Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Do body-part concepts depend on the EBA/FBA?

Identifieur interne : 000E14 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000E13; suivant : 000E15

Do body-part concepts depend on the EBA/FBA?

Auteurs : David Kemmerer

Source :

RBID : pubmed:24168535

Abstract

Abstract Downing and Peelen argue that the EBA/FBA represent body-part shapes in a highly schematic manner that is independent of personal identity, emotional expression, movement pattern, and action goal, and that cuts across visual and haptic modalities. According to the grounded cognition framework, these properties make the EBA/FBA suitable for processing body-part shapes not only for perceptual purposes but also for conceptual purposes. Any account of the neural substrates of body-part concepts must, however, accommodate significant cross-linguistic diversity in this semantic domain. Hence, an alternative possibility is that the shape components of body-part concepts depend on areas adjacent to the EBA/FBA.

DOI: 10.1080/17588928.2011.604718
PubMed: 24168535

Links to Exploration step

pubmed:24168535

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Do body-part concepts depend on the EBA/FBA?</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kemmerer, David" sort="Kemmerer, David" uniqKey="Kemmerer D" first="David" last="Kemmerer">David Kemmerer</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:affiliation>a Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences , Purdue University , West Lafayette , IN , USA.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="????">
<PubDate>
<MedlineDate>2011 Sep-Dec</MedlineDate>
</PubDate>
</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1080/17588928.2011.604718</idno>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:24168535</idno>
<idno type="pmid">24168535</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000E14</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">Do body-part concepts depend on the EBA/FBA?</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kemmerer, David" sort="Kemmerer, David" uniqKey="Kemmerer D" first="David" last="Kemmerer">David Kemmerer</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:affiliation>a Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences , Purdue University , West Lafayette , IN , USA.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Cognitive neuroscience</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1758-8928</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract Downing and Peelen argue that the EBA/FBA represent body-part shapes in a highly schematic manner that is independent of personal identity, emotional expression, movement pattern, and action goal, and that cuts across visual and haptic modalities. According to the grounded cognition framework, these properties make the EBA/FBA suitable for processing body-part shapes not only for perceptual purposes but also for conceptual purposes. Any account of the neural substrates of body-part concepts must, however, accommodate significant cross-linguistic diversity in this semantic domain. Hence, an alternative possibility is that the shape components of body-part concepts depend on areas adjacent to the EBA/FBA.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed>
<MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="PubMed-not-MEDLINE">
<PMID Version="1">24168535</PMID>
<DateCreated>
<Year>2013</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>30</Day>
</DateCreated>
<DateCompleted>
<Year>2013</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>31</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<Article PubModel="Print">
<Journal>
<ISSN IssnType="Print">1758-8928</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print">
<Volume>2</Volume>
<Issue>3-4</Issue>
<PubDate>
<MedlineDate>2011 Sep-Dec</MedlineDate>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Cognitive neuroscience</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Cogn Neurosci</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Do body-part concepts depend on the EBA/FBA?</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination>
<MedlinePgn>204-5</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1080/17588928.2011.604718</ELocationID>
<Abstract>
<AbstractText>Abstract Downing and Peelen argue that the EBA/FBA represent body-part shapes in a highly schematic manner that is independent of personal identity, emotional expression, movement pattern, and action goal, and that cuts across visual and haptic modalities. According to the grounded cognition framework, these properties make the EBA/FBA suitable for processing body-part shapes not only for perceptual purposes but also for conceptual purposes. Any account of the neural substrates of body-part concepts must, however, accommodate significant cross-linguistic diversity in this semantic domain. Hence, an alternative possibility is that the shape components of body-part concepts depend on areas adjacent to the EBA/FBA.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y">
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Kemmerer</LastName>
<ForeName>David</ForeName>
<Initials>D</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>a Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences , Purdue University , West Lafayette , IN , USA.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo>
<Country>England</Country>
<MedlineTA>Cogn Neurosci</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>101518151</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>1758-8928</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData>
<History>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez">
<Year>2013</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>31</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed">
<Year>2011</Year>
<Month>9</Month>
<Day>1</Day>
<Hour>0</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline">
<Year>2011</Year>
<Month>9</Month>
<Day>1</Day>
<Hour>0</Hour>
<Minute>1</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1080/17588928.2011.604718</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24168535</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000E14 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000E14 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PubMed
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:24168535
   |texte=   Do body-part concepts depend on the EBA/FBA?
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:24168535" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024