Short‐term versus medium‐term monitoring for detecting gully‐erosion variability in a Mediterranean environment
Identifieur interne : 001977 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001976; suivant : 001978Short‐term versus medium‐term monitoring for detecting gully‐erosion variability in a Mediterranean environment
Auteurs : Irene Marzolff ; Johannes B. Ries ; Jean PoesenSource :
- Earth Surface Processes and Landforms [ 0197-9337 ] ; 2011-09-30.
Abstract
This study investigates how medium‐term gully‐development data differ from short‐term data, and which factors influence their spatial and temporal variability at nine selected actively retreating bank gullies situated in four Spanish basin landscapes. Small‐format aerial photographs using unmanned, remote‐controlled platforms were taken at the gully sites in short‐term intervals of one to two years over medium‐term periods of seven to 13 years and gully change during each period was determined using stereophotogrammetry and a geographic information system. Results show a high variability of annual gully retreat rates both between gullies and between observation periods. The mean linear headcut retreat rates range between 0·02 and 0·26 m a–1. Gully area loss was between 0·8 and 22 m² a–1 and gully volume loss between 0·5 to 100 m³ a–1, of which sidewall erosion may play a considerable part. A non‐linear relationship between catchment area and medium‐term gully headcut volume change was found for these gullies. The short‐term changes observed at the individual gullies show very high variability: on average, the maximum headcut volume change observed in 7–13 years was 14·3 times larger than the minimum change. Dependency on precipitation varies but is clearly higher for headcuts than sidewalls, especially in smaller and less disturbed catchments. The varying influences of land use and human activities with their positive or negative effects on runoff production and connectivity play a dominant role in these study areas, both for short‐term variability and medium‐term difference in gully development. The study proves the value of capturing spatially continuous, high‐resolution three‐dimensional data using small‐format aerial photography for detailed gully monitoring. Results confirm that short‐term data are not representative of longer‐term gully development and demonstrate the necessity for medium‐ to long‐term monitoring. However, short‐term data are still required to understand the processes – particularly human activity at varying time scales – causing fluctuations in gully erosion rates. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Url:
DOI: 10.1002/esp.2172
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:C4F0A85BCB5844D6AF983D597C393E333744C340Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Short‐term versus medium‐term monitoring for detecting gully‐erosion variability in a Mediterranean environment</title><author><name sortKey="Marzolff, Irene" sort="Marzolff, Irene" uniqKey="Marzolff I" first="Irene" last="Marzolff">Irene Marzolff</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Physical Geography, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: marzolff@em.uni‐frankfurt.de</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ries, Johannes B" sort="Ries, Johannes B" uniqKey="Ries J" first="Johannes B." last="Ries">Johannes B. Ries</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Physical Geography, University of Trier, Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Poesen, Jean" sort="Poesen, Jean" uniqKey="Poesen J" first="Jean" last="Poesen">Jean Poesen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Division of Geography, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, K.U.Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:C4F0A85BCB5844D6AF983D597C393E333744C340</idno><date when="2011" year="2011">2011</date><idno type="doi">10.1002/esp.2172</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/C4F0A85BCB5844D6AF983D597C393E333744C340/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001977</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001977</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Short‐term versus medium‐term monitoring for detecting gully‐erosion variability in a Mediterranean environment</title><author><name sortKey="Marzolff, Irene" sort="Marzolff, Irene" uniqKey="Marzolff I" first="Irene" last="Marzolff">Irene Marzolff</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Physical Geography, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: marzolff@em.uni‐frankfurt.de</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ries, Johannes B" sort="Ries, Johannes B" uniqKey="Ries J" first="Johannes B." last="Ries">Johannes B. Ries</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Physical Geography, University of Trier, Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Poesen, Jean" sort="Poesen, Jean" uniqKey="Poesen J" first="Jean" last="Poesen">Jean Poesen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Division of Geography, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, K.U.Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Earth Surface Processes and Landforms</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Earth Surf. Process. Landforms</title><idno type="ISSN">0197-9337</idno><idno type="eISSN">1096-9837</idno><imprint><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2011-09-30">2011-09-30</date><biblScope unit="volume">36</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">12</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1604">1604</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1623">1623</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0197-9337</idno></series><idno type="istex">C4F0A85BCB5844D6AF983D597C393E333744C340</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/esp.2172</idno><idno type="ArticleID">ESP2172</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0197-9337</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">This study investigates how medium‐term gully‐development data differ from short‐term data, and which factors influence their spatial and temporal variability at nine selected actively retreating bank gullies situated in four Spanish basin landscapes. Small‐format aerial photographs using unmanned, remote‐controlled platforms were taken at the gully sites in short‐term intervals of one to two years over medium‐term periods of seven to 13 years and gully change during each period was determined using stereophotogrammetry and a geographic information system. Results show a high variability of annual gully retreat rates both between gullies and between observation periods. The mean linear headcut retreat rates range between 0·02 and 0·26 m a–1. Gully area loss was between 0·8 and 22 m² a–1 and gully volume loss between 0·5 to 100 m³ a–1, of which sidewall erosion may play a considerable part. A non‐linear relationship between catchment area and medium‐term gully headcut volume change was found for these gullies. The short‐term changes observed at the individual gullies show very high variability: on average, the maximum headcut volume change observed in 7–13 years was 14·3 times larger than the minimum change. Dependency on precipitation varies but is clearly higher for headcuts than sidewalls, especially in smaller and less disturbed catchments. The varying influences of land use and human activities with their positive or negative effects on runoff production and connectivity play a dominant role in these study areas, both for short‐term variability and medium‐term difference in gully development. The study proves the value of capturing spatially continuous, high‐resolution three‐dimensional data using small‐format aerial photography for detailed gully monitoring. Results confirm that short‐term data are not representative of longer‐term gully development and demonstrate the necessity for medium‐ to long‐term monitoring. However, short‐term data are still required to understand the processes – particularly human activity at varying time scales – causing fluctuations in gully erosion rates. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Irene Marzolff</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Physical Geography, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany</json:string><json:string>E-mail: marzolff@em.uni‐frankfurt.de</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Johannes B. Ries</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Physical Geography, University of Trier, Trier, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Jean Poesen</name><affiliations><json:string>Division of Geography, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, K.U.Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>gully development</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>human impact</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>small‐format aerial photography</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>photogrammetry</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>semi‐arid regions</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>ESP2172</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>This study investigates how medium‐term gully‐development data differ from short‐term data, and which factors influence their spatial and temporal variability at nine selected actively retreating bank gullies situated in four Spanish basin landscapes. Small‐format aerial photographs using unmanned, remote‐controlled platforms were taken at the gully sites in short‐term intervals of one to two years over medium‐term periods of seven to 13 years and gully change during each period was determined using stereophotogrammetry and a geographic information system. Results show a high variability of annual gully retreat rates both between gullies and between observation periods. The mean linear headcut retreat rates range between 0·02 and 0·26 m a–1. Gully area loss was between 0·8 and 22 m² a–1 and gully volume loss between 0·5 to 100 m³ a–1, of which sidewall erosion may play a considerable part. A non‐linear relationship between catchment area and medium‐term gully headcut volume change was found for these gullies. The short‐term changes observed at the individual gullies show very high variability: on average, the maximum headcut volume change observed in 7–13 years was 14·3 times larger than the minimum change. Dependency on precipitation varies but is clearly higher for headcuts than sidewalls, especially in smaller and less disturbed catchments. The varying influences of land use and human activities with their positive or negative effects on runoff production and connectivity play a dominant role in these study areas, both for short‐term variability and medium‐term difference in gully development. The study proves the value of capturing spatially continuous, high‐resolution three‐dimensional data using small‐format aerial photography for detailed gully monitoring. Results confirm that short‐term data are not representative of longer‐term gully development and demonstrate the necessity for medium‐ to long‐term monitoring. However, short‐term data are still required to understand the processes – particularly human activity at varying time scales – causing fluctuations in gully erosion rates. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 841.89 pts (A4)</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>2166</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>12658</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>77360</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>20</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>310</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Short‐term versus medium‐term monitoring for detecting gully‐erosion variability in a Mediterranean environment</title><refBibs><json:item><host><author></author><title>Aber JS, Marzolff I, Ries JB. 2010. Small‐format Aerial Photography: Principles, Techniques and Geoscience Applications. Elsevier Science: Amsterdam.