Serveur d'exploration sur l'oranger

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Comparison of microextraction procedures to determine pesticides in oranges by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Identifieur interne : 000E20 ( PubMed/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000E19; suivant : 000E21

Comparison of microextraction procedures to determine pesticides in oranges by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Auteurs : C. Blasco [Espagne] ; G. Font ; Y. Pic

Source :

RBID : pubmed:12350094

English descriptors

Abstract

A liquid chromatographic-mass spectrometric method has been developed for the determination of bitertanol, carbendazim, fenthion, flusilazole, hexythiazox, imidacloprid, methidathion, methiocarb, pyriproxyfen and trichlorfon. Two procedures, based on stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) and matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD), have been evaluated for the extraction of these compounds in oranges. Their respective advantages and disadvantages are also discussed. The recoveries obtained by MSPD ranged from 47 to 96% and the relative standard deviations (RSDs) ranged from 1 to 15%, whereas with the SBSE method the recoveries were between 8 and 84% and the RSDs between 4 and 16%. Although, the limits of quantitation of most compounds are much better (0.001-0.05 mg kg(-1)) by SBSE, it is not suitable to determine some polar pesticides as carbendazim, imidacloprid and trichlorfon. Results obtained by both methods were compared, in terms of sensitivity and selectivity, with a classical ethyl acetate extraction method, and the three methods were applied to analyze real samples. As MSPD is easier to perform, faster than the organic solvent extraction, and shows equal accuracy and resolution, its application for analyzing pesticides in oranges is recommended.

PubMed: 12350094


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

pubmed:12350094

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Comparison of microextraction procedures to determine pesticides in oranges by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Blasco, C" sort="Blasco, C" uniqKey="Blasco C" first="C" last="Blasco">C. Blasco</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Laboratori de Bromatologia i Toxicologia, Facultat de Farmàcia, Universitat de Valencia, Burjassot, Spain.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Espagne</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Laboratori de Bromatologia i Toxicologia, Facultat de Farmàcia, Universitat de Valencia, Burjassot</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Burjassot</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Font, G" sort="Font, G" uniqKey="Font G" first="G" last="Font">G. Font</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Pic, Y" sort="Pic, Y" uniqKey="Pic Y" first="Y" last="Pic">Y. Pic</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2002">2002</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:12350094</idno>
<idno type="pmid">12350094</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000E73</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000E73</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">000E73</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">Comparison of microextraction procedures to determine pesticides in oranges by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Blasco, C" sort="Blasco, C" uniqKey="Blasco C" first="C" last="Blasco">C. Blasco</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Laboratori de Bromatologia i Toxicologia, Facultat de Farmàcia, Universitat de Valencia, Burjassot, Spain.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Espagne</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Laboratori de Bromatologia i Toxicologia, Facultat de Farmàcia, Universitat de Valencia, Burjassot</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Burjassot</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Font, G" sort="Font, G" uniqKey="Font G" first="G" last="Font">G. Font</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Pic, Y" sort="Pic, Y" uniqKey="Pic Y" first="Y" last="Pic">Y. Pic</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Journal of chromatography. A</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0021-9673</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2002" type="published">2002</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Chromatography, Liquid (methods)</term>
<term>Citrus sinensis (chemistry)</term>
<term>Mass Spectrometry (methods)</term>
<term>Pesticides (analysis)</term>
<term>Reproducibility of Results</term>
<term>Sensitivity and Specificity</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="analysis" xml:lang="en">
<term>Pesticides</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="chemistry" xml:lang="en">
<term>Citrus sinensis</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en">
<term>Chromatography, Liquid</term>
<term>Mass Spectrometry</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en">
<term>Reproducibility of Results</term>
<term>Sensitivity and Specificity</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">A liquid chromatographic-mass spectrometric method has been developed for the determination of bitertanol, carbendazim, fenthion, flusilazole, hexythiazox, imidacloprid, methidathion, methiocarb, pyriproxyfen and trichlorfon. Two procedures, based on stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) and matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD), have been evaluated for the extraction of these compounds in oranges. Their respective advantages and disadvantages are also discussed. The recoveries obtained by MSPD ranged from 47 to 96% and the relative standard deviations (RSDs) ranged from 1 to 15%, whereas with the SBSE method the recoveries were between 8 and 84% and the RSDs between 4 and 16%. Although, the limits of quantitation of most compounds are much better (0.001-0.05 mg kg(-1)) by SBSE, it is not suitable to determine some polar pesticides as carbendazim, imidacloprid and trichlorfon. Results obtained by both methods were compared, in terms of sensitivity and selectivity, with a classical ethyl acetate extraction method, and the three methods were applied to analyze real samples. As MSPD is easier to perform, faster than the organic solvent extraction, and shows equal accuracy and resolution, its application for analyzing pesticides in oranges is recommended.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed>
<MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM">
<PMID Version="1">12350094</PMID>
<DateCreated>
<Year>2002</Year>
<Month>9</Month>
<Day>27</Day>
</DateCreated>
<DateCompleted>
<Year>2003</Year>
<Month>03</Month>
<Day>31</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised>
<Year>2009</Year>
<Month>1</Month>
<Day>15</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print">
<Journal>
<ISSN IssnType="Print">0021-9673</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print">
<Volume>970</Volume>
<Issue>1-2</Issue>
<PubDate>
<Year>2002</Year>
<Month>Sep</Month>
<Day>13</Day>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Journal of chromatography. A</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>J Chromatogr A</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Comparison of microextraction procedures to determine pesticides in oranges by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination>
<MedlinePgn>201-12</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<Abstract>
<AbstractText>A liquid chromatographic-mass spectrometric method has been developed for the determination of bitertanol, carbendazim, fenthion, flusilazole, hexythiazox, imidacloprid, methidathion, methiocarb, pyriproxyfen and trichlorfon. Two procedures, based on stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) and matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD), have been evaluated for the extraction of these compounds in oranges. Their respective advantages and disadvantages are also discussed. The recoveries obtained by MSPD ranged from 47 to 96% and the relative standard deviations (RSDs) ranged from 1 to 15%, whereas with the SBSE method the recoveries were between 8 and 84% and the RSDs between 4 and 16%. Although, the limits of quantitation of most compounds are much better (0.001-0.05 mg kg(-1)) by SBSE, it is not suitable to determine some polar pesticides as carbendazim, imidacloprid and trichlorfon. Results obtained by both methods were compared, in terms of sensitivity and selectivity, with a classical ethyl acetate extraction method, and the three methods were applied to analyze real samples. As MSPD is easier to perform, faster than the organic solvent extraction, and shows equal accuracy and resolution, its application for analyzing pesticides in oranges is recommended.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y">
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Blasco</LastName>
<ForeName>C</ForeName>
<Initials>C</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Laboratori de Bromatologia i Toxicologia, Facultat de Farmàcia, Universitat de Valencia, Burjassot, Spain.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Font</LastName>
<ForeName>G</ForeName>
<Initials>G</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Picó</LastName>
<ForeName>Y</ForeName>
<Initials>Y</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>ENG</Language>
<PublicationTypeList>
<PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo>
<Country>Netherlands</Country>
<MedlineTA>J Chromatogr A</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>9318488</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0021-9673</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<ChemicalList>
<Chemical>
<RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D010575">Pesticides</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
</ChemicalList>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D002853" MajorTopicYN="N">Chromatography, Liquid</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D032084" MajorTopicYN="N">Citrus sinensis</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000737" MajorTopicYN="Y">chemistry</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D013058" MajorTopicYN="N">Mass Spectrometry</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D010575" MajorTopicYN="N">Pesticides</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000032" MajorTopicYN="Y">analysis</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D015203" MajorTopicYN="N">Reproducibility of Results</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D012680" MajorTopicYN="N">Sensitivity and Specificity</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData>
<History>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed">
<Year>2002</Year>
<Month>9</Month>
<Day>28</Day>
<Hour>4</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline">
<Year>2003</Year>
<Month>4</Month>
<Day>1</Day>
<Hour>5</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez">
<Year>2002</Year>
<Month>9</Month>
<Day>28</Day>
<Hour>4</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12350094</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>Espagne</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree>
<noCountry>
<name sortKey="Font, G" sort="Font, G" uniqKey="Font G" first="G" last="Font">G. Font</name>
<name sortKey="Pic, Y" sort="Pic, Y" uniqKey="Pic Y" first="Y" last="Pic">Y. Pic</name>
</noCountry>
<country name="Espagne">
<noRegion>
<name sortKey="Blasco, C" sort="Blasco, C" uniqKey="Blasco C" first="C" last="Blasco">C. Blasco</name>
</noRegion>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Bois/explor/OrangerV1/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000E20 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000E20 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Bois
   |area=    OrangerV1
   |flux=    PubMed
   |étape=   Checkpoint
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:12350094
   |texte=   Comparison of microextraction procedures to determine pesticides in oranges by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:12350094" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a OrangerV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25.
Data generation: Sat Dec 3 17:11:04 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 18:18:32 2024