HapticV1, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 000165

What do hands know about hills? Interpreting Taylor-Covill and Eves (2013) in context

Identifieur interne : 000165 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000164; suivant : 000166

What do hands know about hills? Interpreting Taylor-Covill and Eves (2013) in context

Auteurs : Frank H. Durgin

Source :

Acta psychologica [ 0001-6918 ] ; 2013.

RBID : Pascal:13-0333142

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Main, Sensibilité tactile, Perception espace, Etude expérimentale, Orientation spatiale, Homme.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Experimental study, Hand, Human, Space perception, Spatial orientation, Tactile sensitivity.

Abstract

Hills appear much steeper than they are. Although near surface slant is also exaggerated, near surfaces appear much shallower than equivalently slanted hills. Taylor-Covill and Eves (2013) propose a new type of palm orientation measuring device that provides outputs that accurately reflect the physical slants of stairs and hills from 19 to 30° and also seems to accurately reflect the slants of near surfaces (25-30°). They question the validity of the observations of Durgin, Hajnal, Li, Tonge & Stigliani (2010), who observed that palm boards grossly underestimated near surfaces. Here I review our recent work on the visual and haptic perception of near surface orientation in order to place Taylor-Covill and Eves' arguments in context. I note in particular that free hand measures of real surfaces in near space show excellent calibration, but free hand measures show gross exaggeration for hills. This leads to the question of the grounds for preferring a mechanical device to a freely wielded hand. In addition I report an investigative replication of the crucial observations that led to our concerns about the value of palm boards as measures of perception and note the specific methodological details that we have accounted for in our procedures. Finally, I propose some testable hypotheses regarding how better-than-expected haptic matches to hills may arise.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0001-6918`
A02	`01`			`@0 APSOAZ`
A03		`1`		`@0 Acta psychol.`
A05				`@2 144`
A06				`@2 2`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 What do hands know about hills? Interpreting Taylor-Covill and Eves (2013) in context`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 DURGIN (Frank H.)`
A14	`01`			`@1 Department of Psychology, Swarthmore College, 500 College Ave @2 Swarthmore, PA 19081 @3 USA @Z 1 aut.`
A20				`@1 451-458`
A21				`@1 2013`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 2174 @5 354000504208360280`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2013 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 3/4 p.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 13-0333142`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Acta psychologica`
A66	`01`			`@0 GBR`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 Hills appear much steeper than they are. Although near surface slant is also exaggerated, near surfaces appear much shallower than equivalently slanted hills. Taylor-Covill and Eves (2013) propose a new type of palm orientation measuring device that provides outputs that accurately reflect the physical slants of stairs and hills from 19 to 30° and also seems to accurately reflect the slants of near surfaces (25-30°). They question the validity of the observations of Durgin, Hajnal, Li, Tonge & Stigliani (2010), who observed that palm boards grossly underestimated near surfaces. Here I review our recent work on the visual and haptic perception of near surface orientation in order to place Taylor-Covill and Eves' arguments in context. I note in particular that free hand measures of real surfaces in near space show excellent calibration, but free hand measures show gross exaggeration for hills. This leads to the question of the grounds for preferring a mechanical device to a freely wielded hand. In addition I report an investigative replication of the crucial observations that led to our concerns about the value of palm boards as measures of perception and note the specific methodological details that we have accounted for in our procedures. Finally, I propose some testable hypotheses regarding how better-than-expected haptic matches to hills may arise.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 002A26E05`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Main @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Hand @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Mano @5 01`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Sensibilité tactile @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Tactile sensitivity @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Sensibilidad tactil @5 02`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Perception espace @5 04`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Space perception @5 04`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Percepción espacio @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Etude expérimentale @5 06`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Experimental study @5 06`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estudio experimental @5 06`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Orientation spatiale @5 07`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Spatial orientation @5 07`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Orientación espacial @5 07`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Homme @5 18`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Human @5 18`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Hombre @5 18`
C07	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Cognition @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Cognition @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cognición @5 37`
C07	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Perception @5 38`
C07	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Perception @5 38`
C07	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Percepción @5 38`
N21				`@1 315`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	PASCAL 13-0333142 INIST
ET :	What do hands know about hills? Interpreting Taylor-Covill and Eves (2013) in context
AU :	DURGIN (Frank H.)
AF :	Department of Psychology, Swarthmore College, 500 College Ave/Swarthmore, PA 19081/Etats-Unis (1 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO :	Acta psychologica; ISSN 0001-6918; Coden APSOAZ; Royaume-Uni; Da. 2013; Vol. 144; No. 2; Pp. 451-458; Bibl. 3/4 p.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	Hills appear much steeper than they are. Although near surface slant is also exaggerated, near surfaces appear much shallower than equivalently slanted hills. Taylor-Covill and Eves (2013) propose a new type of palm orientation measuring device that provides outputs that accurately reflect the physical slants of stairs and hills from 19 to 30° and also seems to accurately reflect the slants of near surfaces (25-30°). They question the validity of the observations of Durgin, Hajnal, Li, Tonge & Stigliani (2010), who observed that palm boards grossly underestimated near surfaces. Here I review our recent work on the visual and haptic perception of near surface orientation in order to place Taylor-Covill and Eves' arguments in context. I note in particular that free hand measures of real surfaces in near space show excellent calibration, but free hand measures show gross exaggeration for hills. This leads to the question of the grounds for preferring a mechanical device to a freely wielded hand. In addition I report an investigative replication of the crucial observations that led to our concerns about the value of palm boards as measures of perception and note the specific methodological details that we have accounted for in our procedures. Finally, I propose some testable hypotheses regarding how better-than-expected haptic matches to hills may arise.
CC :	002A26E05
FD :	Main; Sensibilité tactile; Perception espace; Etude expérimentale; Orientation spatiale; Homme
FG :	Cognition; Perception
ED :	Hand; Tactile sensitivity; Space perception; Experimental study; Spatial orientation; Human
EG :	Cognition; Perception
SD :	Mano; Sensibilidad tactil; Percepción espacio; Estudio experimental; Orientación espacial; Hombre
LO :	INIST-2174.354000504208360280
ID :	13-0333142

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:13-0333142

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">What do hands know about hills? Interpreting Taylor-Covill and Eves (2013) in context</title>
<author><name sortKey="Durgin, Frank H" sort="Durgin, Frank H" uniqKey="Durgin F" first="Frank H." last="Durgin">Frank H. Durgin</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Psychology, Swarthmore College, 500 College Ave</s1>
<s2>Swarthmore, PA 19081</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">13-0333142</idno>
<date when="2013">2013</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 13-0333142 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:13-0333142</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000165</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">What do hands know about hills? Interpreting Taylor-Covill and Eves (2013) in context</title>
<author><name sortKey="Durgin, Frank H" sort="Durgin, Frank H" uniqKey="Durgin F" first="Frank H." last="Durgin">Frank H. Durgin</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Psychology, Swarthmore College, 500 College Ave</s1>
<s2>Swarthmore, PA 19081</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Acta psychologica</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Acta psychol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0001-6918</idno>
<imprint><date when="2013">2013</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Acta psychologica</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Acta psychol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0001-6918</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Experimental study</term>
<term>Hand</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Space perception</term>
<term>Spatial orientation</term>
<term>Tactile sensitivity</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Main</term>
<term>Sensibilité tactile</term>
<term>Perception espace</term>
<term>Etude expérimentale</term>
<term>Orientation spatiale</term>
<term>Homme</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Hills appear much steeper than they are. Although near surface slant is also exaggerated, near surfaces appear much shallower than equivalently slanted hills. Taylor-Covill and Eves (2013) propose a new type of palm orientation measuring device that provides outputs that accurately reflect the physical slants of stairs and hills from 19 to 30° and also seems to accurately reflect the slants of near surfaces (25-30°). They question the validity of the observations of Durgin, Hajnal, Li, Tonge & Stigliani (2010), who observed that palm boards grossly underestimated near surfaces. Here I review our recent work on the visual and haptic perception of near surface orientation in order to place Taylor-Covill and Eves' arguments in context. I note in particular that free hand measures of real surfaces in near space show excellent calibration, but free hand measures show gross exaggeration for hills. This leads to the question of the grounds for preferring a mechanical device to a freely wielded hand. In addition I report an investigative replication of the crucial observations that led to our concerns about the value of palm boards as measures of perception and note the specific methodological details that we have accounted for in our procedures. Finally, I propose some testable hypotheses regarding how better-than-expected haptic matches to hills may arise.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0001-6918</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>APSOAZ</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Acta psychol.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>144</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>2</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>What do hands know about hills? Interpreting Taylor-Covill and Eves (2013) in context</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>DURGIN (Frank H.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Psychology, Swarthmore College, 500 College Ave</s1>
<s2>Swarthmore, PA 19081</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>451-458</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2013</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>2174</s2>
<s5>354000504208360280</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2013 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>3/4 p.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>13-0333142</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Acta psychologica</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>GBR</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Hills appear much steeper than they are. Although near surface slant is also exaggerated, near surfaces appear much shallower than equivalently slanted hills. Taylor-Covill and Eves (2013) propose a new type of palm orientation measuring device that provides outputs that accurately reflect the physical slants of stairs and hills from 19 to 30° and also seems to accurately reflect the slants of near surfaces (25-30°). They question the validity of the observations of Durgin, Hajnal, Li, Tonge & Stigliani (2010), who observed that palm boards grossly underestimated near surfaces. Here I review our recent work on the visual and haptic perception of near surface orientation in order to place Taylor-Covill and Eves' arguments in context. I note in particular that free hand measures of real surfaces in near space show excellent calibration, but free hand measures show gross exaggeration for hills. This leads to the question of the grounds for preferring a mechanical device to a freely wielded hand. In addition I report an investigative replication of the crucial observations that led to our concerns about the value of palm boards as measures of perception and note the specific methodological details that we have accounted for in our procedures. Finally, I propose some testable hypotheses regarding how better-than-expected haptic matches to hills may arise.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002A26E05</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Main</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Hand</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Mano</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Sensibilité tactile</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Tactile sensitivity</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Sensibilidad tactil</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Perception espace</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Space perception</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Percepción espacio</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etude expérimentale</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Experimental study</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudio experimental</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Orientation spatiale</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Spatial orientation</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Orientación espacial</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cognición</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Perception</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Perception</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Percepción</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>315</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 13-0333142 INIST</NO>
<ET>What do hands know about hills? Interpreting Taylor-Covill and Eves (2013) in context</ET>
<AU>DURGIN (Frank H.)</AU>
<AF>Department of Psychology, Swarthmore College, 500 College Ave/Swarthmore, PA 19081/Etats-Unis (1 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Acta psychologica; ISSN 0001-6918; Coden APSOAZ; Royaume-Uni; Da. 2013; Vol. 144; No. 2; Pp. 451-458; Bibl. 3/4 p.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Hills appear much steeper than they are. Although near surface slant is also exaggerated, near surfaces appear much shallower than equivalently slanted hills. Taylor-Covill and Eves (2013) propose a new type of palm orientation measuring device that provides outputs that accurately reflect the physical slants of stairs and hills from 19 to 30° and also seems to accurately reflect the slants of near surfaces (25-30°). They question the validity of the observations of Durgin, Hajnal, Li, Tonge & Stigliani (2010), who observed that palm boards grossly underestimated near surfaces. Here I review our recent work on the visual and haptic perception of near surface orientation in order to place Taylor-Covill and Eves' arguments in context. I note in particular that free hand measures of real surfaces in near space show excellent calibration, but free hand measures show gross exaggeration for hills. This leads to the question of the grounds for preferring a mechanical device to a freely wielded hand. In addition I report an investigative replication of the crucial observations that led to our concerns about the value of palm boards as measures of perception and note the specific methodological details that we have accounted for in our procedures. Finally, I propose some testable hypotheses regarding how better-than-expected haptic matches to hills may arise.</EA>
<CC>002A26E05</CC>
<FD>Main; Sensibilité tactile; Perception espace; Etude expérimentale; Orientation spatiale; Homme</FD>
<FG>Cognition; Perception</FG>
<ED>Hand; Tactile sensitivity; Space perception; Experimental study; Spatial orientation; Human</ED>
<EG>Cognition; Perception</EG>
<SD>Mano; Sensibilidad tactil; Percepción espacio; Estudio experimental; Orientación espacial; Hombre</SD>
<LO>INIST-2174.354000504208360280</LO>
<ID>13-0333142</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000165 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000165 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:13-0333142
   |texte=   What do hands know about hills? Interpreting Taylor-Covill and Eves (2013) in context
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024

	Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

What do hands know about hills? Interpreting Taylor-Covill and Eves (2013) in context

What do hands know about hills? Interpreting Taylor-Covill and Eves (2013) in context

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri