Application of FISK, an Invasiveness Screening Tool for Non‐Native Freshwater Fishes, in the Murray‐Darling Basin (Southeastern Australia)
Identifieur interne : 000396 ( Main/Merge ); précédent : 000395; suivant : 000397Application of FISK, an Invasiveness Screening Tool for Non‐Native Freshwater Fishes, in the Murray‐Darling Basin (Southeastern Australia)
Auteurs : Lorenzo Vilizzi [Royaume-Uni, Canada] ; Gordon H. Copp [Royaume-Uni, Canada]Source :
- Risk Analysis [ 0272-4332 ] ; 2013-08.
Abstract
The Fish Invasiveness Scoring Kit (FISK) is currently one of the most popular pre‐screening tools for freshwater fishes. A recent upgrade has ensured its wider climatic relevance to countries with subtropical regions. This enhancement is of particular importance to Australia, which encompasses tropical, arid, and temperate zones, and where the introduction of non‐native fish species poses a significant risk to biodiversity. In this study, 55 fish species previously evaluated in a U.K.‐based calibration of FISK are reassessed for their potential invasiveness in the Murray‐Darling Basin (MDB; southeastern Australia), the continent's largest catchment encompassing arid and temperate climates. Approximately half of the species were classed as “medium risk” and the other half as “high risk,” and the ≥19 threshold previously identified from the calibration study was confirmed. The three highest scoring species (common carp Cyprinus carpio carpio, goldfish Carassius auratus, and eastern mosquitofish Gambusia holbrooki) were those already present and invasive in the area, whereas nearly half of the tropical and subtropical species had lower scores compared to U.K. assessments, possibly because of climate change predictions of drier conditions across the MDB. There were some discordances between FISK and two Australian‐based assessment protocols, one of which is qualitative and the other represents a simplified version of FISK. Notably, the Australian origins of FISK should provide for an additional reason for further applications of the tool in other RA areas (i.e., drainage basins) of the continent, ultimately encouraging adoption as the country's reference screening tool for management and conservation purposes.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01860.x
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 000C69
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 000C67
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 000087
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:32328040CA23313FC92D44F8C25954E4AE271169Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Application of FISK, an Invasiveness Screening Tool for Non‐Native Freshwater Fishes, in the Murray‐Darling Basin (Southeastern Australia)</title><author><name sortKey="Vilizzi, Lorenzo" sort="Vilizzi, Lorenzo" uniqKey="Vilizzi L" first="Lorenzo" last="Vilizzi">Lorenzo Vilizzi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Copp, Gordon H" sort="Copp, Gordon H" uniqKey="Copp G" first="Gordon H." last="Copp">Gordon H. Copp</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:32328040CA23313FC92D44F8C25954E4AE271169</idno><date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01860.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/32328040CA23313FC92D44F8C25954E4AE271169/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000C69</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000C69</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000C67</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000087</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000087</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0272-4332:2013:Vilizzi L:application:of:fisk</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000396</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Application of FISK, an Invasiveness Screening Tool for Non‐Native Freshwater Fishes, in the Murray‐Darling Basin (Southeastern Australia)</title><author><name sortKey="Vilizzi, Lorenzo" sort="Vilizzi, Lorenzo" uniqKey="Vilizzi L" first="Lorenzo" last="Vilizzi">Lorenzo Vilizzi</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Salmon & Freshwater Team, Cefas, Pakefield Road, NR33 0HT, Lowestoft, Suffolk</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Suffolk</wicri:noRegion></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>School of Conservation Science, Bournemouth University, Poole, Dorset</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Dorset</wicri:noRegion></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>Environmental and Life Sciences Graduate Program, Trent University, Peterborough</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Peterborough</wicri:noRegion></affiliation><affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Copp, Gordon H" sort="Copp, Gordon H" uniqKey="Copp G" first="Gordon H." last="Copp">Gordon H. Copp</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Salmon & Freshwater Team, Cefas, Pakefield Road, NR33 0HT, Lowestoft, Suffolk</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Suffolk</wicri:noRegion></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>School of Conservation Science, Bournemouth University, Poole, Dorset</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Dorset</wicri:noRegion></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>Environmental and Life Sciences Graduate Program, Trent University, Peterborough</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Peterborough</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Risk Analysis</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Risk Analysis</title><idno type="ISSN">0272-4332</idno><idno type="eISSN">1539-6924</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><date type="published" when="2013-08">2013-08</date><biblScope unit="volume">33</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">8</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1432">1432</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1440">1440</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0272-4332</idno></series><idno type="istex">32328040CA23313FC92D44F8C25954E4AE271169</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01860.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">RISA1860</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0272-4332</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">The Fish Invasiveness Scoring Kit (FISK) is currently one of the most popular pre‐screening tools for freshwater fishes. A recent upgrade has ensured its wider climatic relevance to countries with subtropical regions. This enhancement is of particular importance to Australia, which encompasses tropical, arid, and temperate zones, and where the introduction of non‐native fish species poses a significant risk to biodiversity. In this study, 55 fish species previously evaluated in a U.K.‐based calibration of FISK are reassessed for their potential invasiveness in the Murray‐Darling Basin (MDB; southeastern Australia), the continent's largest catchment encompassing arid and temperate climates. Approximately half of the species were classed as “medium risk” and the other half as “high risk,” and the ≥19 threshold previously identified from the calibration study was confirmed. The three highest scoring species (common carp Cyprinus carpio carpio, goldfish Carassius auratus, and eastern mosquitofish Gambusia holbrooki) were those already present and invasive in the area, whereas nearly half of the tropical and subtropical species had lower scores compared to U.K. assessments, possibly because of climate change predictions of drier conditions across the MDB. There were some discordances between FISK and two Australian‐based assessment protocols, one of which is qualitative and the other represents a simplified version of FISK. Notably, the Australian origins of FISK should provide for an additional reason for further applications of the tool in other RA areas (i.e., drainage basins) of the continent, ultimately encouraging adoption as the country's reference screening tool for management and conservation purposes.</div></front></TEI></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Eau/explor/EsturgeonV1/Data/Main/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000396 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 000396 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Eau
|area= EsturgeonV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Merge
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:32328040CA23313FC92D44F8C25954E4AE271169
|texte= Application of FISK, an Invasiveness Screening Tool for Non‐Native Freshwater Fishes, in the Murray‐Darling Basin (Southeastern Australia)
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.27. |  |