On the Reliability of Implicit and Explicit Memory Measures
Identifieur interne : 001524 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001523; suivant : 001525On the Reliability of Implicit and Explicit Memory Measures
Auteurs : Axel Buchner ; Werner WippichSource :
- Cognitive Psychology [ 0010-0285 ] ; 2000.
Abstract
Functional dissociations between implicit and explicit memory tests often take the form of large differences between groups or experimental conditions (e.g., amnesics and controls, elderly and younger persons, or persons learning with and without a distracting secondary task) when performance is assessed using explicit memory tests, whereas no difference is observed with implicit memory tests. We argue that the interpretation of such dissociations in terms of the memory processes or systems involved in performance is problematic because the same data pattern would emerge as a result of a mere methodological artifact, that is, the situation that implicit memory tests have low reliability whereas explicit memory tests are fairly reliable measurement instruments. We present reasons for such a reliability difference, and we demonstrate it empirically in Experiments 1a, 1b, and 2. However, our analysis also shows, and Experiment 3 confirms empirically, that implicit memory tests need not necessarily be less reliable measurement instruments than explicit memory tests.
Url:
DOI: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0731
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:017C4F9D13CE6096996262F5D084697876CE1DC5Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">On the Reliability of Implicit and Explicit Memory Measures</title><author><name sortKey="Buchner, Axel" sort="Buchner, Axel" uniqKey="Buchner A" first="Axel" last="Buchner">Axel Buchner</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Trier, Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wippich, Werner" sort="Wippich, Werner" uniqKey="Wippich W" first="Werner" last="Wippich">Werner Wippich</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Trier, Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:017C4F9D13CE6096996262F5D084697876CE1DC5</idno><date when="2000" year="2000">2000</date><idno type="doi">10.1006/cogp.1999.0731</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/017C4F9D13CE6096996262F5D084697876CE1DC5/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001524</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001524</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">On the Reliability of Implicit and Explicit Memory Measures</title><author><name sortKey="Buchner, Axel" sort="Buchner, Axel" uniqKey="Buchner A" first="Axel" last="Buchner">Axel Buchner</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Trier, Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wippich, Werner" sort="Wippich, Werner" uniqKey="Wippich W" first="Werner" last="Wippich">Werner Wippich</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Trier, Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Cognitive Psychology</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">YCOGP</title><idno type="ISSN">0010-0285</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="2000">2000</date><biblScope unit="volume">40</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="227">227</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="259">259</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0010-0285</idno></series><idno type="istex">017C4F9D13CE6096996262F5D084697876CE1DC5</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1006/cogp.1999.0731</idno><idno type="PII">S0010-0285(99)90731-4</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0010-0285</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Functional dissociations between implicit and explicit memory tests often take the form of large differences between groups or experimental conditions (e.g., amnesics and controls, elderly and younger persons, or persons learning with and without a distracting secondary task) when performance is assessed using explicit memory tests, whereas no difference is observed with implicit memory tests. We argue that the interpretation of such dissociations in terms of the memory processes or systems involved in performance is problematic because the same data pattern would emerge as a result of a mere methodological artifact, that is, the situation that implicit memory tests have low reliability whereas explicit memory tests are fairly reliable measurement instruments. We present reasons for such a reliability difference, and we demonstrate it empirically in Experiments 1a, 1b, and 2. However, our analysis also shows, and Experiment 3 confirms empirically, that implicit memory tests need not necessarily be less reliable measurement instruments than explicit memory tests.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>elsevier</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Axel Buchner</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Trier, Trier, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Werner Wippich</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Trier, Trier, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>Full-length article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Functional dissociations between implicit and explicit memory tests often take the form of large differences between groups or experimental conditions (e.g., amnesics and controls, elderly and younger persons, or persons learning with and without a distracting secondary task) when performance is assessed using explicit memory tests, whereas no difference is observed with implicit memory tests. We argue that the interpretation of such dissociations in terms of the memory processes or systems involved in performance is problematic because the same data pattern would emerge as a result of a mere methodological artifact, that is, the situation that implicit memory tests have low reliability whereas explicit memory tests are fairly reliable measurement instruments. We present reasons for such a reliability difference, and we demonstrate it empirically in Experiments 1a, 1b, and 2. However, our analysis also shows, and Experiment 3 confirms empirically, that implicit memory tests need not necessarily be less reliable measurement instruments than explicit memory tests.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.872</score><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>359 x 583 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><keywordCount>0</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>1078</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>14692</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>85939</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>33</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>156</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>On the Reliability of Implicit and Explicit Memory Measures</title><pii><json:string>S0010-0285(99)90731-4</json:string></pii><refBibs><json:item><author><json:item><name>I.L. Baschek</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Bredenkamp</name></json:item><json:item><name>B. Oehrle</name></json:item><json:item><name>W. Wippich</name></json:item></author><host><volume>24</volume><pages><last>396</last><first>353</first></pages><author></author><title>Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie</title></host><title>Bestimmung der Bildhaftigkeit (I), Konkretheit (C) und der Bedeutungshaltigkeit (m'1 ) von 800 Substantiven [Determination of imagery, concreteness and meaningfulness of 800 nouns]</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>T.A. Blaxton</name></json:item></author><host><volume>15</volume><pages><last>668</last><first>657</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition</title></host><title>Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer appropriate processing framework</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A. Buchner</name></json:item><json:item><name>W. Wippich</name></json:item></author><host><volume>5</volume><pages><last>220</last><first>197</first></pages><author></author><title>Consciousness and Cognition</title></host><title>Unconscious gender bias in fame judgments?</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A. Buchner</name></json:item><json:item><name>W. Wippich</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>46</last><first>3</first></pages><author></author><title>Handbook of implicit learning</title></host><title>Differences and commonalities between implicit learning and implicit memory</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Disordered thought in schizophrenia</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L. Clare</name></json:item><json:item><name>P.J. McKenna</name></json:item><json:item><name>A.M. Mortimer</name></json:item><json:item><name>A.D. Baddeley</name></json:item></author><host><volume>31</volume><pages><last>1241</last><first>1225</first></pages><author></author><title>Neuropsychologia</title></host><title>Memory in schizophrenia: What is impaired and what is preserved?</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. Cohen</name></json:item></author><host><volume>65</volume><pages><last>153</last><first>145</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology</title></host><title>The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>H.V. Curran</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. Barrow</name></json:item><json:item><name>H. Weingartner</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Lader</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Bernik</name></json:item></author><host><volume>122</volume><pages><last>193</last><first>187</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychopharmacology</title></host><title>Encoding, remembering and awareness in lorazepam-induced amnesia</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>H.P. Davis</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Cohen</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Gandy</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. Colombo</name></json:item><json:item><name>G. VanDusseldorp</name></json:item><json:item><name>N. Simolke</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Romano</name></json:item></author><host><volume>104</volume><pages><last>297</last><first>288</first></pages><author></author><title>Behavioral Neuroscience</title></host><title>Lexical priming deficits as a function of age</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>P. Graf</name></json:item><json:item><name>A.P. Shimamura</name></json:item><json:item><name>L.R. Squire</name></json:item></author><host><volume>11</volume><pages><last>396</last><first>386</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition</title></host><title>Priming across modalities and priming across category levels: Extending the domain of preserved function in amnesia</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D.A. Grosse</name></json:item><json:item><name>R.S. Wilson</name></json:item><json:item><name>J.H. Fox</name></json:item></author><host><volume>5</volume><pages><last>306</last><first>304</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychology and Aging</title></host><title>Preserved word-stem-completion priming of semantically encoded information in Alzheimer's disease</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Theory of mental tests</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S.B. Hamann</name></json:item><json:item><name>L.R. Squire</name></json:item></author><host><volume>22</volume><pages><last>947</last><first>933</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition</title></host><title>Level-of-processing effects in word-completion priming: A neuropsychological study</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D.L. Hintzman</name></json:item></author><host><volume>87</volume><pages><last>410</last><first>398</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychological Review</title></host><title>Simpson's Paradox and the analysis of memory retrieval</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D.L. Hintzman</name></json:item></author><host><volume>41</volume><pages><last>139</last><first>109</first></pages><author></author><title>Annual Review of Psychology</title></host><title>Human learning and memory: Connections and dissociations</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D.L. Hintzman</name></json:item><json:item><name>A.L. Hartry</name></json:item></author><host><volume>16</volume><pages><last>969</last><first>955</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition</title></host><title>Item effects in recognition and fragment completion: Contingency relations vary for different subsets of words</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Isingrini</name></json:item><json:item><name>F. Vazou</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. Leroy</name></json:item></author><host><volume>23</volume><pages><last>467</last><first>462</first></pages><author></author><title>Memory & Cognition</title></host><title>Dissociation of implicit and explicit memory tests: Effect of age and divided attention on category exemplar generation and cued recall</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L.L. Jacoby</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Dallas</name></json:item></author><host><volume>110</volume><pages><last>340</last><first>306</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Experimental Psychology: General</title></host><title>On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L.L. Jacoby</name></json:item><json:item><name>V. Woloshyn</name></json:item><json:item><name>C.M. Kelley</name></json:item></author><host><volume>118</volume><pages><last>125</last><first>115</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Experimental Psychology: General</title></host><title>Becoming famous without being recognized: Unconscious influences of memory produced by dividing attention</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L.L. Light</name></json:item><json:item><name>S.A. Albertson</name></json:item></author><host><volume>4</volume><pages><last>492</last><first>487</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychology and Aging</title></host><title>Direct and indirect tests of memory for category exemplars in young and older adults</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L.L. Light</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Singh</name></json:item></author><host><volume>13</volume><pages><last>541</last><first>531</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition</title></host><title>Implicit and explicit memory in young and older adults</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G.D. Logan</name></json:item><json:item><name>S.E. Taylor</name></json:item><json:item><name>J.L. Etherton</name></json:item></author><host><volume>22</volume><pages><last>638</last><first>620</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition</title></host><title>Attention in the acquisition and expression of automaticity</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Statistical theories of mental test scores</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>H.R. Mannhaupt</name></json:item></author><host><volume>2</volume><pages><last>278</last><first>264</first></pages><author></author><title>Sprache & Kognition</title></host><title>Produktionsnormen für verbale Reaktionen zu 40 geläufigen Kategorien [German category norms for verbal items in 40 categories]</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C.A. Manning</name></json:item><json:item><name>M.W. Parsons</name></json:item><json:item><name>E.M. Cotter</name></json:item><json:item><name>P.E. Gold</name></json:item></author><host><volume>25</volume><pages><last>108</last><first>103</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychobiology</title></host><title>Glucose effects on declarative and nondeclarative memory in healthy elderly and young adults</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>P.M. Merikle</name></json:item><json:item><name>E.M. Reingold</name></json:item></author><host><volume>17</volume><pages><last>233</last><first>224</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition</title></host><title>Comparing direct (explicit) and indirect (implicit) measures to study unconscious memory</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>N.W. Mulligan</name></json:item></author><host><volume>25</volume><pages><last>17</last><first>11</first></pages><author></author><title>Memory & Cognition</title></host><title>Attention and implicit memory tests: The effects of varying attentional load on conceptual priming</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>N.W. Mulligan</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Hartman</name></json:item></author><host><volume>24</volume><pages><last>465</last><first>453</first></pages><author></author><title>Memory & Cognition</title></host><title>Divided attention and indirect memory tests</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R.M. Nosofsky</name></json:item><json:item><name>S.R. Zaki</name></json:item></author><host><volume>9</volume><pages><last>255</last><first>247</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychological Science</title></host><title>Dissociations between categorization and recognition in amnesic and normal individuals: An exemplar-based interpretation</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A.L. Ostergaard</name></json:item></author><host><volume>18</volume><pages><last>420</last><first>413</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition</title></host><title>A method for judging measures of stochastic dependence: Further comments on the current controversy</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A.L. Ostergaard</name></json:item><json:item><name>T.L. Jernigan</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>349</last><first>327</first></pages><author></author><title>Implicit memory: New directions in cognition, development, and neuropsychology</title></host><title>Are word priming and explicit memory mediated by different brain structures?