Assessing perceived potential outcomes of prosthodontic treatment in partial and fully edentulous patients
Identifieur interne : 003905 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 003904; suivant : 003906Assessing perceived potential outcomes of prosthodontic treatment in partial and fully edentulous patients
Auteurs : C. R. Leles ; W. J. Morandini ; É. T. Da Silva ; M. De F. Nunes ; M. C. M. FreireSource :
- Journal of Oral Rehabilitation [ 0305-182X ] ; 2008-09.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Blackwell publishing, Brazilian ministry, Cause harm, Clinical outcomes, Clinical practice, Clinical variables, Community dent, Conceptual analysis, Consecutive sample, Dent, Dent assoc, Dental arches, Dental prosthodontics, Dental treatment, Denture, Economic variables, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Edentulous space, Edentulous spaces, Edentulous subjects, Education level, Educational level, Federal university, Gender, General health, General risks, Gingival tissues, Goias, Good reliability, Greater perception, Health care, Health status indicators, Important predictors, Independent variables, Internal consistency, Journal compilation, Life measures, Limited awareness, Lower scores, Measure perception scores, Natural teeth, Negative perceptions, Older adults, Oral health, Oral health status, Oral rehabil, Oral rehabilitation, Perception scores, Positive aspects, Positive perceptions, Possible outcomes, Potential outcomes, Potential risks, Prosthet dent, Prosthodont, Prosthodont restor dent, Prosthodontic, Prosthodontic treatment, Prosthodontics, Reliability, Risk subscales, Risks consequences, Second phase, Second stage, Single spaces, Spec care dentist, Subscale domains, Subscales, Tooth loss, Treatment need, Treatment outcomes, Treatment planning, Treatment results, Whole scale.
- Teeft :
- Blackwell publishing, Brazilian ministry, Cause harm, Clinical outcomes, Clinical practice, Clinical variables, Community dent, Conceptual analysis, Consecutive sample, Dent, Dent assoc, Dental arches, Dental prosthodontics, Dental treatment, Denture, Economic variables, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Edentulous space, Edentulous spaces, Edentulous subjects, Education level, Educational level, Federal university, Gender, General health, General risks, Gingival tissues, Goias, Good reliability, Greater perception, Health care, Health status indicators, Important predictors, Independent variables, Internal consistency, Journal compilation, Life measures, Limited awareness, Lower scores, Measure perception scores, Natural teeth, Negative perceptions, Older adults, Oral health, Oral health status, Oral rehabil, Oral rehabilitation, Perception scores, Positive aspects, Positive perceptions, Possible outcomes, Potential outcomes, Potential risks, Prosthet dent, Prosthodont, Prosthodont restor dent, Prosthodontic, Prosthodontic treatment, Prosthodontics, Reliability, Risk subscales, Risks consequences, Second phase, Second stage, Single spaces, Spec care dentist, Subscale domains, Subscales, Tooth loss, Treatment need, Treatment outcomes, Treatment planning, Treatment results, Whole scale.