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>N Bellin</name></json:item><json:item><name>B van Wesemael</name></json:item><json:item><name>A Meerkerk</name></json:item><json:item><name>V Vanacker</name></json:item><json:item><name>GG Barbera</name></json:item></author><host><volume>76</volume><pages><last>121</last><first>114</first></pages><issue>2</issue><author></author><title>Catena</title></host><title>Abandonment of soil and water conservation structures in Mediterranean ecosystems. A case study from south east Spain</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>HH Bennett</name></json:item></author><host><volume>50</volume><pages><last>72</last><first>59</first></pages><issue>1</issue><author></author><title>Geographical Review</title></host><title>Soil erosion in Spain</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>HD Betts</name></json:item><json:item><name>NA Trustrum</name></json:item><json:item><name>RC Derose</name></json:item></author><host><volume>28</volume><pages><last>1058</last><first>1043</first></pages><issue>10</issue><author></author><title>Earth Surface Processes and Landforms</title></host><title>Geomorphic changes in a complex gully system measured from sequential digital elevation models, and implications for management</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>RJ Blong</name></json:item><json:item><name>OP Graham</name></json:item><json:item><name>JA Veness</name></json:item></author><host><volume>7</volume><pages><last>385</last><first>381</first></pages><issue>4</issue><author></author><title>Earth Surface Processes and Landforms</title></host><title>The role of sidewall processes in gully development; some NSW examples</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G. Bocco</name></json:item></author><host><volume>15</volume><pages><last>406</last><first>392</first></pages><issue>4</issue><author></author><title>Progress in Physical Geography</title></host><title>Gully erosion: processes and models</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D Boellstorff</name></json:item><json:item><name>G Benito</name></json:item></author><host><volume>107</volume><pages><last>243</last><first>231</first></pages><issue>2–3</issue><author></author><title>Agriculture, Ecosystems and Envorinment</title></host><title>Impacts of set‐aside policy on the risk of soil erosion in central Spain</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L Borselli</name></json:item><json:item><name>D Torri</name></json:item><json:item><name>L Øygarden</name></json:item><json:item><name>S de Alba</name></json:item><json:item><name>JA Martínez‐Casasnovas</name></json:item><json:item><name>P Bazzoffi</name></json:item><json:item><name>G Jakab</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>658</last><first>643</first></pages><author></author><title>Soil Erosion in Europe</title></host><title>Land Levelling</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>AP Brooks</name></json:item><json:item><name>JG Shellberg</name></json:item><json:item><name>J Knight</name></json:item><json:item><name>J Spencer</name></json:item></author><host><volume>34</volume><pages><last>1969</last><first>1951</first></pages><issue>14</issue><author></author><title>Earth Surface Processes and Landforms</title></host><title>Alluvial gully erosion: an example from the Mitchell fluvial megafan, Queensland, Australia</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>MA Campo</name></json:item><json:item><name>J Álvarez‐Mozos</name></json:item><json:item><name>J Casalí</name></json:item><json:item><name>LM De Santisteban</name></json:item><json:item><name>R Giménez</name></json:item><json:item><name>JA Martínez‐Casasnovas</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>150</last><first>147</first></pages><author></author><title>Soil and Water Conservation Under Changing Land Use</title></host><title>Long term evolution assessment of the permanent gully network in Las Bardenas Reales area (Navarre, Spain) influenced by land use change</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>El temporal de lluvia mantiene a 11 comunidades en alerta</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>H Faulkner</name></json:item></author><host><volume>6</volume><pages><last>200</last><first>179</first></pages><issue>3</issue><author></author><title>Land Degradation & Rehabilitation</title></host><title>Gully erosion associated with the expansion of unterraced almond cultivation in the coastal Sierra de Lújar, S. Spain</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>JM García‐Ruiz</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>11</last><first>1</first></pages><issue>1</issue><author></author><title>Catena</title></host><title>The effects of land uses on soil erosion in Spain: a review</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G Hu</name></json:item><json:item><name>Y Wu</name></json:item><json:item><name>B Liu</name></json:item><json:item><name>Z Yu</name></json:item><json:item><name>Z You</name></json:item><json:item><name>Y Zhang</name></json:item></author><host><volume>71</volume><pages><last>329</last><first>321</first></pages><author></author><title>Catena</title></host><title>Short‐term gully retreat rates over rolling hill areas in black soil of Northeast China</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>JP Lesschen</name></json:item><json:item><name>E Cammeraat</name></json:item><json:item><name>T Nieman</name></json:item></author><host><volume>33</volume><pages><last>1584</last><first>1574</first></pages><issue>10</issue><author></author><title>Earth Surface Processes and Landforms</title></host><title>Erosion and terrace failure due to agricultural land abandonment in a semi‐arid environment</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>E de Luna Armenteros</name></json:item><json:item><name>A Laguna Luna</name></json:item><json:item><name>J Poesen</name></json:item><json:item><name>JV Giráldez Ververa</name></json:item></author><host><volume>11</volume><pages><last>73</last><first>65</first></pages><issue>1</issue><author></author><title>Ingeniería del Agua</title></host><title>Evolución de un sistema de cárcavas activas en el sureste Español</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>JA Martínez‐Casasnovas</name></json:item><json:item><name>C Antón‐Fernándes</name></json:item><json:item><name>MC Ramos</name></json:item></author><host><volume>28</volume><pages><last>456</last><first>443</first></pages><issue>5</issue><author></author><title>Earth Surface Processes and Landforms</title></host><title>Sediment production in large gullies of the mediterranean area (NE Spain) from high‐resolution digital elevation models and geographical information systems analysis</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>JA Martínez‐Casasnovas</name></json:item><json:item><name>MC Ramos</name></json:item><json:item><name>J Poesen</name></json:item></author><host><volume>58</volume><pages><last>321</last><first>305</first></pages><author></author><title>Geomorphology</title></host><title>Assessment of sidewall erosion in large gullies using multi‐temporal DEMs and logistic regression analysis</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>JA Martínez‐Casasnovas</name></json:item><json:item><name>M Concepción Ramos</name></json:item><json:item><name>D García‐Hernández</name></json:item></author><host><volume>34</volume><pages><last>1937</last><first>1927</first></pages><issue>14</issue><author></author><title>Earth Surface Processes and Landforms</title></host><title>Effects of land‐use changes in vegetation cover and sidewall erosion in a gully head of the Penedès region (northeast Spain)</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>I Marzolff</name></json:item><json:item><name>J Poesen</name></json:item></author><host><volume>111</volume><pages><last>60</last><first>48</first></pages><issue>1–2</issue><author></author><title>Geomorphology</title></host><title>The potential of 3D gully monitoring with GIS using high‐resolution aerial photography and a digital photogrammetry system</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>I Marzolff</name></json:item><json:item><name>JB Ries</name></json:item></author><host><volume>51</volume><pages><last>425</last><first>405</first></pages><issue>4</issue><author></author><title>Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie N. F.</title></host><title>Gully monitoring in semi‐arid landscapes</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J Nachtergaele</name></json:item><json:item><name>J Poesen</name></json:item></author><host><volume>24</volume><pages><last>706</last><first>693</first></pages><issue>8</issue><author></author><title>Earth Surface Processes and Landforms</title></host><title>Assessment of soil losses by ephemeral gully erosion using high‐altitude (stereo) aerial photographs</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>JJ Oñate</name></json:item><json:item><name>B Peco</name></json:item></author><host><volume>22</volume><pages><last>114</last><first>103</first></pages><issue>2</issue><author></author><title>Land Use Policy</title></host><title>Policy impact on desertification: stakeholders perceptions in southeast Spain</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D Oostwoud Wijdenes</name></json:item><json:item><name>RB Bryan</name></json:item></author><host><volume>26</volume><pages><last>933</last><first>911</first></pages><issue>9</issue><author></author><title>Earth Surface Processes and Landforms</title></host><title>Gully‐head erosion processes on a semi‐arid valley floor in Kenya</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D Oostwoud Wijdenes</name></json:item><json:item><name>J Poesen</name></json:item><json:item><name>L Vandekerckhove</name></json:item><json:item><name>M Ghesquiere</name></json:item></author><host><volume>39</volume><pages><last>167</last><first>147</first></pages><issue>3</issue><author></author><title>Catena</title></host><title>Spatial distribution of gully head activity and sediment supply along an ephemeral channel in a Mediterranean environment</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J Poesen</name></json:item><json:item><name>JM Hooke</name></json:item></author><host><volume>21</volume><pages><last>199</last><first>157</first></pages><issue>2</issue><author></author><title>Progress in Physical Geography</title></host><title>Erosion, flooding and channel management in Mediterranean environments of southern Europe</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J Poesen</name></json:item><json:item><name>J Nachtergaele</name></json:item><json:item><name>G Verstraeten</name></json:item><json:item><name>C Valentin</name></json:item></author><host><volume>50</volume><pages><last>133</last><first>91</first></pages><issue>2–4</issue><author></author><title>Catena</title></host><title>Gully erosion and environmental change: importance and research needs</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J Poesen</name></json:item><json:item><name>T Vanwalleghem</name></json:item><json:item><name>J de Vente</name></json:item><json:item><name>A Knapen</name></json:item><json:item><name>G Verstraeten</name></json:item><json:item><name>JA Martínez‐Casasnovas</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>536</last><first>515</first></pages><author></author><title>Soil Erosion in Europe</title></host><title>Gully erosion in Europe</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J Poesen</name></json:item><json:item><name>D Torri</name></json:item><json:item><name>T Vanwalleghem</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>Handbook of Erosion Modelling</title></host><title>Gully erosion: procedures to adopt when modelling soil erosion in landscapes affected by gullying</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>JB Ries</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>195</last><first>177</first></pages><author></author><title>Geomorphologie und Paläoökologie. Frankfurter Geowissenschaftliche Arbeiten, Serie D 25</title></host><title>Schluchterosion im Ebrobecken – Großmaßstäbiges Luftbildmonitoring am Barranco de las Lenas und mikromorphologische Beobachtungen an Barranco‐Wänden</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>JB Ries</name></json:item><json:item><name>M Langer</name></json:item></author><host><volume>121</volume><pages><last>108</last><first>91</first></pages><author></author><title>Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie N. F. Suppl.‐Bd.</title></host><title>Experimental investigations on water and wind erosion on abandoned fields and arable land in the Central Ebro Basin, Aragón/Spain</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>JB Ries</name></json:item><json:item><name>I Marzolff</name></json:item></author><host><volume>50</volume><pages><last>328</last><first>309</first></pages><issue>2–4</issue><author></author><title>Catena</title></host><title>Monitoring of gully erosion in the central Ebro Basin by large‐scale aerial photography from a remotely controlled blimp</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J Rodzik</name></json:item><json:item><name>T Furtak</name></json:item><json:item><name>W Zglobicki</name></json:item></author><host><volume>34</volume><pages><last>1950</last><first>1938</first></pages><issue>14</issue><author></author><title>Earth Surface Processes and Landforms</title></host><title>The impact of snowmelt and heavy rainfall runoff on erosion rates in a gully system, Lublin Upland, Poland</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A Romero Díaz</name></json:item><json:item><name>P Marín Sanleandro</name></json:item><json:item><name>A Sánchez Soriano</name></json:item><json:item><name>F Belmonte Serrato</name></json:item><json:item><name>H Faulkner</name></json:item></author><host><volume>69</volume><pages><last>293</last><first>282</first></pages><issue>3</issue><author></author><title>Catena</title></host><title>The causes of piping in a set of abandoned agricultural terraces in southeast Spain</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Sala M. 1991. Soil Erosion Studies in Spain. Geoforma Ediciones: Logroño.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M Seeger</name></json:item><json:item><name>I Marzolff</name></json:item><json:item><name>JB Ries</name></json:item></author><host><volume>53</volume><pages><last>431</last><first>417</first></pages><issue>4</issue><author></author><title>Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie N. F.</title></host><title>Identification of gully‐development processes in semi‐arid NE‐Spain</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A Solé Benet</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>346</last><first>311</first></pages><author></author><title>Soil Erosion in Europe</title></host><title>Spain</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Thornes JB. 1976. Semi‐arid Erosional Systems: Case Studies from Spain, Geographical Papers No. 7. London School of Economics and Political Science: London.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L Vandekerckhove</name></json:item><json:item><name>J Poesen</name></json:item><json:item><name>D Oostwoud Wijdenes</name></json:item><json:item><name>G Gyssels</name></json:item><json:item><name>L Beuselinck</name></json:item><json:item><name>E de Luna</name></json:item></author><host><volume>33</volume><pages><last>58</last><first>37</first></pages><issue>1–2</issue><author></author><title>Geomorphology</title></host><title>Characteristics and controlling factors of bank gullies in two semi‐arid Mediterranean environments</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L Vandekerckhove</name></json:item><json:item><name>J Poesen</name></json:item><json:item><name>D Oostwoud Wijdenes</name></json:item><json:item><name>G Gyssels</name></json:item></author><host><volume>44</volume><pages><last>161</last><first>133</first></pages><issue>2</issue><author></author><title>Catena</title></host><title>Short‐term gully retreat rates in Mediterranean environments</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L Vandekerckhove</name></json:item><json:item><name>J Poesen</name></json:item><json:item><name>G Govers</name></json:item></author><host><volume>50</volume><pages><last>352</last><first>329</first></pages><issue>2–4</issue><author></author><title>Catena</title></host><title>Medium‐term gully headcut retreat rates in southeast Spain determined from aerial photographs and ground measurements</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>T Vanwalleghem</name></json:item><json:item><name>H Bork</name></json:item><json:item><name>J Poesen</name></json:item><json:item><name>G Schmidtchen</name></json:item><json:item><name>M Dotterweich</name></json:item><json:item><name>J Nachtergaele</name></json:item><json:item><name>H Bork</name></json:item><json:item><name>J Deckers</name></json:item><json:item><name>B Brüsch</name></json:item><json:item><name>J Bungeneers</name></json:item><json:item><name>M De Bie</name></json:item></author><host><volume>63</volume><pages><last>243</last><first>221</first></pages><issue>2–3</issue><author></author><title>Catena</title></host><title>Rapid development and infilling of a buried gully under cropland, central Belgium</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>T Vanwalleghem</name></json:item><json:item><name>J Poesen</name></json:item><json:item><name>M Van Den Eeckhaut</name></json:item><json:item><name>J Nachtergaele</name></json:item><json:item><name>J Deckers</name></json:item></author><host><volume>15</volume><pages><last>386</last><first>378</first></pages><issue>3</issue><author></author><title>The Holocene</title></host><title>Reconstructing rainfall and land use conditions leading to the development of old gullies</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Y Wu</name></json:item><json:item><name>Q Zheng</name></json:item><json:item><name>Y Zhang</name></json:item><json:item><name>B Liu</name></json:item><json:item><name>H Cheng</name></json:item><json:item><name>Y Wang</name></json:item></author><host><volume>101</volume><pages><last>691</last><first>683</first></pages><issue>4</issue><author></author><title>Geomorphology</title></host><title>Development