Do action systems resist visual illusions?
Identifieur interne : 007E65 ( Main/Merge ); précédent : 007E64; suivant : 007E66Do action systems resist visual illusions?
Auteurs : David P. Carey [Royaume-Uni]Source :
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences [ 1364-6613 ] ; 2001.
Descripteurs français
- Wicri :
- topic : Psychologie.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Arguments about the relative independence of visual modules in the primate brain are not new. Recently, though, these debates have resurfaced in the form of arguments about the extent to which visuomotor reaching and grasping systems are insensitive to visual illusions that dramatically bias visual perception. The first wave of studies of illusory effects on perception and action have supported the idea of independence of motor systems, but recent findings have been more critical. In this article, I review several of these studies, most of which (but not all) can be reconciled with the two-visual-systems model.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01592-8
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 001295
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 001295
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 002D15
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:293CE3B277754E296024051EF6074EAA70BF97FALe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Do action systems resist visual illusions?</title><author><name sortKey="Carey, David P" sort="Carey, David P" uniqKey="Carey D" first="David P" last="Carey">David P. Carey</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:293CE3B277754E296024051EF6074EAA70BF97FA</idno><date when="2001" year="2001">2001</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01592-8</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/293CE3B277754E296024051EF6074EAA70BF97FA/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001295</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001295</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">002D15</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">1364-6613:2001:Carey D:do:action:systems</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">007E65</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Do action systems resist visual illusions?</title><author><name sortKey="Carey, David P" sort="Carey, David P" uniqKey="Carey D" first="David P" last="Carey">David P. Carey</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country>Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Neuropsychology Research Group, Dept of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Aberdeen</wicri:noRegion></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country wicri:rule="url">Royaume-Uni</country></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Trends in Cognitive Sciences</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">TICS</title><idno type="ISSN">1364-6613</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="2001">2001</date><biblScope unit="volume">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="109">109</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="113">113</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1364-6613</idno></series><idno type="istex">293CE3B277754E296024051EF6074EAA70BF97FA</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01592-8</idno><idno type="PII">S1364-6613(00)01592-8</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1364-6613</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Cognitive Science</term><term>Psychology</term><term>action</term><term>dorsal stream</term><term>grasping</term><term>reaching</term><term>two-visual-systems model</term><term>visual illusions</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Psychologie</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Arguments about the relative independence of visual modules in the primate brain are not new. Recently, though, these debates have resurfaced in the form of arguments about the extent to which visuomotor reaching and grasping systems are insensitive to visual illusions that dramatically bias visual perception. The first wave of studies of illusory effects on perception and action have supported the idea of independence of motor systems, but recent findings have been more critical. In this article, I review several of these studies, most of which (but not all) can be reconciled with the two-visual-systems model.</div></front></TEI></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/Main/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 007E65 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 007E65 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Merge
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:293CE3B277754E296024051EF6074EAA70BF97FA
|texte= Do action systems resist visual illusions?
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |