health outcomes</json:string><json:string>likert scale</json:string><json:string>durham region</json:string><json:string>ontario</json:string><json:string>oral</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Albert O. Adegbembo BDS, DDPH, MSc, FRCD(C)</name><affiliations><json:string>Division of Public Health Services and Research, College of Dentistry University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla.</json:string><json:string>Correspondence address: *Corresponding author:aadegbembodental.ufl.edu</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>James L. Leake DDS, DDPH, MSc, FRCD(C)</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Patricia A. Main BDS, DDS, DDPH, MSc, FRCD(C)</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Herenia P. Lawrence DDS, MSc, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Mary L. Chipman BSc, MA</name><affiliations><json:string>Graduate Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>aged</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dentl insurance</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>oral health status</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>interview</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>cross‐sectional survey</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>nursing home</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Canada</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>SCD275</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-VX97TP1X-T</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>miscellaneous</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>To assess whether dental insurance influences how institutionalized older adults ages 65 and older rank their oral health status, a census survey was designed for residents of Durham's (Canada) Municipal Homes for the Aged. The odds ratio (OR) and the Cochran & Mantel‐Haenszel's OR were used to estimate the crude and adjusted effect of dental insurance on oral health status, respectively. Overall, 64 percent participated in the interview. Oral health status was ranked as “good,”“very good” or “excellent” by 57 percent of the participants. This ranking was clearly unrelated to the residents having dental insurance, as only 28 percent had dental coverage. Significant effect modifiers included age, dental status and whether the participant had visited the dentist within the last year. Dental insurance positively influenced how dentate participants ranked their oral health status (OR = 2.26; 95 percent CI 1.19; 4.28). In edentulous participants, age and visiting the dentist within the last year modified the effect of dental insurance on oral health status. Having dental insurance reduced the odds of reporting “good,”“very good” or “excellent” oral health (OR = 0.20; 95 percent CI = 0.08; 0.49) among the participants ages 85 and older who did not visit the dentist within the last year; however, the opposite was true for their younger counterparts who visited the dentist within the last year (OR = 7.20; 95 percent CI = 1.08; 47.96). In this population, therefore, dental insurance was associated with higher oral health status rank among the dentate, but its effect on the edentulous population depended on age and the pattern of visiting the dentist.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>10</score><pdfWordCount>7143</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>44971</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>11</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>606.959 x 782.159 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>263</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1669</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>7</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>The Influence of Dental Insurance on Institutionalized Older Adults in Ranking Their Oral Health Status</title><pmid><json:string>16463599</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Special Care in Dentistry</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1754-4505</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0275-1879</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1754-4505</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>SCD</json:string></publisherId><volume>25</volume><issue>6</issue><pages><first>275</first><last>285</last><total>11</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1974</json:string><json:string>1981</json:string><json:string>2005</json:string><json:string>1</json:string><json:string>1971</json:string><json:string>1970s</json:string><json:string>1996</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>University of Toronto</json:string><json:string>Bureau of Economic and Behavioral Research</json:string><json:string>SAS Institute Inc</json:string><json:string>Dentistry University</json:string><json:string>Department of Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario</json:string><json:string>Statistics Canada, Oct</json:string><json:string>Danish National Health Insurance</json:string><json:string>University of Chicago</json:string><json:string>Oxford University</json:string><json:string>In Comparing Oral Health Care Systems</json:string><json:string>Graduate Department of Public Health Sciences, Universlty of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario</json:string><json:string>World Health Organization</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>College</json:string><json:string>Dental</json:string><json:string>Percent</json:string><json:string>K. Does</json:string><json:string>Dentistry</json:string><json:string>OR Probability</json:string><json:string>Spec</json:string><json:string>G. Association</json:string><json:string>D. Relationship</json:string><json:string>Raven Publishers</json:string><json:string>Patricia A. Main</json:string><json:string>Mary L. Chipman</json:string><json:string>Gen Dent</json:string><json:string>P. Lawrence</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Durham</json:string><json:string>United States</json:string><json:string>Durham Region</json:string><json:string>Norway</json:string><json:string>Georgia</json:string><json:string>Washington</json:string><json:string>Canada</json:string><json:string>DC</json:string><json:string>Greenland</json:string><json:string>Atlanta</json:string><json:string>York</json:string><json:string>Ottawa</json:string><json:string>Goldberg</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>University of Toronto, 2001</json:string><json:string>University of Toronto, 1982</json:string><json:string>[185]</json:string><json:string>SpringerVerlag New York Inc., 2002</json:string><json:string>[265]</json:string><json:string>Rinehart and Winston, 1985</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-VX97TP1X-T</json:string></ark><categories><wos></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>2005</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2005</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1754-4505.2005.tb01401.x</json:string></doi><id>7F9D982BDC29218CCE426E333DE0B7F1EF86911F</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7F9D982BDC29218CCE426E333DE0B7F1EF86911F/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7F9D982BDC29218CCE426E333DE0B7F1EF86911F/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/7F9D982BDC29218CCE426E333DE0B7F1EF86911F/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">The Influence of Dental Insurance on Institutionalized Older Adults in Ranking Their Oral Health Status</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2005-11"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="other" source="miscellaneous" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-7474895G-0">other</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="other"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The Influence of Dental Insurance on Institutionalized Older Adults in Ranking Their Oral Health Status</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Albert O.</forename><surname>Adegbembo</surname><roleName type="degree">BDS, DDPH, MSc, FRCD(C)</roleName></persName><affiliation>Division of Public Health Services and Research, College of Dentistry University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla.<address><country key="US"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>*Corresponding author:aadegbembodental.ufl.edu</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">James L.</forename><surname>Leake</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, DDPH, MSc, FRCD(C)</roleName></persName><affiliation>Department of Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Patricia A.</forename><surname>Main</surname><roleName type="degree">BDS, DDS, DDPH, MSc, FRCD(C)</roleName></persName><affiliation>Department of Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Herenia P.</forename><surname>Lawrence</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, MSc, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>Department of Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">Mary L.</forename><surname>Chipman</surname><roleName type="degree">BSc, MA</roleName></persName><affiliation>Graduate Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">7F9D982BDC29218CCE426E333DE0B7F1EF86911F</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-VX97TP1X-T</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1754-4505.2005.tb01401.x</idno><idno type="unit">SCD275</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:SCD.SCD275.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Special Care in Dentistry</title><title level="j" type="alt">SPECIAL CARE IN DENTISTRY</title><idno type="pISSN">0275-1879</idno><idno type="eISSN">1754-4505</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1754-4505</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/scd.2005.25.issue-6</idno><idno type="product">SCD</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">25</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="275">275</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="285">285</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">11</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2005-11"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>ABSTRACT</head><p>To assess whether dental insurance influences how institutionalized older adults ages 65 and older rank their oral health status, a census survey was designed for residents of Durham's (Canada) Municipal Homes for the Aged. The odds ratio (OR) and the Cochran & Mantel‐Haenszel's OR were used to estimate the crude and adjusted effect of dental insurance on oral health status, respectively. Overall, 64 percent participated in the interview. Oral health status was ranked as “good,”“very good” or “excellent” by 57 percent of the participants. This ranking was clearly unrelated to the residents having dental insurance, as only 28 percent had dental coverage. Significant effect modifiers included age, dental status and whether the participant had visited the dentist within the last year. Dental insurance positively influenced how dentate participants ranked their oral health status (OR = 2.26; 95 percent CI 1.19; 4.28). In edentulous participants, age and visiting the dentist within the last year modified the effect of dental insurance on oral health status. Having dental insurance reduced the odds of reporting “good,”“very good” or “excellent” oral health (OR = 0.20; 95 percent CI = 0.08; 0.49) among the participants ages 85 and older who did not visit the dentist within the last year; however, the opposite was true for their younger counterparts who visited the dentist within the last year (OR = 7.20; 95 percent CI = 1.08; 47.96). In this population, therefore, dental insurance was associated with higher oral health status rank among the dentate, but its effect on the edentulous population depended on age and the pattern of visiting the dentist.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">aged</term><term xml:id="k2">dentl insurance</term><term xml:id="k3">oral health status</term><term xml:id="k4">interview</term><term xml:id="k5">cross‐sectional survey</term><term xml:id="k6">nursing home</term><term xml:id="k7">Canada</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Cover Story</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7F9D982BDC29218CCE426E333DE0B7F1EF86911F/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1754-4505</doi><issn type="print">0275-1879</issn><issn type="electronic">1754-4505</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="SCD"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="SPECIAL CARE IN DENTISTRY">Special Care in Dentistry</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="11006"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/scd.2005.25.issue-6</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="25">25</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="6">6</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2005-11">November 2005</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="miscellaneous" position="0027500" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1754-4505.2005.tb01401.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="SCD275"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="11"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Cover Story</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2008-06-28"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2008-06-28"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-03-02"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-02-08"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-11-03"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="275">275</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="285">285</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>*Corresponding author:aadegbembodental.ufl.edu</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:SCD.SCD275.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="referenceTotal" number="68"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="6"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">The Influence of Dental Insurance on Institutionalized Older Adults in Ranking Their Oral Health Status</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Albert O.</givenNames><familyName>Adegbembo</familyName><degrees>BDS, DDPH, MSc, FRCD(C)</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>James L.</givenNames><familyName>Leake</familyName><degrees>DDS, DDPH, MSc, FRCD(C)</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Patricia A.</givenNames><familyName>Main</familyName><degrees>BDS, DDS, DDPH, MSc, FRCD(C)</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Herenia P.</givenNames><familyName>Lawrence</familyName><degrees>DDS, MSc, PhD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Mary L.</givenNames><familyName>Chipman</familyName><degrees>BSc, MA</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="US"><unparsedAffiliation>Division of Public Health Services and Research, College of Dentistry University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla.</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3"><unparsedAffiliation>Graduate Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">aged</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">dentl insurance</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">oral health status</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">interview</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">cross‐sectional survey</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">nursing home</keyword><keyword xml:id="k7">Canada</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p>To assess whether dental insurance influences how institutionalized older adults ages 65 and older rank their oral health status, a census survey was designed for residents of Durham's (Canada) Municipal Homes for the Aged. The odds ratio (OR) and the Cochran & Mantel‐Haenszel's OR were used to estimate the crude and adjusted effect of dental insurance on oral health status, respectively. Overall, 64 percent participated in the interview. Oral health status was ranked as “good,”“very good” or “excellent” by 57 percent of the participants. This ranking was clearly unrelated to the residents having dental insurance, as only 28 percent had dental coverage. Significant effect modifiers included age, dental status and whether the participant had visited the dentist within the last year. Dental insurance positively influenced how dentate participants ranked their oral health status (OR = 2.26; 95 percent CI 1.19; 4.28). In edentulous participants, age and visiting the dentist within the last year modified the effect of dental insurance on oral health status. Having dental insurance reduced the odds of reporting “good,”“very good” or “excellent” oral health (OR = 0.20; 95 percent CI = 0.08; 0.49) among the participants ages 85 and older who did not visit the dentist within the last year; however, the opposite was true for their younger counterparts who visited the dentist within the last year (OR = 7.20; 95 percent CI = 1.08; 47.96). In this population, therefore, dental insurance was associated with higher oral health status rank among the dentate, but its effect on the edentulous population depended on age and the pattern of visiting the dentist.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>The Influence of Dental Insurance on Institutionalized Older Adults in Ranking Their Oral Health Status</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>The Influence of Dental Insurance on Institutionalized Older Adults in Ranking Their Oral Health Status</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Albert O.</namePart><namePart type="family">Adegbembo</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">BDS, DDPH, MSc, FRCD(C)</namePart><affiliation>Division of Public Health Services and Research, College of Dentistry University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla.</affiliation><affiliation>Correspondence address: *Corresponding author:aadegbembodental.ufl.edu</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">James L.</namePart><namePart type="family">Leake</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, DDPH, MSc, FRCD(C)</namePart><affiliation>Department of Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Patricia A.</namePart><namePart type="family">Main</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">BDS, DDS, DDPH, MSc, FRCD(C)</namePart><affiliation>Department of Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Herenia P.</namePart><namePart type="family">Lawrence</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, MSc, PhD</namePart><affiliation>Department of Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Mary L.</namePart><namePart type="family">Chipman</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">BSc, MA</namePart><affiliation>Graduate Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="miscellaneous" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2005-11</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2005</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="references">68</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">6</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">To assess whether dental insurance influences how institutionalized older adults ages 65 and older rank their oral health status, a census survey was designed for residents of Durham's (Canada) Municipal Homes for the Aged. The odds ratio (OR) and the Cochran & Mantel‐Haenszel's OR were used to estimate the crude and adjusted effect of dental insurance on oral health status, respectively. Overall, 64 percent participated in the interview. Oral health status was ranked as “good,”“very good” or “excellent” by 57 percent of the participants. This ranking was clearly unrelated to the residents having dental insurance, as only 28 percent had dental coverage. Significant effect modifiers included age, dental status and whether the participant had visited the dentist within the last year. Dental insurance positively influenced how dentate participants ranked their oral health status (OR = 2.26; 95 percent CI 1.19; 4.28). In edentulous participants, age and visiting the dentist within the last year modified the effect of dental insurance on oral health status. Having dental insurance reduced the odds of reporting “good,”“very good” or “excellent” oral health (OR = 0.20; 95 percent CI = 0.08; 0.49) among the participants ages 85 and older who did not visit the dentist within the last year; however, the opposite was true for their younger counterparts who visited the dentist within the last year (OR = 7.20; 95 percent CI = 1.08; 47.96). In this population, therefore, dental insurance was associated with higher oral health status rank among the dentate, but its effect on the edentulous population depended on age and the pattern of visiting the dentist.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>aged</topic><topic>dentl insurance</topic><topic>oral health status</topic><topic>interview</topic><topic>cross‐sectional survey</topic><topic>nursing home</topic><topic>Canada</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Special Care in Dentistry</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0275-1879</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1754-4505</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1754-4505</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">SCD</identifier><part><date>2005</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>25</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>6</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>275</start><end>285</end><total>11</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">7F9D982BDC29218CCE426E333DE0B7F1EF86911F</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-VX97TP1X-T</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1754-4505.2005.tb01401.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">SCD275</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7F9D982BDC29218CCE426E333DE0B7F1EF86911F/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003F28 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003F28 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:7F9D982BDC29218CCE426E333DE0B7F1EF86911F
|texte= The Influence of Dental Insurance on Institutionalized Older Adults in Ranking Their Oral Health Status
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |