Application of FISK, an Invasiveness Screening Tool for Non‐Native Freshwater Fishes, in the Murray‐Darling Basin (Southeastern Australia)
Identifieur interne : 000C69 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000C68; suivant : 000C70Application of FISK, an Invasiveness Screening Tool for Non‐Native Freshwater Fishes, in the Murray‐Darling Basin (Southeastern Australia)
Auteurs : Lorenzo Vilizzi ; Gordon H. CoppSource :
- Risk Analysis [ 0272-4332 ] ; 2013-08.
Abstract
The Fish Invasiveness Scoring Kit (FISK) is currently one of the most popular pre‐screening tools for freshwater fishes. A recent upgrade has ensured its wider climatic relevance to countries with subtropical regions. This enhancement is of particular importance to Australia, which encompasses tropical, arid, and temperate zones, and where the introduction of non‐native fish species poses a significant risk to biodiversity. In this study, 55 fish species previously evaluated in a U.K.‐based calibration of FISK are reassessed for their potential invasiveness in the Murray‐Darling Basin (MDB; southeastern Australia), the continent's largest catchment encompassing arid and temperate climates. Approximately half of the species were classed as “medium risk” and the other half as “high risk,” and the ≥19 threshold previously identified from the calibration study was confirmed. The three highest scoring species (common carp Cyprinus carpio carpio, goldfish Carassius auratus, and eastern mosquitofish Gambusia holbrooki) were those already present and invasive in the area, whereas nearly half of the tropical and subtropical species had lower scores compared to U.K. assessments, possibly because of climate change predictions of drier conditions across the MDB. There were some discordances between FISK and two Australian‐based assessment protocols, one of which is qualitative and the other represents a simplified version of FISK. Notably, the Australian origins of FISK should provide for an additional reason for further applications of the tool in other RA areas (i.e., drainage basins) of the continent, ultimately encouraging adoption as the country's reference screening tool for management and conservation purposes.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01860.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:32328040CA23313FC92D44F8C25954E4AE271169Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Application of FISK, an Invasiveness Screening Tool for Non‐Native Freshwater Fishes, in the Murray‐Darling Basin (Southeastern Australia)</title><author><name sortKey="Vilizzi, Lorenzo" sort="Vilizzi, Lorenzo" uniqKey="Vilizzi L" first="Lorenzo" last="Vilizzi">Lorenzo Vilizzi</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Salmon & Freshwater Team, Cefas, Pakefield Road, NR33 0HT, Lowestoft, Suffolk, U.K.</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Conservation Science, Bournemouth University, Poole, Dorset, U.K.</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Environmental and Life Sciences Graduate Program, Trent University, Peterborough, Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: lorenzo.vilizzi@gmail.com</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Copp, Gordon H" sort="Copp, Gordon H" uniqKey="Copp G" first="Gordon H." last="Copp">Gordon H. Copp</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Salmon & Freshwater Team, Cefas, Pakefield Road, NR33 0HT, Lowestoft, Suffolk, U.K.</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Conservation Science, Bournemouth University, Poole, Dorset, U.K.</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Environmental and Life Sciences Graduate Program, Trent University, Peterborough, Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:32328040CA23313FC92D44F8C25954E4AE271169</idno><date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01860.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/32328040CA23313FC92D44F8C25954E4AE271169/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000C69</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000C69</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Application of FISK, an Invasiveness Screening Tool for Non‐Native Freshwater Fishes, in the Murray‐Darling Basin (Southeastern Australia)</title><author><name sortKey="Vilizzi, Lorenzo" sort="Vilizzi, Lorenzo" uniqKey="Vilizzi L" first="Lorenzo" last="Vilizzi">Lorenzo Vilizzi</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Salmon & Freshwater Team, Cefas, Pakefield Road, NR33 0HT, Lowestoft, Suffolk, U.K.</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Conservation Science, Bournemouth University, Poole, Dorset, U.K.</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Environmental and Life Sciences Graduate Program, Trent University, Peterborough, Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: lorenzo.vilizzi@gmail.com</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Copp, Gordon H" sort="Copp, Gordon H" uniqKey="Copp G" first="Gordon H." last="Copp">Gordon H. Copp</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Salmon & Freshwater Team, Cefas, Pakefield Road, NR33 0HT, Lowestoft, Suffolk, U.K.</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Conservation Science, Bournemouth University, Poole, Dorset, U.K.</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Environmental and Life Sciences Graduate Program, Trent University, Peterborough, Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Risk Analysis</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Risk Analysis</title><idno type="ISSN">0272-4332</idno><idno type="eISSN">1539-6924</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><date type="published" when="2013-08">2013-08</date><biblScope unit="volume">33</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">8</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1432">1432</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1440">1440</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0272-4332</idno></series><idno type="istex">32328040CA23313FC92D44F8C25954E4AE271169</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01860.