Genome-wide analysis of SSR and ILP markers in trees: diversity profiling, alternate distribution, and applications in duplication.
Identifieur interne : 000809 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 000808; suivant : 000810Genome-wide analysis of SSR and ILP markers in trees: diversity profiling, alternate distribution, and applications in duplication.
Auteurs : Xinyao Xia ; Lin Lin Luan ; Guanghua Qin ; Li Fang Yu ; Zhi Wei Wang ; Wan Chen Dong ; Yumin Song ; Yuling Qiao ; Xian Sheng Zhang ; Ya Lin Sang ; Long YangSource :
- Scientific reports [ 2045-2322 ] ; 2017.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Breeding (methods), Chromosome Mapping (methods), Genetic Loci (genetics), Genetic Markers (genetics), Genetic Variation (genetics), Genome, Plant (genetics), Genome-Wide Association Study (methods), Introns (genetics), Microsatellite Repeats (genetics), Phylogeny (MeSH), Polymorphism, Genetic (genetics), Trees (genetics).
- MESH :
- chemical , genetics : Genetic Markers.
- genetics : Genetic Loci, Genetic Variation, Genome, Plant, Introns, Microsatellite Repeats, Polymorphism, Genetic, Trees.
- methods : Breeding, Chromosome Mapping, Genome-Wide Association Study.
- Phylogeny.
Abstract
Molecular markers are efficient tools for breeding and genetic studies. However, despite their ecological and economic importance, their development and application have long been hampered. In this study, we identified 524,170 simple sequence repeat (SSR), 267,636 intron length polymorphism (ILP), and 11,872 potential intron polymorphism (PIP) markers from 16 tree species based on recently available genome sequences. Larger motifs, including hexamers and heptamers, accounted for most of the seven different types of SSR loci. Within these loci, A/T bases comprised a significantly larger proportion of sequence than G/C. SSR and ILP markers exhibited an alternative distribution pattern. Most SSRs were monomorphic markers, and the proportions of polymorphic markers were positively correlated with genome size. By verifying with all 16 tree species, 54 SSR, 418 ILP, and four PIP universal markers were obtained, and their efficiency was examined by PCR. A combination of five SSR and six ILP markers were used for the phylogenetic analysis of 30 willow samples, revealing a positive correlation between genetic diversity and geographic distance. We also found that SSRs can be used as tools for duplication analysis. Our findings provide important foundations for the development of breeding and genetic studies in tree species.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-17203-6
PubMed: 29263331
PubMed Central: PMC5738346
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:29263331Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Genome-wide analysis of SSR and ILP markers in trees: diversity profiling, alternate distribution, and applications in duplication.</title><author><name sortKey="Xia, Xinyao" sort="Xia, Xinyao" uniqKey="Xia X" first="Xinyao" last="Xia">Xinyao Xia</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>College of Forestry, College of Plant Protection, College of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Agricultural Big-Data Research Center, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Luan, Lin Lin" sort="Luan, Lin Lin" uniqKey="Luan L" first="Lin Lin" last="Luan">Lin Lin Luan</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>College of Forestry, College of Plant Protection, College of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Agricultural Big-Data Research Center, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Qin, Guanghua" sort="Qin, Guanghua" uniqKey="Qin G" first="Guanghua" last="Qin">Guanghua Qin</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Shandong Academy of Forestry, Jinan, 250014, China.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Yu, Li Fang" sort="Yu, Li Fang" uniqKey="Yu L" first="Li Fang" last="Yu">Li Fang Yu</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>College of Forestry, College of Plant Protection, College of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Agricultural Big-Data Research Center, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wang, Zhi Wei" sort="Wang, Zhi Wei" uniqKey="Wang Z" first="Zhi Wei" last="Wang">Zhi Wei Wang</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>College of Forestry, College of Plant Protection, College of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Agricultural Big-Data Research Center, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Dong, Wan Chen" sort="Dong, Wan Chen" uniqKey="Dong W" first="Wan Chen" last="Dong">Wan Chen Dong</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>College of Forestry, College of Plant Protection, College of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Agricultural Big-Data Research Center, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Song, Yumin" sort="Song, Yumin" uniqKey="Song Y" first="Yumin" last="Song">Yumin Song</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Shandong Academy of Forestry, Jinan, 250014, China.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Qiao, Yuling" sort="Qiao, Yuling" uniqKey="Qiao Y" first="Yuling" last="Qiao">Yuling Qiao</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Shandong Academy of Forestry, Jinan, 250014, China.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Zhang, Xian Sheng" sort="Zhang, Xian Sheng" uniqKey="Zhang X" first="Xian Sheng" last="Zhang">Xian Sheng Zhang</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>College of Forestry, College of Plant Protection, College of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Agricultural Big-Data Research Center, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sang, Ya Lin" sort="Sang, Ya Lin" uniqKey="Sang Y" first="Ya Lin" last="Sang">Ya Lin Sang</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>College of Forestry, College of Plant Protection, College of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Agricultural Big-Data Research Center, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China. sangyl@sdau.edu.cn.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Yang, Long" sort="Yang, Long" uniqKey="Yang L" first="Long" last="Yang">Long Yang</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>College of Forestry, College of Plant Protection, College of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Agricultural Big-Data Research Center, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China. lyang@sdau.edu.cn.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2017">2017</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:29263331</idno><idno type="pmid">29263331</idno><idno type="doi">10.1038/s41598-017-17203-6</idno><idno type="pmc">PMC5738346</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000809</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000809</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Genome-wide analysis of SSR and ILP markers in trees: diversity profiling, alternate distribution, and applications in duplication.</title><author><name sortKey="Xia, Xinyao" sort="Xia, Xinyao" uniqKey="Xia X" first="Xinyao" last="Xia">Xinyao Xia</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>College of Forestry, College of Plant Protection, College of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Agricultural Big-Data Research Center, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Luan, Lin Lin" sort="Luan, Lin Lin" uniqKey="Luan L" first="Lin Lin" last="Luan">Lin Lin Luan</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>College of Forestry, College of Plant Protection, College of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Agricultural Big-Data Research Center, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Qin, Guanghua" sort="Qin, Guanghua" uniqKey="Qin G" first="Guanghua" last="Qin">Guanghua Qin</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Shandong Academy of Forestry, Jinan, 250014, China.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Yu, Li Fang" sort="Yu, Li Fang" uniqKey="Yu L" first="Li Fang" last="Yu">Li Fang Yu</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>College of Forestry, College of Plant Protection, College of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Agricultural Big-Data Research Center, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wang, Zhi Wei" sort="Wang, Zhi Wei" uniqKey="Wang Z" first="Zhi Wei" last="Wang">Zhi Wei Wang</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>College of Forestry, College of Plant Protection, College of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Agricultural Big-Data Research Center, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Dong, Wan Chen" sort="Dong, Wan Chen" uniqKey="Dong W" first="Wan Chen" last="Dong">Wan Chen Dong</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>College of Forestry, College of Plant Protection, College of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Agricultural Big-Data Research Center, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Song, Yumin" sort="Song, Yumin" uniqKey="Song Y" first="Yumin" last="Song">Yumin Song</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Shandong Academy of Forestry, Jinan, 250014, China.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Qiao, Yuling" sort="Qiao, Yuling" uniqKey="Qiao Y" first="Yuling" last="Qiao">Yuling Qiao</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Shandong Academy of Forestry, Jinan, 250014, China.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Zhang, Xian Sheng" sort="Zhang, Xian Sheng" uniqKey="Zhang X" first="Xian Sheng" last="Zhang">Xian Sheng Zhang</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>College of Forestry, College of Plant Protection, College of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Agricultural Big-Data Research Center, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sang, Ya Lin" sort="Sang, Ya Lin" uniqKey="Sang Y" first="Ya Lin" last="Sang">Ya Lin Sang</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>College of Forestry, College of Plant Protection, College of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Agricultural Big-Data Research Center, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China. sangyl@sdau.edu.cn.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Yang, Long" sort="Yang, Long" uniqKey="Yang L" first="Long" last="Yang">Long Yang</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>College of Forestry, College of Plant Protection, College of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Agricultural Big-Data Research Center, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China. lyang@sdau.edu.cn.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Scientific reports</title><idno type="eISSN">2045-2322</idno><imprint><date when="2017" type="published">2017</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Breeding (methods)</term><term>Chromosome Mapping (methods)</term><term>Genetic Loci (genetics)</term><term>Genetic Markers (genetics)</term><term>Genetic Variation (genetics)</term><term>Genome, Plant (genetics)</term><term>Genome-Wide Association Study (methods)</term><term>Introns (genetics)</term><term>Microsatellite Repeats (genetics)</term><term>Phylogeny (MeSH)</term><term>Polymorphism, Genetic (genetics)</term><term>Trees (genetics)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="genetics" xml:lang="en"><term>Genetic Markers</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="genetics" xml:lang="en"><term>Genetic Loci</term><term>Genetic Variation</term><term>Genome, Plant</term><term>Introns</term><term>Microsatellite Repeats</term><term>Polymorphism, Genetic</term><term>Trees</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Breeding</term><term>Chromosome Mapping</term><term>Genome-Wide Association Study</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Phylogeny</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Molecular markers are efficient tools for breeding and genetic studies. However, despite their ecological and economic importance, their development and application have long been hampered. In this study, we identified 524,170 simple sequence repeat (SSR), 267,636 intron length polymorphism (ILP), and 11,872 potential intron polymorphism (PIP) markers from 16 tree species based on recently available genome sequences. Larger motifs, including hexamers and heptamers, accounted for most of the seven different types of SSR loci. Within these loci, A/T bases comprised a significantly larger proportion of sequence than G/C. SSR and ILP markers exhibited an alternative distribution pattern. Most SSRs were monomorphic markers, and the proportions of polymorphic markers were positively correlated with genome size. By verifying with all 16 tree species, 54 SSR, 418 ILP, and four PIP universal markers were obtained, and their efficiency was examined by PCR. A combination of five SSR and six ILP markers were used for the phylogenetic analysis of 30 willow samples, revealing a positive correlation between genetic diversity and geographic distance. We also found that SSRs can be used as tools for duplication analysis. Our findings provide important foundations for the development of breeding and genetic studies in tree species.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">29263331</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2019</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>15</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2019</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>15</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">2045-2322</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>7</Volume><Issue>1</Issue><PubDate><Year>2017</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>20</Day></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Scientific reports</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Sci Rep</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Genome-wide analysis of SSR and ILP markers in trees: diversity profiling, alternate distribution, and applications in duplication.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>17902</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1038/s41598-017-17203-6</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Molecular markers are efficient tools for breeding and genetic studies. However, despite their ecological and economic importance, their development and application have long been hampered. In this study, we identified 524,170 simple sequence repeat (SSR), 267,636 intron length polymorphism (ILP), and 11,872 potential intron polymorphism (PIP) markers from 16 tree species based on recently available genome sequences. Larger motifs, including hexamers and heptamers, accounted for most of the seven different types of SSR loci. Within these loci, A/T bases comprised a significantly larger proportion of sequence than G/C. SSR and ILP markers exhibited an alternative distribution pattern. Most SSRs were monomorphic markers, and the proportions of polymorphic markers were positively correlated with genome size. By verifying with all 16 tree species, 54 SSR, 418 ILP, and four PIP universal markers were obtained, and their efficiency was examined by PCR. A combination of five SSR and six ILP markers were used for the phylogenetic analysis of 30 willow samples, revealing a positive correlation between genetic diversity and geographic distance. We also found that SSRs can be used as tools for duplication analysis. Our findings provide important foundations for the development of breeding and genetic studies in tree species.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Xia</LastName><ForeName>Xinyao</ForeName><Initials>X</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>College of Forestry, College of Plant Protection, College of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Agricultural Big-Data Research Center, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Luan</LastName><ForeName>Lin Lin</ForeName><Initials>LL</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>College of Forestry, College of Plant Protection, College of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Agricultural Big-Data Research Center, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Qin</LastName><ForeName>Guanghua</ForeName><Initials>G</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Shandong Academy of Forestry, Jinan, 250014, China.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Yu</LastName><ForeName>Li Fang</ForeName><Initials>LF</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>College of Forestry, College of Plant Protection, College of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Agricultural Big-Data Research Center, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Wang</LastName><ForeName>Zhi Wei</ForeName><Initials>ZW</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>College of Forestry, College of Plant Protection, College of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Agricultural Big-Data Research Center, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Dong</LastName><ForeName>Wan Chen</ForeName><Initials>WC</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>College of Forestry, College of Plant Protection, College of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Agricultural Big-Data Research Center, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Song</LastName><ForeName>Yumin</ForeName><Initials>Y</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Shandong Academy of Forestry, Jinan, 250014, China.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Qiao</LastName><ForeName>Yuling</ForeName><Initials>Y</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Shandong Academy of Forestry, Jinan, 250014, China.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Zhang</LastName><ForeName>Xian Sheng</ForeName><Initials>XS</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>College of Forestry, College of Plant Protection, College of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Agricultural Big-Data Research Center, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Sang</LastName><ForeName>Ya Lin</ForeName><Initials>YL</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>College of Forestry, College of Plant Protection, College of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Agricultural Big-Data Research Center, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China. sangyl@sdau.edu.cn.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Yang</LastName><ForeName>Long</ForeName><Initials>L</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>College of Forestry, College of Plant Protection, College of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Agricultural Big-Data Research Center, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, China. lyang@sdau.edu.cn.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2017</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>20</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>Sci Rep</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101563288</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>2045-2322</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D005819">Genetic Markers</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001947" MajorTopicYN="N">Breeding</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002874" MajorTopicYN="N">Chromosome Mapping</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D056426" MajorTopicYN="N">Genetic Loci</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005819" MajorTopicYN="N">Genetic Markers</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="Y">genetics</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014644" MajorTopicYN="N">Genetic Variation</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018745" MajorTopicYN="N">Genome, Plant</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="Y">genetics</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D055106" MajorTopicYN="N">Genome-Wide Association Study</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007438" MajorTopicYN="N">Introns</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018895" MajorTopicYN="N">Microsatellite Repeats</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="Y">genetics</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010802" MajorTopicYN="N">Phylogeny</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011110" MajorTopicYN="N">Polymorphism, Genetic</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="Y">genetics</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014197" MajorTopicYN="N">Trees</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="Y">genetics</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2017</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>05</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2017</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>22</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2017</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>22</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2017</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>22</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2019</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>16</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">29263331</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1038/s41598-017-17203-6</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">10.1038/s41598-017-17203-6</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC5738346</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Science. 2008 Jun 13;320(5882):1444-9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18556546</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Genome Res. 2002 Apr;12(4):656-64</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11932250</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 01;6:23765</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">27032371</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Yi Chuan. 2008 Feb;30(2):225-30</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18244930</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nat Rev Genet. 2011 Feb;12(2):111-22</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21245829</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Bioinformatics. 2007 Aug 15;23(16):2174-7</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17545179</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Sci Rep. 2016 Jun 24;6:28594</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">27339202</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Theor Appl Genet. 2005 Nov;111(7):1347-56</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16167139</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nucleic Acids Res. 1980 Oct 10;8(19):4321-5</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">7433111</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Genome Res. 2009 Sep;19(9):1639-45</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19541911</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nat Commun. 2014 Apr 22;5:3657</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24755649</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Genome Biol. 2013 Jun 03;14(6):r53</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23731509</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Genet Genomics. 2014 Dec;289(6):1045-60</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25092473</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Integr Plant Biol. 2011 Feb;53(2):151-65</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21205181</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Curr Genet. 2011 Apr;57(2):75-88</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21132299</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Front Plant Sci. 2016 Sep 13;7:1350</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">27679641</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Science. 2013 Dec 20;342(6165):1241089</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24357323</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Trends Genet. 2000 Jun;16(6):276-7</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10827456</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>DNA Res. 2011 Feb;18(1):65-76</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21149391</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Plant Mol Biol Report. 2016;34:37-51</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26843779</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nature. 2013 May 30;497(7451):579-84</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23698360</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403-10</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">2231712</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Cell Res. 2014 Oct;24(10):1274-7</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24980958</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Trends Biotechnol. 1998 Nov;16(11):456-9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9830153</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Genet Mol Res. 2016 Mar 04;15(1):15017364</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26985935</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>BMC Evol Biol. 2015 Nov 10;15:245</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26555542</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nature. 2013 Aug 15;500(7462):335-9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23883927</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nature. 2017 Jan 12;541(7636):212-216</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28024298</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Food Chem. 2016 Mar 1;194:1329-36</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26471689</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nat Genet. 2013 May;45(5):487-94</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23525075</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Apr;40(7):e49</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22217600</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nat Commun. 2013;4:2797</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24256998</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nat Plants. 2016 May 23;2(6):16073</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">27255837</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/WillowV1/Data/Main/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000809 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000809 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Bois
|area= WillowV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:29263331
|texte= Genome-wide analysis of SSR and ILP markers in trees: diversity profiling, alternate distribution, and applications in duplication.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:29263331" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a WillowV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. |  |