</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A.J. Parkin</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. Streete</name></json:item></author><host><volume>79</volume><pages><last>369</last><first>361</first></pages><author></author><title>British Journal of Psychology</title></host><title>Implicit and explicit memory in young children and adults</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>P. Perruchet</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. Baveux</name></json:item></author><host><volume>17</volume><pages><last>86</last><first>77</first></pages><author></author><title>Memory & Cognition</title></host><title>Correlational analysis of explicit and implicit memory performance</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>H.L. Roediger</name></json:item></author><host><volume>45</volume><pages><last>1056</last><first>1043</first></pages><author></author><title>American Psychologist</title></host><title>Implicit memory. Retention without awareness</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>H.L. Roediger</name></json:item><json:item><name>K.B. McDermott</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>131</last><first>63</first></pages><author></author><title>Handbook of neuropsychology</title></host><title>Implicit memory in normal human subjects</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J.S. Rossi</name></json:item></author><host><volume>58</volume><pages><last>656</last><first>646</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology</title></host><title>Statistical power of psychological research: What have we gained in 20 years?</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Modern psychometrics</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D.L. Schacter</name></json:item></author><host><volume>13</volume><pages><last>518</last><first>501</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition</title></host><title>Implicit memory: History and current status</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D.L. Schacter</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. McGlynn</name></json:item></author><host><volume>102</volume><pages><last>181</last><first>151</first></pages><author></author><title>American Journal of Psychology</title></host><title>Implicit memory: Effects of elaboration depend on unitization</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B.L. Schwartz</name></json:item><json:item><name>R.B. Rosse</name></json:item><json:item><name>S.I. Deutsch</name></json:item></author><host><volume>21</volume><pages><last>72</last><first>63</first></pages><author></author><title>Memory & Cognition</title></host><title>Limits of the processing view in accounting for dissociations among memory measures in a clinical population</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J.G. Seamon</name></json:item><json:item><name>D. Ganor Stern</name></json:item><json:item><name>M.J. Crowley</name></json:item><json:item><name>S.M. Wilson</name></json:item><json:item><name>W.J. Weber</name></json:item><json:item><name>C.M. O'Rourke</name></json:item><json:item><name>J.K. Mahoney</name></json:item></author><host><volume>25</volume><pages><last>374</last><first>367</first></pages><author></author><title>Memory & Cognition</title></host><title>A mere exposure effect for transformed three-dimensional objects: Effects of reflection, size, or color changes on affect and recognition</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>P. Sedlmeier</name></json:item><json:item><name>G. Gigerenzer</name></json:item></author><host><volume>105</volume><pages><last>316</last><first>309</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychological Bulletin</title></host><title>Do studies of statistical power have an effect on the power of studies?</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>N.C. Silver</name></json:item><json:item><name>W.P. Dunlap</name></json:item></author><host><volume>72</volume><pages><last>148</last><first>146</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Applied Psychology</title></host><title>Averaging correlation coefficients: Should Fisher's z transformation be used?</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J.G. Snodgrass</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Corwin</name></json:item></author><host><volume>117</volume><pages><last>50</last><first>34</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Experimental Psychology: General</title></host><title>Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J.G. Snodgrass</name></json:item><json:item><name>K. Feenan</name></json:item></author><host><volume>119</volume><pages><last>296</last><first>276</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Experimental Psychology: General</title></host><title>Priming effects in picture fragment completion: Support for the perceptual closure hypothesis</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J.G. Snodgrass</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Vanderwart</name></json:item></author><host><volume>6</volume><pages><last>215</last><first>174</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory</title></host><title>A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L.R. Squire</name></json:item><json:item><name>A.P. Shimamura</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. Graf</name></json:item></author><host><volume>11</volume><pages><last>44</last><first>37</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition</title></host><title>Independence of recognition memory and priming effects: A neuropsychological analysis</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>K. Srinivas</name></json:item><json:item><name>H.L. Roediger</name></json:item></author><host><volume>29</volume><pages><last>412</last><first>389</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Memory and Language</title></host><title>Classifying implicit memory tests: Category associations and anagram solution</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. Steyer</name></json:item></author><host><volume>3</volume><pages><last>60</last><first>25</first></pages><author></author><title>Methodika</title></host><title>Models of classical psychometric test theory as stochastic measurement models: Representation, uniqueness, meaningfulness, identifiability, and testability</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>E. Tulving</name></json:item><json:item><name>D.L. Schacter</name></json:item></author><host><volume>247</volume><pages><last>306</last><first>301</first></pages><author></author><title>Science</title></host><title>Priming and human memory systems</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>E.K. Warrington</name></json:item><json:item><name>L. Weiskrantz</name></json:item></author><host><volume>228</volume><pages><last>630</last><first>628</first></pages><author></author><title>Nature</title></host><title>Amnesic syndrome: Consolidation or retrieval?</title></json:item></refBibs><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><volume>40</volume><pii><json:string>S0010-0285(00)X0016-3</json:string></pii><pages><last>259</last><first>227</first></pages><issn><json:string>0010-0285</json:string></issn><issue>3</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><title>Cognitive Psychology</title><publicationDate>2000</publicationDate></host><categories><wos><json:string>social science</json:string><json:string>psychology, experimental</json:string><json:string>science</json:string><json:string>psychology</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>health sciences</json:string><json:string>psychology & cognitive sciences</json:string><json:string>experimental psychology</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2000</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2000</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1006/cogp.1999.0731</json:string></doi><id>017C4F9D13CE6096996262F5D084697876CE1DC5</id><score>2.9171638</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/017C4F9D13CE6096996262F5D084697876CE1DC5/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/017C4F9D13CE6096996262F5D084697876CE1DC5/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/017C4F9D13CE6096996262F5D084697876CE1DC5/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">On the Reliability of Implicit and Explicit Memory Measures</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><availability><p>©2000 Academic Press</p></availability><date>2000</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note>We thank Jens F. Beckmann, Douglas Hintzman, and Michael Masson for valuable comments on an earlier version of this article and Arno Latten, Bettina Mehl, Nina Kraume as well as Jörg Kunz for their assistance with data collection. The research reported in this article was supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft to Axel Buchner (Bu 945/1–2) and to Werner Wippich (Wi 943/2-2).</note><note>Address correspondence and reprint requests to Axel Buchner, FB I—Psychologie, Universität Trier, D-54286 Trier, Germany. Fax: +49 651 201 2955. E-mail: buchner@cogpsy.uni-trier.de</note><note type="content">Section title: Regular Article</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">On the Reliability of Implicit and Explicit Memory Measures</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Axel</forename><surname>Buchner</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Trier, Trier, Germany</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">Werner</forename><surname>Wippich</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Trier, Trier, Germany</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Cognitive Psychology</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">YCOGP</title><idno type="pISSN">0010-0285</idno><idno type="PII">S0010-0285(00)X0016-3</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="2000"></date><biblScope unit="volume">40</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="227">227</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="259">259</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">017C4F9D13CE6096996262F5D084697876CE1DC5</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1006/cogp.1999.0731</idno><idno type="PII">S0010-0285(99)90731-4</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2000</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Functional dissociations between implicit and explicit memory tests often take the form of large differences between groups or experimental conditions (e.g., amnesics and controls, elderly and younger persons, or persons learning with and without a distracting secondary task) when performance is assessed using explicit memory tests, whereas no difference is observed with implicit memory tests. We argue that the interpretation of such dissociations in terms of the memory processes or systems involved in performance is problematic because the same data pattern would emerge as a result of a mere methodological artifact, that is, the situation that implicit memory tests have low reliability whereas explicit memory tests are fairly reliable measurement instruments. We present reasons for such a reliability difference, and we demonstrate it empirically in Experiments 1a, 1b, and 2. However, our analysis also shows, and Experiment 3 confirms empirically, that implicit memory tests need not necessarily be less reliable measurement instruments than explicit memory tests.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2000">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/017C4F9D13CE6096996262F5D084697876CE1DC5/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Elsevier, elements deleted: tail"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//ES//DTD journal article DTD version 4.5.2//EN//XML" URI="art452.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><converted-article version="4.5.2" docsubtype="fla" xml:lang="en"><item-info><jid>YCOGP</jid><aid>90731</aid><ce:pii>S0010-0285(99)90731-4</ce:pii><ce:doi>10.1006/cogp.1999.0731</ce:doi><ce:copyright type="full-transfer" year="2000">Academic Press</ce:copyright></item-info><head><ce:article-footnote><ce:label>☆</ce:label><ce:note-para>We thank Jens F. Beckmann, Douglas Hintzman, and Michael Masson for valuable comments on an earlier version of this article and Arno Latten, Bettina Mehl, Nina Kraume as well as Jörg Kunz for their assistance with data collection. The research reported in this article was supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft to Axel Buchner (Bu 945/1–2) and to Werner Wippich (Wi 943/2-2).</ce:note-para><ce:note-para>Address correspondence and reprint requests to Axel Buchner, FB I—Psychologie, Universität Trier, D-54286 Trier, Germany. Fax: +49 651 201 2955. E-mail: buchner@cogpsy.uni-trier.de</ce:note-para></ce:article-footnote><ce:dochead><ce:textfn>Regular Article</ce:textfn></ce:dochead><ce:title>On the Reliability of Implicit and Explicit Memory Measures</ce:title><ce:author-group><ce:author><ce:given-name>Axel</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Buchner</ce:surname></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>Werner</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Wippich</ce:surname></ce:author><ce:affiliation><ce:textfn>University of Trier, Trier, Germany</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation></ce:author-group><ce:date-accepted day="1" month="11" year="1999"></ce:date-accepted><ce:abstract><ce:section-title>Abstract</ce:section-title><ce:abstract-sec><ce:simple-para>Functional dissociations between implicit and explicit memory tests often take the form of large differences between groups or experimental conditions (e.g., amnesics and controls, elderly and younger persons, or persons learning with and without a distracting secondary task) when performance is assessed using explicit memory tests, whereas no difference is observed with implicit memory tests. We argue that the interpretation of such dissociations in terms of the memory processes or systems involved in performance is problematic because the same data pattern would emerge as a result of a mere methodological artifact, that is, the situation that implicit memory tests have low reliability whereas explicit memory tests are fairly reliable measurement instruments. We present reasons for such a reliability difference, and we demonstrate it empirically in Experiments 1a, 1b, and 2. However, our analysis also shows, and Experiment 3 confirms empirically, that implicit memory tests need not necessarily be less reliable measurement instruments than explicit memory tests.</ce:simple-para></ce:abstract-sec></ce:abstract></head></converted-article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>On the Reliability of Implicit and Explicit Memory Measures</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" lang="en" contentType="CDATA"><title>On the Reliability of Implicit and Explicit Memory Measures</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Axel</namePart><namePart type="family">Buchner</namePart><affiliation>University of Trier, Trier, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Werner</namePart><namePart type="family">Wippich</namePart><affiliation>University of Trier, Trier, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="Full-length article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2000</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Functional dissociations between implicit and explicit memory tests often take the form of large differences between groups or experimental conditions (e.g., amnesics and controls, elderly and younger persons, or persons learning with and without a distracting secondary task) when performance is assessed using explicit memory tests, whereas no difference is observed with implicit memory tests. We argue that the interpretation of such dissociations in terms of the memory processes or systems involved in performance is problematic because the same data pattern would emerge as a result of a mere methodological artifact, that is, the situation that implicit memory tests have low reliability whereas explicit memory tests are fairly reliable measurement instruments. We present reasons for such a reliability difference, and we demonstrate it empirically in Experiments 1a, 1b, and 2. However, our analysis also shows, and Experiment 3 confirms empirically, that implicit memory tests need not necessarily be less reliable measurement instruments than explicit memory tests.</abstract><note>We thank Jens F. Beckmann, Douglas Hintzman, and Michael Masson for valuable comments on an earlier version of this article and Arno Latten, Bettina Mehl, Nina Kraume as well as Jörg Kunz for their assistance with data collection. The research reported in this article was supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft to Axel Buchner (Bu 945/1–2) and to Werner Wippich (Wi 943/2-2).</note><note>Address correspondence and reprint requests to Axel Buchner, FB I—Psychologie, Universität Trier, D-54286 Trier, Germany. Fax: +49 651 201 2955. E-mail: buchner@cogpsy.uni-trier.de</note><note type="content">Section title: Regular Article</note><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Cognitive Psychology</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>YCOGP</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><originInfo><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">200005</dateIssued></originInfo><identifier type="ISSN">0010-0285</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0010-0285(00)X0016-3</identifier><part><date>200005</date><detail type="volume"><number>40</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="issue"><number>3</number><caption>no.</caption></detail><extent unit="issue pages"><start>173</start><end>259</end></extent><extent unit="pages"><start>227</start><end>259</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">017C4F9D13CE6096996262F5D084697876CE1DC5</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1006/cogp.1999.0731</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0010-0285(99)90731-4</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">©2000 Academic Press</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>ELSEVIER</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Academic Press, ©2000</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001524 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001524 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Rhénanie
|area= UnivTrevesV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:017C4F9D13CE6096996262F5D084697876CE1DC5
|texte= On the Reliability of Implicit and Explicit Memory Measures
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |