Serveur d'exploration sur l'Université de Trèves

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Combining field methods in tourism research

Identifieur interne : 001321 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001320; suivant : 001322

Combining field methods in tourism research

Auteurs : Rudi Hartmann

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:8FCB6DD418BABF8EDC7A8693C1555A6696A83D4E

Abstract

Too often interviewing forms the only method of data collection in recreation and tourism research. It is maintained here that the research could profit from a combination and integration of different field methods and techniques. This is shown in the case of the European trips of young American and Canadian tourists. In this study, these travelers were interviewed, observed, and counted in various ways. The information gained through the different field methods proved to be complementary in nature and allowed counterchecks. The findings were useful both on a macro- and micro-level. A comparison of the methods introduced disclosed major advantages and serious shortcomings in each case. Participant observation proved to be a powerful heuristic tool; however, its uses also posed ethical questions.

Url:
DOI: 10.1016/0160-7383(88)90073-4

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:8FCB6DD418BABF8EDC7A8693C1555A6696A83D4E

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Combining field methods in tourism research</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Hartmann, Rudi" sort="Hartmann, Rudi" uniqKey="Hartmann R" first="Rudi" last="Hartmann">Rudi Hartmann</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>University of Colorado, USA</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:8FCB6DD418BABF8EDC7A8693C1555A6696A83D4E</idno>
<date when="1988" year="1988">1988</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/0160-7383(88)90073-4</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/8FCB6DD418BABF8EDC7A8693C1555A6696A83D4E/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001321</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001321</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a">Combining field methods in tourism research</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Hartmann, Rudi" sort="Hartmann, Rudi" uniqKey="Hartmann R" first="Rudi" last="Hartmann">Rudi Hartmann</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>University of Colorado, USA</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">Annals of Tourism Research</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">ATR</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0160-7383</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<date type="published" when="1988">1988</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">15</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="88">88</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="105">105</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0160-7383</idno>
</series>
<idno type="istex">8FCB6DD418BABF8EDC7A8693C1555A6696A83D4E</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1016/0160-7383(88)90073-4</idno>
<idno type="PII">0160-7383(88)90073-4</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0160-7383</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Too often interviewing forms the only method of data collection in recreation and tourism research. It is maintained here that the research could profit from a combination and integration of different field methods and techniques. This is shown in the case of the European trips of young American and Canadian tourists. In this study, these travelers were interviewed, observed, and counted in various ways. The information gained through the different field methods proved to be complementary in nature and allowed counterchecks. The findings were useful both on a macro- and micro-level. A comparison of the methods introduced disclosed major advantages and serious shortcomings in each case. Participant observation proved to be a powerful heuristic tool; however, its uses also posed ethical questions.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex>
<corpusName>elsevier</corpusName>
<author>
<json:item>
<name>Rudi Hartmann</name>
<affiliations>
<json:string>University of Colorado, USA</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
</author>
<subject>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>field methods</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>American and Canadian tourists</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>interviewing</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>observational methods</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>ethical issues</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>méthodes de recherches sur le terrain</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>touristes canadiens et américains</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>méthodes d'observation</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>problémes éthiques</value>
</json:item>
</subject>
<language>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<originalGenre>
<json:string>Full-length article</json:string>
</originalGenre>
<abstract>Too often interviewing forms the only method of data collection in recreation and tourism research. It is maintained here that the research could profit from a combination and integration of different field methods and techniques. This is shown in the case of the European trips of young American and Canadian tourists. In this study, these travelers were interviewed, observed, and counted in various ways. The information gained through the different field methods proved to be complementary in nature and allowed counterchecks. The findings were useful both on a macro- and micro-level. A comparison of the methods introduced disclosed major advantages and serious shortcomings in each case. Participant observation proved to be a powerful heuristic tool; however, its uses also posed ethical questions.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators>
<score>6.464</score>
<pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageSize>432 x 648 pts</pdfPageSize>
<refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative>
<keywordCount>9</keywordCount>
<abstractCharCount>806</abstractCharCount>
<pdfWordCount>5812</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>42399</pdfCharCount>
<pdfPageCount>18</pdfPageCount>
<abstractWordCount>122</abstractWordCount>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>Combining field methods in tourism research</title>
<pii>
<json:string>0160-7383(88)90073-4</json:string>
</pii>
<refBibs>
<json:item>
<author>
<json:item>
<name>W. Burch, Jr.</name>
</json:item>
</author>
<host>
<pages>
<last>145</last>
<first>130</first>
</pages>
<author></author>
<title>Land & Leisure: Concepts and Methods in Outdoor Recreation</title>
</host>
<title>Observation as a Technique for Recreation Research</title>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<author>
<json:item>
<name>F. Campbell</name>
</json:item>
</author>
<host>
<volume>2</volume>
<pages>
<last>236</last>
<first>226</first>
</pages>
<author></author>
<title>Journal of Leisure Research</title>
</host>
<title>Participant Observation in Outdoor Recreation</title>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<author>
<json:item>
<name>G. Dann</name>
</json:item>
</author>
<host>
<volume>8</volume>
<pages>
<last>219</last>
<first>187</first>
</pages>
<author></author>
<title>Annals of Tourism Research</title>
</host>
<title>Tourist Motivation: An Appraisal</title>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<host>
<author></author>
<title>Ethics in Social and Behavioral Research</title>
</host>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<host>
<author></author>
<title>Das raeumliche Verhalten junger nordamerikanischer Touristen in Bayern — Ein Beispiel fuer Staedtetourismus</title>
</host>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<author>
<json:item>
<name>R. Hartman</name>
</json:item>
</author>
<host>
<pages>
<last>188</last>
<first>177</first>
</pages>
<author></author>
<title>Proceedings of International Geographical Union Symposium</title>
</host>
<title>A “Tourist Day” in the City: Methodological Issues in the Spatio-Temporal Study of City Tourism</title>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<host>
<author></author>
<title>Freizeit-Reisen und Tourismus in Deutschland und in den Vereinigten Staaten – Eine interkulturelle Untersuchung</title>
</host>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<author>
<json:item>
<name>R. Hartman</name>
</json:item>
</author>
<host>
<volume>28</volume>
<pages>
<last>156</last>
<first>145</first>
</pages>
<issue>3/4</issue>
<author></author>
<title>Zeitschrift fuer Wirtschaftsgeographie</title>
</host>
<title>Ein “Touristentag” in der Stadt — Methodische Betrachtungen zum Staedte — tourismus dargestellt am Beispiel der Europareisen junger amerikanis ten</title>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<author>
<json:item>
<name>R. Hartman</name>
</json:item>
</author>
<host>
<volume>5</volume>
<pages>
<last>33</last>
<first>25</first>
</pages>
<author></author>
<title>Leisure Studies</title>
</host>
<title>Tourism, Seasonality and Social Change</title>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<author>
<json:item>
<name>P. Jackson</name>
</json:item>
</author>
<host>
<volume>65</volume>
<pages>
<last>46</last>
<first>39</first>
</pages>
<issue>1</issue>
<author></author>
<title>Geografiska Annaler</title>
</host>
<title>Principles and Problems of Participant Observation</title>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<host>
<author></author>
<title>Jugend im Urlaub</title>
</host>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<host>
<author></author>
<title>Privatheit als Problem und Gegenstand der Psychologie</title>
</host>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<host>
<author></author>
<title>Freizeit und Alltag</title>
</host>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<host>
<author></author>
<title>Analyzing Social Settings: A guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis</title>
</host>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<host>
<author></author>
<title>A World of Strangers</title>
</host>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<author>
<json:item>
<name>D. Mercer</name>
</json:item>
</author>
<host>
<volume>3</volume>
<pages>
<last>276</last>
<first>261</first>
</pages>
<author></author>
<title>Journal of Leisure Research</title>
</host>
<title>The Role of Perception in the Recreation Experience: A Review and Discussion</title>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<author>
<json:item>
<name>B. Mitchell</name>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<name>D. Draper</name>
</json:item>
</author>
<host>
<volume>35</volume>
<pages>
<last>17</last>
<first>9</first>
</pages>
<issue>1</issue>
<author></author>
<title>Professional Geographer</title>
</host>
<title>Ethics in Geographical Research</title>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<author>
<json:item>
<name>C. Riddick</name>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<name>M. deSchriver</name>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<name>E. Weissinger</name>
</json:item>
</author>
<host>
<volume>16</volume>
<pages>
<last>321</last>
<first>311</first>
</pages>
<author></author>
<title>Journal of Leisure Research</title>
</host>
<title>A Methodological Review of Research in Journal of Leisure Research from 1978 to 1982</title>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<author>
<json:item>
<name>G. Romsa</name>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<name>M. Blenman</name>
</json:item>
</author>
<host>
<volume>8</volume>
<pages>
<last>401</last>
<first>393</first>
</pages>
<issue>2</issue>
<author></author>
<title>Loisir et Société</title>
</host>
<title>On the Consistency of two Data Gathering Procedures for Retirees' Leisure Activities</title>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<host>
<author></author>
<title>Fieldwork Experience: Qualitative Approaches to Social Research</title>
</host>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<author>
<json:item>
<name>W. Whyte</name>
</json:item>
</author>
<host>
<volume>14</volume>
<pages>
<last>66</last>
<first>56</first>
</pages>
<author></author>
<title>American Sociologist</title>
</host>
<title>On Making the Most of Participant Observation</title>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<host>
<author></author>
<title>The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces</title>
</host>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<host>
<author></author>
<title>Learning from the Field: A Guide from Experience</title>
</host>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<author>
<json:item>
<name>T. Wilson</name>
</json:item>
</author>
<host>
<volume>34</volume>
<pages>
<last>486</last>
<first>469</first>
</pages>
<author></author>
<title>Koelner Zeitschrift fuer Soziologie und Sozialforschung</title>
</host>
<title>Qualitative “oder” quantitative Methoden in der Sozialforschung</title>
</json:item>
</refBibs>
<genre>
<json:string>research-article</json:string>
</genre>
<host>
<volume>15</volume>
<pii>
<json:string>S0160-7383(00)X0080-1</json:string>
</pii>
<pages>
<last>105</last>
<first>88</first>
</pages>
<issn>
<json:string>0160-7383</json:string>
</issn>
<issue>1</issue>
<genre>
<json:string>journal</json:string>
</genre>
<language>
<json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<title>Annals of Tourism Research</title>
<publicationDate>1988</publicationDate>
</host>
<categories>
<wos>
<json:string>social science</json:string>
<json:string>sociology</json:string>
<json:string>hospitality, leisure, sport & tourism</json:string>
</wos>
<scienceMetrix>
<json:string>economic & social sciences</json:string>
<json:string>economics & business </json:string>
<json:string>sport, leisure & tourism</json:string>
</scienceMetrix>
</categories>
<publicationDate>1988</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>1988</copyrightDate>
<doi>
<json:string>10.1016/0160-7383(88)90073-4</json:string>
</doi>
<id>8FCB6DD418BABF8EDC7A8693C1555A6696A83D4E</id>
<score>0.07392982</score>
<fulltext>
<json:item>
<extension>pdf</extension>
<original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8FCB6DD418BABF8EDC7A8693C1555A6696A83D4E/fulltext/pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<extension>zip</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8FCB6DD418BABF8EDC7A8693C1555A6696A83D4E/fulltext/zip</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/8FCB6DD418BABF8EDC7A8693C1555A6696A83D4E/fulltext/tei">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title level="a">Combining field methods in tourism research</title>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<availability>
<p>ELSEVIER</p>
</availability>
<date>1988</date>
</publicationStmt>
<notesStmt>
<note>Refereed anonymously</note>
</notesStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct type="inbook">
<analytic>
<title level="a">Combining field methods in tourism research</title>
<author xml:id="author-1">
<persName>
<forename type="first">Rudi</forename>
<surname>Hartmann</surname>
</persName>
<note type="biography">Visiting Asssistant Professor at the University of Colorado (Dept. of Geography, Campus Box 260, Boulder, CO 80309, USA). He received his Ph.D. from the Geography Department at the Technische Universitaet Muenchen, West Germany. His present research interests include methodological issues in the geographic study of travel and tourism.</note>
<affiliation>Visiting Asssistant Professor at the University of Colorado (Dept. of Geography, Campus Box 260, Boulder, CO 80309, USA). He received his Ph.D. from the Geography Department at the Technische Universitaet Muenchen, West Germany. His present research interests include methodological issues in the geographic study of travel and tourism.</affiliation>
<affiliation>University of Colorado, USA</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<title level="j">Annals of Tourism Research</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">ATR</title>
<idno type="pISSN">0160-7383</idno>
<idno type="PII">S0160-7383(00)X0080-1</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<date type="published" when="1988"></date>
<biblScope unit="volume">15</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="88">88</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="105">105</biblScope>
</imprint>
</monogr>
<idno type="istex">8FCB6DD418BABF8EDC7A8693C1555A6696A83D4E</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1016/0160-7383(88)90073-4</idno>
<idno type="PII">0160-7383(88)90073-4</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<creation>
<date>1988</date>
</creation>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
<abstract xml:lang="en">
<p>Too often interviewing forms the only method of data collection in recreation and tourism research. It is maintained here that the research could profit from a combination and integration of different field methods and techniques. This is shown in the case of the European trips of young American and Canadian tourists. In this study, these travelers were interviewed, observed, and counted in various ways. The information gained through the different field methods proved to be complementary in nature and allowed counterchecks. The findings were useful both on a macro- and micro-level. A comparison of the methods introduced disclosed major advantages and serious shortcomings in each case. Participant observation proved to be a powerful heuristic tool; however, its uses also posed ethical questions.</p>
</abstract>
<abstract xml:lang="fr">
<p>Résumé: La combinaison des méthods d'enquêtes sur le terrain les recherches en tourisme. Il arrive trop souvent que l'on rassemble des données pour la recherche en récréation ou en tourisme uniquement par moyen d'une enquête. Le présent article maintient que les recherches pourraient tirer avantage d'une combinaison et d'une intégration de diverses techniques et méthodes de recherches sur le terrain. Cela se voit dans le cas de voyages en Europe faits par de jeunes touristes américains et canadiens. Pour le présent article, on a interviewé, observé et conté ces jeunes voyageurs de plusieurs facons. Les informations qu'on a recueillies à travers les différentes méthodes de recherches se sont avérées complémentaires de nature, et elles on permis des vérifications. Les conclusions étaient utiles aux niveaux macro et micro. Une comparaison des méthodes a révélé des avantages importants et des défauts sérieux dans chacun des cas. L'observation des participants s'est montrée un outil heuristique puissant; néanmoins son utilisation a posé des problémes d'ordre éthique.</p>
</abstract>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="keyword">
<list>
<head>Keywords</head>
<item>
<term>field methods</term>
</item>
<item>
<term>American and Canadian tourists</term>
</item>
<item>
<term>interviewing</term>
</item>
<item>
<term>observational methods</term>
</item>
<item>
<term>ethical issues</term>
</item>
</list>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<textClass xml:lang="fr">
<keywords scheme="keyword">
<list>
<head>Mots-clé</head>
<item>
<term>méthodes de recherches sur le terrain</term>
</item>
<item>
<term>touristes canadiens et américains</term>
</item>
<item>
<term>méthodes d'observation</term>
</item>
<item>
<term>problémes éthiques</term>
</item>
</list>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
<revisionDesc>
<change when="1987-06-19">Modified</change>
<change when="1988">Published</change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
<json:item>
<extension>txt</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8FCB6DD418BABF8EDC7A8693C1555A6696A83D4E/fulltext/txt</uri>
</json:item>
</fulltext>
<metadata>
<istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Elsevier, elements deleted: tail">
<istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:docType PUBLIC="-//ES//DTD journal article DTD version 4.5.2//EN//XML" URI="art452.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType>
<istex:document>
<converted-article version="4.5.2" docsubtype="fla">
<item-info>
<jid>ATR</jid>
<aid>88900734</aid>
<ce:pii>0160-7383(88)90073-4</ce:pii>
<ce:doi>10.1016/0160-7383(88)90073-4</ce:doi>
<ce:copyright type="unknown" year="1988"></ce:copyright>
</item-info>
<head>
<ce:title>Combining field methods in tourism research</ce:title>
<ce:author-group>
<ce:author>
<ce:given-name>Rudi</ce:given-name>
<ce:surname>Hartmann</ce:surname>
<ce:cross-ref refid="FN1">
<ce:sup></ce:sup>
</ce:cross-ref>
</ce:author>
<ce:affiliation>
<ce:textfn>University of Colorado, USA</ce:textfn>
</ce:affiliation>
<ce:footnote id="FN1">
<ce:label></ce:label>
<ce:note-para>Visiting Asssistant Professor at the University of Colorado (Dept. of Geography, Campus Box 260, Boulder, CO 80309, USA). He received his Ph.D. from the Geography Department at the Technische Universitaet Muenchen, West Germany. His present research interests include methodological issues in the geographic study of travel and tourism.</ce:note-para>
</ce:footnote>
</ce:author-group>
<ce:date-received day="8" month="4" year="1987"></ce:date-received>
<ce:date-revised day="19" month="6" year="1987"></ce:date-revised>
<ce:date-accepted day="28" month="7" year="1987"></ce:date-accepted>
<ce:miscellaneous>Refereed anonymously</ce:miscellaneous>
<ce:abstract>
<ce:section-title>Abstract</ce:section-title>
<ce:abstract-sec>
<ce:simple-para>Too often interviewing forms the only method of data collection in recreation and tourism research. It is maintained here that the research could profit from a combination and integration of different field methods and techniques. This is shown in the case of the European trips of young American and Canadian tourists. In this study, these travelers were interviewed, observed, and counted in various ways. The information gained through the different field methods proved to be complementary in nature and allowed counterchecks. The findings were useful both on a macro- and micro-level. A comparison of the methods introduced disclosed major advantages and serious shortcomings in each case. Participant observation proved to be a powerful heuristic tool; however, its uses also posed ethical questions.</ce:simple-para>
</ce:abstract-sec>
</ce:abstract>
<ce:abstract xml:lang="fr">
<ce:section-title>Résumé</ce:section-title>
<ce:abstract-sec>
<ce:simple-para>La combinaison des méthods d'enquêtes sur le terrain les recherches en tourisme. Il arrive trop souvent que l'on rassemble des données pour la recherche en récréation ou en tourisme uniquement par moyen d'une enquête. Le présent article maintient que les recherches pourraient tirer avantage d'une combinaison et d'une intégration de diverses techniques et méthodes de recherches sur le terrain. Cela se voit dans le cas de voyages en Europe faits par de jeunes touristes américains et canadiens. Pour le présent article, on a interviewé, observé et conté ces jeunes voyageurs de plusieurs facons. Les informations qu'on a recueillies à travers les différentes méthodes de recherches se sont avérées complémentaires de nature, et elles on permis des vérifications. Les conclusions étaient utiles aux niveaux macro et micro. Une comparaison des méthodes a révélé des avantages importants et des défauts sérieux dans chacun des cas. L'observation des participants s'est montrée un outil heuristique puissant; néanmoins son utilisation a posé des problémes d'ordre éthique.</ce:simple-para>
</ce:abstract-sec>
</ce:abstract>
<ce:keywords>
<ce:section-title>Keywords</ce:section-title>
<ce:keyword>
<ce:text>field methods</ce:text>
</ce:keyword>
<ce:keyword>
<ce:text>American and Canadian tourists</ce:text>
</ce:keyword>
<ce:keyword>
<ce:text>interviewing</ce:text>
</ce:keyword>
<ce:keyword>
<ce:text>observational methods</ce:text>
</ce:keyword>
<ce:keyword>
<ce:text>ethical issues</ce:text>
</ce:keyword>
</ce:keywords>
<ce:keywords xml:lang="fr">
<ce:section-title>Mots-clé</ce:section-title>
<ce:keyword>
<ce:text>méthodes de recherches sur le terrain</ce:text>
</ce:keyword>
<ce:keyword>
<ce:text>touristes canadiens et américains</ce:text>
</ce:keyword>
<ce:keyword>
<ce:text>méthodes d'observation</ce:text>
</ce:keyword>
<ce:keyword>
<ce:text>problémes éthiques</ce:text>
</ce:keyword>
</ce:keywords>
</head>
</converted-article>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6">
<titleInfo>
<title>Combining field methods in tourism research</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA">
<title>Combining field methods in tourism research</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Rudi</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Hartmann</namePart>
<affiliation>University of Colorado, USA</affiliation>
<description>Visiting Asssistant Professor at the University of Colorado (Dept. of Geography, Campus Box 260, Boulder, CO 80309, USA). He received his Ph.D. from the Geography Department at the Technische Universitaet Muenchen, West Germany. His present research interests include methodological issues in the geographic study of travel and tourism.</description>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="research-article" displayLabel="Full-length article"></genre>
<originInfo>
<publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1988</dateIssued>
<dateModified encoding="w3cdtf">1987-06-19</dateModified>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1988</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription>
<internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract lang="en">Too often interviewing forms the only method of data collection in recreation and tourism research. It is maintained here that the research could profit from a combination and integration of different field methods and techniques. This is shown in the case of the European trips of young American and Canadian tourists. In this study, these travelers were interviewed, observed, and counted in various ways. The information gained through the different field methods proved to be complementary in nature and allowed counterchecks. The findings were useful both on a macro- and micro-level. A comparison of the methods introduced disclosed major advantages and serious shortcomings in each case. Participant observation proved to be a powerful heuristic tool; however, its uses also posed ethical questions.</abstract>
<abstract lang="fr">Résumé: La combinaison des méthods d'enquêtes sur le terrain les recherches en tourisme. Il arrive trop souvent que l'on rassemble des données pour la recherche en récréation ou en tourisme uniquement par moyen d'une enquête. Le présent article maintient que les recherches pourraient tirer avantage d'une combinaison et d'une intégration de diverses techniques et méthodes de recherches sur le terrain. Cela se voit dans le cas de voyages en Europe faits par de jeunes touristes américains et canadiens. Pour le présent article, on a interviewé, observé et conté ces jeunes voyageurs de plusieurs facons. Les informations qu'on a recueillies à travers les différentes méthodes de recherches se sont avérées complémentaires de nature, et elles on permis des vérifications. Les conclusions étaient utiles aux niveaux macro et micro. Une comparaison des méthodes a révélé des avantages importants et des défauts sérieux dans chacun des cas. L'observation des participants s'est montrée un outil heuristique puissant; néanmoins son utilisation a posé des problémes d'ordre éthique.</abstract>
<note>Refereed anonymously</note>
<subject>
<genre>Keywords</genre>
<topic>field methods</topic>
<topic>American and Canadian tourists</topic>
<topic>interviewing</topic>
<topic>observational methods</topic>
<topic>ethical issues</topic>
</subject>
<subject lang="fr">
<genre>Mots-clé</genre>
<topic>méthodes de recherches sur le terrain</topic>
<topic>touristes canadiens et américains</topic>
<topic>méthodes d'observation</topic>
<topic>problémes éthiques</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Annals of Tourism Research</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="abbreviated">
<title>ATR</title>
</titleInfo>
<genre type="journal">journal</genre>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1988</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<identifier type="ISSN">0160-7383</identifier>
<identifier type="PII">S0160-7383(00)X0080-1</identifier>
<part>
<date>1988</date>
<detail type="volume">
<number>15</number>
<caption>vol.</caption>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<number>1</number>
<caption>no.</caption>
</detail>
<extent unit="issue pages">
<start>1</start>
<end>178</end>
</extent>
<extent unit="pages">
<start>88</start>
<end>105</end>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">8FCB6DD418BABF8EDC7A8693C1555A6696A83D4E</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1016/0160-7383(88)90073-4</identifier>
<identifier type="PII">0160-7383(88)90073-4</identifier>
<recordInfo>
<recordContentSource>ELSEVIER</recordContentSource>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
</metadata>
<serie></serie>
</istex>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001321 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001321 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Rhénanie
   |area=    UnivTrevesV1
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:8FCB6DD418BABF8EDC7A8693C1555A6696A83D4E
   |texte=   Combining field methods in tourism research
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31.
Data generation: Sat Jul 22 16:29:01 2017. Site generation: Wed Feb 28 14:55:37 2024