Calibration Is Both Functional and Anatomical
Identifieur interne : 000087 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000086; suivant : 000088Calibration Is Both Functional and Anatomical
Auteurs : Geoffrey P. Bingham ; Jing S. Pan ; Mark A. Mon-WilliamsSource :
- Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance [ 0096-1523 ] ; 2014.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Bingham and Pagano (1998) described calibration as a mapping from embodied perceptual units to an embodied action unit and suggested that it is an inherent component of perception/action that yields accurate targeted actions. We tested two predictions of this "Mapping Theory." First, calibration should transfer between limbs, because it involves a mapping from perceptual units to an action unit, and thus is functionally specific to the action (Pan, Coats, and Bingham, 2014). We used distorted haptic feedback to calibrate feedforward right hand reaches and tested right and left hand reaches after calibration. The calibration transferred. Second, the Mapping Theory predicts that limb specific calibration should be possible because the units are embodied and anatomy contributes to their scaling. Limbs must be calibrated to one another given potential anatomical differences among limbs. We used distorted haptic feedback to calibrate feedforward reaches with right and left arms simultaneously in opposite directions relative to a visually specified target. Reaches tested after calibration revealed reliable limb specific calibration. Both predictions were confirmed. This resolves a prevailing controversy as to whether calibration is functional (Bruggeman & Warren, 2010; Rieser, Pick, Ashmead, & Garing, 1995) or anatomical (Durgin et al., 2003; Durgin & Pelah, 1999). Necessarily, it is both.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
pA |
|
---|
Format Inist (serveur)
NO : | PASCAL 14-0071360 INIST |
---|---|
ET : | Calibration Is Both Functional and Anatomical |
AU : | BINGHAM (Geoffrey P.); PAN (Jing S.); MON-WILLIAMS (Mark A.) |
AF : | Indiana University/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut.); University of Leeds/Royaume-Uni (3 aut.) |
DT : | Publication en série; Compte-rendu; Niveau analytique |
SO : | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance; ISSN 0096-1523; Coden JPHPDH; Etats-Unis; Da. 2014; Vol. 40; No. 1; Pp. 61-70; Bibl. 3/4 p. |
LA : | Anglais |
EA : | Bingham and Pagano (1998) described calibration as a mapping from embodied perceptual units to an embodied action unit and suggested that it is an inherent component of perception/action that yields accurate targeted actions. We tested two predictions of this "Mapping Theory." First, calibration should transfer between limbs, because it involves a mapping from perceptual units to an action unit, and thus is functionally specific to the action (Pan, Coats, and Bingham, 2014). We used distorted haptic feedback to calibrate feedforward right hand reaches and tested right and left hand reaches after calibration. The calibration transferred. Second, the Mapping Theory predicts that limb specific calibration should be possible because the units are embodied and anatomy contributes to their scaling. Limbs must be calibrated to one another given potential anatomical differences among limbs. We used distorted haptic feedback to calibrate feedforward reaches with right and left arms simultaneously in opposite directions relative to a visually specified target. Reaches tested after calibration revealed reliable limb specific calibration. Both predictions were confirmed. This resolves a prevailing controversy as to whether calibration is functional (Bruggeman & Warren, 2010; Rieser, Pick, Ashmead, & Garing, 1995) or anatomical (Durgin et al., 2003; Durgin & Pelah, 1999). Necessarily, it is both. |
CC : | 002A26D04 |
FD : | Etalonnage; Adaptation; Incarnation; Perception espace; Motricité; Mouvement orienté; Etude expérimentale; Vision; Homme |
FG : | Cognition; Perception |
ED : | Calibration; Adaptation; Embodiment; Space perception; Motricity; Goal directed movement; Experimental study; Vision; Human |
EG : | Cognition; Perception |
SD : | Contraste; Adaptación; Encarnación; Percepción espacio; Motricidad; Movimiento orientado; Estudio experimental; Visión; Hombre |
LO : | INIST-3032D.354000505770150080 |
ID : | 14-0071360 |
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:14-0071360Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Calibration Is Both Functional and Anatomical</title>
<author><name sortKey="Bingham, Geoffrey P" sort="Bingham, Geoffrey P" uniqKey="Bingham G" first="Geoffrey P." last="Bingham">Geoffrey P. Bingham</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Indiana University</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Pan, Jing S" sort="Pan, Jing S" uniqKey="Pan J" first="Jing S." last="Pan">Jing S. Pan</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Indiana University</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Mon Williams, Mark A" sort="Mon Williams, Mark A" uniqKey="Mon Williams M" first="Mark A." last="Mon-Williams">Mark A. Mon-Williams</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>University of Leeds</s1>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">14-0071360</idno>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 14-0071360 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:14-0071360</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000087</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Calibration Is Both Functional and Anatomical</title>
<author><name sortKey="Bingham, Geoffrey P" sort="Bingham, Geoffrey P" uniqKey="Bingham G" first="Geoffrey P." last="Bingham">Geoffrey P. Bingham</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Indiana University</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Pan, Jing S" sort="Pan, Jing S" uniqKey="Pan J" first="Jing S." last="Pan">Jing S. Pan</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Indiana University</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Mon Williams, Mark A" sort="Mon Williams, Mark A" uniqKey="Mon Williams M" first="Mark A." last="Mon-Williams">Mark A. Mon-Williams</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>University of Leeds</s1>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. exp. psychol. Hum. percept. perform.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0096-1523</idno>
<imprint><date when="2014">2014</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. exp. psychol. Hum. percept. perform.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0096-1523</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adaptation</term>
<term>Calibration</term>
<term>Embodiment</term>
<term>Experimental study</term>
<term>Goal directed movement</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Motricity</term>
<term>Space perception</term>
<term>Vision</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Etalonnage</term>
<term>Adaptation</term>
<term>Incarnation</term>
<term>Perception espace</term>
<term>Motricité</term>
<term>Mouvement orienté</term>
<term>Etude expérimentale</term>
<term>Vision</term>
<term>Homme</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Bingham and Pagano (1998) described calibration as a mapping from embodied perceptual units to an embodied action unit and suggested that it is an inherent component of perception/action that yields accurate targeted actions. We tested two predictions of this "Mapping Theory." First, calibration should transfer between limbs, because it involves a mapping from perceptual units to an action unit, and thus is functionally specific to the action (Pan, Coats, and Bingham, 2014). We used distorted haptic feedback to calibrate feedforward right hand reaches and tested right and left hand reaches after calibration. The calibration transferred. Second, the Mapping Theory predicts that limb specific calibration should be possible because the units are embodied and anatomy contributes to their scaling. Limbs must be calibrated to one another given potential anatomical differences among limbs. We used distorted haptic feedback to calibrate feedforward reaches with right and left arms simultaneously in opposite directions relative to a visually specified target. Reaches tested after calibration revealed reliable limb specific calibration. Both predictions were confirmed. This resolves a prevailing controversy as to whether calibration is functional (Bruggeman & Warren, 2010; Rieser, Pick, Ashmead, & Garing, 1995) or anatomical (Durgin et al., 2003; Durgin & Pelah, 1999). Necessarily, it is both.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0096-1523</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>JPHPDH</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>J. exp. psychol. Hum. percept. perform.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>40</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>1</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Calibration Is Both Functional and Anatomical</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>BINGHAM (Geoffrey P.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>PAN (Jing S.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>MON-WILLIAMS (Mark A.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Indiana University</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>University of Leeds</s1>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>61-70</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2014</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>3032D</s2>
<s5>354000505770150080</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2014 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>3/4 p.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>14-0071360</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
<s3>C</s3>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Bingham and Pagano (1998) described calibration as a mapping from embodied perceptual units to an embodied action unit and suggested that it is an inherent component of perception/action that yields accurate targeted actions. We tested two predictions of this "Mapping Theory." First, calibration should transfer between limbs, because it involves a mapping from perceptual units to an action unit, and thus is functionally specific to the action (Pan, Coats, and Bingham, 2014). We used distorted haptic feedback to calibrate feedforward right hand reaches and tested right and left hand reaches after calibration. The calibration transferred. Second, the Mapping Theory predicts that limb specific calibration should be possible because the units are embodied and anatomy contributes to their scaling. Limbs must be calibrated to one another given potential anatomical differences among limbs. We used distorted haptic feedback to calibrate feedforward reaches with right and left arms simultaneously in opposite directions relative to a visually specified target. Reaches tested after calibration revealed reliable limb specific calibration. Both predictions were confirmed. This resolves a prevailing controversy as to whether calibration is functional (Bruggeman & Warren, 2010; Rieser, Pick, Ashmead, & Garing, 1995) or anatomical (Durgin et al., 2003; Durgin & Pelah, 1999). Necessarily, it is both.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002A26D04</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etalonnage</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Calibration</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Contraste</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Adaptation</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Adaptation</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Adaptación</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Incarnation</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Embodiment</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Encarnación</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Perception espace</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Space perception</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Percepción espacio</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Motricité</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Motricity</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Motricidad</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Mouvement orienté</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Goal directed movement</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Movimiento orientado</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etude expérimentale</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Experimental study</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudio experimental</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Vision</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Vision</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Visión</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cognición</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Perception</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Perception</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Percepción</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>097</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 14-0071360 INIST</NO>
<ET>Calibration Is Both Functional and Anatomical</ET>
<AU>BINGHAM (Geoffrey P.); PAN (Jing S.); MON-WILLIAMS (Mark A.)</AU>
<AF>Indiana University/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut.); University of Leeds/Royaume-Uni (3 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Compte-rendu; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance; ISSN 0096-1523; Coden JPHPDH; Etats-Unis; Da. 2014; Vol. 40; No. 1; Pp. 61-70; Bibl. 3/4 p.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Bingham and Pagano (1998) described calibration as a mapping from embodied perceptual units to an embodied action unit and suggested that it is an inherent component of perception/action that yields accurate targeted actions. We tested two predictions of this "Mapping Theory." First, calibration should transfer between limbs, because it involves a mapping from perceptual units to an action unit, and thus is functionally specific to the action (Pan, Coats, and Bingham, 2014). We used distorted haptic feedback to calibrate feedforward right hand reaches and tested right and left hand reaches after calibration. The calibration transferred. Second, the Mapping Theory predicts that limb specific calibration should be possible because the units are embodied and anatomy contributes to their scaling. Limbs must be calibrated to one another given potential anatomical differences among limbs. We used distorted haptic feedback to calibrate feedforward reaches with right and left arms simultaneously in opposite directions relative to a visually specified target. Reaches tested after calibration revealed reliable limb specific calibration. Both predictions were confirmed. This resolves a prevailing controversy as to whether calibration is functional (Bruggeman & Warren, 2010; Rieser, Pick, Ashmead, & Garing, 1995) or anatomical (Durgin et al., 2003; Durgin & Pelah, 1999). Necessarily, it is both.</EA>
<CC>002A26D04</CC>
<FD>Etalonnage; Adaptation; Incarnation; Perception espace; Motricité; Mouvement orienté; Etude expérimentale; Vision; Homme</FD>
<FG>Cognition; Perception</FG>
<ED>Calibration; Adaptation; Embodiment; Space perception; Motricity; Goal directed movement; Experimental study; Vision; Human</ED>
<EG>Cognition; Perception</EG>
<SD>Contraste; Adaptación; Encarnación; Percepción espacio; Motricidad; Movimiento orientado; Estudio experimental; Visión; Hombre</SD>
<LO>INIST-3032D.354000505770150080</LO>
<ID>14-0071360</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000087 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000087 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Ticri/CIDE |area= HapticV1 |flux= PascalFrancis |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= Pascal:14-0071360 |texte= Calibration Is Both Functional and Anatomical }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. | ![]() |