Tactile and visual perception during polishing: An ethnoarchaeological study in India (Mahabalipuram, Tamil Nadu)
Identifieur interne :
000182 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus );
précédent :
000181;
suivant :
000183
Tactile and visual perception during polishing: An ethnoarchaeological study in India (Mahabalipuram, Tamil Nadu)
Auteurs : H. Procopiou ;
E. Morero ;
R. Vargiolu ;
M. Suarez-Sanabria ;
H. ZahouaniSource :
-
Wear [ 0043-1648 ] ; 2013.
RBID : Pascal:13-0280544
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
- Polissage,
Topographie surface,
Méthode échelle multiple,
Transformation ondelette,
Essai usure,
Texture surface,
Surface lisse,
Rugosité,
Pierre,
Archéologie,
Sensibilité tactile,
Perception visuelle.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Multiscale method,
Polishing,
Smooth surface,
Stone,
Surface topography,
Tactile sensitivity,
Visual perception,
Wear test,
archaeology,
roughness,
surface textures,
wavelet transformation.
Abstract
Stone polishing techniques, a deep reaching technical innovation, appeared in the Eastern Mediterranean during the Neolithic period and were generalised during the Bronze Age. Our team wanted to find out what specific techniques were employed but also which criteria were applied by prehistoric craftsmen to evaluate polished surfaces. Ethnographic data suggested that craftsmen used visual and haptic criteria during polishing and that apprenticeship required highly developed sensory abilities. In order to analyse these abilities, we studied traditional stone polishing at Mahabalipuram (India, Tamil Nadu) and observed, as craftsmen pointed out to us, that the more skilful ones "measure with their hands". The surface topography of polished samples was measured with an interferometer and a confocal rugosimeter. Polish has been identified by a multi-scale analysis based on the 2D method of continuous wavelets transform (CWT). Finally, the research team considered the sensorial perception of the polish by using an "haptic tribometer". Using this methodology we were able to show that technical choices occurring are closely related to the colour and the texture of the surface desired, for aesthetic reasons. Coming back to the archaeological record, our team was able to identify similar types of polish: some workshops (Egypt) produced mainly smooth and mat surfaces, some others (Crete) rougher but more shiny ones. This variability suggests cultural influence on the perception of surfaces within the prehistoric eastern Mediterranean.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
| pA |
| A01 | 01 | 1 | | @0 0043-1648 |
|---|
| A02 | 01 | | | @0 WEARAH |
|---|
| A03 | | 1 | | @0 Wear |
|---|
| A05 | | | | @2 301 |
|---|
| A06 | | | | @2 1-2 |
|---|
| A08 | 01 | 1 | ENG | @1 Tactile and visual perception during polishing: An ethnoarchaeological study in India (Mahabalipuram, Tamil Nadu) |
|---|
| A09 | 01 | 1 | ENG | @1 19th Internatinal Conference on Wear of Materials |
|---|
| A11 | 01 | 1 | | @1 PROCOPIOU (H.) |
|---|
| A11 | 02 | 1 | | @1 MORERO (E.) |
|---|
| A11 | 03 | 1 | | @1 VARGIOLU (R.) |
|---|
| A11 | 04 | 1 | | @1 SUAREZ-SANABRIA (M.) |
|---|
| A11 | 05 | 1 | | @1 ZAHOUANI (H.) |
|---|
| A12 | 01 | 1 | | @1 BLAU (Peter J.) @9 ed. |
|---|
| A14 | 01 | | | @1 Protohistoire Egéenne, Université de Paris 1/Panthéon-Sorbonne, UMR CNRS 7041 (ArScAn) @3 FRA @Z 1 aut. |
|---|
| A14 | 02 | | | @1 Research Laboratory for Archaeology and History of Art @2 Oxford @3 GBR @Z 2 aut. |
|---|
| A14 | 03 | | | @1 Laboratoire de Tribologie et Dynamique des Systèmes, UMR CNRS 5513, Université de Lyon, École Centrale de Lyon, Ecole Nationale d'lngénieurs de St Etienne @3 FRA @Z 3 aut. @Z 4 aut. @Z 5 aut. |
|---|
| A15 | 01 | | | @1 Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TN @3 USA @Z 1 aut. |
|---|
| A20 | | | | @1 144-149 |
|---|
| A21 | | | | @1 2013 |
|---|
| A23 | 01 | | | @0 ENG |
|---|
| A43 | 01 | | | @1 INIST @2 8579 @5 354000503629540210 |
|---|
| A44 | | | | @0 0000 @1 © 2013 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved. |
|---|
| A45 | | | | @0 27 ref. |
|---|
| A47 | 01 | 1 | | @0 13-0280544 |
|---|
| A60 | | | | @1 P @2 C |
|---|
| A61 | | | | @0 A |
|---|
| A64 | 01 | 1 | | @0 Wear |
|---|
| A66 | 01 | | | @0 NLD |
|---|
| C01 | 01 | | ENG | @0 Stone polishing techniques, a deep reaching technical innovation, appeared in the Eastern Mediterranean during the Neolithic period and were generalised during the Bronze Age. Our team wanted to find out what specific techniques were employed but also which criteria were applied by prehistoric craftsmen to evaluate polished surfaces. Ethnographic data suggested that craftsmen used visual and haptic criteria during polishing and that apprenticeship required highly developed sensory abilities. In order to analyse these abilities, we studied traditional stone polishing at Mahabalipuram (India, Tamil Nadu) and observed, as craftsmen pointed out to us, that the more skilful ones "measure with their hands". The surface topography of polished samples was measured with an interferometer and a confocal rugosimeter. Polish has been identified by a multi-scale analysis based on the 2D method of continuous wavelets transform (CWT). Finally, the research team considered the sensorial perception of the polish by using an "haptic tribometer". Using this methodology we were able to show that technical choices occurring are closely related to the colour and the texture of the surface desired, for aesthetic reasons. Coming back to the archaeological record, our team was able to identify similar types of polish: some workshops (Egypt) produced mainly smooth and mat surfaces, some others (Crete) rougher but more shiny ones. This variability suggests cultural influence on the perception of surfaces within the prehistoric eastern Mediterranean. |
|---|
| C02 | 01 | 2 | | @0 001E01 |
|---|
| C02 | 02 | 2 | | @0 220 |
|---|
| C03 | 01 | X | FRE | @0 Polissage @5 02 |
|---|
| C03 | 01 | X | ENG | @0 Polishing @5 02 |
|---|
| C03 | 01 | X | SPA | @0 Pulimiento @5 02 |
|---|
| C03 | 02 | 3 | FRE | @0 Topographie surface @5 03 |
|---|
| C03 | 02 | 3 | ENG | @0 Surface topography @5 03 |
|---|
| C03 | 03 | X | FRE | @0 Méthode échelle multiple @5 04 |
|---|
| C03 | 03 | X | ENG | @0 Multiscale method @5 04 |
|---|
| C03 | 03 | X | SPA | @0 Método escala múltiple @5 04 |
|---|
| C03 | 04 | 2 | FRE | @0 Transformation ondelette @5 05 |
|---|
| C03 | 04 | 2 | ENG | @0 wavelet transformation @5 05 |
|---|
| C03 | 05 | X | FRE | @0 Essai usure @5 06 |
|---|
| C03 | 05 | X | ENG | @0 Wear test @5 06 |
|---|
| C03 | 05 | X | SPA | @0 Prueba al desgaste @5 06 |
|---|
| C03 | 06 | 2 | FRE | @0 Texture surface @5 08 |
|---|
| C03 | 06 | 2 | ENG | @0 surface textures @5 08 |
|---|
| C03 | 07 | X | FRE | @0 Surface lisse @5 09 |
|---|
| C03 | 07 | X | ENG | @0 Smooth surface @5 09 |
|---|
| C03 | 07 | X | SPA | @0 Superficie lisa @5 09 |
|---|
| C03 | 08 | 2 | FRE | @0 Rugosité @5 10 |
|---|
| C03 | 08 | 2 | ENG | @0 roughness @5 10 |
|---|
| C03 | 08 | 2 | SPA | @0 Rugosidad @5 10 |
|---|
| C03 | 09 | X | FRE | @0 Pierre @5 11 |
|---|
| C03 | 09 | X | ENG | @0 Stone @5 11 |
|---|
| C03 | 09 | X | SPA | @0 Piedra @5 11 |
|---|
| C03 | 10 | 2 | FRE | @0 Archéologie @5 12 |
|---|
| C03 | 10 | 2 | ENG | @0 archaeology @5 12 |
|---|
| C03 | 10 | 2 | SPA | @0 Arqueología @5 12 |
|---|
| C03 | 11 | X | FRE | @0 Sensibilité tactile @5 13 |
|---|
| C03 | 11 | X | ENG | @0 Tactile sensitivity @5 13 |
|---|
| C03 | 11 | X | SPA | @0 Sensibilidad tactil @5 13 |
|---|
| C03 | 12 | X | FRE | @0 Perception visuelle @5 14 |
|---|
| C03 | 12 | X | ENG | @0 Visual perception @5 14 |
|---|
| C03 | 12 | X | SPA | @0 Percepción visual @5 14 |
|---|
| N21 | | | | @1 266 |
|---|
|
|---|
| pR |
| A30 | 01 | 1 | ENG | @1 WOM Internatinal Conference on Wear of Materials @2 19 @3 Portland, Oregon USA @4 2013-04-14 |
|---|
|
|---|
Format Inist (serveur)
| NO : | PASCAL 13-0280544 INIST |
|---|
| ET : | Tactile and visual perception during polishing: An ethnoarchaeological study in India (Mahabalipuram, Tamil Nadu) |
|---|
| AU : | PROCOPIOU (H.); MORERO (E.); VARGIOLU (R.); SUAREZ-SANABRIA (M.); ZAHOUANI (H.); BLAU (Peter J.) |
|---|
| AF : | Protohistoire Egéenne, Université de Paris 1/Panthéon-Sorbonne, UMR CNRS 7041 (ArScAn)/France (1 aut.); Research Laboratory for Archaeology and History of Art/Oxford/Royaume-Uni (2 aut.); Laboratoire de Tribologie et Dynamique des Systèmes, UMR CNRS 5513, Université de Lyon, École Centrale de Lyon, Ecole Nationale d'lngénieurs de St Etienne/France (3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut.); Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TN/Etats-Unis (1 aut.) |
|---|
| DT : | Publication en série; Congrès; Niveau analytique |
|---|
| SO : | Wear; ISSN 0043-1648; Coden WEARAH; Pays-Bas; Da. 2013; Vol. 301; No. 1-2; Pp. 144-149; Bibl. 27 ref. |
|---|
| LA : | Anglais |
|---|
| EA : | Stone polishing techniques, a deep reaching technical innovation, appeared in the Eastern Mediterranean during the Neolithic period and were generalised during the Bronze Age. Our team wanted to find out what specific techniques were employed but also which criteria were applied by prehistoric craftsmen to evaluate polished surfaces. Ethnographic data suggested that craftsmen used visual and haptic criteria during polishing and that apprenticeship required highly developed sensory abilities. In order to analyse these abilities, we studied traditional stone polishing at Mahabalipuram (India, Tamil Nadu) and observed, as craftsmen pointed out to us, that the more skilful ones "measure with their hands". The surface topography of polished samples was measured with an interferometer and a confocal rugosimeter. Polish has been identified by a multi-scale analysis based on the 2D method of continuous wavelets transform (CWT). Finally, the research team considered the sensorial perception of the polish by using an "haptic tribometer". Using this methodology we were able to show that technical choices occurring are closely related to the colour and the texture of the surface desired, for aesthetic reasons. Coming back to the archaeological record, our team was able to identify similar types of polish: some workshops (Egypt) produced mainly smooth and mat surfaces, some others (Crete) rougher but more shiny ones. This variability suggests cultural influence on the perception of surfaces within the prehistoric eastern Mediterranean. |
|---|
| CC : | 001E01; 220 |
|---|
| FD : | Polissage; Topographie surface; Méthode échelle multiple; Transformation ondelette; Essai usure; Texture surface; Surface lisse; Rugosité; Pierre; Archéologie; Sensibilité tactile; Perception visuelle |
|---|
| ED : | Polishing; Surface topography; Multiscale method; wavelet transformation; Wear test; surface textures; Smooth surface; roughness; Stone; archaeology; Tactile sensitivity; Visual perception |
|---|
| SD : | Pulimiento; Método escala múltiple; Prueba al desgaste; Superficie lisa; Rugosidad; Piedra; Arqueología; Sensibilidad tactil; Percepción visual |
|---|
| LO : | INIST-8579.354000503629540210 |
|---|
| ID : | 13-0280544 |
|---|
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:13-0280544
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Tactile and visual perception during polishing: An ethnoarchaeological study in India (Mahabalipuram, Tamil Nadu)</title>
<author><name sortKey="Procopiou, H" sort="Procopiou, H" uniqKey="Procopiou H" first="H." last="Procopiou">H. Procopiou</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Protohistoire Egéenne, Université de Paris 1/Panthéon-Sorbonne, UMR CNRS 7041 (ArScAn)</s1>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14><author><name sortKey="Morero, E" sort="Morero, E" uniqKey="Morero E" first="E." last="Morero">E. Morero</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Research Laboratory for Archaeology and History of Art</s1>
<s2>Oxford</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14><author><name sortKey="Vargiolu, R" sort="Vargiolu, R" uniqKey="Vargiolu R" first="R." last="Vargiolu">R. Vargiolu</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Laboratoire de Tribologie et Dynamique des Systèmes, UMR CNRS 5513, Université de Lyon, École Centrale de Lyon, Ecole Nationale d'lngénieurs de St Etienne</s1>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14><author><name sortKey="Suarez Sanabria, M" sort="Suarez Sanabria, M" uniqKey="Suarez Sanabria M" first="M." last="Suarez-Sanabria">M. Suarez-Sanabria</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Laboratoire de Tribologie et Dynamique des Systèmes, UMR CNRS 5513, Université de Lyon, École Centrale de Lyon, Ecole Nationale d'lngénieurs de St Etienne</s1>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14><author><name sortKey="Zahouani, H" sort="Zahouani, H" uniqKey="Zahouani H" first="H." last="Zahouani">H. Zahouani</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Laboratoire de Tribologie et Dynamique des Systèmes, UMR CNRS 5513, Université de Lyon, École Centrale de Lyon, Ecole Nationale d'lngénieurs de St Etienne</s1>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">13-0280544</idno>
<date when="2013">2013</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 13-0280544 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:13-0280544</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000182</idno>
</publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Tactile and visual perception during polishing: An ethnoarchaeological study in India (Mahabalipuram, Tamil Nadu)</title>
<author><name sortKey="Procopiou, H" sort="Procopiou, H" uniqKey="Procopiou H" first="H." last="Procopiou">H. Procopiou</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Protohistoire Egéenne, Université de Paris 1/Panthéon-Sorbonne, UMR CNRS 7041 (ArScAn)</s1>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14><author><name sortKey="Morero, E" sort="Morero, E" uniqKey="Morero E" first="E." last="Morero">E. Morero</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Research Laboratory for Archaeology and History of Art</s1>
<s2>Oxford</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14><author><name sortKey="Vargiolu, R" sort="Vargiolu, R" uniqKey="Vargiolu R" first="R." last="Vargiolu">R. Vargiolu</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Laboratoire de Tribologie et Dynamique des Systèmes, UMR CNRS 5513, Université de Lyon, École Centrale de Lyon, Ecole Nationale d'lngénieurs de St Etienne</s1>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14><author><name sortKey="Suarez Sanabria, M" sort="Suarez Sanabria, M" uniqKey="Suarez Sanabria M" first="M." last="Suarez-Sanabria">M. Suarez-Sanabria</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Laboratoire de Tribologie et Dynamique des Systèmes, UMR CNRS 5513, Université de Lyon, École Centrale de Lyon, Ecole Nationale d'lngénieurs de St Etienne</s1>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14><author><name sortKey="Zahouani, H" sort="Zahouani, H" uniqKey="Zahouani H" first="H." last="Zahouani">H. Zahouani</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Laboratoire de Tribologie et Dynamique des Systèmes, UMR CNRS 5513, Université de Lyon, École Centrale de Lyon, Ecole Nationale d'lngénieurs de St Etienne</s1>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14><series><title level="j" type="main">Wear</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Wear</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0043-1648</idno>
<imprint><date when="2013">2013</date>
</imprint><seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Wear</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Wear</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0043-1648</idno>
</seriesStmt><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Multiscale method</term>
<term>Polishing</term>
<term>Smooth surface</term>
<term>Stone</term>
<term>Surface topography</term>
<term>Tactile sensitivity</term>
<term>Visual perception</term>
<term>Wear test</term>
<term>archaeology</term>
<term>roughness</term>
<term>surface textures</term>
<term>wavelet transformation</term>
</keywords><keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Polissage</term>
<term>Topographie surface</term>
<term>Méthode échelle multiple</term>
<term>Transformation ondelette</term>
<term>Essai usure</term>
<term>Texture surface</term>
<term>Surface lisse</term>
<term>Rugosité</term>
<term>Pierre</term>
<term>Archéologie</term>
<term>Sensibilité tactile</term>
<term>Perception visuelle</term>
</keywords><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Stone polishing techniques, a deep reaching technical innovation, appeared in the Eastern Mediterranean during the Neolithic period and were generalised during the Bronze Age. Our team wanted to find out what specific techniques were employed but also which criteria were applied by prehistoric craftsmen to evaluate polished surfaces. Ethnographic data suggested that craftsmen used visual and haptic criteria during polishing and that apprenticeship required highly developed sensory abilities. In order to analyse these abilities, we studied traditional stone polishing at Mahabalipuram (India, Tamil Nadu) and observed, as craftsmen pointed out to us, that the more skilful ones "measure with their hands". The surface topography of polished samples was measured with an interferometer and a confocal rugosimeter. Polish has been identified by a multi-scale analysis based on the 2D method of continuous wavelets transform (CWT). Finally, the research team considered the sensorial perception of the polish by using an "haptic tribometer". Using this methodology we were able to show that technical choices occurring are closely related to the colour and the texture of the surface desired, for aesthetic reasons. Coming back to the archaeological record, our team was able to identify similar types of polish: some workshops (Egypt) produced mainly smooth and mat surfaces, some others (Crete) rougher but more shiny ones. This variability suggests cultural influence on the perception of surfaces within the prehistoric eastern Mediterranean.</div>
</front><inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0043-1648</s0>
</fA01><fA02 i1="01"><s0>WEARAH</s0>
</fA02><fA03 i2="1"><s0>Wear</s0>
</fA03><fA05><s2>301</s2>
</fA05><fA06><s2>1-2</s2>
</fA06><fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Tactile and visual perception during polishing: An ethnoarchaeological study in India (Mahabalipuram, Tamil Nadu)</s1>
</fA08><fA09 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>19th Internatinal Conference on Wear of Materials</s1>
</fA09><fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>PROCOPIOU (H.)</s1>
</fA11><fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>MORERO (E.)</s1>
</fA11><fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>VARGIOLU (R.)</s1>
</fA11><fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>SUAREZ-SANABRIA (M.)</s1>
</fA11><fA11 i1="05" i2="1"><s1>ZAHOUANI (H.)</s1>
</fA11><fA12 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>BLAU (Peter J.)</s1>
<s9>ed.</s9>
</fA12><fA14 i1="01"><s1>Protohistoire Egéenne, Université de Paris 1/Panthéon-Sorbonne, UMR CNRS 7041 (ArScAn)</s1>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14><fA14 i1="02"><s1>Research Laboratory for Archaeology and History of Art</s1>
<s2>Oxford</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14><fA14 i1="03"><s1>Laboratoire de Tribologie et Dynamique des Systèmes, UMR CNRS 5513, Université de Lyon, École Centrale de Lyon, Ecole Nationale d'lngénieurs de St Etienne</s1>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</fA14><fA15 i1="01"><s1>Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TN</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA15><fA20><s1>144-149</s1>
</fA20><fA21><s1>2013</s1>
</fA21><fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23><fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>8579</s2>
<s5>354000503629540210</s5>
</fA43><fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2013 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44><fA45><s0>27 ref.</s0>
</fA45><fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>13-0280544</s0>
</fA47><fA60><s1>P</s1>
<s2>C</s2>
</fA60><fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Wear</s0>
</fA64><fA66 i1="01"><s0>NLD</s0>
</fA66><fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Stone polishing techniques, a deep reaching technical innovation, appeared in the Eastern Mediterranean during the Neolithic period and were generalised during the Bronze Age. Our team wanted to find out what specific techniques were employed but also which criteria were applied by prehistoric craftsmen to evaluate polished surfaces. Ethnographic data suggested that craftsmen used visual and haptic criteria during polishing and that apprenticeship required highly developed sensory abilities. In order to analyse these abilities, we studied traditional stone polishing at Mahabalipuram (India, Tamil Nadu) and observed, as craftsmen pointed out to us, that the more skilful ones "measure with their hands". The surface topography of polished samples was measured with an interferometer and a confocal rugosimeter. Polish has been identified by a multi-scale analysis based on the 2D method of continuous wavelets transform (CWT). Finally, the research team considered the sensorial perception of the polish by using an "haptic tribometer". Using this methodology we were able to show that technical choices occurring are closely related to the colour and the texture of the surface desired, for aesthetic reasons. Coming back to the archaeological record, our team was able to identify similar types of polish: some workshops (Egypt) produced mainly smooth and mat surfaces, some others (Crete) rougher but more shiny ones. This variability suggests cultural influence on the perception of surfaces within the prehistoric eastern Mediterranean.</s0>
</fC01><fC02 i1="01" i2="2"><s0>001E01</s0>
</fC02><fC02 i1="02" i2="2"><s0>220</s0>
</fC02><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Polissage</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Polishing</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Pulimiento</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="3" l="FRE"><s0>Topographie surface</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="3" l="ENG"><s0>Surface topography</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Méthode échelle multiple</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Multiscale method</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Método escala múltiple</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="2" l="FRE"><s0>Transformation ondelette</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="2" l="ENG"><s0>wavelet transformation</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Essai usure</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Wear test</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Prueba al desgaste</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="2" l="FRE"><s0>Texture surface</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="2" l="ENG"><s0>surface textures</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Surface lisse</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Smooth surface</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Superficie lisa</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="2" l="FRE"><s0>Rugosité</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="2" l="ENG"><s0>roughness</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="2" l="SPA"><s0>Rugosidad</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Pierre</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Stone</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Piedra</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="10" i2="2" l="FRE"><s0>Archéologie</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="10" i2="2" l="ENG"><s0>archaeology</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="10" i2="2" l="SPA"><s0>Arqueología</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Sensibilité tactile</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Tactile sensitivity</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Sensibilidad tactil</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Perception visuelle</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Visual perception</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Percepción visual</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03><fN21><s1>266</s1>
</fN21><pR><fA30 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>WOM Internatinal Conference on Wear of Materials</s1>
<s2>19</s2>
<s3>Portland, Oregon USA</s3>
<s4>2013-04-14</s4>
</fA30><server><NO>PASCAL 13-0280544 INIST</NO>
<ET>Tactile and visual perception during polishing: An ethnoarchaeological study in India (Mahabalipuram, Tamil Nadu)</ET>
<AU>PROCOPIOU (H.); MORERO (E.); VARGIOLU (R.); SUAREZ-SANABRIA (M.); ZAHOUANI (H.); BLAU (Peter J.)</AU>
<AF>Protohistoire Egéenne, Université de Paris 1/Panthéon-Sorbonne, UMR CNRS 7041 (ArScAn)/France (1 aut.); Research Laboratory for Archaeology and History of Art/Oxford/Royaume-Uni (2 aut.); Laboratoire de Tribologie et Dynamique des Systèmes, UMR CNRS 5513, Université de Lyon, École Centrale de Lyon, Ecole Nationale d'lngénieurs de St Etienne/France (3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut.); Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TN/Etats-Unis (1 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Congrès; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Wear; ISSN 0043-1648; Coden WEARAH; Pays-Bas; Da. 2013; Vol. 301; No. 1-2; Pp. 144-149; Bibl. 27 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Stone polishing techniques, a deep reaching technical innovation, appeared in the Eastern Mediterranean during the Neolithic period and were generalised during the Bronze Age. Our team wanted to find out what specific techniques were employed but also which criteria were applied by prehistoric craftsmen to evaluate polished surfaces. Ethnographic data suggested that craftsmen used visual and haptic criteria during polishing and that apprenticeship required highly developed sensory abilities. In order to analyse these abilities, we studied traditional stone polishing at Mahabalipuram (India, Tamil Nadu) and observed, as craftsmen pointed out to us, that the more skilful ones "measure with their hands". The surface topography of polished samples was measured with an interferometer and a confocal rugosimeter. Polish has been identified by a multi-scale analysis based on the 2D method of continuous wavelets transform (CWT). Finally, the research team considered the sensorial perception of the polish by using an "haptic tribometer". Using this methodology we were able to show that technical choices occurring are closely related to the colour and the texture of the surface desired, for aesthetic reasons. Coming back to the archaeological record, our team was able to identify similar types of polish: some workshops (Egypt) produced mainly smooth and mat surfaces, some others (Crete) rougher but more shiny ones. This variability suggests cultural influence on the perception of surfaces within the prehistoric eastern Mediterranean.</EA>
<CC>001E01; 220</CC>
<FD>Polissage; Topographie surface; Méthode échelle multiple; Transformation ondelette; Essai usure; Texture surface; Surface lisse; Rugosité; Pierre; Archéologie; Sensibilité tactile; Perception visuelle</FD>
<ED>Polishing; Surface topography; Multiscale method; wavelet transformation; Wear test; surface textures; Smooth surface; roughness; Stone; archaeology; Tactile sensitivity; Visual perception</ED>
<SD>Pulimiento; Método escala múltiple; Prueba al desgaste; Superficie lisa; Rugosidad; Piedra; Arqueología; Sensibilidad tactil; Percepción visual</SD>
<LO>INIST-8579.354000503629540210</LO>
<ID>13-0280544</ID>
</server>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000182 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000182 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PascalFrancis
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= Pascal:13-0280544
|texte= Tactile and visual perception during polishing: An ethnoarchaeological study in India (Mahabalipuram, Tamil Nadu)
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024 |  |