of gullies and sediment production in the black soil region of northeastern China</title></json:item></refBibs><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>36</volume><publisherId><json:string>ESP</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>20</total><last>1623</last><first>1604</first></pages><issn><json:string>0197-9337</json:string></issn><issue>12</issue><subject><json:item><value>Research Article</value></json:item></subject><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1096-9837</json:string></eissn><title>Earth Surface Processes and Landforms</title><doi><json:string>10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9837</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>science</json:string><json:string>geosciences, multidisciplinary</json:string><json:string>geography, physical</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>economic & social sciences</json:string><json:string>social sciences</json:string><json:string>geography</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2011</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2011</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1002/esp.2172</json:string></doi><id>C4F0A85BCB5844D6AF983D597C393E333744C340</id><score>1.40885</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/C4F0A85BCB5844D6AF983D597C393E333744C340/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/C4F0A85BCB5844D6AF983D597C393E333744C340/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/C4F0A85BCB5844D6AF983D597C393E333744C340/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Short‐term versus medium‐term monitoring for detecting gully‐erosion variability in a Mediterranean environment</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p></availability><date>2011-06-11</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Short‐term versus medium‐term monitoring for detecting gully‐erosion variability in a Mediterranean environment</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Irene</forename><surname>Marzolff</surname></persName><email>marzolff@em.uni‐frankfurt.de</email><affiliation>Department of Physical Geography, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">Johannes B.</forename><surname>Ries</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Physical Geography, University of Trier, Trier, Germany</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-3"><persName><forename type="first">Jean</forename><surname>Poesen</surname></persName><affiliation>Division of Geography, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, K.U.Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Earth Surface Processes and Landforms</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Earth Surf. Process. Landforms</title><idno type="pISSN">0197-9337</idno><idno type="eISSN">1096-9837</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9837</idno><imprint><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2011-09-30"></date><biblScope unit="volume">36</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">12</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1604">1604</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1623">1623</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">C4F0A85BCB5844D6AF983D597C393E333744C340</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/esp.2172</idno><idno type="ArticleID">ESP2172</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2011-06-11</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract><p>This study investigates how medium‐term gully‐development data differ from short‐term data, and which factors influence their spatial and temporal variability at nine selected actively retreating bank gullies situated in four Spanish basin landscapes. Small‐format aerial photographs using unmanned, remote‐controlled platforms were taken at the gully sites in short‐term intervals of one to two years over medium‐term periods of seven to 13 years and gully change during each period was determined using stereophotogrammetry and a geographic information system. Results show a high variability of annual gully retreat rates both between gullies and between observation periods. The mean linear headcut retreat rates range between 0·02 and 0·26 m a–1. Gully area loss was between 0·8 and 22 m² a–1 and gully volume loss between 0·5 to 100 m³ a–1, of which sidewall erosion may play a considerable part. A non‐linear relationship between catchment area and medium‐term gully headcut volume change was found for these gullies. The short‐term changes observed at the individual gullies show very high variability: on average, the maximum headcut volume change observed in 7–13 years was 14·3 times larger than the minimum change. Dependency on precipitation varies but is clearly higher for headcuts than sidewalls, especially in smaller and less disturbed catchments. The varying influences of land use and human activities with their positive or negative effects on runoff production and connectivity play a dominant role in these study areas, both for short‐term variability and medium‐term difference in gully development. The study proves the value of capturing spatially continuous, high‐resolution three‐dimensional data using small‐format aerial photography for detailed gully monitoring. Results confirm that short‐term data are not representative of longer‐term gully development and demonstrate the necessity for medium‐ to long‐term monitoring. However, short‐term data are still required to understand the processes – particularly human activity at varying time scales – causing fluctuations in gully erosion rates. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>keywords</head><item><term>gully development</term></item><item><term>human impact</term></item><item><term>small‐format aerial photography</term></item><item><term>photogrammetry</term></item><item><term>semi‐arid regions</term></item></list></keywords></textClass><textClass><keywords scheme="Journal Subject"><list><head>article-category</head><item><term>Research Article</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2011-01-10">Received</change><change when="2011-04-20">Registration</change><change when="2011-06-11">Created</change><change when="2011-09-30">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/C4F0A85BCB5844D6AF983D597C393E333744C340/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component type="serialArticle" version="2.0" xml:lang="en" xml:id="esp2172"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Chichester, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi>10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9837</doi><issn type="print">0197-9337</issn><issn type="electronic">1096-9837</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="ESP"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS">Earth Surface Processes and Landforms</title><title type="short">Earth Surf. Process. Landforms</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="120"><doi>10.1002/esp.v36.12</doi><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="36">36</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">12</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2011-09-30">30 September 2011</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" position="4" type="article" status="forIssue"><doi>10.1002/esp.2172</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="ESP2172"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="20"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Research Article</title><title type="tocHeading1">Research Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="manuscriptReceived" date="2011-01-10"></event><event type="manuscriptRevised" date="2011-04-01"></event><event type="manuscriptAccepted" date="2011-04-20"></event><event type="xmlCreated" agent="SPi Global" date="2011-06-11"></event><event type="publishedOnlineAccepted" date="2011-05-13"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2011-07-18"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2011-07-18"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2011-09-09"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-25"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">1604</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">1623</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>I. Marzolff, Department of Physical Geography, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. E‐mail: <email normalForm="marzolff@em.uni-frankfurt.de">marzolff@em.uni‐frankfurt.de</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:ESP.ESP2172.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><titleGroup><title type="main">Short‐term versus medium‐term monitoring for detecting gully‐erosion variability in a Mediterranean environment</title><title type="short">SHORT‐TERM VERSUS MEDIUM‐TERM GULLY‐EROSION VARIABILITY</title><title type="shortAuthors">I. MARZOLFF, J. B. RIES AND J. POESEN</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="esp2172-cr-0001" affiliationRef="#esp2172-aff-0001" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Irene</givenNames><familyName>Marzolff</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="esp2172-cr-0002" affiliationRef="#esp2172-aff-0002"><personName><givenNames>Johannes B.</givenNames><familyName>Ries</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="esp2172-cr-0003" affiliationRef="#esp2172-aff-0003"><personName><givenNames>Jean</givenNames><familyName>Poesen</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="esp2172-aff-0001" countryCode="DE" type="organization"><orgDiv>Department of Physical Geography</orgDiv><orgName>Johann Wolfgang Goethe University</orgName><address><city>Frankfurt am Main</city><country>Germany</country></address></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="esp2172-aff-0002" countryCode="DE" type="organization"><orgDiv>Department of Physical Geography</orgDiv><orgName>University of Trier</orgName><address><city>Trier</city><country>Germany</country></address></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="esp2172-aff-0003" countryCode="BE" type="organization"><orgDiv>Division of Geography, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences</orgDiv><orgName>K.U.Leuven</orgName><address><city>Heverlee</city><country>Belgium</country></address></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup type="author"><keyword xml:id="esp2172-kwd-0001">gully development</keyword><keyword xml:id="esp2172-kwd-0002">human impact</keyword><keyword xml:id="esp2172-kwd-0003">small‐format aerial photography</keyword><keyword xml:id="esp2172-kwd-0004">photogrammetry</keyword><keyword xml:id="esp2172-kwd-0005">semi‐arid regions</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p>This study investigates how medium‐term gully‐development data differ from short‐term data, and which factors influence their spatial and temporal variability at nine selected actively retreating bank gullies situated in four Spanish basin landscapes. Small‐format aerial photographs using unmanned, remote‐controlled platforms were taken at the gully sites in short‐term intervals of one to two years over medium‐term periods of seven to 13 years and gully change during each period was determined using stereophotogrammetry and a geographic information system. Results show a high variability of annual gully retreat rates both between gullies and between observation periods. The mean linear headcut retreat rates range between 0·02 and 0·26 m a<sup>–1</sup>. Gully area loss was between 0·8 and 22 m² a<sup>–1</sup> and gully volume loss between 0·5 to 100 m³ a<sup>–1</sup>, of which sidewall erosion may play a considerable part. A non‐linear relationship between catchment area and medium‐term gully headcut volume change was found for these gullies. The short‐term changes observed at the individual gullies show very high variability: on average, the maximum headcut volume change observed in 7–13 years was 14·3 times larger than the minimum change. Dependency on precipitation varies but is clearly higher for headcuts than sidewalls, especially in smaller and less disturbed catchments. The varying influences of land use and human activities with their positive or negative effects on runoff production and connectivity play a dominant role in these study areas, both for short‐term variability and medium‐term difference in gully development. The study proves the value of capturing spatially continuous, high‐resolution three‐dimensional data using small‐format aerial photography for detailed gully monitoring. Results confirm that short‐term data are not representative of longer‐term gully development and demonstrate the necessity for medium‐ to long‐term monitoring. However, short‐term data are still required to understand the processes – particularly human activity at varying time scales – causing fluctuations in gully erosion rates. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Short‐term versus medium‐term monitoring for detecting gully‐erosion variability in a Mediterranean environment</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>SHORT‐TERM VERSUS MEDIUM‐TERM GULLY‐EROSION VARIABILITY</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Short‐term versus medium‐term monitoring for detecting gully‐erosion variability in a Mediterranean environment</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Irene</namePart><namePart type="family">Marzolff</namePart><affiliation>Department of Physical Geography, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: marzolff@em.uni‐frankfurt.de</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Johannes B.</namePart><namePart type="family">Ries</namePart><affiliation>Department of Physical Geography, University of Trier, Trier, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Jean</namePart><namePart type="family">Poesen</namePart><affiliation>Division of Geography, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, K.U.Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Chichester, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2011-09-30</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2011-06-11</dateCreated><dateCaptured encoding="w3cdtf">2011-01-10</dateCaptured><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2011-04-20</dateValid><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract>This study investigates how medium‐term gully‐development data differ from short‐term data, and which factors influence their spatial and temporal variability at nine selected actively retreating bank gullies situated in four Spanish basin landscapes. Small‐format aerial photographs using unmanned, remote‐controlled platforms were taken at the gully sites in short‐term intervals of one to two years over medium‐term periods of seven to 13 years and gully change during each period was determined using stereophotogrammetry and a geographic information system. Results show a high variability of annual gully retreat rates both between gullies and between observation periods. The mean linear headcut retreat rates range between 0·02 and 0·26 m a–1. Gully area loss was between 0·8 and 22 m² a–1 and gully volume loss between 0·5 to 100 m³ a–1, of which sidewall erosion may play a considerable part. A non‐linear relationship between catchment area and medium‐term gully headcut volume change was found for these gullies. The short‐term changes observed at the individual gullies show very high variability: on average, the maximum headcut volume change observed in 7–13 years was 14·3 times larger than the minimum change. Dependency on precipitation varies but is clearly higher for headcuts than sidewalls, especially in smaller and less disturbed catchments. The varying influences of land use and human activities with their positive or negative effects on runoff production and connectivity play a dominant role in these study areas, both for short‐term variability and medium‐term difference in gully development. The study proves the value of capturing spatially continuous, high‐resolution three‐dimensional data using small‐format aerial photography for detailed gully monitoring. Results confirm that short‐term data are not representative of longer‐term gully development and demonstrate the necessity for medium‐ to long‐term monitoring. However, short‐term data are still required to understand the processes – particularly human activity at varying time scales – causing fluctuations in gully erosion rates. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><subject><genre>keywords</genre><topic>gully development</topic><topic>human impact</topic><topic>small‐format aerial photography</topic><topic>photogrammetry</topic><topic>semi‐arid regions</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Earth Surface Processes and Landforms</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Earth Surf. Process. Landforms</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Research Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0197-9337</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1096-9837</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9837</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">ESP</identifier><part><date>2011</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>36</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>12</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>1604</start><end>1623</end><total>20</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">C4F0A85BCB5844D6AF983D597C393E333744C340</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/esp.2172</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">ESP2172</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001977 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001977 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Rhénanie
|area= UnivTrevesV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:C4F0A85BCB5844D6AF983D597C393E333744C340
|texte= Short‐term versus medium‐term monitoring for detecting gully‐erosion variability in a Mediterranean environment
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |