Combining field methods in tourism research
Identifieur interne : 001209 ( Istex/Curation ); précédent : 001208; suivant : 001210Combining field methods in tourism research
Auteurs : Rudi Hartmann [États-Unis]Source :
- Annals of Tourism Research [ 0160-7383 ] ; 1988.
Abstract
Too often interviewing forms the only method of data collection in recreation and tourism research. It is maintained here that the research could profit from a combination and integration of different field methods and techniques. This is shown in the case of the European trips of young American and Canadian tourists. In this study, these travelers were interviewed, observed, and counted in various ways. The information gained through the different field methods proved to be complementary in nature and allowed counterchecks. The findings were useful both on a macro- and micro-level. A comparison of the methods introduced disclosed major advantages and serious shortcomings in each case. Participant observation proved to be a powerful heuristic tool; however, its uses also posed ethical questions.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/0160-7383(88)90073-4
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :001321
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:8FCB6DD418BABF8EDC7A8693C1555A6696A83D4ELe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>Combining field methods in tourism research</title><author><name sortKey="Hartmann, Rudi" sort="Hartmann, Rudi" uniqKey="Hartmann R" first="Rudi" last="Hartmann">Rudi Hartmann</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>University of Colorado, USA</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>University of Colorado</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:8FCB6DD418BABF8EDC7A8693C1555A6696A83D4E</idno><date when="1988" year="1988">1988</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/0160-7383(88)90073-4</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/8FCB6DD418BABF8EDC7A8693C1555A6696A83D4E/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001321</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001321</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001209</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">Combining field methods in tourism research</title><author><name sortKey="Hartmann, Rudi" sort="Hartmann, Rudi" uniqKey="Hartmann R" first="Rudi" last="Hartmann">Rudi Hartmann</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>University of Colorado, USA</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>University of Colorado</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Annals of Tourism Research</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">ATR</title><idno type="ISSN">0160-7383</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1988">1988</date><biblScope unit="volume">15</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="88">88</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="105">105</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0160-7383</idno></series><idno type="istex">8FCB6DD418BABF8EDC7A8693C1555A6696A83D4E</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/0160-7383(88)90073-4</idno><idno type="PII">0160-7383(88)90073-4</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0160-7383</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Too often interviewing forms the only method of data collection in recreation and tourism research. It is maintained here that the research could profit from a combination and integration of different field methods and techniques. This is shown in the case of the European trips of young American and Canadian tourists. In this study, these travelers were interviewed, observed, and counted in various ways. The information gained through the different field methods proved to be complementary in nature and allowed counterchecks. The findings were useful both on a macro- and micro-level. A comparison of the methods introduced disclosed major advantages and serious shortcomings in each case. Participant observation proved to be a powerful heuristic tool; however, its uses also posed ethical questions.</div></front></TEI></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/Istex/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001209 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 001209 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Rhénanie
|area= UnivTrevesV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:8FCB6DD418BABF8EDC7A8693C1555A6696A83D4E
|texte= Combining field methods in tourism research
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |