Measurement of patient‐derived utility values for periodontal health using a multi‐attribute scale
Identifieur interne : 003906 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 003905; suivant : 003907Measurement of patient‐derived utility values for periodontal health using a multi‐attribute scale
Auteurs : C. A. Bellamy ; M. R. Brickley ; R. McandrewSource :
- Journal of Clinical Periodontology [ 0303-6979 ] ; 1996-09.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Best outcome, Dental care, Dental education, Dental health, Dentistry, Domain, False teeth, Formal decision analysis techniques, Health state, Health states, Individual patient, Interand weightings, Knowledge future, Negative attitudes, Oral health, Oral surgery, Overall utility score, Patient perceptions, Periodontal, Periodontal disease, Periodontal health, Periodontal patients, Periodontal treatment, Sante parodontale, Significant component, Specific concern, Statement description statement, Treatment planning, Utility values, Various health states, Wales college, Weighting, Wide range.
- Teeft :
- Best outcome, Dental care, Dental education, Dental health, Dentistry, Domain, False teeth, Formal decision analysis techniques, Health state, Health states, Individual patient, Interand weightings, Knowledge future, Negative attitudes, Oral health, Oral surgery, Overall utility score, Patient perceptions, Periodontal, Periodontal disease, Periodontal health, Periodontal patients, Periodontal treatment, Sante parodontale, Significant component, Specific concern, Statement description statement, Treatment planning, Utility values, Various health states, Wales college, Weighting, Wide range.
Abstract
Abstract Periodontal health states are difficult to quantify and no formal scale quantifying patients' utilities for periodontal health states exits. Multi‐attribute utility (MAD) techniques were used to develop such a scale. The MAU scale maybe used to quantify patients' assessment of their current periodontal health and that of possible treatment outcomes. Such data, combined with probability values in formal decision analysis techniques would result in improved rationality of treatment planning for periodontal disease. 20 patients attending for routine undergraduate care were interviewed. Data from these interviews were sorted into groups of common interest (domains). Intra‐domain health statements were complied from the interview content. 21 patients ranked the intra‐domain statements on a scale of 0–100. This same group of patients also performed an inter‐domain weighting. Mean results showed that patients were 2× as concerned with how they felt and with the prognosis of possible outcomes, than with how they looked and what facts they knew about their oral health. However, the real value of utilities research lies in application of individual results to treatment planning, as there is a wide range of opinion regarding outcome health states.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.1996.tb00615.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:7355D562611726F905ABED7B3E217B5DABF1270FLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Measurement of patient‐derived utility values for periodontal health using a multi‐attribute scale</title><author><name sortKey="Bellamy, C A" sort="Bellamy, C A" uniqKey="Bellamy C" first="C. A." last="Bellamy">C. A. Bellamy</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Decisions in Dentistry Group, Department of Oral Surgery, Medicine and Pathology, Dental School, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XY, Wales, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence address: C. A. Bellamy, Department of Oral Surgery, Medicine and Pathology, Dental School, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XY, Wales, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Brickley, M R" sort="Brickley, M R" uniqKey="Brickley M" first="M. R." last="Brickley">M. R. Brickley</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Decisions in Dentistry Group, Department of Oral Surgery, Medicine and Pathology, Dental School, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XY, Wales, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mcandrew, R" sort="Mcandrew, R" uniqKey="Mcandrew R" first="R." last="Mcandrew">R. Mcandrew</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Dental School, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XY, Wales, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:7355D562611726F905ABED7B3E217B5DABF1270F</idno><date when="1996" year="1996">1996</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-051X.1996.tb00615.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/7355D562611726F905ABED7B3E217B5DABF1270F/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">003906</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">003906</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Measurement of patient‐derived utility values for periodontal health using a multi‐attribute scale</title><author><name sortKey="Bellamy, C A" sort="Bellamy, C A" uniqKey="Bellamy C" first="C. A." last="Bellamy">C. A. Bellamy</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Decisions in Dentistry Group, Department of Oral Surgery, Medicine and Pathology, Dental School, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XY, Wales, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence address: C. A. Bellamy, Department of Oral Surgery, Medicine and Pathology, Dental School, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XY, Wales, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Brickley, M R" sort="Brickley, M R" uniqKey="Brickley M" first="M. R." last="Brickley">M. R. Brickley</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Decisions in Dentistry Group, Department of Oral Surgery, Medicine and Pathology, Dental School, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XY, Wales, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mcandrew, R" sort="Mcandrew, R" uniqKey="Mcandrew R" first="R." last="Mcandrew">R. Mcandrew</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Dental School, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XY, Wales, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY</title><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-051X</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">23</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">9</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="805">805</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="809">809</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">5</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1996-09">1996-09</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Best outcome</term><term>Dental care</term><term>Dental education</term><term>Dental health</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Domain</term><term>False teeth</term><term>Formal decision analysis techniques</term><term>Health state</term><term>Health states</term><term>Individual patient</term><term>Interand weightings</term><term>Knowledge future</term><term>Negative attitudes</term><term>Oral health</term><term>Oral surgery</term><term>Overall utility score</term><term>Patient perceptions</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontal disease</term><term>Periodontal health</term><term>Periodontal patients</term><term>Periodontal treatment</term><term>Sante parodontale</term><term>Significant component</term><term>Specific concern</term><term>Statement description statement</term><term>Treatment planning</term><term>Utility values</term><term>Various health states</term><term>Wales college</term><term>Weighting</term><term>Wide range</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Best outcome</term><term>Dental care</term><term>Dental education</term><term>Dental health</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Domain</term><term>False teeth</term><term>Formal decision analysis techniques</term><term>Health state</term><term>Health states</term><term>Individual patient</term><term>Interand weightings</term><term>Knowledge future</term><term>Negative attitudes</term><term>Oral health</term><term>Oral surgery</term><term>Overall utility score</term><term>Patient perceptions</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontal disease</term><term>Periodontal health</term><term>Periodontal patients</term><term>Periodontal treatment</term><term>Sante parodontale</term><term>Significant component</term><term>Specific concern</term><term>Statement description statement</term><term>Treatment planning</term><term>Utility values</term><term>Various health states</term><term>Wales college</term><term>Weighting</term><term>Wide range</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Abstract Periodontal health states are difficult to quantify and no formal scale quantifying patients' utilities for periodontal health states exits. Multi‐attribute utility (MAD) techniques were used to develop such a scale. The MAU scale maybe used to quantify patients' assessment of their current periodontal health and that of possible treatment outcomes. Such data, combined with probability values in formal decision analysis techniques would result in improved rationality of treatment planning for periodontal disease. 20 patients attending for routine undergraduate care were interviewed. Data from these interviews were sorted into groups of common interest (domains). Intra‐domain health statements were complied from the interview content. 21 patients ranked the intra‐domain statements on a scale of 0–100. This same group of patients also performed an inter‐domain weighting. Mean results showed that patients were 2× as concerned with how they felt and with the prognosis of possible outcomes, than with how they looked and what facts they knew about their oral health. However, the real value of utilities research lies in application of individual results to treatment planning, as there is a wide range of opinion regarding outcome health states.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>periodontal</json:string><json:string>treatment planning</json:string><json:string>health state</json:string><json:string>periodontal treatment</json:string><json:string>periodontal health</json:string><json:string>false teeth</json:string><json:string>periodontal disease</json:string><json:string>oral health</json:string><json:string>weighting</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>wales college</json:string><json:string>health states</json:string><json:string>oral surgery</json:string><json:string>knowledge future</json:string><json:string>utility values</json:string><json:string>various health states</json:string><json:string>formal decision analysis techniques</json:string><json:string>wide range</json:string><json:string>significant component</json:string><json:string>best outcome</json:string><json:string>individual patient</json:string><json:string>patient perceptions</json:string><json:string>interand weightings</json:string><json:string>specific concern</json:string><json:string>negative attitudes</json:string><json:string>dental health</json:string><json:string>dental care</json:string><json:string>statement description statement</json:string><json:string>dental education</json:string><json:string>overall utility score</json:string><json:string>sante parodontale</json:string><json:string>periodontal patients</json:string><json:string>domain</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>C. A. Bellamy</name><affiliations><json:string>Decisions in Dentistry Group, Department of Oral Surgery, Medicine and Pathology, Dental School, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XY, Wales, UK</json:string><json:string>Correspondence address: C. A. Bellamy, Department of Oral Surgery, Medicine and Pathology, Dental School, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XY, Wales, UK</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>M. R. Brickley</name><affiliations><json:string>Decisions in Dentistry Group, Department of Oral Surgery, Medicine and Pathology, Dental School, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XY, Wales, UK</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>R. McAndrew</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Dental School, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XY, Wales, UK</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>periodontal health</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>multi‐attribute utility</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>health measurement scale</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>JCPE805</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-RD04HSDP-X</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Abstract Periodontal health states are difficult to quantify and no formal scale quantifying patients' utilities for periodontal health states exits. Multi‐attribute utility (MAD) techniques were used to develop such a scale. The MAU scale maybe used to quantify patients' assessment of their current periodontal health and that of possible treatment outcomes. Such data, combined with probability values in formal decision analysis techniques would result in improved rationality of treatment planning for periodontal disease. 20 patients attending for routine undergraduate care were interviewed. Data from these interviews were sorted into groups of common interest (domains). Intra‐domain health statements were complied from the interview content. 21 patients ranked the intra‐domain statements on a scale of 0–100. This same group of patients also performed an inter‐domain weighting. Mean results showed that patients were 2× as concerned with how they felt and with the prognosis of possible outcomes, than with how they looked and what facts they knew about their oral health. However, the real value of utilities research lies in application of individual results to treatment planning, as there is a wide range of opinion regarding outcome health states.</abstract><qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>186</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1265</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>3</keywordCount><score>7.642</score><pdfWordCount>3410</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>22059</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>6</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>465 x 670 pts</pdfPageSize></qualityIndicators><title>Measurement of patient‐derived utility values for periodontal health using a multi‐attribute scale</title><pmid><json:string>8891929</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0303-6979</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-051X</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JCPE</json:string></publisherId><volume>23</volume><issue>9</issue><pages><first>805</first><last>809</last><total>5</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1996</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>South Glamorgan Local Research Ethical Committee</json:string><json:string>UK Bellamy CA</json:string><json:string>Department of Periodontology, University of Wales College of Medicine</json:string><json:string>University of Wales College of Medicine</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Professor</json:string><json:string>A. Dolby</json:string><json:string>R. McAndrew</json:string><json:string>Following</json:string><json:string>E. J. Kay</json:string><json:string>M. R. Brickley</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Delphi</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Brickley et al, (1993)</json:string><json:string>Axelsson & Lmdhe 1978</json:string><json:string>Todd & Lader 1988</json:string><json:string>Wilson et al, 1984</json:string><json:string>Wennstrom et al, 1990</json:string><json:string>Wilson 1987</json:string><json:string>Bellamy et al.</json:string><json:string>Kay (1992)</json:string><json:string>McCreery et al. 1991</json:string><json:string>Matthews & McCuUoch 1993</json:string><json:string>Carter 1992</json:string><json:string>Kay 1992</json:string><json:string>Croucher 1987</json:string><json:string>Kay 1991</json:string><json:string>Tan et al, 1992</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-RD04HSDP-X</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Periodontics</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>1996</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1996</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-051X.1996.tb00615.x</json:string></doi><id>7355D562611726F905ABED7B3E217B5DABF1270F</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7355D562611726F905ABED7B3E217B5DABF1270F/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7355D562611726F905ABED7B3E217B5DABF1270F/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/7355D562611726F905ABED7B3E217B5DABF1270F/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Measurement of patient‐derived utility values for periodontal health using a multi‐attribute scale</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1996-09"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Measurement of patient‐derived utility values for periodontal health using a multi‐attribute scale</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">C. A.</forename><surname>Bellamy</surname></persName><affiliation>Decisions in Dentistry Group, Department of Oral Surgery, Medicine and Pathology, Dental School, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XY, Wales, UK<address><country key="GB"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>C. A. Bellamy, Department of Oral Surgery, Medicine and Pathology, Dental School, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XY, Wales, UK</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">M. R.</forename><surname>Brickley</surname></persName><affiliation>Decisions in Dentistry Group, Department of Oral Surgery, Medicine and Pathology, Dental School, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XY, Wales, UK<address><country key="GB"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">R.</forename><surname>McAndrew</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Dental School, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XY, Wales, UK<address><country key="GB"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">7355D562611726F905ABED7B3E217B5DABF1270F</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-RD04HSDP-X</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-051X.1996.tb00615.x</idno><idno type="unit">JCPE805</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JCPE.JCPE805.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY</title><idno type="pISSN">0303-6979</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-051X</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cpe.1996.23.issue-9</idno><idno type="product">JCPE</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">23</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">9</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="805">805</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="809">809</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">5</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1996-09"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p><hi rend="bold">Abstract</hi> Periodontal health states are difficult to quantify and no formal scale quantifying patients' utilities for periodontal health states exits. Multi‐attribute utility (MAD) techniques were used to develop such a scale. The MAU scale maybe used to quantify patients' assessment of their current periodontal health and that of possible treatment outcomes. Such data, combined with probability values in formal decision analysis techniques would result in improved rationality of treatment planning for periodontal disease. 20 patients attending for routine undergraduate care were interviewed. Data from these interviews were sorted into groups of common interest (domains). Intra‐domain health statements were complied from the interview content. 21 patients ranked the intra‐domain statements on a scale of 0–100. This same group of patients also performed an inter‐domain weighting. Mean results showed that patients were 2× as concerned with how they felt and with the prognosis of possible outcomes, than with how they looked and what facts they knew about their oral health. However, the real value of utilities research lies in application of individual results to treatment planning, as there is a wide range of opinion regarding outcome health states.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">periodontal health</term><term xml:id="k2">multi‐attribute utility</term><term xml:id="k3">health measurement scale</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7355D562611726F905ABED7B3E217B5DABF1270F/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</doi><issn type="print">0303-6979</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-051X</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JCPE"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY">Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="09009"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cpe.1996.23.issue-9</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="23">23</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="9">9</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="1996-09">September 1996</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0080500" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-051X.1996.tb00615.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JCPE805"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="5"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2005-12-13"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2005-12-13"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-03-09"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-19"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-23"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="805">805</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="809">809</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>C. A. Bellamy, Department of Oral Surgery, Medicine and Pathology, Dental School, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XY, Wales, UK</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JCPE.JCPE805.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted for publication 12 June 1995</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="referenceTotal" number="23"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="4"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Measurement of patient‐derived utility values for periodontal health using a multi‐attribute scale</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>C. A.</givenNames><familyName>Bellamy</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>M. R.</givenNames><familyName>Brickley</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>R.</givenNames><familyName>McAndrew</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="GB"><unparsedAffiliation>Decisions in Dentistry Group, Department of Oral Surgery, Medicine and Pathology, Dental School, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XY, Wales, UK</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="GB"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Periodontology, Dental School, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XY, Wales, UK</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">periodontal health</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">multi‐attribute utility</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">health measurement scale</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><b>Abstract</b> Periodontal health states are difficult to quantify and no formal scale quantifying patients' utilities for periodontal health states exits. Multi‐attribute utility (MAD) techniques were used to develop such a scale. The MAU scale maybe used to quantify patients' assessment of their current periodontal health and that of possible treatment outcomes. Such data, combined with probability values in formal decision analysis techniques would result in improved rationality of treatment planning for periodontal disease. 20 patients attending for routine undergraduate care were interviewed. Data from these interviews were sorted into groups of common interest (domains). Intra‐domain health statements were complied from the interview content. 21 patients ranked the intra‐domain statements on a scale of 0–100. This same group of patients also performed an inter‐domain weighting. Mean results showed that patients were 2× as concerned with how they felt and with the prognosis of possible outcomes, than with how they looked and what facts they knew about their oral health. However, the real value of utilities research lies in application of individual results to treatment planning, as there is a wide range of opinion regarding outcome health states.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Measurement of patient‐derived utility values for periodontal health using a multi‐attribute scale</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Measurement of patient‐derived utility values for periodontal health using a multi‐attribute scale</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">C. A.</namePart><namePart type="family">Bellamy</namePart><affiliation>Decisions in Dentistry Group, Department of Oral Surgery, Medicine and Pathology, Dental School, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XY, Wales, UK</affiliation><affiliation>Correspondence address: C. A. Bellamy, Department of Oral Surgery, Medicine and Pathology, Dental School, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XY, Wales, UK</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">M. R.</namePart><namePart type="family">Brickley</namePart><affiliation>Decisions in Dentistry Group, Department of Oral Surgery, Medicine and Pathology, Dental School, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XY, Wales, UK</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">R.</namePart><namePart type="family">McAndrew</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Dental School, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XY, Wales, UK</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1996-09</dateIssued><edition>Accepted for publication 12 June 1995</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1996</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="references">23</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">4</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Abstract Periodontal health states are difficult to quantify and no formal scale quantifying patients' utilities for periodontal health states exits. Multi‐attribute utility (MAD) techniques were used to develop such a scale. The MAU scale maybe used to quantify patients' assessment of their current periodontal health and that of possible treatment outcomes. Such data, combined with probability values in formal decision analysis techniques would result in improved rationality of treatment planning for periodontal disease. 20 patients attending for routine undergraduate care were interviewed. Data from these interviews were sorted into groups of common interest (domains). Intra‐domain health statements were complied from the interview content. 21 patients ranked the intra‐domain statements on a scale of 0–100. This same group of patients also performed an inter‐domain weighting. Mean results showed that patients were 2× as concerned with how they felt and with the prognosis of possible outcomes, than with how they looked and what facts they knew about their oral health. However, the real value of utilities research lies in application of individual results to treatment planning, as there is a wide range of opinion regarding outcome health states.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>periodontal health</topic><topic>multi‐attribute utility</topic><topic>health measurement scale</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0303-6979</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-051X</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JCPE</identifier><part><date>1996</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>23</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>9</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>805</start><end>809</end><total>5</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">7355D562611726F905ABED7B3E217B5DABF1270F</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-RD04HSDP-X</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-051X.1996.tb00615.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JCPE805</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7355D562611726F905ABED7B3E217B5DABF1270F/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003906 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003906 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:7355D562611726F905ABED7B3E217B5DABF1270F
|texte= Measurement of patient‐derived utility values for periodontal health using a multi‐attribute scale
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |