Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Relative effectiveness of physical and virtual manipulatives for conceptual change in science: how falling objects fall

Identifieur interne : 000071 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000070; suivant : 000072

Relative effectiveness of physical and virtual manipulatives for conceptual change in science: how falling objects fall

Auteurs : A. W. Lazonder ; S. Ehrenhard

Source :

RBID : Pascal:14-0134516

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

This study offers new insights into the ongoing debate about whether physical and virtual materials are equally effective in inquiry-based science instruction. Physical materials were predicted to have a surplus value when haptic feedback helps discern object characteristics or when the perceived credibility of experimental data can impede conceptual change. Both assumptions were tested by comparing the belief revisions and confidence ratings of children (n = 60) engaged in an inquiry task about falling objects. Children were assigned to one of three instructional conditions that differed with regard to the type of materials and the possibility to manipulate those materials. Main findings confirmed the alleged benefits of physical manipulation in correcting misconceptions about object characteristics that are perceived by touch. Belief revision about visually discernible characteristics proved independent of the type of material and type of manipulation, as was children's confidence in their post-instructional beliefs. Together, these findings indicate that tactile cues derived from physical manipulation can have a unique contribution to children's science learning.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

pA  
A01 01  1    @0 0266-4909
A03   1    @0 J. comput. assist. learn. : (Print)
A05       @2 30
A06       @2 2
A08 01  1  ENG  @1 Relative effectiveness of physical and virtual manipulatives for conceptual change in science: how falling objects fall
A11 01  1    @1 LAZONDER (A. W.)
A11 02  1    @1 EHRENHARD (S.)
A14 01      @1 Department of Instructional Technology, University of Twente @2 Enschede @3 NLD @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut.
A20       @1 110-120
A21       @1 2014
A23 01      @0 ENG
A43 01      @1 INIST @2 20994 @5 354000501154510020
A44       @0 0000 @1 © 2014 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.
A45       @0 1 p.3/4
A47 01  1    @0 14-0134516
A60       @1 P
A61       @0 A
A64 01  1    @0 Journal of computer assisted learning : (Print)
A66 01      @0 GBR
C01 01    ENG  @0 This study offers new insights into the ongoing debate about whether physical and virtual materials are equally effective in inquiry-based science instruction. Physical materials were predicted to have a surplus value when haptic feedback helps discern object characteristics or when the perceived credibility of experimental data can impede conceptual change. Both assumptions were tested by comparing the belief revisions and confidence ratings of children (n = 60) engaged in an inquiry task about falling objects. Children were assigned to one of three instructional conditions that differed with regard to the type of materials and the possibility to manipulate those materials. Main findings confirmed the alleged benefits of physical manipulation in correcting misconceptions about object characteristics that are perceived by touch. Belief revision about visually discernible characteristics proved independent of the type of material and type of manipulation, as was children's confidence in their post-instructional beliefs. Together, these findings indicate that tactile cues derived from physical manipulation can have a unique contribution to children's science learning.
C02 01  X    @0 002A26K05
C02 02  X    @0 002A26K03
C03 01  X  FRE  @0 Science @5 01
C03 01  X  ENG  @0 Sciences @5 01
C03 01  X  SPA  @0 Ciencia @5 01
C03 02  X  FRE  @0 Enseignement assisté ordinateur @5 02
C03 02  X  ENG  @0 Computer assisted teaching @5 02
C03 02  X  SPA  @0 Enseñanza asistida por computador @5 02
C03 03  X  FRE  @0 Apprentissage @5 03
C03 03  X  ENG  @0 Learning @5 03
C03 03  X  SPA  @0 Aprendizaje @5 03
C03 04  X  FRE  @0 Physique @5 04
C03 04  X  ENG  @0 Physics @5 04
C03 04  X  SPA  @0 Física @5 04
C03 05  X  FRE  @0 Chute @5 05
C03 05  X  ENG  @0 Fall @5 05
C03 05  X  SPA  @0 Caida @5 05
C03 06  X  FRE  @0 Simulation ordinateur @5 07
C03 06  X  ENG  @0 Computer simulation @5 07
C03 06  X  SPA  @0 Simulación computadora @5 07
C03 07  X  FRE  @0 Homme @5 18
C03 07  X  ENG  @0 Human @5 18
C03 07  X  SPA  @0 Hombre @5 18
C03 08  X  FRE  @0 Enfant @5 19
C03 08  X  ENG  @0 Child @5 19
C03 08  X  SPA  @0 Niño @5 19
C03 09  X  FRE  @0 Age scolaire @5 20
C03 09  X  ENG  @0 School age @5 20
C03 09  X  SPA  @0 Edad escolar @5 20
C03 10  X  FRE  @0 Changement conceptuel @4 INC @5 86
C07 01  X  FRE  @0 Processus acquisition @5 37
C07 01  X  ENG  @0 Acquisition process @5 37
C07 01  X  SPA  @0 Proceso adquisición @5 37
N21       @1 174

Format Inist (serveur)

NO : PASCAL 14-0134516 INIST
ET : Relative effectiveness of physical and virtual manipulatives for conceptual change in science: how falling objects fall
AU : LAZONDER (A. W.); EHRENHARD (S.)
AF : Department of Instructional Technology, University of Twente/Enschede/Pays-Bas (1 aut., 2 aut.)
DT : Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO : Journal of computer assisted learning : (Print); ISSN 0266-4909; Royaume-Uni; Da. 2014; Vol. 30; No. 2; Pp. 110-120; Bibl. 1 p.3/4
LA : Anglais
EA : This study offers new insights into the ongoing debate about whether physical and virtual materials are equally effective in inquiry-based science instruction. Physical materials were predicted to have a surplus value when haptic feedback helps discern object characteristics or when the perceived credibility of experimental data can impede conceptual change. Both assumptions were tested by comparing the belief revisions and confidence ratings of children (n = 60) engaged in an inquiry task about falling objects. Children were assigned to one of three instructional conditions that differed with regard to the type of materials and the possibility to manipulate those materials. Main findings confirmed the alleged benefits of physical manipulation in correcting misconceptions about object characteristics that are perceived by touch. Belief revision about visually discernible characteristics proved independent of the type of material and type of manipulation, as was children's confidence in their post-instructional beliefs. Together, these findings indicate that tactile cues derived from physical manipulation can have a unique contribution to children's science learning.
CC : 002A26K05; 002A26K03
FD : Science; Enseignement assisté ordinateur; Apprentissage; Physique; Chute; Simulation ordinateur; Homme; Enfant; Age scolaire; Changement conceptuel
FG : Processus acquisition
ED : Sciences; Computer assisted teaching; Learning; Physics; Fall; Computer simulation; Human; Child; School age
EG : Acquisition process
SD : Ciencia; Enseñanza asistida por computador; Aprendizaje; Física; Caida; Simulación computadora; Hombre; Niño; Edad escolar
LO : INIST-20994.354000501154510020
ID : 14-0134516

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:14-0134516

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Relative effectiveness of physical and virtual manipulatives for conceptual change in science: how falling objects fall</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Lazonder, A W" sort="Lazonder, A W" uniqKey="Lazonder A" first="A. W." last="Lazonder">A. W. Lazonder</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Instructional Technology, University of Twente</s1>
<s2>Enschede</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ehrenhard, S" sort="Ehrenhard, S" uniqKey="Ehrenhard S" first="S." last="Ehrenhard">S. Ehrenhard</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Instructional Technology, University of Twente</s1>
<s2>Enschede</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">14-0134516</idno>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 14-0134516 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:14-0134516</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000071</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Relative effectiveness of physical and virtual manipulatives for conceptual change in science: how falling objects fall</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Lazonder, A W" sort="Lazonder, A W" uniqKey="Lazonder A" first="A. W." last="Lazonder">A. W. Lazonder</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Instructional Technology, University of Twente</s1>
<s2>Enschede</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ehrenhard, S" sort="Ehrenhard, S" uniqKey="Ehrenhard S" first="S." last="Ehrenhard">S. Ehrenhard</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Instructional Technology, University of Twente</s1>
<s2>Enschede</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Journal of computer assisted learning : (Print)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. comput. assist. learn. : (Print)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0266-4909</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">Journal of computer assisted learning : (Print)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. comput. assist. learn. : (Print)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0266-4909</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Child</term>
<term>Computer assisted teaching</term>
<term>Computer simulation</term>
<term>Fall</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Learning</term>
<term>Physics</term>
<term>School age</term>
<term>Sciences</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Science</term>
<term>Enseignement assisté ordinateur</term>
<term>Apprentissage</term>
<term>Physique</term>
<term>Chute</term>
<term>Simulation ordinateur</term>
<term>Homme</term>
<term>Enfant</term>
<term>Age scolaire</term>
<term>Changement conceptuel</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This study offers new insights into the ongoing debate about whether physical and virtual materials are equally effective in inquiry-based science instruction. Physical materials were predicted to have a surplus value when haptic feedback helps discern object characteristics or when the perceived credibility of experimental data can impede conceptual change. Both assumptions were tested by comparing the belief revisions and confidence ratings of children (n = 60) engaged in an inquiry task about falling objects. Children were assigned to one of three instructional conditions that differed with regard to the type of materials and the possibility to manipulate those materials. Main findings confirmed the alleged benefits of physical manipulation in correcting misconceptions about object characteristics that are perceived by touch. Belief revision about visually discernible characteristics proved independent of the type of material and type of manipulation, as was children's confidence in their post-instructional beliefs. Together, these findings indicate that tactile cues derived from physical manipulation can have a unique contribution to children's science learning.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>0266-4909</s0>
</fA01>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>J. comput. assist. learn. : (Print)</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>30</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06>
<s2>2</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Relative effectiveness of physical and virtual manipulatives for conceptual change in science: how falling objects fall</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>LAZONDER (A. W.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>EHRENHARD (S.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Instructional Technology, University of Twente</s1>
<s2>Enschede</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20>
<s1>110-120</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2014</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>20994</s2>
<s5>354000501154510020</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2014 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>1 p.3/4</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>14-0134516</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>Journal of computer assisted learning : (Print)</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>GBR</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>This study offers new insights into the ongoing debate about whether physical and virtual materials are equally effective in inquiry-based science instruction. Physical materials were predicted to have a surplus value when haptic feedback helps discern object characteristics or when the perceived credibility of experimental data can impede conceptual change. Both assumptions were tested by comparing the belief revisions and confidence ratings of children (n = 60) engaged in an inquiry task about falling objects. Children were assigned to one of three instructional conditions that differed with regard to the type of materials and the possibility to manipulate those materials. Main findings confirmed the alleged benefits of physical manipulation in correcting misconceptions about object characteristics that are perceived by touch. Belief revision about visually discernible characteristics proved independent of the type of material and type of manipulation, as was children's confidence in their post-instructional beliefs. Together, these findings indicate that tactile cues derived from physical manipulation can have a unique contribution to children's science learning.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X">
<s0>002A26K05</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X">
<s0>002A26K03</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Science</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Sciences</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Ciencia</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Enseignement assisté ordinateur</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Computer assisted teaching</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Enseñanza asistida por computador</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Apprentissage</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Learning</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Aprendizaje</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Physique</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Physics</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Física</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Chute</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Fall</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Caida</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Simulation ordinateur</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Computer simulation</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Simulación computadora</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Human</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Enfant</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Child</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Niño</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Age scolaire</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>School age</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Edad escolar</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Changement conceptuel</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>86</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Processus acquisition</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Acquisition process</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Proceso adquisición</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21>
<s1>174</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server>
<NO>PASCAL 14-0134516 INIST</NO>
<ET>Relative effectiveness of physical and virtual manipulatives for conceptual change in science: how falling objects fall</ET>
<AU>LAZONDER (A. W.); EHRENHARD (S.)</AU>
<AF>Department of Instructional Technology, University of Twente/Enschede/Pays-Bas (1 aut., 2 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Journal of computer assisted learning : (Print); ISSN 0266-4909; Royaume-Uni; Da. 2014; Vol. 30; No. 2; Pp. 110-120; Bibl. 1 p.3/4</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>This study offers new insights into the ongoing debate about whether physical and virtual materials are equally effective in inquiry-based science instruction. Physical materials were predicted to have a surplus value when haptic feedback helps discern object characteristics or when the perceived credibility of experimental data can impede conceptual change. Both assumptions were tested by comparing the belief revisions and confidence ratings of children (n = 60) engaged in an inquiry task about falling objects. Children were assigned to one of three instructional conditions that differed with regard to the type of materials and the possibility to manipulate those materials. Main findings confirmed the alleged benefits of physical manipulation in correcting misconceptions about object characteristics that are perceived by touch. Belief revision about visually discernible characteristics proved independent of the type of material and type of manipulation, as was children's confidence in their post-instructional beliefs. Together, these findings indicate that tactile cues derived from physical manipulation can have a unique contribution to children's science learning.</EA>
<CC>002A26K05; 002A26K03</CC>
<FD>Science; Enseignement assisté ordinateur; Apprentissage; Physique; Chute; Simulation ordinateur; Homme; Enfant; Age scolaire; Changement conceptuel</FD>
<FG>Processus acquisition</FG>
<ED>Sciences; Computer assisted teaching; Learning; Physics; Fall; Computer simulation; Human; Child; School age</ED>
<EG>Acquisition process</EG>
<SD>Ciencia; Enseñanza asistida por computador; Aprendizaje; Física; Caida; Simulación computadora; Hombre; Niño; Edad escolar</SD>
<LO>INIST-20994.354000501154510020</LO>
<ID>14-0134516</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000071 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000071 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:14-0134516
   |texte=   Relative effectiveness of physical and virtual manipulatives for conceptual change in science: how falling objects fall
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024