Serveur d'exploration autour du libre accès en Belgique

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Looking for zero-sum or win-win outcomes: A game-theoretical analysis of the fair use debate

Identifieur interne : 001317 ( Main/Merge ); précédent : 001316; suivant : 001318

Looking for zero-sum or win-win outcomes: A game-theoretical analysis of the fair use debate

Auteurs : Yu-Lin Chang [Royaume-Uni]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:6CA3A43797E942F9A24A7F903CFF9B663FAECA9E

Abstract

DRM (Digital Rights Management) affects the traditional doctrine of fair use. Currently the fair use debate in essence involves an interest conflict between the information industries and the individual user. That is, industry prefers fared use while the users preference is for traditional free use. In order to make the fair use solution feasible, it depends heavily on the industry and users willingness to obey the final outcome. This paper argues that the key point required to accommodate the fair use debate is the coordination concept which is important but long ignored because we have been used to treating fair use debates as an all-or-nothing problem. Hence, this paper recommends that the battle of the sexes game, long accepted as useful for dealing with the coordination problem involving interest conflict between the parties and also Schellings focal point concept (exploring expectation convergence of all affected parties) can provide useful game-theoretic insight for lawyers to think about how to avoid zero-sum solutions to the fair use debate.

Url:
DOI: 10.1093/ijlit/eam009

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:6CA3A43797E942F9A24A7F903CFF9B663FAECA9E

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Looking for zero-sum or win-win outcomes: A game-theoretical analysis of the fair use debate</title>
<author wicri:is="90%">
<name sortKey="Chang, Yu Lin" sort="Chang, Yu Lin" uniqKey="Chang Y" first="Yu-Lin" last="Chang">Yu-Lin Chang</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:6CA3A43797E942F9A24A7F903CFF9B663FAECA9E</idno>
<date when="2008" year="2008">2008</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1093/ijlit/eam009</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/6CA3A43797E942F9A24A7F903CFF9B663FAECA9E/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001838</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001753</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000E00</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0967-0769:2008:Chang Y:looking:for:zero</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">001317</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a">Looking for zero-sum or win-win outcomes: A game-theoretical analysis of the fair use debate</title>
<author wicri:is="90%">
<name sortKey="Chang, Yu Lin" sort="Chang, Yu Lin" uniqKey="Chang Y" first="Yu-Lin" last="Chang">Yu-Lin Chang</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country wicri:rule="url">Royaume-Uni</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">International Journal of Law and Information Technology</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0967-0769</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1464-3693</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher>
<date type="published" when="2007-09-28">2007-09-28</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">16</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="176">176</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="204">204</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0967-0769</idno>
</series>
<idno type="istex">6CA3A43797E942F9A24A7F903CFF9B663FAECA9E</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1093/ijlit/eam009</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0967-0769</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract">DRM (Digital Rights Management) affects the traditional doctrine of fair use. Currently the fair use debate in essence involves an interest conflict between the information industries and the individual user. That is, industry prefers fared use while the users preference is for traditional free use. In order to make the fair use solution feasible, it depends heavily on the industry and users willingness to obey the final outcome. This paper argues that the key point required to accommodate the fair use debate is the coordination concept which is important but long ignored because we have been used to treating fair use debates as an all-or-nothing problem. Hence, this paper recommends that the battle of the sexes game, long accepted as useful for dealing with the coordination problem involving interest conflict between the parties and also Schellings focal point concept (exploring expectation convergence of all affected parties) can provide useful game-theoretic insight for lawyers to think about how to avoid zero-sum solutions to the fair use debate.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Belgique/explor/OpenAccessBelV2/Data/Main/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001317 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 001317 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Belgique
   |area=    OpenAccessBelV2
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Merge
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:6CA3A43797E942F9A24A7F903CFF9B663FAECA9E
   |texte=   Looking for zero-sum or win-win outcomes: A game-theoretical analysis of the fair use debate
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25.
Data generation: Thu Dec 1 00:43:49 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 14:51:30 2024