HapticV1, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 000B85

Influence of 360-degree enhanced optic edge design of a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification

Identifieur interne : 000B85 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000B84; suivant : 000B86

Influence of 360-degree enhanced optic edge design of a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification

Auteurs : Yutaro Nishi ; Tanja M. Rabsilber ; Il-Joo Limberger ; Andreas J. Reuland ; Gerd U. Auffarth

Source :

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery [ 0886-3350 ] ; 2007.

RBID : Pascal:07-0121162

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Influence, Optique, Bord, Conception, Hydrophilie, Acrylique dérivé polymère, Postérieur, Capsule, Opacification, Chirurgie, Ophtalmologie, Traitement.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Acrylic polymer, Capsule, Design, Edge, Hydrophily, Influence, Opacification, Ophthalmology, Optics, Posterior, Surgery, Treatment.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the rate of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) with the single-piece hydrophilic acrylic foldable Rayner Centerflex 570H intraocular lens (IOL), which has a sharp optic edge design excluding the optic-haptic junction, and the Rayner C-flex 570C IOL, which has an improved 360-degree sharp edge. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. METHODS: As part of a multicenter U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) study, 42 patients who had implantation of a C-flex IOL in 1 eye after uneventful phacoemulsification were enrolled. six and 12 months postoperatively, PCO was evaluated by retroillumination photographs using Evaluation of Posterior Capsule Opacification (EPCO) 2000 image-analysis software. The data were then compared with those in a matched group of patients with a Centerflex IOL who participated in a previous FDA study. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients with the C-flex IOL was 71.5 years + 8.2 (SD) There was a statistically significant difference in EPCO scores between the C-flex group and Centerflex group. Six months after surgery, the mean EPCO value (total IOL optic) was 0.07 + 0.17 in the C-flex group (n = 37) and 0.20 ± 0.20 in the Centerflex group (n = 36) (P<.01, Wilcoxon test). By 12 months, the mean had increased to 0,16 + 0.20 in the C-flex group (n = 37) and 0.35 + 0.22 in the Centerflex group (n = 31) (P<.01, Wilcoxon test). CONCLUSIONS: The C-flex lOLs showed good functional results and significantly lower PCO formation than the earlier model Centerflex IOL. The enhanced edge of the C-flex IOL seemed to improve PCO prevention clinically.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0886-3350`
A02	`01`			`@0 JCSUEV`
A03		`1`		`@0 J. cataract refractive surg.`
A05				`@2 33`
A06				`@2 2`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Influence of 360-degree enhanced optic edge design of a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 NISHI (Yutaro)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 RABSILBER (Tanja M.)`
A11	`03`	`1`		`@1 LIMBERGER (Il-Joo)`
A11	`04`	`1`		`@1 REULAND (Andreas J.)`
A11	`05`	`1`		`@1 AUFFARTH (Gerd U.)`
A14	`01`			`@1 International Vision Correction Research Centre, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg @2 Heidelberg @3 DEU @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut. @Z 3 aut. @Z 4 aut. @Z 5 aut.`
A20				`@1 227-231`
A21				`@1 2007`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 20937 @5 354000145429490090`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2007 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 29 ref.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 07-0121162`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Journal of cataract and refractive surgery`
A66	`01`			`@0 USA`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 PURPOSE: To compare the rate of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) with the single-piece hydrophilic acrylic foldable Rayner Centerflex 570H intraocular lens (IOL), which has a sharp optic edge design excluding the optic-haptic junction, and the Rayner C-flex 570C IOL, which has an improved 360-degree sharp edge. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. METHODS: As part of a multicenter U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) study, 42 patients who had implantation of a C-flex IOL in 1 eye after uneventful phacoemulsification were enrolled. six and 12 months postoperatively, PCO was evaluated by retroillumination photographs using Evaluation of Posterior Capsule Opacification (EPCO) 2000 image-analysis software. The data were then compared with those in a matched group of patients with a Centerflex IOL who participated in a previous FDA study. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients with the C-flex IOL was 71.5 years + 8.2 (SD) There was a statistically significant difference in EPCO scores between the C-flex group and Centerflex group. Six months after surgery, the mean EPCO value (total IOL optic) was 0.07 + 0.17 in the C-flex group (n = 37) and 0.20 ± 0.20 in the Centerflex group (n = 36) (P<.01, Wilcoxon test). By 12 months, the mean had increased to 0,16 + 0.20 in the C-flex group (n = 37) and 0.35 + 0.22 in the Centerflex group (n = 31) (P<.01, Wilcoxon test). CONCLUSIONS: The C-flex lOLs showed good functional results and significantly lower PCO formation than the earlier model Centerflex IOL. The enhanced edge of the C-flex IOL seemed to improve PCO prevention clinically.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 002B25B`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Influence @5 02`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Influence @5 02`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Influencia @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Optique @5 03`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Optics @5 03`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Optica @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Bord @5 05`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Edge @5 05`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Borde @5 05`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Conception @5 06`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Design @5 06`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Diseño @5 06`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Hydrophilie @5 08`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Hydrophily @5 08`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Hidrofilia @5 08`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Acrylique dérivé polymère @2 NK @5 09`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Acrylic polymer @2 NK @5 09`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Acrilico derivado polímero @2 NK @5 09`
C03	`07`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Postérieur @5 11`
C03	`07`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Posterior @5 11`
C03	`07`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Posterior @5 11`
C03	`08`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Capsule @5 12`
C03	`08`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Capsule @5 12`
C03	`08`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cápsula @5 12`
C03	`09`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Opacification @5 14`
C03	`09`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Opacification @5 14`
C03	`09`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Opacificación @5 14`
C03	`10`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Chirurgie @5 15`
C03	`10`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Surgery @5 15`
C03	`10`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cirugía @5 15`
C03	`11`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Ophtalmologie @5 17`
C03	`11`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Ophthalmology @5 17`
C03	`11`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Oftalmología @5 17`
C03	`12`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Traitement @5 25`
C03	`12`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Treatment @5 25`
C03	`12`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Tratamiento @5 25`
N21				`@1 078`
N44	`01`			`@1 OTO`
N82				`@1 OTO`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	PASCAL 07-0121162 INIST
ET :	Influence of 360-degree enhanced optic edge design of a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification
AU :	NISHI (Yutaro); RABSILBER (Tanja M.); LIMBERGER (Il-Joo); REULAND (Andreas J.); AUFFARTH (Gerd U.)
AF :	International Vision Correction Research Centre, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg/Heidelberg/Allemagne (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO :	Journal of cataract and refractive surgery; ISSN 0886-3350; Coden JCSUEV; Etats-Unis; Da. 2007; Vol. 33; No. 2; Pp. 227-231; Bibl. 29 ref.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	PURPOSE: To compare the rate of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) with the single-piece hydrophilic acrylic foldable Rayner Centerflex 570H intraocular lens (IOL), which has a sharp optic edge design excluding the optic-haptic junction, and the Rayner C-flex 570C IOL, which has an improved 360-degree sharp edge. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. METHODS: As part of a multicenter U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) study, 42 patients who had implantation of a C-flex IOL in 1 eye after uneventful phacoemulsification were enrolled. six and 12 months postoperatively, PCO was evaluated by retroillumination photographs using Evaluation of Posterior Capsule Opacification (EPCO) 2000 image-analysis software. The data were then compared with those in a matched group of patients with a Centerflex IOL who participated in a previous FDA study. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients with the C-flex IOL was 71.5 years + 8.2 (SD) There was a statistically significant difference in EPCO scores between the C-flex group and Centerflex group. Six months after surgery, the mean EPCO value (total IOL optic) was 0.07 + 0.17 in the C-flex group (n = 37) and 0.20 ± 0.20 in the Centerflex group (n = 36) (P<.01, Wilcoxon test). By 12 months, the mean had increased to 0,16 + 0.20 in the C-flex group (n = 37) and 0.35 + 0.22 in the Centerflex group (n = 31) (P<.01, Wilcoxon test). CONCLUSIONS: The C-flex lOLs showed good functional results and significantly lower PCO formation than the earlier model Centerflex IOL. The enhanced edge of the C-flex IOL seemed to improve PCO prevention clinically.
CC :	002B25B
FD :	Influence; Optique; Bord; Conception; Hydrophilie; Acrylique dérivé polymère; Postérieur; Capsule; Opacification; Chirurgie; Ophtalmologie; Traitement
ED :	Influence; Optics; Edge; Design; Hydrophily; Acrylic polymer; Posterior; Capsule; Opacification; Surgery; Ophthalmology; Treatment
SD :	Influencia; Optica; Borde; Diseño; Hidrofilia; Acrilico derivado polímero; Posterior; Cápsula; Opacificación; Cirugía; Oftalmología; Tratamiento
LO :	INIST-20937.354000145429490090
ID :	07-0121162

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:07-0121162

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Influence of 360-degree enhanced optic edge design of a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification</title>
<author><name sortKey="Nishi, Yutaro" sort="Nishi, Yutaro" uniqKey="Nishi Y" first="Yutaro" last="Nishi">Yutaro Nishi</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>International Vision Correction Research Centre, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg</s1>
<s2>Heidelberg</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Rabsilber, Tanja M" sort="Rabsilber, Tanja M" uniqKey="Rabsilber T" first="Tanja M." last="Rabsilber">Tanja M. Rabsilber</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>International Vision Correction Research Centre, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg</s1>
<s2>Heidelberg</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Limberger, Il Joo" sort="Limberger, Il Joo" uniqKey="Limberger I" first="Il-Joo" last="Limberger">Il-Joo Limberger</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>International Vision Correction Research Centre, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg</s1>
<s2>Heidelberg</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Reuland, Andreas J" sort="Reuland, Andreas J" uniqKey="Reuland A" first="Andreas J." last="Reuland">Andreas J. Reuland</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>International Vision Correction Research Centre, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg</s1>
<s2>Heidelberg</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Auffarth, Gerd U" sort="Auffarth, Gerd U" uniqKey="Auffarth G" first="Gerd U." last="Auffarth">Gerd U. Auffarth</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>International Vision Correction Research Centre, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg</s1>
<s2>Heidelberg</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">07-0121162</idno>
<date when="2007">2007</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 07-0121162 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:07-0121162</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000B85</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Influence of 360-degree enhanced optic edge design of a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification</title>
<author><name sortKey="Nishi, Yutaro" sort="Nishi, Yutaro" uniqKey="Nishi Y" first="Yutaro" last="Nishi">Yutaro Nishi</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>International Vision Correction Research Centre, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg</s1>
<s2>Heidelberg</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Rabsilber, Tanja M" sort="Rabsilber, Tanja M" uniqKey="Rabsilber T" first="Tanja M." last="Rabsilber">Tanja M. Rabsilber</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>International Vision Correction Research Centre, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg</s1>
<s2>Heidelberg</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Limberger, Il Joo" sort="Limberger, Il Joo" uniqKey="Limberger I" first="Il-Joo" last="Limberger">Il-Joo Limberger</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>International Vision Correction Research Centre, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg</s1>
<s2>Heidelberg</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Reuland, Andreas J" sort="Reuland, Andreas J" uniqKey="Reuland A" first="Andreas J." last="Reuland">Andreas J. Reuland</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>International Vision Correction Research Centre, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg</s1>
<s2>Heidelberg</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Auffarth, Gerd U" sort="Auffarth, Gerd U" uniqKey="Auffarth G" first="Gerd U." last="Auffarth">Gerd U. Auffarth</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>International Vision Correction Research Centre, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg</s1>
<s2>Heidelberg</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. cataract refractive surg.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno>
<imprint><date when="2007">2007</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. cataract refractive surg.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Acrylic polymer</term>
<term>Capsule</term>
<term>Design</term>
<term>Edge</term>
<term>Hydrophily</term>
<term>Influence</term>
<term>Opacification</term>
<term>Ophthalmology</term>
<term>Optics</term>
<term>Posterior</term>
<term>Surgery</term>
<term>Treatment</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Influence</term>
<term>Optique</term>
<term>Bord</term>
<term>Conception</term>
<term>Hydrophilie</term>
<term>Acrylique dérivé polymère</term>
<term>Postérieur</term>
<term>Capsule</term>
<term>Opacification</term>
<term>Chirurgie</term>
<term>Ophtalmologie</term>
<term>Traitement</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">PURPOSE: To compare the rate of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) with the single-piece hydrophilic acrylic foldable Rayner Centerflex 570H intraocular lens (IOL), which has a sharp optic edge design excluding the optic-haptic junction, and the Rayner C-flex 570C IOL, which has an improved 360-degree sharp edge. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. METHODS: As part of a multicenter U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) study, 42 patients who had implantation of a C-flex IOL in 1 eye after uneventful phacoemulsification were enrolled. six and 12 months postoperatively, PCO was evaluated by retroillumination photographs using Evaluation of Posterior Capsule Opacification (EPCO) 2000 image-analysis software. The data were then compared with those in a matched group of patients with a Centerflex IOL who participated in a previous FDA study. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients with the C-flex IOL was 71.5 years + 8.2 (SD) There was a statistically significant difference in EPCO scores between the C-flex group and Centerflex group. Six months after surgery, the mean EPCO value (total IOL optic) was 0.07 + 0.17 in the C-flex group (n = 37) and 0.20 ± 0.20 in the Centerflex group (n = 36) (P<.01, Wilcoxon test). By 12 months, the mean had increased to 0,16 + 0.20 in the C-flex group (n = 37) and 0.35 + 0.22 in the Centerflex group (n = 31) (P<.01, Wilcoxon test). CONCLUSIONS: The C-flex lOLs showed good functional results and significantly lower PCO formation than the earlier model Centerflex IOL. The enhanced edge of the C-flex IOL seemed to improve PCO prevention clinically.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0886-3350</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>JCSUEV</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>J. cataract refractive surg.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>33</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>2</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Influence of 360-degree enhanced optic edge design of a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>NISHI (Yutaro)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>RABSILBER (Tanja M.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>LIMBERGER (Il-Joo)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>REULAND (Andreas J.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1"><s1>AUFFARTH (Gerd U.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>International Vision Correction Research Centre, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg</s1>
<s2>Heidelberg</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>227-231</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2007</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>20937</s2>
<s5>354000145429490090</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2007 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>29 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>07-0121162</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>PURPOSE: To compare the rate of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) with the single-piece hydrophilic acrylic foldable Rayner Centerflex 570H intraocular lens (IOL), which has a sharp optic edge design excluding the optic-haptic junction, and the Rayner C-flex 570C IOL, which has an improved 360-degree sharp edge. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. METHODS: As part of a multicenter U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) study, 42 patients who had implantation of a C-flex IOL in 1 eye after uneventful phacoemulsification were enrolled. six and 12 months postoperatively, PCO was evaluated by retroillumination photographs using Evaluation of Posterior Capsule Opacification (EPCO) 2000 image-analysis software. The data were then compared with those in a matched group of patients with a Centerflex IOL who participated in a previous FDA study. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients with the C-flex IOL was 71.5 years + 8.2 (SD) There was a statistically significant difference in EPCO scores between the C-flex group and Centerflex group. Six months after surgery, the mean EPCO value (total IOL optic) was 0.07 + 0.17 in the C-flex group (n = 37) and 0.20 ± 0.20 in the Centerflex group (n = 36) (P<.01, Wilcoxon test). By 12 months, the mean had increased to 0,16 + 0.20 in the C-flex group (n = 37) and 0.35 + 0.22 in the Centerflex group (n = 31) (P<.01, Wilcoxon test). CONCLUSIONS: The C-flex lOLs showed good functional results and significantly lower PCO formation than the earlier model Centerflex IOL. The enhanced edge of the C-flex IOL seemed to improve PCO prevention clinically.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B25B</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Influence</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Influence</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Influencia</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Optique</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Optics</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Optica</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Bord</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Edge</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Borde</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Conception</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Design</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Diseño</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Hydrophilie</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Hydrophily</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hidrofilia</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Acrylique dérivé polymère</s0>
<s2>NK</s2>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Acrylic polymer</s0>
<s2>NK</s2>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Acrilico derivado polímero</s0>
<s2>NK</s2>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Postérieur</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Posterior</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Posterior</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Capsule</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Capsule</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cápsula</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Opacification</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Opacification</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Opacificación</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Chirurgie</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Surgery</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cirugía</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Ophtalmologie</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Ophthalmology</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Oftalmología</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Traitement</s0>
<s5>25</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Treatment</s0>
<s5>25</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Tratamiento</s0>
<s5>25</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21><s1>078</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 07-0121162 INIST</NO>
<ET>Influence of 360-degree enhanced optic edge design of a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification</ET>
<AU>NISHI (Yutaro); RABSILBER (Tanja M.); LIMBERGER (Il-Joo); REULAND (Andreas J.); AUFFARTH (Gerd U.)</AU>
<AF>International Vision Correction Research Centre, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg/Heidelberg/Allemagne (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery; ISSN 0886-3350; Coden JCSUEV; Etats-Unis; Da. 2007; Vol. 33; No. 2; Pp. 227-231; Bibl. 29 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>PURPOSE: To compare the rate of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) with the single-piece hydrophilic acrylic foldable Rayner Centerflex 570H intraocular lens (IOL), which has a sharp optic edge design excluding the optic-haptic junction, and the Rayner C-flex 570C IOL, which has an improved 360-degree sharp edge. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. METHODS: As part of a multicenter U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) study, 42 patients who had implantation of a C-flex IOL in 1 eye after uneventful phacoemulsification were enrolled. six and 12 months postoperatively, PCO was evaluated by retroillumination photographs using Evaluation of Posterior Capsule Opacification (EPCO) 2000 image-analysis software. The data were then compared with those in a matched group of patients with a Centerflex IOL who participated in a previous FDA study. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients with the C-flex IOL was 71.5 years + 8.2 (SD) There was a statistically significant difference in EPCO scores between the C-flex group and Centerflex group. Six months after surgery, the mean EPCO value (total IOL optic) was 0.07 + 0.17 in the C-flex group (n = 37) and 0.20 ± 0.20 in the Centerflex group (n = 36) (P<.01, Wilcoxon test). By 12 months, the mean had increased to 0,16 + 0.20 in the C-flex group (n = 37) and 0.35 + 0.22 in the Centerflex group (n = 31) (P<.01, Wilcoxon test). CONCLUSIONS: The C-flex lOLs showed good functional results and significantly lower PCO formation than the earlier model Centerflex IOL. The enhanced edge of the C-flex IOL seemed to improve PCO prevention clinically.</EA>
<CC>002B25B</CC>
<FD>Influence; Optique; Bord; Conception; Hydrophilie; Acrylique dérivé polymère; Postérieur; Capsule; Opacification; Chirurgie; Ophtalmologie; Traitement</FD>
<ED>Influence; Optics; Edge; Design; Hydrophily; Acrylic polymer; Posterior; Capsule; Opacification; Surgery; Ophthalmology; Treatment</ED>
<SD>Influencia; Optica; Borde; Diseño; Hidrofilia; Acrilico derivado polímero; Posterior; Cápsula; Opacificación; Cirugía; Oftalmología; Tratamiento</SD>
<LO>INIST-20937.354000145429490090</LO>
<ID>07-0121162</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000B85 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000B85 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:07-0121162
   |texte=   Influence of 360-degree enhanced optic edge design of a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024

	Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Influence of 360-degree enhanced optic edge design of a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification

Influence of 360-degree enhanced optic edge design of a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri