HapticV1, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 000458

Learning Retention of Thoracic Pedicle Screw Placement Using a High-Resolution Augmented Reality Simulator With Haptic Feedback

Identifieur interne : 000458 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000457; suivant : 000459

Learning Retention of Thoracic Pedicle Screw Placement Using a High-Resolution Augmented Reality Simulator With Haptic Feedback

Auteurs : Cristian J. Luciano ; P. Pat Banerjee ; Brad Bellotte ; G. Michael ; Michael Jr Lemole ; Fady T. Charbel ; Ben Roitberg

Source :

Neurosurgery [ 0148-396X ] ; 2011.

RBID : Pascal:11-0381804

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Pathologie du système nerveux, Apprentissage, Vis, Haute résolution, Réalité augmentée, Simulateur, Boucle réaction, Chirurgie, Simulation, Réalité virtuelle.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Augmented reality, Feedback, High resolution, Learning, Nervous system diseases, Screw, Simulation, Simulator, Surgery, Virtual reality.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the use of a part-task simulator with 3D and haptic feedback as a training tool for a common neurosurgical procedure - placement of thoracic pedicle screws. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the learning retention of thoracic pedicle screw placement on a high-performance augmented reality and haptic technology workstation. METHODS: Fifty-one fellows and residents performed thoracic pedicle screw placement on the simulator. The virtual screws were drilled into a virtual patient's thoracic spine derived from a computed tomography data set of a real patient. RESULTS: With a 12.5% failure rate, a 2-proportion ztest yielded P=.08. For performance accuracy, an aggregate Euclidean distance deviation from entry landmark on the pedicle and a similar deviation from the target landmark in the vertebral body yielded P = .04 from a 2-sample t test in which the rejected null hypothesis assumes no improvement in performance accuracy from the practice to the test sessions, and the alternative hypothesis assumes an improvement. CONCLUSION: The performance accuracy on the simulator was comparable to the accuracy reported in literature on recent retrospective evaluation of such placements. The failure rates indicated a minor drop from practice to test sessions, and also indicated a trend (P = .08) toward learning retention resulting in improvement from practice to test sessions. The performance accuracy showed a 15% mean score improvement and more than a 50% reduction in standard deviation from practice to test. It showed evidence (P = .04) of performance accuracy improvement from practice to test session.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0148-396X`
A02	`01`			`@0 NRSRDY`
A03		`1`		`@0 Neurosurgery`
A05				`@2 69`
A06				`@2 3 @3 SUP`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Learning Retention of Thoracic Pedicle Screw Placement Using a High-Resolution Augmented Reality Simulator With Haptic Feedback`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 LUCIANO (Cristian J.)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 BANERJEE (P. Pat)`
A11	`03`	`1`		`@1 BELLOTTE (Brad)`
A11	`04`	`1`		`@1 MICHAEL (G.)`
A11	`05`	`1`		`@1 LEMOLE (Michael JR)`
A11	`06`	`1`		`@1 CHARBEL (Fady T.)`
A11	`07`	`1`		`@1 ROITBERG (Ben)`
A14	`01`			`@1 Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago @2 Chicago, Illinois @3 USA @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut.`
A14	`02`			`@1 Department of Computer Science, College of Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago @2 Chicago, Illinois @3 USA @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut.`
A14	`03`			`@1 Department of Bioengineering, College of Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago @2 Chicago, Illinois @3 USA @Z 2 aut.`
A14	`04`			`@1 Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny General Hospital @2 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania @3 USA @Z 3 aut. @Z 4 aut.`
A14	`05`			`@1 Division of Neurosurgery, University of Arizona @2 Tucson, Arizona @3 USA @Z 5 aut.`
A14	`06`			`@1 Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago @2 Chicago, Illinois @3 USA @Z 6 aut.`
A14	`07`			`@1 Division of Neurosurgery, University of Chicago @2 Chicago, Illinois @3 USA @Z 7 aut.`
A20				`@1 14-19`
A21				`@1 2011`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 18396 @5 354000500133000030`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2011 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 3 ref.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 11-0381804`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Neurosurgery`
A66	`01`			`@0 USA`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 BACKGROUND: We evaluated the use of a part-task simulator with 3D and haptic feedback as a training tool for a common neurosurgical procedure - placement of thoracic pedicle screws. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the learning retention of thoracic pedicle screw placement on a high-performance augmented reality and haptic technology workstation. METHODS: Fifty-one fellows and residents performed thoracic pedicle screw placement on the simulator. The virtual screws were drilled into a virtual patient's thoracic spine derived from a computed tomography data set of a real patient. RESULTS: With a 12.5% failure rate, a 2-proportion ztest yielded P=.08. For performance accuracy, an aggregate Euclidean distance deviation from entry landmark on the pedicle and a similar deviation from the target landmark in the vertebral body yielded P = .04 from a 2-sample t test in which the rejected null hypothesis assumes no improvement in performance accuracy from the practice to the test sessions, and the alternative hypothesis assumes an improvement. CONCLUSION: The performance accuracy on the simulator was comparable to the accuracy reported in literature on recent retrospective evaluation of such placements. The failure rates indicated a minor drop from practice to test sessions, and also indicated a trend (P = .08) toward learning retention resulting in improvement from practice to test sessions. The performance accuracy showed a 15% mean score improvement and more than a 50% reduction in standard deviation from practice to test. It showed evidence (P = .04) of performance accuracy improvement from practice to test session.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 002B25J`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Pathologie du système nerveux @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Nervous system diseases @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Sistema nervioso patología @5 01`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Apprentissage @5 09`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Learning @5 09`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Aprendizaje @5 09`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Vis @5 10`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Screw @5 10`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Tornillo @5 10`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Haute résolution @5 11`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 High resolution @5 11`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Alta resolucion @5 11`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Réalité augmentée @5 12`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Augmented reality @5 12`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Realidad aumentada @5 12`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Simulateur @5 13`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Simulator @5 13`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Simulador @5 13`
C03	`07`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Boucle réaction @5 14`
C03	`07`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Feedback @5 14`
C03	`07`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Retroalimentación @5 14`
C03	`08`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Chirurgie @5 15`
C03	`08`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Surgery @5 15`
C03	`08`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cirugía @5 15`
C03	`09`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Simulation @5 17`
C03	`09`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Simulation @5 17`
C03	`09`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Simulación @5 17`
C03	`10`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Réalité virtuelle @5 18`
C03	`10`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Virtual reality @5 18`
C03	`10`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Realidad virtual @5 18`
N21				`@1 262`
N44	`01`			`@1 OTO`
N82				`@1 OTO`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	PASCAL 11-0381804 INIST
ET :	Learning Retention of Thoracic Pedicle Screw Placement Using a High-Resolution Augmented Reality Simulator With Haptic Feedback
AU :	LUCIANO (Cristian J.); BANERJEE (P. Pat); BELLOTTE (Brad); MICHAEL (G.); LEMOLE (Michael JR); CHARBEL (Fady T.); ROITBERG (Ben)
AF :	Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago/Chicago, Illinois/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut.); Department of Computer Science, College of Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago/Chicago, Illinois/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut.); Department of Bioengineering, College of Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago/Chicago, Illinois/Etats-Unis (2 aut.); Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny General Hospital/Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania/Etats-Unis (3 aut., 4 aut.); Division of Neurosurgery, University of Arizona/Tucson, Arizona/Etats-Unis (5 aut.); Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago/Chicago, Illinois/Etats-Unis (6 aut.); Division of Neurosurgery, University of Chicago/Chicago, Illinois/Etats-Unis (7 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO :	Neurosurgery; ISSN 0148-396X; Coden NRSRDY; Etats-Unis; Da. 2011; Vol. 69; No. 3 SUP; Pp. 14-19; Bibl. 3 ref.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	BACKGROUND: We evaluated the use of a part-task simulator with 3D and haptic feedback as a training tool for a common neurosurgical procedure - placement of thoracic pedicle screws. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the learning retention of thoracic pedicle screw placement on a high-performance augmented reality and haptic technology workstation. METHODS: Fifty-one fellows and residents performed thoracic pedicle screw placement on the simulator. The virtual screws were drilled into a virtual patient's thoracic spine derived from a computed tomography data set of a real patient. RESULTS: With a 12.5% failure rate, a 2-proportion ztest yielded P=.08. For performance accuracy, an aggregate Euclidean distance deviation from entry landmark on the pedicle and a similar deviation from the target landmark in the vertebral body yielded P = .04 from a 2-sample t test in which the rejected null hypothesis assumes no improvement in performance accuracy from the practice to the test sessions, and the alternative hypothesis assumes an improvement. CONCLUSION: The performance accuracy on the simulator was comparable to the accuracy reported in literature on recent retrospective evaluation of such placements. The failure rates indicated a minor drop from practice to test sessions, and also indicated a trend (P = .08) toward learning retention resulting in improvement from practice to test sessions. The performance accuracy showed a 15% mean score improvement and more than a 50% reduction in standard deviation from practice to test. It showed evidence (P = .04) of performance accuracy improvement from practice to test session.
CC :	002B25J
FD :	Pathologie du système nerveux; Apprentissage; Vis; Haute résolution; Réalité augmentée; Simulateur; Boucle réaction; Chirurgie; Simulation; Réalité virtuelle
ED :	Nervous system diseases; Learning; Screw; High resolution; Augmented reality; Simulator; Feedback; Surgery; Simulation; Virtual reality
SD :	Sistema nervioso patología; Aprendizaje; Tornillo; Alta resolucion; Realidad aumentada; Simulador; Retroalimentación; Cirugía; Simulación; Realidad virtual
LO :	INIST-18396.354000500133000030
ID :	11-0381804

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:11-0381804

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Learning Retention of Thoracic Pedicle Screw Placement Using a High-Resolution Augmented Reality Simulator With Haptic Feedback</title>
<author><name sortKey="Luciano, Cristian J" sort="Luciano, Cristian J" uniqKey="Luciano C" first="Cristian J." last="Luciano">Cristian J. Luciano</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago</s1>
<s2>Chicago, Illinois</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Computer Science, College of Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago</s1>
<s2>Chicago, Illinois</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Banerjee, P Pat" sort="Banerjee, P Pat" uniqKey="Banerjee P" first="P. Pat" last="Banerjee">P. Pat Banerjee</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago</s1>
<s2>Chicago, Illinois</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Computer Science, College of Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago</s1>
<s2>Chicago, Illinois</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Bioengineering, College of Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago</s1>
<s2>Chicago, Illinois</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Bellotte, Brad" sort="Bellotte, Brad" uniqKey="Bellotte B" first="Brad" last="Bellotte">Brad Bellotte</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="04"><s1>Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny General Hospital</s1>
<s2>Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Michael, G" sort="Michael, G" uniqKey="Michael G" first="G." last="Michael">G. Michael</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="04"><s1>Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny General Hospital</s1>
<s2>Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Lemole, Michael Jr" sort="Lemole, Michael Jr" uniqKey="Lemole M" first="Michael Jr" last="Lemole">Michael Jr Lemole</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="05"><s1>Division of Neurosurgery, University of Arizona</s1>
<s2>Tucson, Arizona</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Charbel, Fady T" sort="Charbel, Fady T" uniqKey="Charbel F" first="Fady T." last="Charbel">Fady T. Charbel</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="06"><s1>Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago</s1>
<s2>Chicago, Illinois</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Roitberg, Ben" sort="Roitberg, Ben" uniqKey="Roitberg B" first="Ben" last="Roitberg">Ben Roitberg</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="07"><s1>Division of Neurosurgery, University of Chicago</s1>
<s2>Chicago, Illinois</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">11-0381804</idno>
<date when="2011">2011</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 11-0381804 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:11-0381804</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000458</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Learning Retention of Thoracic Pedicle Screw Placement Using a High-Resolution Augmented Reality Simulator With Haptic Feedback</title>
<author><name sortKey="Luciano, Cristian J" sort="Luciano, Cristian J" uniqKey="Luciano C" first="Cristian J." last="Luciano">Cristian J. Luciano</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago</s1>
<s2>Chicago, Illinois</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Computer Science, College of Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago</s1>
<s2>Chicago, Illinois</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Banerjee, P Pat" sort="Banerjee, P Pat" uniqKey="Banerjee P" first="P. Pat" last="Banerjee">P. Pat Banerjee</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago</s1>
<s2>Chicago, Illinois</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Computer Science, College of Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago</s1>
<s2>Chicago, Illinois</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Bioengineering, College of Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago</s1>
<s2>Chicago, Illinois</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Bellotte, Brad" sort="Bellotte, Brad" uniqKey="Bellotte B" first="Brad" last="Bellotte">Brad Bellotte</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="04"><s1>Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny General Hospital</s1>
<s2>Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Michael, G" sort="Michael, G" uniqKey="Michael G" first="G." last="Michael">G. Michael</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="04"><s1>Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny General Hospital</s1>
<s2>Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Lemole, Michael Jr" sort="Lemole, Michael Jr" uniqKey="Lemole M" first="Michael Jr" last="Lemole">Michael Jr Lemole</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="05"><s1>Division of Neurosurgery, University of Arizona</s1>
<s2>Tucson, Arizona</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Charbel, Fady T" sort="Charbel, Fady T" uniqKey="Charbel F" first="Fady T." last="Charbel">Fady T. Charbel</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="06"><s1>Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago</s1>
<s2>Chicago, Illinois</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Roitberg, Ben" sort="Roitberg, Ben" uniqKey="Roitberg B" first="Ben" last="Roitberg">Ben Roitberg</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="07"><s1>Division of Neurosurgery, University of Chicago</s1>
<s2>Chicago, Illinois</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Neurosurgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Neurosurgery</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0148-396X</idno>
<imprint><date when="2011">2011</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Neurosurgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Neurosurgery</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0148-396X</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Augmented reality</term>
<term>Feedback</term>
<term>High resolution</term>
<term>Learning</term>
<term>Nervous system diseases</term>
<term>Screw</term>
<term>Simulation</term>
<term>Simulator</term>
<term>Surgery</term>
<term>Virtual reality</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Pathologie du   système nerveux</term>
<term>Apprentissage</term>
<term>Vis</term>
<term>Haute résolution</term>
<term>Réalité augmentée</term>
<term>Simulateur</term>
<term>Boucle réaction</term>
<term>Chirurgie</term>
<term>Simulation</term>
<term>Réalité virtuelle</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">BACKGROUND: We evaluated the use of a part-task simulator with 3D and haptic feedback as a training tool for a common neurosurgical procedure - placement of thoracic pedicle screws. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the learning retention of thoracic pedicle screw placement on a high-performance augmented reality and haptic technology workstation. METHODS: Fifty-one fellows and residents performed thoracic pedicle screw placement on the simulator. The virtual screws were drilled into a virtual patient's thoracic spine derived from a computed tomography data set of a real patient. RESULTS: With a 12.5% failure rate, a 2-proportion ztest yielded P=.08. For performance accuracy, an aggregate Euclidean distance deviation from entry landmark on the pedicle and a similar deviation from the target landmark in the vertebral body yielded P = .04 from a 2-sample t test in which the rejected null hypothesis assumes no improvement in performance accuracy from the practice to the test sessions, and the alternative hypothesis assumes an improvement. CONCLUSION: The performance accuracy on the simulator was comparable to the accuracy reported in literature on recent retrospective evaluation of such placements. The failure rates indicated a minor drop from practice to test sessions, and also indicated a trend (P = .08) toward learning retention resulting in improvement from practice to test sessions. The performance accuracy showed a 15% mean score improvement and more than a 50% reduction in standard deviation from practice to test. It showed evidence (P = .04) of performance accuracy improvement from practice to test session.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0148-396X</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>NRSRDY</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Neurosurgery</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>69</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>3</s2>
<s3>SUP</s3>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Learning Retention of Thoracic Pedicle Screw Placement Using a High-Resolution Augmented Reality Simulator With Haptic Feedback</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>LUCIANO (Cristian J.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>BANERJEE (P. Pat)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>BELLOTTE (Brad)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>MICHAEL (G.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1"><s1>LEMOLE (Michael JR)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="06" i2="1"><s1>CHARBEL (Fady T.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="07" i2="1"><s1>ROITBERG (Ben)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago</s1>
<s2>Chicago, Illinois</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Computer Science, College of Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago</s1>
<s2>Chicago, Illinois</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Bioengineering, College of Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago</s1>
<s2>Chicago, Illinois</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="04"><s1>Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny General Hospital</s1>
<s2>Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="05"><s1>Division of Neurosurgery, University of Arizona</s1>
<s2>Tucson, Arizona</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="06"><s1>Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago</s1>
<s2>Chicago, Illinois</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="07"><s1>Division of Neurosurgery, University of Chicago</s1>
<s2>Chicago, Illinois</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>14-19</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2011</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>18396</s2>
<s5>354000500133000030</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2011 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>3 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>11-0381804</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Neurosurgery</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>BACKGROUND: We evaluated the use of a part-task simulator with 3D and haptic feedback as a training tool for a common neurosurgical procedure - placement of thoracic pedicle screws. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the learning retention of thoracic pedicle screw placement on a high-performance augmented reality and haptic technology workstation. METHODS: Fifty-one fellows and residents performed thoracic pedicle screw placement on the simulator. The virtual screws were drilled into a virtual patient's thoracic spine derived from a computed tomography data set of a real patient. RESULTS: With a 12.5% failure rate, a 2-proportion ztest yielded P=.08. For performance accuracy, an aggregate Euclidean distance deviation from entry landmark on the pedicle and a similar deviation from the target landmark in the vertebral body yielded P = .04 from a 2-sample t test in which the rejected null hypothesis assumes no improvement in performance accuracy from the practice to the test sessions, and the alternative hypothesis assumes an improvement. CONCLUSION: The performance accuracy on the simulator was comparable to the accuracy reported in literature on recent retrospective evaluation of such placements. The failure rates indicated a minor drop from practice to test sessions, and also indicated a trend (P = .08) toward learning retention resulting in improvement from practice to test sessions. The performance accuracy showed a 15% mean score improvement and more than a 50% reduction in standard deviation from practice to test. It showed evidence (P = .04) of performance accuracy improvement from practice to test session.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B25J</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Pathologie du   système nerveux</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Nervous system diseases</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Sistema nervioso patología</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Apprentissage</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Learning</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Aprendizaje</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Vis</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Screw</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Tornillo</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Haute résolution</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>High resolution</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Alta resolucion</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Réalité augmentée</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Augmented reality</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Realidad aumentada</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Simulateur</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Simulator</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Simulador</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Boucle réaction</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Feedback</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Retroalimentación</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Chirurgie</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Surgery</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cirugía</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Simulation</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Simulation</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Simulación</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Réalité virtuelle</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Virtual reality</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Realidad virtual</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21><s1>262</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 11-0381804 INIST</NO>
<ET>Learning Retention of Thoracic Pedicle Screw Placement Using a High-Resolution Augmented Reality Simulator With Haptic Feedback</ET>
<AU>LUCIANO (Cristian J.); BANERJEE (P. Pat); BELLOTTE (Brad); MICHAEL (G.); LEMOLE (Michael JR); CHARBEL (Fady T.); ROITBERG (Ben)</AU>
<AF>Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago/Chicago, Illinois/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut.); Department of Computer Science, College of Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago/Chicago, Illinois/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut.); Department of Bioengineering, College of Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago/Chicago, Illinois/Etats-Unis (2 aut.); Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny General Hospital/Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania/Etats-Unis (3 aut., 4 aut.); Division of Neurosurgery, University of Arizona/Tucson, Arizona/Etats-Unis (5 aut.); Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago/Chicago, Illinois/Etats-Unis (6 aut.); Division of Neurosurgery, University of Chicago/Chicago, Illinois/Etats-Unis (7 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Neurosurgery; ISSN 0148-396X; Coden NRSRDY; Etats-Unis; Da. 2011; Vol. 69; No. 3 SUP; Pp. 14-19; Bibl. 3 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>BACKGROUND: We evaluated the use of a part-task simulator with 3D and haptic feedback as a training tool for a common neurosurgical procedure - placement of thoracic pedicle screws. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the learning retention of thoracic pedicle screw placement on a high-performance augmented reality and haptic technology workstation. METHODS: Fifty-one fellows and residents performed thoracic pedicle screw placement on the simulator. The virtual screws were drilled into a virtual patient's thoracic spine derived from a computed tomography data set of a real patient. RESULTS: With a 12.5% failure rate, a 2-proportion ztest yielded P=.08. For performance accuracy, an aggregate Euclidean distance deviation from entry landmark on the pedicle and a similar deviation from the target landmark in the vertebral body yielded P = .04 from a 2-sample t test in which the rejected null hypothesis assumes no improvement in performance accuracy from the practice to the test sessions, and the alternative hypothesis assumes an improvement. CONCLUSION: The performance accuracy on the simulator was comparable to the accuracy reported in literature on recent retrospective evaluation of such placements. The failure rates indicated a minor drop from practice to test sessions, and also indicated a trend (P = .08) toward learning retention resulting in improvement from practice to test sessions. The performance accuracy showed a 15% mean score improvement and more than a 50% reduction in standard deviation from practice to test. It showed evidence (P = .04) of performance accuracy improvement from practice to test session.</EA>
<CC>002B25J</CC>
<FD>Pathologie du   système nerveux; Apprentissage; Vis; Haute résolution; Réalité augmentée; Simulateur; Boucle réaction; Chirurgie; Simulation; Réalité virtuelle</FD>
<ED>Nervous system diseases; Learning; Screw; High resolution; Augmented reality; Simulator; Feedback; Surgery; Simulation; Virtual reality</ED>
<SD>Sistema nervioso patología; Aprendizaje; Tornillo; Alta resolucion; Realidad aumentada; Simulador; Retroalimentación; Cirugía; Simulación; Realidad virtual</SD>
<LO>INIST-18396.354000500133000030</LO>
<ID>11-0381804</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000458 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000458 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:11-0381804
   |texte=   Learning Retention of Thoracic Pedicle Screw Placement Using a High-Resolution Augmented Reality Simulator With Haptic Feedback
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024

	Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Learning Retention of Thoracic Pedicle Screw Placement Using a High-Resolution Augmented Reality Simulator With Haptic Feedback

Learning Retention of Thoracic Pedicle Screw Placement Using a High-Resolution Augmented Reality Simulator With Haptic Feedback

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri