HapticV1, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 000C81

Target acquisition with UAVs : Vigilance displays and advanced cuing interfaces

Identifieur interne : 000C81 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000C80; suivant : 000C82

Target acquisition with UAVs : Vigilance displays and advanced cuing interfaces

Auteurs : Daniel V. Gunn ; Joel S. Warm ; W. Todd Nelson ; Robert S. Bolia ; Donald A. Schumsky ; Kevin J. Corcoran

Source :

Human factors [ 0018-7208 ] ; 2005.

RBID : Pascal:06-0363917

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Ergonomie, Facteur humain, Vigilance, Interface utilisateur, Homme, Avion sans pilote.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Ergonomics, Human, Human factor, User interface, Vigilance.

Abstract

Vigilance and threat detection are critical human factors considerations in the control of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Utilizing a vigilance task in which threat detections (critical signals) led observers to perform a subsequent manual target acquisition task, this study provides information that might have important implications for both of these considerations in the design of future UAV systems. A sensory display format resulted in more threat detections, fewer false alarms, and faster target acquisition times and imposed a lighter workload than did a cognitive display format. Additionally, advanced visual, spatial-audio, and haptic cuing interfaces enhanced acquisition performance over no cuing in the target acquisition phase of the task, and they did so to a similar degree. Thus, in terms of potential applications, this research suggests that a sensory format may be the best display format for threat detection by future UAV operators, that advanced cuing interfaces may prove useful in future UAV systems, and that these interfaces are functionally interchangeable.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0018-7208`
A02	`01`			`@0 HUFAA6`
A03		`1`		`@0 Hum. factors`
A05				`@2 47`
A06				`@2 3`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Target acquisition with UAVs : Vigilance displays and advanced cuing interfaces`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 GUNN (Daniel V.)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 WARM (Joel S.)`
A11	`03`	`1`		`@1 NELSON (W. Todd)`
A11	`04`	`1`		`@1 BOLIA (Robert S.)`
A11	`05`	`1`		`@1 SCHUMSKY (Donald A.)`
A11	`06`	`1`		`@1 CORCORAN (Kevin J.)`
A14	`01`			`@1 Microsoft Game Studios @2 Redmond, Washington @3 USA @Z 1 aut.`
A14	`02`			`@1 University of Cincinnati @2 Cincinnati, Ohio @3 USA @Z 2 aut.`
A14	`03`			`@1 Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base @2 Ohio @3 USA @Z 3 aut. @Z 4 aut.`
A14	`04`			`@1 Kevin J. Corcoran, University of Cincinnati @2 Cincinnati, Ohio @3 USA @Z 5 aut. @Z 6 aut.`
A20				`@1 488-497`
A21				`@1 2005`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 2452 @5 354000135077450030`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2006 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 26 ref.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 06-0363917`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Human factors`
A66	`01`			`@0 USA`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 Vigilance and threat detection are critical human factors considerations in the control of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Utilizing a vigilance task in which threat detections (critical signals) led observers to perform a subsequent manual target acquisition task, this study provides information that might have important implications for both of these considerations in the design of future UAV systems. A sensory display format resulted in more threat detections, fewer false alarms, and faster target acquisition times and imposed a lighter workload than did a cognitive display format. Additionally, advanced visual, spatial-audio, and haptic cuing interfaces enhanced acquisition performance over no cuing in the target acquisition phase of the task, and they did so to a similar degree. Thus, in terms of potential applications, this research suggests that a sensory format may be the best display format for threat detection by future UAV operators, that advanced cuing interfaces may prove useful in future UAV systems, and that these interfaces are functionally interchangeable.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 002A26L07`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Ergonomie @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Ergonomics @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Ergonomía @5 01`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Facteur humain @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Human factor @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Factor humano @5 02`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Vigilance @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Vigilance @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Vigilancia @5 03`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Interface utilisateur @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 User interface @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Interfase usuario @5 04`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Homme @5 18`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Human @5 18`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Hombre @5 18`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Avion sans pilote @4 INC @5 86`
N21				`@1 240`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	PASCAL 06-0363917 INIST
ET :	Target acquisition with UAVs : Vigilance displays and advanced cuing interfaces
AU :	GUNN (Daniel V.); WARM (Joel S.); NELSON (W. Todd); BOLIA (Robert S.); SCHUMSKY (Donald A.); CORCORAN (Kevin J.)
AF :	Microsoft Game Studios/Redmond, Washington/Etats-Unis (1 aut.); University of Cincinnati/Cincinnati, Ohio/Etats-Unis (2 aut.); Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base/Ohio/Etats-Unis (3 aut., 4 aut.); Kevin J. Corcoran, University of Cincinnati/Cincinnati, Ohio/Etats-Unis (5 aut., 6 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO :	Human factors; ISSN 0018-7208; Coden HUFAA6; Etats-Unis; Da. 2005; Vol. 47; No. 3; Pp. 488-497; Bibl. 26 ref.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	Vigilance and threat detection are critical human factors considerations in the control of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Utilizing a vigilance task in which threat detections (critical signals) led observers to perform a subsequent manual target acquisition task, this study provides information that might have important implications for both of these considerations in the design of future UAV systems. A sensory display format resulted in more threat detections, fewer false alarms, and faster target acquisition times and imposed a lighter workload than did a cognitive display format. Additionally, advanced visual, spatial-audio, and haptic cuing interfaces enhanced acquisition performance over no cuing in the target acquisition phase of the task, and they did so to a similar degree. Thus, in terms of potential applications, this research suggests that a sensory format may be the best display format for threat detection by future UAV operators, that advanced cuing interfaces may prove useful in future UAV systems, and that these interfaces are functionally interchangeable.
CC :	002A26L07
FD :	Ergonomie; Facteur humain; Vigilance; Interface utilisateur; Homme; Avion sans pilote
ED :	Ergonomics; Human factor; Vigilance; User interface; Human
SD :	Ergonomía; Factor humano; Vigilancia; Interfase usuario; Hombre
LO :	INIST-2452.354000135077450030
ID :	06-0363917

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:06-0363917

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Target acquisition with UAVs : Vigilance displays and advanced cuing interfaces</title>
<author><name sortKey="Gunn, Daniel V" sort="Gunn, Daniel V" uniqKey="Gunn D" first="Daniel V." last="Gunn">Daniel V. Gunn</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Microsoft Game Studios</s1>
<s2>Redmond, Washington</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Warm, Joel S" sort="Warm, Joel S" uniqKey="Warm J" first="Joel S." last="Warm">Joel S. Warm</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>University of Cincinnati</s1>
<s2>Cincinnati, Ohio</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Nelson, W Todd" sort="Nelson, W Todd" uniqKey="Nelson W" first="W. Todd" last="Nelson">W. Todd Nelson</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base</s1>
<s2>Ohio</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Bolia, Robert S" sort="Bolia, Robert S" uniqKey="Bolia R" first="Robert S." last="Bolia">Robert S. Bolia</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base</s1>
<s2>Ohio</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Schumsky, Donald A" sort="Schumsky, Donald A" uniqKey="Schumsky D" first="Donald A." last="Schumsky">Donald A. Schumsky</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="04"><s1>Kevin J. Corcoran, University of Cincinnati</s1>
<s2>Cincinnati, Ohio</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Corcoran, Kevin J" sort="Corcoran, Kevin J" uniqKey="Corcoran K" first="Kevin J." last="Corcoran">Kevin J. Corcoran</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="04"><s1>Kevin J. Corcoran, University of Cincinnati</s1>
<s2>Cincinnati, Ohio</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">06-0363917</idno>
<date when="2005">2005</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 06-0363917 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:06-0363917</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000C81</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Target acquisition with UAVs : Vigilance displays and advanced cuing interfaces</title>
<author><name sortKey="Gunn, Daniel V" sort="Gunn, Daniel V" uniqKey="Gunn D" first="Daniel V." last="Gunn">Daniel V. Gunn</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Microsoft Game Studios</s1>
<s2>Redmond, Washington</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Warm, Joel S" sort="Warm, Joel S" uniqKey="Warm J" first="Joel S." last="Warm">Joel S. Warm</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>University of Cincinnati</s1>
<s2>Cincinnati, Ohio</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Nelson, W Todd" sort="Nelson, W Todd" uniqKey="Nelson W" first="W. Todd" last="Nelson">W. Todd Nelson</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base</s1>
<s2>Ohio</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Bolia, Robert S" sort="Bolia, Robert S" uniqKey="Bolia R" first="Robert S." last="Bolia">Robert S. Bolia</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base</s1>
<s2>Ohio</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Schumsky, Donald A" sort="Schumsky, Donald A" uniqKey="Schumsky D" first="Donald A." last="Schumsky">Donald A. Schumsky</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="04"><s1>Kevin J. Corcoran, University of Cincinnati</s1>
<s2>Cincinnati, Ohio</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Corcoran, Kevin J" sort="Corcoran, Kevin J" uniqKey="Corcoran K" first="Kevin J." last="Corcoran">Kevin J. Corcoran</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="04"><s1>Kevin J. Corcoran, University of Cincinnati</s1>
<s2>Cincinnati, Ohio</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Human factors</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Hum. factors</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0018-7208</idno>
<imprint><date when="2005">2005</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Human factors</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Hum. factors</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0018-7208</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Ergonomics</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Human factor</term>
<term>User interface</term>
<term>Vigilance</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Ergonomie</term>
<term>Facteur humain</term>
<term>Vigilance</term>
<term>Interface utilisateur</term>
<term>Homme</term>
<term>Avion sans pilote</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Vigilance and threat detection are critical human factors considerations in the control of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Utilizing a vigilance task in which threat detections (critical signals) led observers to perform a subsequent manual target acquisition task, this study provides information that might have important implications for both of these considerations in the design of future UAV systems. A sensory display format resulted in more threat detections, fewer false alarms, and faster target acquisition times and imposed a lighter workload than did a cognitive display format. Additionally, advanced visual, spatial-audio, and haptic cuing interfaces enhanced acquisition performance over no cuing in the target acquisition phase of the task, and they did so to a similar degree. Thus, in terms of potential applications, this research suggests that a sensory format may be the best display format for threat detection by future UAV operators, that advanced cuing interfaces may prove useful in future UAV systems, and that these interfaces are functionally interchangeable.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0018-7208</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>HUFAA6</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Hum. factors</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>47</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>3</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Target acquisition with UAVs : Vigilance displays and advanced cuing interfaces</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>GUNN (Daniel V.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>WARM (Joel S.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>NELSON (W. Todd)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>BOLIA (Robert S.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1"><s1>SCHUMSKY (Donald A.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="06" i2="1"><s1>CORCORAN (Kevin J.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Microsoft Game Studios</s1>
<s2>Redmond, Washington</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>University of Cincinnati</s1>
<s2>Cincinnati, Ohio</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="03"><s1>Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base</s1>
<s2>Ohio</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="04"><s1>Kevin J. Corcoran, University of Cincinnati</s1>
<s2>Cincinnati, Ohio</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>488-497</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2005</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>2452</s2>
<s5>354000135077450030</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2006 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>26 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>06-0363917</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Human factors</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Vigilance and threat detection are critical human factors considerations in the control of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Utilizing a vigilance task in which threat detections (critical signals) led observers to perform a subsequent manual target acquisition task, this study provides information that might have important implications for both of these considerations in the design of future UAV systems. A sensory display format resulted in more threat detections, fewer false alarms, and faster target acquisition times and imposed a lighter workload than did a cognitive display format. Additionally, advanced visual, spatial-audio, and haptic cuing interfaces enhanced acquisition performance over no cuing in the target acquisition phase of the task, and they did so to a similar degree. Thus, in terms of potential applications, this research suggests that a sensory format may be the best display format for threat detection by future UAV operators, that advanced cuing interfaces may prove useful in future UAV systems, and that these interfaces are functionally interchangeable.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002A26L07</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Ergonomie</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Ergonomics</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Ergonomía</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Facteur humain</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human factor</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Factor humano</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Vigilance</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Vigilance</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Vigilancia</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Interface utilisateur</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>User interface</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Interfase usuario</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Avion sans pilote</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>86</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21><s1>240</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 06-0363917 INIST</NO>
<ET>Target acquisition with UAVs : Vigilance displays and advanced cuing interfaces</ET>
<AU>GUNN (Daniel V.); WARM (Joel S.); NELSON (W. Todd); BOLIA (Robert S.); SCHUMSKY (Donald A.); CORCORAN (Kevin J.)</AU>
<AF>Microsoft Game Studios/Redmond, Washington/Etats-Unis (1 aut.); University of Cincinnati/Cincinnati, Ohio/Etats-Unis (2 aut.); Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base/Ohio/Etats-Unis (3 aut., 4 aut.); Kevin J. Corcoran, University of Cincinnati/Cincinnati, Ohio/Etats-Unis (5 aut., 6 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Human factors; ISSN 0018-7208; Coden HUFAA6; Etats-Unis; Da. 2005; Vol. 47; No. 3; Pp. 488-497; Bibl. 26 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Vigilance and threat detection are critical human factors considerations in the control of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Utilizing a vigilance task in which threat detections (critical signals) led observers to perform a subsequent manual target acquisition task, this study provides information that might have important implications for both of these considerations in the design of future UAV systems. A sensory display format resulted in more threat detections, fewer false alarms, and faster target acquisition times and imposed a lighter workload than did a cognitive display format. Additionally, advanced visual, spatial-audio, and haptic cuing interfaces enhanced acquisition performance over no cuing in the target acquisition phase of the task, and they did so to a similar degree. Thus, in terms of potential applications, this research suggests that a sensory format may be the best display format for threat detection by future UAV operators, that advanced cuing interfaces may prove useful in future UAV systems, and that these interfaces are functionally interchangeable.</EA>
<CC>002A26L07</CC>
<FD>Ergonomie; Facteur humain; Vigilance; Interface utilisateur; Homme; Avion sans pilote</FD>
<ED>Ergonomics; Human factor; Vigilance; User interface; Human</ED>
<SD>Ergonomía; Factor humano; Vigilancia; Interfase usuario; Hombre</SD>
<LO>INIST-2452.354000135077450030</LO>
<ID>06-0363917</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000C81 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000C81 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:06-0363917
   |texte=   Target acquisition with UAVs : Vigilance displays and advanced cuing interfaces
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024

	Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Target acquisition with UAVs : Vigilance displays and advanced cuing interfaces

Target acquisition with UAVs : Vigilance displays and advanced cuing interfaces

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri