What do hands know about hills? Interpreting Taylor-Covill and Eves (2013) in context
Identifieur interne : 001E73 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 001E72; suivant : 001E74What do hands know about hills? Interpreting Taylor-Covill and Eves (2013) in context
Auteurs : Frank H. Durgin [États-Unis]Source :
- Acta psychologica [ 0001-6918 ] ; 2013.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
- Wicri :
- topic : Homme.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- physiology : Hand.
- Female, Humans, Male, Space Perception, Touch Perception.
Abstract
Hills appear much steeper than they are. Although near surface slant is also exaggerated, near surfaces appear much shallower than equivalently slanted hills. Taylor-Covill and Eves (2013) propose a new type of palm orientation measuring device that provides outputs that accurately reflect the physical slants of stairs and hills from 19 to 30° and also seems to accurately reflect the slants of near surfaces (25-30°). They question the validity of the observations of Durgin, Hajnal, Li, Tonge & Stigliani (2010), who observed that palm boards grossly underestimated near surfaces. Here I review our recent work on the visual and haptic perception of near surface orientation in order to place Taylor-Covill and Eves' arguments in context. I note in particular that free hand measures of real surfaces in near space show excellent calibration, but free hand measures show gross exaggeration for hills. This leads to the question of the grounds for preferring a mechanical device to a freely wielded hand. In addition I report an investigative replication of the crucial observations that led to our concerns about the value of palm boards as measures of perception and note the specific methodological details that we have accounted for in our procedures. Finally, I propose some testable hypotheses regarding how better-than-expected haptic matches to hills may arise.
Url:
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PascalFrancis, to step Corpus: 000165
- to stream PascalFrancis, to step Corpus: 000246
- to stream PascalFrancis, to step Curation: 001134
- to stream PascalFrancis, to step Checkpoint: 000084
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 001E95
- to stream Pmc, to step Corpus: 000C25
- to stream Pmc, to step Curation: 000C25
- to stream Pmc, to step Checkpoint: 000E88
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: 000897
- to stream PubMed, to step Curation: 000897
- to stream PubMed, to step Checkpoint: 000738
- to stream Ncbi, to step Merge: 002866
- to stream Ncbi, to step Curation: 002866
- to stream Ncbi, to step Checkpoint: 002866
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 001692
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 001E73
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">What do hands know about hills? Interpreting Taylor-Covill and Eves (2013) in context</title>
<author><name sortKey="Durgin, Frank H" sort="Durgin, Frank H" uniqKey="Durgin F" first="Frank H." last="Durgin">Frank H. Durgin</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Psychology, Swarthmore College, 500 College Ave</s1>
<s2>Swarthmore, PA 19081</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
<placeName><region type="state">Pennsylvanie</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">13-0333142</idno>
<date when="2013">2013</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 13-0333142 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:13-0333142</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000165</idno>
<idno type="stanalyst">FRANCIS 13-0333142 INIST</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000246</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Curation">001134</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Checkpoint">000084</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0001-6918:2013:Durgin F:what:do:hands</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">001E95</idno>
<idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno>
<idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3870886</idno>
<idno type="RBID">PMC:3870886</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000C25</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">000C25</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Checkpoint">000E88</idno>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000897</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000897</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">000738</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">002866</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">002866</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">002866</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0001-6918:2013:Durgin F:what:do:hands</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">001692</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">001E73</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">001E73</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">What do hands know about hills? Interpreting Taylor-Covill and Eves (2013) in context</title>
<author><name sortKey="Durgin, Frank H" sort="Durgin, Frank H" uniqKey="Durgin F" first="Frank H." last="Durgin">Frank H. Durgin</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Psychology, Swarthmore College, 500 College Ave</s1>
<s2>Swarthmore, PA 19081</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
<placeName><region type="state">Pennsylvanie</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Acta psychologica</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Acta psychol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0001-6918</idno>
<imprint><date when="2013">2013</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Acta psychologica</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Acta psychol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0001-6918</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Experimental study</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Hand</term>
<term>Hand (physiology)</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Space Perception</term>
<term>Space perception</term>
<term>Spatial orientation</term>
<term>Tactile sensitivity</term>
<term>Touch Perception</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Hand</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Space Perception</term>
<term>Touch Perception</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Main</term>
<term>Sensibilité tactile</term>
<term>Perception espace</term>
<term>Etude expérimentale</term>
<term>Orientation spatiale</term>
<term>Homme</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Homme</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Hills appear much steeper than they are. Although near surface slant is also exaggerated, near surfaces appear much shallower than equivalently slanted hills. Taylor-Covill and Eves (2013) propose a new type of palm orientation measuring device that provides outputs that accurately reflect the physical slants of stairs and hills from 19 to 30° and also seems to accurately reflect the slants of near surfaces (25-30°). They question the validity of the observations of Durgin, Hajnal, Li, Tonge & Stigliani (2010), who observed that palm boards grossly underestimated near surfaces. Here I review our recent work on the visual and haptic perception of near surface orientation in order to place Taylor-Covill and Eves' arguments in context. I note in particular that free hand measures of real surfaces in near space show excellent calibration, but free hand measures show gross exaggeration for hills. This leads to the question of the grounds for preferring a mechanical device to a freely wielded hand. In addition I report an investigative replication of the crucial observations that led to our concerns about the value of palm boards as measures of perception and note the specific methodological details that we have accounted for in our procedures. Finally, I propose some testable hypotheses regarding how better-than-expected haptic matches to hills may arise.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations><list><country><li>États-Unis</li>
</country>
<region><li>Pennsylvanie</li>
</region>
</list>
<tree><country name="États-Unis"><region name="Pennsylvanie"><name sortKey="Durgin, Frank H" sort="Durgin, Frank H" uniqKey="Durgin F" first="Frank H." last="Durgin">Frank H. Durgin</name>
</region>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001E73 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 001E73 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Ticri/CIDE |area= HapticV1 |flux= Main |étape= Exploration |type= RBID |clé= Pascal:13-0333142 |texte= What do hands know about hills? Interpreting Taylor-Covill and Eves (2013) in context }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. | ![]() |