Abstract
Summary The aim was to develop an instrument to measure and to explore the perception of potential outcomes of prosthodontic treatment in partial and fully edentulous patients, including benefits, risks and consequences of non replacement of missing teeth. It was also aimed to assess the influence of clinical and socio‐demographic variables on the perception of potential outcomes. Using a two‐phase data collection (open‐ended and closed‐form), a scale was developed containing 41 statements to measure subject’s perception scores in a 5‐point Likert‐type scale (1, strongly disagree; 2, disagree; 3, neutral; 4, agree; 5, strongly agree). In the second phase 126 partially or fully edentulous subjects were interviewed. Influence of age, gender and clinical variables on perceived outcomes were tested using one‐way anova, independent t‐test and two‐way anova (general linear model). Respondents’ mean age was 51·8 years (s.d.=12·3), and 74% were female. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the scale and subscales ranged from 0·70 to 0·90. Patients’ mean scores ranged from 2·37 to 4·88 (mean=4·25; s.d.=0·65), indicating that subjects tended to agree with the proposed affirmatives (scores 4 and 5). Perception scores were influenced by age, gender, edentulous spaces and use of prosthodontics. Older subjects, female, those with higher number of missing teeth and who have been previously treated had greater perception of benefits and risks of prosthodontic treatment. It was concluded that the proposed instrument was suitable for measuring subjects’ perception of potential outcomes of prosthodontic treatment.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01839.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:734EF09214D30B8AB2FD6677A0EA0CA4B38603DBLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Assessing perceived potential outcomes of prosthodontic treatment in partial and fully edentulous patients</title><author><name sortKey="Leles, C R" sort="Leles, C R" uniqKey="Leles C" first="C. R." last="Leles">C. R. Leles</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prevention and Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiâs, Goiânia, Goiâs, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Morandini, W J" sort="Morandini, W J" uniqKey="Morandini W" first="W. J." last="Morandini">W. J. Morandini</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prevention and Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiâs, Goiânia, Goiâs, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Da Silva, E T" sort="Da Silva, E T" uniqKey="Da Silva E" first="É. T." last="Da Silva">É. T. Da Silva</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prevention and Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiâs, Goiânia, Goiâs, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De F Nunes, M" sort="De F Nunes, M" uniqKey="De F Nunes M" first="M." last="De F. Nunes">M. De F. Nunes</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Stomatological Sciences, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiâs, Goiânia, Goiâs, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Freire, M C M" sort="Freire, M C M" uniqKey="Freire M" first="M. C. M." last="Freire">M. C. M. Freire</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Stomatological Sciences, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiâs, Goiânia, Goiâs, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:734EF09214D30B8AB2FD6677A0EA0CA4B38603DB</idno><date when="2008" year="2008">2008</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01839.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/734EF09214D30B8AB2FD6677A0EA0CA4B38603DB/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">003905</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">003905</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Assessing perceived potential outcomes of prosthodontic treatment in partial and fully edentulous patients</title><author><name sortKey="Leles, C R" sort="Leles, C R" uniqKey="Leles C" first="C. R." last="Leles">C. R. Leles</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prevention and Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiâs, Goiânia, Goiâs, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Morandini, W J" sort="Morandini, W J" uniqKey="Morandini W" first="W. J." last="Morandini">W. J. Morandini</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prevention and Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiâs, Goiânia, Goiâs, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Da Silva, E T" sort="Da Silva, E T" uniqKey="Da Silva E" first="É. T." last="Da Silva">É. T. Da Silva</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prevention and Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiâs, Goiânia, Goiâs, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De F Nunes, M" sort="De F Nunes, M" uniqKey="De F Nunes M" first="M." last="De F. Nunes">M. De F. Nunes</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Stomatological Sciences, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiâs, Goiânia, Goiâs, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Freire, M C M" sort="Freire, M C M" uniqKey="Freire M" first="M. C. M." last="Freire">M. C. M. Freire</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Stomatological Sciences, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiâs, Goiânia, Goiâs, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">35</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">9</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="682">682</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="689">689</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2008-09">2008-09</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Blackwell publishing</term><term>Brazilian ministry</term><term>Cause harm</term><term>Clinical outcomes</term><term>Clinical practice</term><term>Clinical variables</term><term>Community dent</term><term>Conceptual analysis</term><term>Consecutive sample</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dent assoc</term><term>Dental arches</term><term>Dental prosthodontics</term><term>Dental treatment</term><term>Denture</term><term>Economic variables</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Edentulous space</term><term>Edentulous spaces</term><term>Edentulous subjects</term><term>Education level</term><term>Educational level</term><term>Federal university</term><term>Gender</term><term>General health</term><term>General risks</term><term>Gingival tissues</term><term>Goias</term><term>Good reliability</term><term>Greater perception</term><term>Health care</term><term>Health status indicators</term><term>Important predictors</term><term>Independent variables</term><term>Internal consistency</term><term>Journal compilation</term><term>Life measures</term><term>Limited awareness</term><term>Lower scores</term><term>Measure perception scores</term><term>Natural teeth</term><term>Negative perceptions</term><term>Older adults</term><term>Oral health</term><term>Oral health status</term><term>Oral rehabil</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Perception scores</term><term>Positive aspects</term><term>Positive perceptions</term><term>Possible outcomes</term><term>Potential outcomes</term><term>Potential risks</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Prosthodont</term><term>Prosthodont restor dent</term><term>Prosthodontic</term><term>Prosthodontic treatment</term><term>Prosthodontics</term><term>Reliability</term><term>Risk subscales</term><term>Risks consequences</term><term>Second phase</term><term>Second stage</term><term>Single spaces</term><term>Spec care dentist</term><term>Subscale domains</term><term>Subscales</term><term>Tooth loss</term><term>Treatment need</term><term>Treatment outcomes</term><term>Treatment planning</term><term>Treatment results</term><term>Whole scale</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Blackwell publishing</term><term>Brazilian ministry</term><term>Cause harm</term><term>Clinical outcomes</term><term>Clinical practice</term><term>Clinical variables</term><term>Community dent</term><term>Conceptual analysis</term><term>Consecutive sample</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dent assoc</term><term>Dental arches</term><term>Dental prosthodontics</term><term>Dental treatment</term><term>Denture</term><term>Economic variables</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Edentulous space</term><term>Edentulous spaces</term><term>Edentulous subjects</term><term>Education level</term><term>Educational level</term><term>Federal university</term><term>Gender</term><term>General health</term><term>General risks</term><term>Gingival tissues</term><term>Goias</term><term>Good reliability</term><term>Greater perception</term><term>Health care</term><term>Health status indicators</term><term>Important predictors</term><term>Independent variables</term><term>Internal consistency</term><term>Journal compilation</term><term>Life measures</term><term>Limited awareness</term><term>Lower scores</term><term>Measure perception scores</term><term>Natural teeth</term><term>Negative perceptions</term><term>Older adults</term><term>Oral health</term><term>Oral health status</term><term>Oral rehabil</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Perception scores</term><term>Positive aspects</term><term>Positive perceptions</term><term>Possible outcomes</term><term>Potential outcomes</term><term>Potential risks</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Prosthodont</term><term>Prosthodont restor dent</term><term>Prosthodontic</term><term>Prosthodontic treatment</term><term>Prosthodontics</term><term>Reliability</term><term>Risk subscales</term><term>Risks consequences</term><term>Second phase</term><term>Second stage</term><term>Single spaces</term><term>Spec care dentist</term><term>Subscale domains</term><term>Subscales</term><term>Tooth loss</term><term>Treatment need</term><term>Treatment outcomes</term><term>Treatment planning</term><term>Treatment results</term><term>Whole scale</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Summary The aim was to develop an instrument to measure and to explore the perception of potential outcomes of prosthodontic treatment in partial and fully edentulous patients, including benefits, risks and consequences of non replacement of missing teeth. It was also aimed to assess the influence of clinical and socio‐demographic variables on the perception of potential outcomes. Using a two‐phase data collection (open‐ended and closed‐form), a scale was developed containing 41 statements to measure subject’s perception scores in a 5‐point Likert‐type scale (1, strongly disagree; 2, disagree; 3, neutral; 4, agree; 5, strongly agree). In the second phase 126 partially or fully edentulous subjects were interviewed. Influence of age, gender and clinical variables on perceived outcomes were tested using one‐way anova, independent t‐test and two‐way anova (general linear model). Respondents’ mean age was 51·8 years (s.d.=12·3), and 74% were female. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the scale and subscales ranged from 0·70 to 0·90. Patients’ mean scores ranged from 2·37 to 4·88 (mean=4·25; s.d.=0·65), indicating that subjects tended to agree with the proposed affirmatives (scores 4 and 5). Perception scores were influenced by age, gender, edentulous spaces and use of prosthodontics. Older subjects, female, those with higher number of missing teeth and who have been previously treated had greater perception of benefits and risks of prosthodontic treatment. It was concluded that the proposed instrument was suitable for measuring subjects’ perception of potential outcomes of prosthodontic treatment.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>prosthodontics</json:string><json:string>prosthodontic</json:string><json:string>prosthodontic treatment</json:string><json:string>potential outcomes</json:string><json:string>subscales</json:string><json:string>prosthodont</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>journal compilation</json:string><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>blackwell publishing</json:string><json:string>goias</json:string><json:string>perception scores</json:string><json:string>second phase</json:string><json:string>community dent</json:string><json:string>edentulous spaces</json:string><json:string>edentulous subjects</json:string><json:string>oral health</json:string><json:string>education level</json:string><json:string>potential risks</json:string><json:string>independent variables</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string><json:string>risk subscales</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string><json:string>treatment planning</json:string><json:string>tooth loss</json:string><json:string>federal university</json:string><json:string>whole scale</json:string><json:string>clinical variables</json:string><json:string>edentulous space</json:string><json:string>oral rehabilitation</json:string><json:string>lower scores</json:string><json:string>dental treatment</json:string><json:string>health care</json:string><json:string>prosthodont restor dent</json:string><json:string>gender</json:string><json:string>reliability</json:string><json:string>second stage</json:string><json:string>treatment outcomes</json:string><json:string>cause harm</json:string><json:string>gingival tissues</json:string><json:string>treatment results</json:string><json:string>natural teeth</json:string><json:string>oral rehabil</json:string><json:string>measure perception scores</json:string><json:string>internal consistency</json:string><json:string>limited awareness</json:string><json:string>good reliability</json:string><json:string>dental arches</json:string><json:string>clinical practice</json:string><json:string>clinical outcomes</json:string><json:string>possible outcomes</json:string><json:string>subscale domains</json:string><json:string>single spaces</json:string><json:string>educational level</json:string><json:string>consecutive sample</json:string><json:string>general risks</json:string><json:string>life measures</json:string><json:string>oral health status</json:string><json:string>risks consequences</json:string><json:string>economic variables</json:string><json:string>important predictors</json:string><json:string>treatment need</json:string><json:string>positive aspects</json:string><json:string>greater perception</json:string><json:string>prosthet dent</json:string><json:string>health status indicators</json:string><json:string>older adults</json:string><json:string>dental prosthodontics</json:string><json:string>positive perceptions</json:string><json:string>negative perceptions</json:string><json:string>conceptual analysis</json:string><json:string>spec care dentist</json:string><json:string>brazilian ministry</json:string><json:string>dent assoc</json:string><json:string>general health</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>C. R. LELES</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prevention and Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiâs, Goiânia, Goiâs, Brazil</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>W. J. MORANDINI</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prevention and Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiâs, Goiânia, Goiâs, Brazil</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>É. T. Da SILVA</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prevention and Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiâs, Goiânia, Goiâs, Brazil</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>M. De F. NUNES</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Stomatological Sciences, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiâs, Goiânia, Goiâs, Brazil</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>M. C. M. FREIRE</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Stomatological Sciences, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiâs, Goiânia, Goiâs, Brazil</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>prosthodontics</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>treatment outcome</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>questionnaires</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>perception</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>JOOR1839</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-BJXK1ZJ7-M</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Summary The aim was to develop an instrument to measure and to explore the perception of potential outcomes of prosthodontic treatment in partial and fully edentulous patients, including benefits, risks and consequences of non replacement of missing teeth. It was also aimed to assess the influence of clinical and socio‐demographic variables on the perception of potential outcomes. Using a two‐phase data collection (open‐ended and closed‐form), a scale was developed containing 41 statements to measure subject’s perception scores in a 5‐point Likert‐type scale (1, strongly disagree; 2, disagree; 3, neutral; 4, agree; 5, strongly agree). In the second phase 126 partially or fully edentulous subjects were interviewed. Influence of age, gender and clinical variables on perceived outcomes were tested using one‐way anova, independent t‐test and two‐way anova (general linear model). Respondents’ mean age was 51·8 years (s.d.=12·3), and 74% were female. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the scale and subscales ranged from 0·70 to 0·90. Patients’ mean scores ranged from 2·37 to 4·88 (mean=4·25; s.d.=0·65), indicating that subjects tended to agree with the proposed affirmatives (scores 4 and 5). Perception scores were influenced by age, gender, edentulous spaces and use of prosthodontics. Older subjects, female, those with higher number of missing teeth and who have been previously treated had greater perception of benefits and risks of prosthodontic treatment. It was concluded that the proposed instrument was suitable for measuring subjects’ perception of potential outcomes of prosthodontic treatment.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.715</score><pdfWordCount>3907</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>27373</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>8</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>234</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1617</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>4</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Assessing perceived potential outcomes of prosthodontic treatment in partial and fully edentulous patients</title><pmid><json:string>18793353</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0305-182X</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1365-2842</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JOOR</json:string></publisherId><volume>35</volume><issue>9</issue><pages><first>682</first><last>689</last><total>8</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2008</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>SPSS Inc., Chicago</json:string><json:string>Brazilian Ministry of Health</json:string><json:string>Federal University</json:string><json:string>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</json:string><json:string>Department of Stomatological Sciences, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goias, Goiania, Goias, Brazil</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Results</json:string><json:string>The</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Brazil</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Hakestam et al.</json:string><json:string>Hugo et al.</json:string><json:string>Trovik et al.</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-BJXK1ZJ7-M</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2008</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2008</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01839.x</json:string></doi><id>734EF09214D30B8AB2FD6677A0EA0CA4B38603DB</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/734EF09214D30B8AB2FD6677A0EA0CA4B38603DB/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/734EF09214D30B8AB2FD6677A0EA0CA4B38603DB/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/734EF09214D30B8AB2FD6677A0EA0CA4B38603DB/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Assessing perceived potential outcomes of prosthodontic treatment in partial and fully edentulous patients</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2008-09"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Assessing perceived potential outcomes of prosthodontic treatment in partial and fully edentulous patients</title><title level="a" type="short">PERCEIVED POTENTIAL OUTCOMES OF PROSTHODONTICS</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">C. R.</forename><surname>LELES</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Prevention and Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiâs, Goiânia, Goiâs, Brazil<address><country key="BR"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">W. J.</forename><surname>MORANDINI</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Prevention and Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiâs, Goiânia, Goiâs, Brazil<address><country key="BR"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">É. T.</forename><surname>
Da SILVA</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Prevention and Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiâs, Goiânia, Goiâs, Brazil<address><country key="BR"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">M.</forename><surname>
De F. NUNES</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Stomatological Sciences, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiâs, Goiânia, Goiâs, Brazil<address><country key="BR"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">M. C. M.</forename><surname>FREIRE</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Stomatological Sciences, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiâs, Goiânia, Goiâs, Brazil<address><country key="BR"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">734EF09214D30B8AB2FD6677A0EA0CA4B38603DB</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-BJXK1ZJ7-M</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01839.x</idno><idno type="unit">JOOR1839</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JOOR.JOOR1839.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title><idno type="pISSN">0305-182X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/jor.2008.35.issue-9</idno><idno type="product">JOOR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">35</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">9</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="682">682</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="689">689</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2008-09"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p><hi rend="bold">Summary </hi> The aim was to develop an instrument to measure and to explore the perception of potential outcomes of prosthodontic treatment in partial and fully edentulous patients, including benefits, risks and consequences of non replacement of missing teeth. It was also aimed to assess the influence of clinical and socio‐demographic variables on the perception of potential outcomes. Using a two‐phase data collection (open‐ended and closed‐form), a scale was developed containing 41 statements to measure subject’s perception scores in a 5‐point Likert‐type scale (1, strongly disagree; 2, disagree; 3, neutral; 4, agree; 5, strongly agree). In the second phase 126 partially or fully edentulous subjects were interviewed. Influence of age, gender and clinical variables on perceived outcomes were tested using one‐way <hi rend="smallCaps">anova</hi>, independent <hi rend="italic">t</hi>‐test and two‐way <hi rend="smallCaps">anova</hi> (general linear model). Respondents’ mean age was 51·8 years (s.d.=12·3), and 74% were female. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the scale and subscales ranged from 0·70 to 0·90. Patients’ mean scores ranged from 2·37 to 4·88 (mean=4·25; s.d.=0·65), indicating that subjects tended to agree with the proposed affirmatives (scores 4 and 5). Perception scores were influenced by age, gender, edentulous spaces and use of prosthodontics. Older subjects, female, those with higher number of missing teeth and who have been previously treated had greater perception of benefits and risks of prosthodontic treatment. It was concluded that the proposed instrument was suitable for measuring subjects’ perception of potential outcomes of prosthodontic treatment.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">prosthodontics</term><term xml:id="k2">treatment outcome</term><term xml:id="k3">questionnaires</term><term xml:id="k4">perception</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/734EF09214D30B8AB2FD6677A0EA0CA4B38603DB/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</doi><issn type="print">0305-182X</issn><issn type="electronic">1365-2842</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JOOR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="09009"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/jor.2008.35.issue-9</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="35">35</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="9">9</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2008-09">September 2008</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="6" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01839.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JOOR1839"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="8"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2008-08-07"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2008-08-07"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.5 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-04-07"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-20"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-30"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="682">682</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="689">689</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Dr Cláudio Rodrigues Leles, Departamento de Prevenção e Reabilitação Oral, Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade Federal de Goiás, Praça Universitária, S/N, St Universitário, 74605‐220 Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
E‐mail: <email>crleles@odonto.ufg.br</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JOOR.JOOR1839.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted for publication 6 November 2007</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="6"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Assessing perceived potential outcomes of prosthodontic treatment in partial and fully edentulous patients</title><title type="shortAuthors">C. R. LELES <i>et al.</i></title><title type="short">PERCEIVED POTENTIAL OUTCOMES OF PROSTHODONTICS</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>C. R.</givenNames><familyName>LELES</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>W. J.</givenNames><familyName>MORANDINI</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>É. T.</givenNames><familyName>
Da SILVA</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>M.</givenNames><familyName>
De F. NUNES</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>M. C. M.</givenNames><familyName>FREIRE</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="BR"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Prevention and Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiâs, Goiânia, Goiâs, Brazil</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="BR"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Stomatological Sciences, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiâs, Goiânia, Goiâs, Brazil</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">prosthodontics</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">treatment outcome</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">questionnaires</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">perception</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><b>Summary </b> The aim was to develop an instrument to measure and to explore the perception of potential outcomes of prosthodontic treatment in partial and fully edentulous patients, including benefits, risks and consequences of non replacement of missing teeth. It was also aimed to assess the influence of clinical and socio‐demographic variables on the perception of potential outcomes. Using a two‐phase data collection (open‐ended and closed‐form), a scale was developed containing 41 statements to measure subject’s perception scores in a 5‐point Likert‐type scale (1, strongly disagree; 2, disagree; 3, neutral; 4, agree; 5, strongly agree). In the second phase 126 partially or fully edentulous subjects were interviewed. Influence of age, gender and clinical variables on perceived outcomes were tested using one‐way <sc>anova</sc>, independent <i>t</i>‐test and two‐way <sc>anova</sc> (general linear model). Respondents’ mean age was 51·8 years (s.d.=12·3), and 74% were female. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the scale and subscales ranged from 0·70 to 0·90. Patients’ mean scores ranged from 2·37 to 4·88 (mean=4·25; s.d.=0·65), indicating that subjects tended to agree with the proposed affirmatives (scores 4 and 5). Perception scores were influenced by age, gender, edentulous spaces and use of prosthodontics. Older subjects, female, those with higher number of missing teeth and who have been previously treated had greater perception of benefits and risks of prosthodontic treatment. It was concluded that the proposed instrument was suitable for measuring subjects’ perception of potential outcomes of prosthodontic treatment.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Assessing perceived potential outcomes of prosthodontic treatment in partial and fully edentulous patients</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>PERCEIVED POTENTIAL OUTCOMES OF PROSTHODONTICS</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Assessing perceived potential outcomes of prosthodontic treatment in partial and fully edentulous patients</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">C. R.</namePart><namePart type="family">LELES</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prevention and Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiâs, Goiânia, Goiâs, Brazil</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">W. J.</namePart><namePart type="family">MORANDINI</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prevention and Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiâs, Goiânia, Goiâs, Brazil</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">É. T.</namePart><namePart type="family">Da SILVA</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prevention and Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiâs, Goiânia, Goiâs, Brazil</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">M.</namePart><namePart type="family">De F. NUNES</namePart><affiliation>Department of Stomatological Sciences, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiâs, Goiânia, Goiâs, Brazil</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">M. C. M.</namePart><namePart type="family">FREIRE</namePart><affiliation>Department of Stomatological Sciences, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiâs, Goiânia, Goiâs, Brazil</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2008-09</dateIssued><edition>Accepted for publication 6 November 2007</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2008</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">0</extent><extent unit="tables">6</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Summary The aim was to develop an instrument to measure and to explore the perception of potential outcomes of prosthodontic treatment in partial and fully edentulous patients, including benefits, risks and consequences of non replacement of missing teeth. It was also aimed to assess the influence of clinical and socio‐demographic variables on the perception of potential outcomes. Using a two‐phase data collection (open‐ended and closed‐form), a scale was developed containing 41 statements to measure subject’s perception scores in a 5‐point Likert‐type scale (1, strongly disagree; 2, disagree; 3, neutral; 4, agree; 5, strongly agree). In the second phase 126 partially or fully edentulous subjects were interviewed. Influence of age, gender and clinical variables on perceived outcomes were tested using one‐way anova, independent t‐test and two‐way anova (general linear model). Respondents’ mean age was 51·8 years (s.d.=12·3), and 74% were female. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the scale and subscales ranged from 0·70 to 0·90. Patients’ mean scores ranged from 2·37 to 4·88 (mean=4·25; s.d.=0·65), indicating that subjects tended to agree with the proposed affirmatives (scores 4 and 5). Perception scores were influenced by age, gender, edentulous spaces and use of prosthodontics. Older subjects, female, those with higher number of missing teeth and who have been previously treated had greater perception of benefits and risks of prosthodontic treatment. It was concluded that the proposed instrument was suitable for measuring subjects’ perception of potential outcomes of prosthodontic treatment.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>prosthodontics</topic><topic>treatment outcome</topic><topic>questionnaires</topic><topic>perception</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0305-182X</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1365-2842</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JOOR</identifier><part><date>2008</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>35</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>9</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>682</start><end>689</end><total>8</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">734EF09214D30B8AB2FD6677A0EA0CA4B38603DB</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-BJXK1ZJ7-M</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01839.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JOOR1839</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/734EF09214D30B8AB2FD6677A0EA0CA4B38603DB/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003905 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003905 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:734EF09214D30B8AB2FD6677A0EA0CA4B38603DB
|texte= Assessing perceived potential outcomes of prosthodontic treatment in partial and fully edentulous patients
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |