Incision width after phacoemulsification with foldable intraocular lens implantation
Identifieur interne : 001496 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 001495; suivant : 001497Incision width after phacoemulsification with foldable intraocular lens implantation
Auteurs : N. MamalisSource :
- Journal of cataract and refractive surgery [ 0886-3350 ] ; 2000.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the incision size after insertion of foldable intraocular lenses (lOLs) using both a forceps and injectors. Setting: Intermountain Ocular Research Center, Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. Methods: One hundred patients had phacoemulsification through a clear corneal wound. The incision width was measured before and after IOL implantation. A 3-piece silicone IOL and a 3-piece acrylic IOL (both with an optic diameter of 5.5 mm) were inserted using a forceps. A plate-haptic silicone lens and a 3-piece silicone lens with a 6.0 mm diameter optic were inserted using an injector. Results: The wound size in the group with the 3-piece silicone lens inserted with a forceps enlarged 4.4% (3.23 to 3.38 mm) in the low-power IOL group (15.0 to 20.0 diopters [D]) and 6.2% (3.24 to 3.44 mm) in the high-power IOL group (20.5 to 25.0 D). Similarly, the acrylic IOL wound enlarged 5% (3.21 to 3.37 mm) in the low-power IOL group and 6% (3.25 to 3.44 mm) in the high-power IOL group when a forceps was used. The 3-piece silicone and plate silicone lenses inserted using an injector enlarged the wound 3.2% and 3.3% (3.02 to 3.11 mm and 3.05 to 3.15 mm), respectively. There was no difference in the wound size with higher IOL powers in eyes with injected lenses. Conclusions: Clear corneal incisions enlarge after insertion of foldable lOLs in a predictable manner, with a forceps-inserted IOL enlarging the wound diameter more than lenses inserted with an injector. The forceps-inserted lens group also showed a difference in wound size related to IOL power.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
| pA |
|
|---|
Format Inist (serveur)
| NO : | PASCAL 00-0125695 INIST |
|---|---|
| ET : | Incision width after phacoemulsification with foldable intraocular lens implantation |
| AU : | MAMALIS (N.) |
| AF : | John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah/Salt Lake City, Utah/Etats-Unis (1 aut.) |
| DT : | Publication en série; Niveau analytique |
| SO : | Journal of cataract and refractive surgery; ISSN 0886-3350; Coden JCSUEV; Etats-Unis; Da. 2000; Vol. 26; No. 2; Pp. 237-241; Bibl. 13 ref. |
| LA : | Anglais |
| EA : | Purpose: To determine the incision size after insertion of foldable intraocular lenses (lOLs) using both a forceps and injectors. Setting: Intermountain Ocular Research Center, Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. Methods: One hundred patients had phacoemulsification through a clear corneal wound. The incision width was measured before and after IOL implantation. A 3-piece silicone IOL and a 3-piece acrylic IOL (both with an optic diameter of 5.5 mm) were inserted using a forceps. A plate-haptic silicone lens and a 3-piece silicone lens with a 6.0 mm diameter optic were inserted using an injector. Results: The wound size in the group with the 3-piece silicone lens inserted with a forceps enlarged 4.4% (3.23 to 3.38 mm) in the low-power IOL group (15.0 to 20.0 diopters [D]) and 6.2% (3.24 to 3.44 mm) in the high-power IOL group (20.5 to 25.0 D). Similarly, the acrylic IOL wound enlarged 5% (3.21 to 3.37 mm) in the low-power IOL group and 6% (3.25 to 3.44 mm) in the high-power IOL group when a forceps was used. The 3-piece silicone and plate silicone lenses inserted using an injector enlarged the wound 3.2% and 3.3% (3.02 to 3.11 mm and 3.05 to 3.15 mm), respectively. There was no difference in the wound size with higher IOL powers in eyes with injected lenses. Conclusions: Clear corneal incisions enlarge after insertion of foldable lOLs in a predictable manner, with a forceps-inserted IOL enlarging the wound diameter more than lenses inserted with an injector. The forceps-inserted lens group also showed a difference in wound size related to IOL power. |
| CC : | 002B25B |
| FD : | Phacoémulsification; Cristallin; Oeil; Lentille intraoculaire; Implantation; Incision chirurgicale; Taille; Homme |
| FG : | Chirurgie |
| ED : | Phacoemulsification; Lens; Eye; Intraocular lens; Implantation; Surgical incision; Size; Human |
| EG : | Surgery |
| SD : | Facoemulsificación; Cristalino; Ojo; Lente intraocular; Implantación; Incisión quirúrgica; Talla; Hombre |
| LO : | INIST-20937.354000081903090100 |
| ID : | 00-0125695 |
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:00-0125695Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Incision width after phacoemulsification with foldable intraocular lens implantation</title><author><name sortKey="Mamalis, N" sort="Mamalis, N" uniqKey="Mamalis N" first="N." last="Mamalis">N. Mamalis</name><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah</s1><s2>Salt Lake City, Utah</s2><s3>USA</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno><idno type="inist">00-0125695</idno><date when="2000">2000</date><idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 00-0125695 INIST</idno><idno type="RBID">Pascal:00-0125695</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">001496</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Incision width after phacoemulsification with foldable intraocular lens implantation</title><author><name sortKey="Mamalis, N" sort="Mamalis, N" uniqKey="Mamalis N" first="N." last="Mamalis">N. Mamalis</name><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah</s1><s2>Salt Lake City, Utah</s2><s3>USA</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</title><title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. cataract refractive surg.</title><idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno><imprint><date when="2000">2000</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</title><title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. cataract refractive surg.</title><idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Eye</term><term>Human</term><term>Implantation</term><term>Intraocular lens</term><term>Lens</term><term>Phacoemulsification</term><term>Size</term><term>Surgical incision</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Phacoémulsification</term><term>Cristallin</term><term>Oeil</term><term>Lentille intraoculaire</term><term>Implantation</term><term>Incision chirurgicale</term><term>Taille</term><term>Homme</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Purpose: To determine the incision size after insertion of foldable intraocular lenses (lOLs) using both a forceps and injectors. Setting: Intermountain Ocular Research Center, Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. Methods: One hundred patients had phacoemulsification through a clear corneal wound. The incision width was measured before and after IOL implantation. A 3-piece silicone IOL and a 3-piece acrylic IOL (both with an optic diameter of 5.5 mm) were inserted using a forceps. A plate-haptic silicone lens and a 3-piece silicone lens with a 6.0 mm diameter optic were inserted using an injector. Results: The wound size in the group with the 3-piece silicone lens inserted with a forceps enlarged 4.4% (3.23 to 3.38 mm) in the low-power IOL group (15.0 to 20.0 diopters [D]) and 6.2% (3.24 to 3.44 mm) in the high-power IOL group (20.5 to 25.0 D). Similarly, the acrylic IOL wound enlarged 5% (3.21 to 3.37 mm) in the low-power IOL group and 6% (3.25 to 3.44 mm) in the high-power IOL group when a forceps was used. The 3-piece silicone and plate silicone lenses inserted using an injector enlarged the wound 3.2% and 3.3% (3.02 to 3.11 mm and 3.05 to 3.15 mm), respectively. There was no difference in the wound size with higher IOL powers in eyes with injected lenses. Conclusions: Clear corneal incisions enlarge after insertion of foldable lOLs in a predictable manner, with a forceps-inserted IOL enlarging the wound diameter more than lenses inserted with an injector. The forceps-inserted lens group also showed a difference in wound size related to IOL power.</div></front></TEI><inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0886-3350</s0></fA01><fA02 i1="01"><s0>JCSUEV</s0></fA02><fA03 i2="1"><s0>J. cataract refractive surg.</s0></fA03><fA05><s2>26</s2></fA05><fA06><s2>2</s2></fA06><fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Incision width after phacoemulsification with foldable intraocular lens implantation</s1></fA08><fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>MAMALIS (N.)</s1></fA11><fA14 i1="01"><s1>John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah</s1><s2>Salt Lake City, Utah</s2><s3>USA</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ></fA14><fA20><s1>237-241</s1></fA20><fA21><s1>2000</s1></fA21><fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0></fA23><fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1><s2>20937</s2><s5>354000081903090100</s5></fA43><fA44><s0>0000</s0><s1>© 2000 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1></fA44><fA45><s0>13 ref.</s0></fA45><fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>00-0125695</s0></fA47><fA60><s1>P</s1></fA60><fA61><s0>A</s0></fA61><fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</s0></fA64><fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0></fA66><fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Purpose: To determine the incision size after insertion of foldable intraocular lenses (lOLs) using both a forceps and injectors. Setting: Intermountain Ocular Research Center, Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. Methods: One hundred patients had phacoemulsification through a clear corneal wound. The incision width was measured before and after IOL implantation. A 3-piece silicone IOL and a 3-piece acrylic IOL (both with an optic diameter of 5.5 mm) were inserted using a forceps. A plate-haptic silicone lens and a 3-piece silicone lens with a 6.0 mm diameter optic were inserted using an injector. Results: The wound size in the group with the 3-piece silicone lens inserted with a forceps enlarged 4.4% (3.23 to 3.38 mm) in the low-power IOL group (15.0 to 20.0 diopters [D]) and 6.2% (3.24 to 3.44 mm) in the high-power IOL group (20.5 to 25.0 D). Similarly, the acrylic IOL wound enlarged 5% (3.21 to 3.37 mm) in the low-power IOL group and 6% (3.25 to 3.44 mm) in the high-power IOL group when a forceps was used. The 3-piece silicone and plate silicone lenses inserted using an injector enlarged the wound 3.2% and 3.3% (3.02 to 3.11 mm and 3.05 to 3.15 mm), respectively. There was no difference in the wound size with higher IOL powers in eyes with injected lenses. Conclusions: Clear corneal incisions enlarge after insertion of foldable lOLs in a predictable manner, with a forceps-inserted IOL enlarging the wound diameter more than lenses inserted with an injector. The forceps-inserted lens group also showed a difference in wound size related to IOL power.</s0></fC01><fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B25B</s0></fC02><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Phacoémulsification</s0><s5>01</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Phacoemulsification</s0><s5>01</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Facoemulsificación</s0><s5>01</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Cristallin</s0><s5>02</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Lens</s0><s5>02</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cristalino</s0><s5>02</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Oeil</s0><s5>03</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Eye</s0><s5>03</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Ojo</s0><s5>03</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Lentille intraoculaire</s0><s5>04</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Intraocular lens</s0><s5>04</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Lente intraocular</s0><s5>04</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Implantation</s0><s5>05</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Implantation</s0><s5>05</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Implantación</s0><s5>05</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Incision chirurgicale</s0><s5>07</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Surgical incision</s0><s5>07</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Incisión quirúrgica</s0><s5>07</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Taille</s0><s5>08</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Size</s0><s5>08</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Talla</s0><s5>08</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0><s5>10</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0><s5>10</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0><s5>10</s5></fC03><fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Chirurgie</s0><s5>37</s5></fC07><fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Surgery</s0><s5>37</s5></fC07><fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cirugía</s0><s5>37</s5></fC07><fN21><s1>094</s1></fN21></pA></standard><server><NO>PASCAL 00-0125695 INIST</NO><ET>Incision width after phacoemulsification with foldable intraocular lens implantation</ET><AU>MAMALIS (N.)</AU><AF>John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah/Salt Lake City, Utah/Etats-Unis (1 aut.)</AF><DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT><SO>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery; ISSN 0886-3350; Coden JCSUEV; Etats-Unis; Da. 2000; Vol. 26; No. 2; Pp. 237-241; Bibl. 13 ref.</SO><LA>Anglais</LA><EA>Purpose: To determine the incision size after insertion of foldable intraocular lenses (lOLs) using both a forceps and injectors. Setting: Intermountain Ocular Research Center, Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. Methods: One hundred patients had phacoemulsification through a clear corneal wound. The incision width was measured before and after IOL implantation. A 3-piece silicone IOL and a 3-piece acrylic IOL (both with an optic diameter of 5.5 mm) were inserted using a forceps. A plate-haptic silicone lens and a 3-piece silicone lens with a 6.0 mm diameter optic were inserted using an injector. Results: The wound size in the group with the 3-piece silicone lens inserted with a forceps enlarged 4.4% (3.23 to 3.38 mm) in the low-power IOL group (15.0 to 20.0 diopters [D]) and 6.2% (3.24 to 3.44 mm) in the high-power IOL group (20.5 to 25.0 D). Similarly, the acrylic IOL wound enlarged 5% (3.21 to 3.37 mm) in the low-power IOL group and 6% (3.25 to 3.44 mm) in the high-power IOL group when a forceps was used. The 3-piece silicone and plate silicone lenses inserted using an injector enlarged the wound 3.2% and 3.3% (3.02 to 3.11 mm and 3.05 to 3.15 mm), respectively. There was no difference in the wound size with higher IOL powers in eyes with injected lenses. Conclusions: Clear corneal incisions enlarge after insertion of foldable lOLs in a predictable manner, with a forceps-inserted IOL enlarging the wound diameter more than lenses inserted with an injector. The forceps-inserted lens group also showed a difference in wound size related to IOL power.</EA><CC>002B25B</CC><FD>Phacoémulsification; Cristallin; Oeil; Lentille intraoculaire; Implantation; Incision chirurgicale; Taille; Homme</FD><FG>Chirurgie</FG><ED>Phacoemulsification; Lens; Eye; Intraocular lens; Implantation; Surgical incision; Size; Human</ED><EG>Surgery</EG><SD>Facoemulsificación; Cristalino; Ojo; Lente intraocular; Implantación; Incisión quirúrgica; Talla; Hombre</SD><LO>INIST-20937.354000081903090100</LO><ID>00-0125695</ID></server></inist></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001496 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001496 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PascalFrancis
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= Pascal:00-0125695
|texte= Incision width after phacoemulsification with foldable intraocular lens implantation
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |