Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Effects of human-machine interface design for intelligent speed adaptation on driving behavior and acceptance

Identifieur interne : 000D09 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000D08; suivant : 000D10

Effects of human-machine interface design for intelligent speed adaptation on driving behavior and acceptance

Auteurs : Arno M. Rook ; Jeroen H. Hogema

Source :

RBID : Pascal:06-0305109

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

The effects of human-machine interface (HMI) design for intelligent speed adaptation (ISA) on driving behavior and acceptance were measured in a moving-base research driving simulator. Sixty-four experienced drivers participated in two simulator experiments (32 in each). During the simulated runs with ISA, the speed limit was communicated through the ISA system. The ISA system consisted of an indication of the speed limit on the speedometer and a gas pedal that could be used either as a haptic or tactile pedal or as a dead throttle. Two versions of the haptic gas pedal were examined in Experiment I: a low-force ISA (easy to overrule, informative in nature) and a high-force ISA (stronger counterforce, more compulsory in nature). Two other configurations were tested in Experiment II: a tactile pedal (a vibration on the gas pedal, informative in nature) and a dead throttle (completely restraining the driver from exceeding the speed limit). It was hypothesized that the closer the ISA is to an informative type, the higher the acceptance and the smaller the effects on driving behavior would be. This hypothesis appeared to be valid, although for both driving behavior and acceptance, not all four HMIs could be ranked unambiguously on the scale from no ISA to full ISA. In sharp curves, drivers appeared to choose a driving speed below the speed limit, irrespective of ISA. The specific road environment scenarios that were inserted to examine presupposed compensatory behavior for experienced delay indicated no signs of compensatory driving behavior.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

pA  
A01 01  1    @0 0361-1981
A02 01      @0 TRREDM
A03   1    @0 Transp. res. rec.
A06       @2 1937
A08 01  1  ENG  @1 Effects of human-machine interface design for intelligent speed adaptation on driving behavior and acceptance
A09 01  1  ENG  @1 Human performance; simulation and visualization
A11 01  1    @1 ROOK (Arno M.)
A11 02  1    @1 HOGEMA (Jeroen H.)
A14 01      @1 TNO Human Factors, P.O. Box 23 @2 3769 ZG Soesterberg @3 NLD @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut.
A20       @1 79-86
A21       @1 2005
A23 01      @0 ENG
A43 01      @1 INIST @2 10459B @5 354000153344860120
A44       @0 0000 @1 © 2006 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.
A45       @0 9 ref.
A47 01  1    @0 06-0305109
A60       @1 P
A61       @0 A
A64 01  1    @0 Transportation research record
A66 01      @0 USA
C01 01    ENG  @0 The effects of human-machine interface (HMI) design for intelligent speed adaptation (ISA) on driving behavior and acceptance were measured in a moving-base research driving simulator. Sixty-four experienced drivers participated in two simulator experiments (32 in each). During the simulated runs with ISA, the speed limit was communicated through the ISA system. The ISA system consisted of an indication of the speed limit on the speedometer and a gas pedal that could be used either as a haptic or tactile pedal or as a dead throttle. Two versions of the haptic gas pedal were examined in Experiment I: a low-force ISA (easy to overrule, informative in nature) and a high-force ISA (stronger counterforce, more compulsory in nature). Two other configurations were tested in Experiment II: a tactile pedal (a vibration on the gas pedal, informative in nature) and a dead throttle (completely restraining the driver from exceeding the speed limit). It was hypothesized that the closer the ISA is to an informative type, the higher the acceptance and the smaller the effects on driving behavior would be. This hypothesis appeared to be valid, although for both driving behavior and acceptance, not all four HMIs could be ranked unambiguously on the scale from no ISA to full ISA. In sharp curves, drivers appeared to choose a driving speed below the speed limit, irrespective of ISA. The specific road environment scenarios that were inserted to examine presupposed compensatory behavior for experienced delay indicated no signs of compensatory driving behavior.
C02 01  X    @0 001D15C
C03 01  X  FRE  @0 Trafic routier @5 01
C03 01  X  ENG  @0 Road traffic @5 01
C03 01  X  SPA  @0 Tráfico carretera @5 01
C03 02  X  FRE  @0 Conduite véhicule @5 02
C03 02  X  ENG  @0 Vehicle driving @5 02
C03 02  X  SPA  @0 Conducción vehículo @5 02
C03 03  X  FRE  @0 Conception système @5 03
C03 03  X  ENG  @0 System design @5 03
C03 03  X  SPA  @0 Concepción sistema @5 03
C03 04  X  FRE  @0 Système homme machine @5 04
C03 04  X  ENG  @0 Man machine system @5 04
C03 04  X  SPA  @0 Sistema hombre máquina @5 04
C03 05  X  FRE  @0 Système intelligent @5 05
C03 05  X  ENG  @0 Intelligent system @5 05
C03 05  X  SPA  @0 Sistema inteligente @5 05
C03 06  X  FRE  @0 Comportement @5 06
C03 06  X  ENG  @0 Behavior @5 06
C03 06  X  SPA  @0 Conducta @5 06
C03 07  X  FRE  @0 Vitesse déplacement @5 07
C03 07  X  ENG  @0 Speed @5 07
C03 07  X  SPA  @0 Velocidad desplazamiento @5 07
C03 08  X  FRE  @0 Simulateur @5 08
C03 08  X  ENG  @0 Simulator @5 08
C03 08  X  SPA  @0 Simulador @5 08
C03 09  X  FRE  @0 Etude expérimentale @5 09
C03 09  X  ENG  @0 Experimental study @5 09
C03 09  X  SPA  @0 Estudio experimental @5 09
C03 10  X  FRE  @0 Essai en place @5 10
C03 10  X  ENG  @0 In situ test @5 10
C03 10  X  SPA  @0 Ensayo en sitio @5 10
C03 11  X  FRE  @0 Analyse statistique @5 11
C03 11  X  ENG  @0 Statistical analysis @5 11
C03 11  X  SPA  @0 Análisis estadístico @5 11
C03 12  X  FRE  @0 Sécurité trafic @5 12
C03 12  X  ENG  @0 Traffic safety @5 12
C03 12  X  SPA  @0 Seguridad tráfico @5 12
C03 13  X  FRE  @0 Charge travail @5 13
C03 13  X  ENG  @0 Workload @5 13
C03 13  X  SPA  @0 Carga trabajo @5 13
C03 14  X  FRE  @0 Acceptation @5 14
C03 14  X  ENG  @0 Acceptance @5 14
C03 14  X  SPA  @0 Aceptación @5 14
N21       @1 198
N44 01      @1 PSI
N82       @1 PSI

Format Inist (serveur)

NO : PASCAL 06-0305109 INIST
ET : Effects of human-machine interface design for intelligent speed adaptation on driving behavior and acceptance
AU : ROOK (Arno M.); HOGEMA (Jeroen H.)
AF : TNO Human Factors, P.O. Box 23/3769 ZG Soesterberg/Pays-Bas (1 aut., 2 aut.)
DT : Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO : Transportation research record; ISSN 0361-1981; Coden TRREDM; Etats-Unis; Da. 2005; No. 1937; Pp. 79-86; Bibl. 9 ref.
LA : Anglais
EA : The effects of human-machine interface (HMI) design for intelligent speed adaptation (ISA) on driving behavior and acceptance were measured in a moving-base research driving simulator. Sixty-four experienced drivers participated in two simulator experiments (32 in each). During the simulated runs with ISA, the speed limit was communicated through the ISA system. The ISA system consisted of an indication of the speed limit on the speedometer and a gas pedal that could be used either as a haptic or tactile pedal or as a dead throttle. Two versions of the haptic gas pedal were examined in Experiment I: a low-force ISA (easy to overrule, informative in nature) and a high-force ISA (stronger counterforce, more compulsory in nature). Two other configurations were tested in Experiment II: a tactile pedal (a vibration on the gas pedal, informative in nature) and a dead throttle (completely restraining the driver from exceeding the speed limit). It was hypothesized that the closer the ISA is to an informative type, the higher the acceptance and the smaller the effects on driving behavior would be. This hypothesis appeared to be valid, although for both driving behavior and acceptance, not all four HMIs could be ranked unambiguously on the scale from no ISA to full ISA. In sharp curves, drivers appeared to choose a driving speed below the speed limit, irrespective of ISA. The specific road environment scenarios that were inserted to examine presupposed compensatory behavior for experienced delay indicated no signs of compensatory driving behavior.
CC : 001D15C
FD : Trafic routier; Conduite véhicule; Conception système; Système homme machine; Système intelligent; Comportement; Vitesse déplacement; Simulateur; Etude expérimentale; Essai en place; Analyse statistique; Sécurité trafic; Charge travail; Acceptation
ED : Road traffic; Vehicle driving; System design; Man machine system; Intelligent system; Behavior; Speed; Simulator; Experimental study; In situ test; Statistical analysis; Traffic safety; Workload; Acceptance
SD : Tráfico carretera; Conducción vehículo; Concepción sistema; Sistema hombre máquina; Sistema inteligente; Conducta; Velocidad desplazamiento; Simulador; Estudio experimental; Ensayo en sitio; Análisis estadístico; Seguridad tráfico; Carga trabajo; Aceptación
LO : INIST-10459B.354000153344860120
ID : 06-0305109

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:06-0305109

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Effects of human-machine interface design for intelligent speed adaptation on driving behavior and acceptance</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Rook, Arno M" sort="Rook, Arno M" uniqKey="Rook A" first="Arno M." last="Rook">Arno M. Rook</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>TNO Human Factors, P.O. Box 23</s1>
<s2>3769 ZG Soesterberg</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Hogema, Jeroen H" sort="Hogema, Jeroen H" uniqKey="Hogema J" first="Jeroen H." last="Hogema">Jeroen H. Hogema</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>TNO Human Factors, P.O. Box 23</s1>
<s2>3769 ZG Soesterberg</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">06-0305109</idno>
<date when="2005">2005</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 06-0305109 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:06-0305109</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000D09</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Effects of human-machine interface design for intelligent speed adaptation on driving behavior and acceptance</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Rook, Arno M" sort="Rook, Arno M" uniqKey="Rook A" first="Arno M." last="Rook">Arno M. Rook</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>TNO Human Factors, P.O. Box 23</s1>
<s2>3769 ZG Soesterberg</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Hogema, Jeroen H" sort="Hogema, Jeroen H" uniqKey="Hogema J" first="Jeroen H." last="Hogema">Jeroen H. Hogema</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>TNO Human Factors, P.O. Box 23</s1>
<s2>3769 ZG Soesterberg</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Transportation research record</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Transp. res. rec.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0361-1981</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2005">2005</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">Transportation research record</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Transp. res. rec.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0361-1981</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Acceptance</term>
<term>Behavior</term>
<term>Experimental study</term>
<term>In situ test</term>
<term>Intelligent system</term>
<term>Man machine system</term>
<term>Road traffic</term>
<term>Simulator</term>
<term>Speed</term>
<term>Statistical analysis</term>
<term>System design</term>
<term>Traffic safety</term>
<term>Vehicle driving</term>
<term>Workload</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Trafic routier</term>
<term>Conduite véhicule</term>
<term>Conception système</term>
<term>Système homme machine</term>
<term>Système intelligent</term>
<term>Comportement</term>
<term>Vitesse déplacement</term>
<term>Simulateur</term>
<term>Etude expérimentale</term>
<term>Essai en place</term>
<term>Analyse statistique</term>
<term>Sécurité trafic</term>
<term>Charge travail</term>
<term>Acceptation</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The effects of human-machine interface (HMI) design for intelligent speed adaptation (ISA) on driving behavior and acceptance were measured in a moving-base research driving simulator. Sixty-four experienced drivers participated in two simulator experiments (32 in each). During the simulated runs with ISA, the speed limit was communicated through the ISA system. The ISA system consisted of an indication of the speed limit on the speedometer and a gas pedal that could be used either as a haptic or tactile pedal or as a dead throttle. Two versions of the haptic gas pedal were examined in Experiment I: a low-force ISA (easy to overrule, informative in nature) and a high-force ISA (stronger counterforce, more compulsory in nature). Two other configurations were tested in Experiment II: a tactile pedal (a vibration on the gas pedal, informative in nature) and a dead throttle (completely restraining the driver from exceeding the speed limit). It was hypothesized that the closer the ISA is to an informative type, the higher the acceptance and the smaller the effects on driving behavior would be. This hypothesis appeared to be valid, although for both driving behavior and acceptance, not all four HMIs could be ranked unambiguously on the scale from no ISA to full ISA. In sharp curves, drivers appeared to choose a driving speed below the speed limit, irrespective of ISA. The specific road environment scenarios that were inserted to examine presupposed compensatory behavior for experienced delay indicated no signs of compensatory driving behavior.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>0361-1981</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01">
<s0>TRREDM</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>Transp. res. rec.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA06>
<s2>1937</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Effects of human-machine interface design for intelligent speed adaptation on driving behavior and acceptance</s1>
</fA08>
<fA09 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Human performance; simulation and visualization</s1>
</fA09>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>ROOK (Arno M.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>HOGEMA (Jeroen H.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>TNO Human Factors, P.O. Box 23</s1>
<s2>3769 ZG Soesterberg</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20>
<s1>79-86</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2005</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>10459B</s2>
<s5>354000153344860120</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2006 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>9 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>06-0305109</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>Transportation research record</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>The effects of human-machine interface (HMI) design for intelligent speed adaptation (ISA) on driving behavior and acceptance were measured in a moving-base research driving simulator. Sixty-four experienced drivers participated in two simulator experiments (32 in each). During the simulated runs with ISA, the speed limit was communicated through the ISA system. The ISA system consisted of an indication of the speed limit on the speedometer and a gas pedal that could be used either as a haptic or tactile pedal or as a dead throttle. Two versions of the haptic gas pedal were examined in Experiment I: a low-force ISA (easy to overrule, informative in nature) and a high-force ISA (stronger counterforce, more compulsory in nature). Two other configurations were tested in Experiment II: a tactile pedal (a vibration on the gas pedal, informative in nature) and a dead throttle (completely restraining the driver from exceeding the speed limit). It was hypothesized that the closer the ISA is to an informative type, the higher the acceptance and the smaller the effects on driving behavior would be. This hypothesis appeared to be valid, although for both driving behavior and acceptance, not all four HMIs could be ranked unambiguously on the scale from no ISA to full ISA. In sharp curves, drivers appeared to choose a driving speed below the speed limit, irrespective of ISA. The specific road environment scenarios that were inserted to examine presupposed compensatory behavior for experienced delay indicated no signs of compensatory driving behavior.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X">
<s0>001D15C</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Trafic routier</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Road traffic</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Tráfico carretera</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Conduite véhicule</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Vehicle driving</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Conducción vehículo</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Conception système</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>System design</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Concepción sistema</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Système homme machine</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Man machine system</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Sistema hombre máquina</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Système intelligent</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Intelligent system</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Sistema inteligente</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Comportement</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Behavior</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Conducta</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Vitesse déplacement</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Speed</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Velocidad desplazamiento</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Simulateur</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Simulator</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Simulador</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Etude expérimentale</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Experimental study</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Estudio experimental</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Essai en place</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>In situ test</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Ensayo en sitio</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Analyse statistique</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Statistical analysis</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Análisis estadístico</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Sécurité trafic</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Traffic safety</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Seguridad tráfico</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Charge travail</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Workload</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Carga trabajo</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Acceptation</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Acceptance</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Aceptación</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21>
<s1>198</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01">
<s1>PSI</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82>
<s1>PSI</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server>
<NO>PASCAL 06-0305109 INIST</NO>
<ET>Effects of human-machine interface design for intelligent speed adaptation on driving behavior and acceptance</ET>
<AU>ROOK (Arno M.); HOGEMA (Jeroen H.)</AU>
<AF>TNO Human Factors, P.O. Box 23/3769 ZG Soesterberg/Pays-Bas (1 aut., 2 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Transportation research record; ISSN 0361-1981; Coden TRREDM; Etats-Unis; Da. 2005; No. 1937; Pp. 79-86; Bibl. 9 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>The effects of human-machine interface (HMI) design for intelligent speed adaptation (ISA) on driving behavior and acceptance were measured in a moving-base research driving simulator. Sixty-four experienced drivers participated in two simulator experiments (32 in each). During the simulated runs with ISA, the speed limit was communicated through the ISA system. The ISA system consisted of an indication of the speed limit on the speedometer and a gas pedal that could be used either as a haptic or tactile pedal or as a dead throttle. Two versions of the haptic gas pedal were examined in Experiment I: a low-force ISA (easy to overrule, informative in nature) and a high-force ISA (stronger counterforce, more compulsory in nature). Two other configurations were tested in Experiment II: a tactile pedal (a vibration on the gas pedal, informative in nature) and a dead throttle (completely restraining the driver from exceeding the speed limit). It was hypothesized that the closer the ISA is to an informative type, the higher the acceptance and the smaller the effects on driving behavior would be. This hypothesis appeared to be valid, although for both driving behavior and acceptance, not all four HMIs could be ranked unambiguously on the scale from no ISA to full ISA. In sharp curves, drivers appeared to choose a driving speed below the speed limit, irrespective of ISA. The specific road environment scenarios that were inserted to examine presupposed compensatory behavior for experienced delay indicated no signs of compensatory driving behavior.</EA>
<CC>001D15C</CC>
<FD>Trafic routier; Conduite véhicule; Conception système; Système homme machine; Système intelligent; Comportement; Vitesse déplacement; Simulateur; Etude expérimentale; Essai en place; Analyse statistique; Sécurité trafic; Charge travail; Acceptation</FD>
<ED>Road traffic; Vehicle driving; System design; Man machine system; Intelligent system; Behavior; Speed; Simulator; Experimental study; In situ test; Statistical analysis; Traffic safety; Workload; Acceptance</ED>
<SD>Tráfico carretera; Conducción vehículo; Concepción sistema; Sistema hombre máquina; Sistema inteligente; Conducta; Velocidad desplazamiento; Simulador; Estudio experimental; Ensayo en sitio; Análisis estadístico; Seguridad tráfico; Carga trabajo; Aceptación</SD>
<LO>INIST-10459B.354000153344860120</LO>
<ID>06-0305109</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000D09 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000D09 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:06-0305109
   |texte=   Effects of human-machine interface design for intelligent speed adaptation on driving behavior and acceptance
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024