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">RISA1860</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0272-4332</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">The Fish Invasiveness Scoring Kit (FISK) is currently one of the most popular pre‐screening tools for freshwater fishes. A recent upgrade has ensured its wider climatic relevance to countries with subtropical regions. This enhancement is of particular importance to Australia, which encompasses tropical, arid, and temperate zones, and where the introduction of non‐native fish species poses a significant risk to biodiversity. In this study, 55 fish species previously evaluated in a U.K.‐based calibration of FISK are reassessed for their potential invasiveness in the Murray‐Darling Basin (MDB; southeastern Australia), the continent's largest catchment encompassing arid and temperate climates. Approximately half of the species were classed as “medium risk” and the other half as “high risk,” and the ≥19 threshold previously identified from the calibration study was confirmed. The three highest scoring species (common carp Cyprinus carpio carpio, goldfish Carassius auratus, and eastern mosquitofish Gambusia holbrooki) were those already present and invasive in the area, whereas nearly half of the tropical and subtropical species had lower scores compared to U.K. assessments, possibly because of climate change predictions of drier conditions across the MDB. There were some discordances between FISK and two Australian‐based assessment protocols, one of which is qualitative and the other represents a simplified version of FISK. Notably, the Australian origins of FISK should provide for an additional reason for further applications of the tool in other RA areas (i.e., drainage basins) of the continent, ultimately encouraging adoption as the country's reference screening tool for management and conservation purposes.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Lorenzo Vilizzi</name><affiliations><json:string>Salmon & Freshwater Team, Cefas, Pakefield Road, NR33 0HT, Lowestoft, Suffolk, U.K.</json:string><json:string>School of Conservation Science, Bournemouth University, Poole, Dorset, U.K.</json:string><json:string>Environmental and Life Sciences Graduate Program, Trent University, Peterborough, Canada</json:string><json:string>E-mail: lorenzo.vilizzi@gmail.com</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Gordon H. Copp</name><affiliations><json:string>Salmon & Freshwater Team, Cefas, Pakefield Road, NR33 0HT, Lowestoft, Suffolk, U.K.</json:string><json:string>School of Conservation Science, Bournemouth University, Poole, Dorset, U.K.</json:string><json:string>Environmental and Life Sciences Graduate Program, Trent University, Peterborough, Canada</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Alien species pre‐screening</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>hazard identification</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Pheloung et al. weed risk assessment</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>RISA1860</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>The Fish Invasiveness Scoring Kit (FISK) is currently one of the most popular pre‐screening tools for freshwater fishes. A recent upgrade has ensured its wider climatic relevance to countries with subtropical regions. This enhancement is of particular importance to Australia, which encompasses tropical, arid, and temperate zones, and where the introduction of non‐native fish species poses a significant risk to biodiversity. In this study, 55 fish species previously evaluated in a U.K.‐based calibration of FISK are reassessed for their potential invasiveness in the Murray‐Darling Basin (MDB; southeastern Australia), the continent's largest catchment encompassing arid and temperate climates. Approximately half of the species were classed as “medium risk” and the other half as “high risk,” and the ≥19 threshold previously identified from the calibration study was confirmed. The three highest scoring species (common carp Cyprinus carpio carpio, goldfish Carassius auratus, and eastern mosquitofish Gambusia holbrooki) were those already present and invasive in the area, whereas nearly half of the tropical and subtropical species had lower scores compared to U.K. assessments, possibly because of climate change predictions of drier conditions across the MDB. There were some discordances between FISK and two Australian‐based assessment protocols, one of which is qualitative and the other represents a simplified version of FISK. Notably, the Australian origins of FISK should provide for an additional reason for further applications of the tool in other RA areas (i.e., drainage basins) of the continent, ultimately encouraging adoption as the country's reference screening tool for management and conservation purposes.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.917</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>594 x 783 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>1735</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>3941</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>29702</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>9</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>248</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Application of FISK, an Invasiveness Screening Tool for Non‐Native Freshwater Fishes, in the Murray‐Darling Basin (Southeastern Australia)</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>33</volume><publisherId><json:string>RISA</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>9</total><last>1440</last><first>1432</first></pages><issn><json:string>0272-4332</json:string></issn><issue>8</issue><subject><json:item><value>Original Research Article</value></json:item></subject><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1539-6924</json:string></eissn><title>Risk Analysis</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>social science</json:string><json:string>social sciences, mathematical methods</json:string><json:string>public, environmental & occupational health</json:string><json:string>science</json:string><json:string>mathematics, interdisciplinary applications</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>applied sciences</json:string><json:string>enabling & strategic technologies</json:string><json:string>strategic, defence & security studies</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2013</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2013</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01860.x</json:string></doi><id>32328040CA23313FC92D44F8C25954E4AE271169</id><score>0.04517161</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/32328040CA23313FC92D44F8C25954E4AE271169/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/32328040CA23313FC92D44F8C25954E4AE271169/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/32328040CA23313FC92D44F8C25954E4AE271169/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Application of FISK, an Invasiveness Screening Tool for Non‐Native Freshwater Fishes, in the Murray‐Darling Basin (Southeastern Australia)</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><availability><p>© 2013 Society for Risk Analysis© 2012 Society for Risk Analysis</p></availability><date>2013-08-15</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Application of FISK, an Invasiveness Screening Tool for Non‐Native Freshwater Fishes, in the Murray‐Darling Basin (Southeastern Australia)</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Lorenzo</forename><surname>Vilizzi</surname></persName><email>lorenzo.vilizzi@gmail.com</email><affiliation>Salmon & Freshwater Team, Cefas, Pakefield Road, NR33 0HT, Lowestoft, Suffolk, U.K.</affiliation><affiliation>School of Conservation Science, Bournemouth University, Poole, Dorset, U.K.</affiliation><affiliation>Environmental and Life Sciences Graduate Program, Trent University, Peterborough, Canada</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">Gordon H.</forename><surname>Copp</surname></persName><affiliation>Salmon & Freshwater Team, Cefas, Pakefield Road, NR33 0HT, Lowestoft, Suffolk, U.K.</affiliation><affiliation>School of Conservation Science, Bournemouth University, Poole, Dorset, U.K.</affiliation><affiliation>Environmental and Life Sciences Graduate Program, Trent University, Peterborough, Canada</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Risk Analysis</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Risk Analysis</title><idno type="pISSN">0272-4332</idno><idno type="eISSN">1539-6924</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><date type="published" when="2013-08"></date><biblScope unit="volume">33</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">8</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1432">1432</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1440">1440</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">32328040CA23313FC92D44F8C25954E4AE271169</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01860.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">RISA1860</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2013-08-15</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract><p>The Fish Invasiveness Scoring Kit (FISK) is currently one of the most popular pre‐screening tools for freshwater fishes. A recent upgrade has ensured its wider climatic relevance to countries with subtropical regions. This enhancement is of particular importance to Australia, which encompasses tropical, arid, and temperate zones, and where the introduction of non‐native fish species poses a significant risk to biodiversity. In this study, 55 fish species previously evaluated in a U.K.‐based calibration of FISK are reassessed for their potential invasiveness in the Murray‐Darling Basin (MDB; southeastern Australia), the continent's largest catchment encompassing arid and temperate climates. Approximately half of the species were classed as “medium risk” and the other half as “high risk,” and the ≥19 threshold previously identified from the calibration study was confirmed. The three highest scoring species (common carp Cyprinus carpio carpio, goldfish Carassius auratus, and eastern mosquitofish Gambusia holbrooki) were those already present and invasive in the area, whereas nearly half of the tropical and subtropical species had lower scores compared to U.K. assessments, possibly because of climate change predictions of drier conditions across the MDB. There were some discordances between FISK and two Australian‐based assessment protocols, one of which is qualitative and the other represents a simplified version of FISK. Notably, the Australian origins of FISK should provide for an additional reason for further applications of the tool in other RA areas (i.e., drainage basins) of the continent, ultimately encouraging adoption as the country's reference screening tool for management and conservation purposes.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>keywords</head><item><term>Alien species pre‐screening</term></item><item><term>hazard identification</term></item><item><term>Pheloung et al. weed risk assessment</term></item></list></keywords></textClass><textClass><keywords scheme="Journal Subject"><list><head>article-category</head><item><term>Original Research Article</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2013-08-15">Created</change><change when="2013-08">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/32328040CA23313FC92D44F8C25954E4AE271169/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en" xml:id="RISA1860"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924</doi><issn type="print">0272-4332</issn><issn type="electronic">1539-6924</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="RISA"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="RISK ANALYSIS">Risk Analysis</title><title type="short">Risk Analysis</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="08108"><doi>10.1111/risa.2013.33.issue-8</doi><copyright ownership="thirdParty">© 2013 Society for Risk Analysis</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="33">33</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">8</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2013-08">August 2013</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" position="80" type="article" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01860.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="RISA1860"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="9"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Original Research Article</title><title type="tocHeading1">Special Series: The Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit (FISK) for Non‐native Freshwater Fishes</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="thirdParty">© 2012 Society for Risk Analysis</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlCreated" agent="Aptara" date="2013-08-15"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2012-10-10"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2012-10-10"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2013-08-19"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-20"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.6.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-10-03"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">1432</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">1440</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Address correspondence to Lorenzo Vilizzi, Murray‐Darling Freshwater Research Centre, PO Box 991, Wodonga Vic 3689, Australia; tel. +39-3394984219; fax: +61-260597531; <email>lorenzo.vilizzi@gmail.com</email>.</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:RISA.RISA1860.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><titleGroup><title type="main">Application of FISK, an Invasiveness Screening Tool for Non‐Native Freshwater Fishes, in the Murray‐Darling Basin (Southeastern Australia)</title><title type="shortAuthors">Vilizzi and Copp</title><title type="short">Application of FISK in Southeastern Australia</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="risa1860-cr-0001" corresponding="yes" affiliationRef="#risa1860-aff-0001 #risa1860-aff-0002 #risa1860-aff-0003"><personName><givenNames>Lorenzo</givenNames><familyName>Vilizzi</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="risa1860-cr-0002" affiliationRef="#risa1860-aff-0001 #risa1860-aff-0002 #risa1860-aff-0003"><personName><givenNames>Gordon H.</givenNames><familyName>Copp</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="risa1860-aff-0001" countryCode="GB"><orgDiv>Salmon & Freshwater Team</orgDiv><orgName>Cefas</orgName><address><street>Pakefield Road</street><city>Lowestoft</city><countryPart>Suffolk</countryPart><postCode>NR33 0HT</postCode><country>U.K.</country></address></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="risa1860-aff-0002" countryCode="GB"><orgDiv>School of Conservation Science</orgDiv><orgName>Bournemouth University</orgName><address><city>Poole</city><countryPart>Dorset</countryPart><country>U.K.</country></address></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="risa1860-aff-0003" countryCode="CA"><orgDiv>Environmental and Life Sciences Graduate Program</orgDiv><orgName>Trent University</orgName><address><city>Peterborough</city><country>Canada</country></address></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup type="author"><keyword xml:id="risa1860-kwd-0001">Alien species pre‐screening</keyword><keyword xml:id="risa1860-kwd-0002">hazard identification</keyword><keyword xml:id="risa1860-kwd-0003">Pheloung <i>et al</i>. weed risk assessment</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main"><p>The Fish Invasiveness Scoring Kit (FISK) is currently one of the most popular pre‐screening tools for freshwater fishes. A recent upgrade has ensured its wider climatic relevance to countries with subtropical regions. This enhancement is of particular importance to Australia, which encompasses tropical, arid, and temperate zones, and where the introduction of non‐native fish species poses a significant risk to biodiversity. In this study, 55 fish species previously evaluated in a U.K.‐based calibration of FISK are reassessed for their potential invasiveness in the Murray‐Darling Basin (MDB; southeastern Australia), the continent's largest catchment encompassing arid and temperate climates. Approximately half of the species were classed as “medium risk” and the other half as “high risk,” and the ≥19 threshold previously identified from the calibration study was confirmed. The three highest scoring species (common carp <i>Cyprinus carpio carpio</i>, goldfish <i>Carassius auratus</i>, and eastern mosquitofish <i>Gambusia holbrooki</i>) were those already present and invasive in the area, whereas nearly half of the tropical and subtropical species had lower scores compared to U.K. assessments, possibly because of climate change predictions of drier conditions across the MDB. There were some discordances between FISK and two Australian‐based assessment protocols, one of which is qualitative and the other represents a simplified version of FISK. Notably, the Australian origins of FISK should provide for an additional reason for further applications of the tool in other RA areas (i.e., drainage basins) of the continent, ultimately encouraging adoption as the country's reference screening tool for management and conservation purposes.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Application of FISK, an Invasiveness Screening Tool for Non‐Native Freshwater Fishes, in the Murray‐Darling Basin (Southeastern Australia)</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Application of FISK in Southeastern Australia</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Application of FISK, an Invasiveness Screening Tool for Non‐Native Freshwater Fishes, in the Murray‐Darling Basin (Southeastern Australia)</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Lorenzo</namePart><namePart type="family">Vilizzi</namePart><affiliation>Salmon & Freshwater Team, Cefas, Pakefield Road, NR33 0HT, Lowestoft, Suffolk, U.K.</affiliation><affiliation>School of Conservation Science, Bournemouth University, Poole, Dorset, U.K.</affiliation><affiliation>Environmental and Life Sciences Graduate Program, Trent University, Peterborough, Canada</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: lorenzo.vilizzi@gmail.com</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Gordon H.</namePart><namePart type="family">Copp</namePart><affiliation>Salmon & Freshwater Team, Cefas, Pakefield Road, NR33 0HT, Lowestoft, Suffolk, U.K.</affiliation><affiliation>School of Conservation Science, Bournemouth University, Poole, Dorset, U.K.</affiliation><affiliation>Environmental and Life Sciences Graduate Program, Trent University, Peterborough, Canada</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2013-08</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2013-08-15</dateCreated><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2013</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract>The Fish Invasiveness Scoring Kit (FISK) is currently one of the most popular pre‐screening tools for freshwater fishes. A recent upgrade has ensured its wider climatic relevance to countries with subtropical regions. This enhancement is of particular importance to Australia, which encompasses tropical, arid, and temperate zones, and where the introduction of non‐native fish species poses a significant risk to biodiversity. In this study, 55 fish species previously evaluated in a U.K.‐based calibration of FISK are reassessed for their potential invasiveness in the Murray‐Darling Basin (MDB; southeastern Australia), the continent's largest catchment encompassing arid and temperate climates. Approximately half of the species were classed as “medium risk” and the other half as “high risk,” and the ≥19 threshold previously identified from the calibration study was confirmed. The three highest scoring species (common carp Cyprinus carpio carpio, goldfish Carassius auratus, and eastern mosquitofish Gambusia holbrooki) were those already present and invasive in the area, whereas nearly half of the tropical and subtropical species had lower scores compared to U.K. assessments, possibly because of climate change predictions of drier conditions across the MDB. There were some discordances between FISK and two Australian‐based assessment protocols, one of which is qualitative and the other represents a simplified version of FISK. Notably, the Australian origins of FISK should provide for an additional reason for further applications of the tool in other RA areas (i.e., drainage basins) of the continent, ultimately encouraging adoption as the country's reference screening tool for management and conservation purposes.</abstract><subject><genre>keywords</genre><topic>Alien species pre‐screening</topic><topic>hazard identification</topic><topic>Pheloung et al. weed risk assessment</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Risk Analysis</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Risk Analysis</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Original Research Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0272-4332</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1539-6924</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">RISA</identifier><part><date>2013</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>33</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>8</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>1432</start><end>1440</end><total>9</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">32328040CA23313FC92D44F8C25954E4AE271169</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01860.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">RISA1860</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2013 Society for Risk Analysis© 2012 Society for Risk Analysis</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Eau/explor/EsturgeonV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000C69 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000C69 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Eau
|area= EsturgeonV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:32328040CA23313FC92D44F8C25954E4AE271169
|texte= Application of FISK, an Invasiveness Screening Tool for Non‐Native Freshwater Fishes, in the Murray‐Darling Basin (Southeastern Australia)
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.27. |  |