Intramodal and crolss‐modal verbal communication of forms: A comparison with intraidividual matching
Identifieur interne : 004B17 ( Istex/Checkpoint ); précédent : 004B16; suivant : 004B18Intramodal and crolss‐modal verbal communication of forms: A comparison with intraidividual matching
Auteurs : Bo MolanderSource :
- Scandinavian Journal of Psychology [ 0036-5564 ] ; 1983-09.
Abstract
In two experiments interindividual communication of forms in intramodal (visual‐visual, tactual‐tactual) and cross‐modal (visual‐tactual, tactual‐visual) conditions were compared with the corresponding conditions in intraindividual matching. In the first experiment speakers verbally described three‐dimensionakl objects to listeners, who, on the basis of the descriptions, judged the stimuli presented in other modality to be “same” or “different”. The descriptions produced in this experiment were transcribed and use again in the second experiment. In this experiment the listeners judged stimuli on the basis of the descriptions, judged the stimuli on the basis of descriptions originally meant for comparisons in a different modality. In both experiments the communication phase was followed by individual matching. The results are interpreted as showing:first, that verbal communication efficiently reflects the performance in intraindividual matching. Secondly, intramodal descriptions were found to be less useful than cross‐modal descriptions in a modality other than the one in which the descriptions were produced. Contrary ot earlier findings there was no indication of false negative errors beign associated with verbalizatio. The verbal‐perceptual parallellism suggested by these results is discussed.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1983.tb00484.x
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:9E89B00B2836F9AED01BFB9B70DFFFCADA9C5F0ELe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Intramodal and crolss‐modal verbal communication of forms: A comparison with intraidividual matching</title><author><name sortKey="Molander, Bo" sort="Molander, Bo" uniqKey="Molander B" first="Bo" last="Molander">Bo Molander</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:9E89B00B2836F9AED01BFB9B70DFFFCADA9C5F0E</idno><date when="1983" year="1983">1983</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-9450.1983.tb00484.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/9E89B00B2836F9AED01BFB9B70DFFFCADA9C5F0E/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001F37</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001F37</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">004B17</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Intramodal and crolss‐modal verbal communication of forms: A comparison with intraidividual matching</title><author><name sortKey="Molander, Bo" sort="Molander, Bo" uniqKey="Molander B" first="Bo" last="Molander">Bo Molander</name><affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">Swedan</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Scandinavian Journal of Psychology</title><idno type="ISSN">0036-5564</idno><idno type="eISSN">1467-9450</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1983-09">1983-09</date><biblScope unit="volume">24</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="125">125</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="136">136</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0036-5564</idno></series><idno type="istex">9E89B00B2836F9AED01BFB9B70DFFFCADA9C5F0E</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1467-9450.1983.tb00484.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">SJOP125</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0036-5564</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In two experiments interindividual communication of forms in intramodal (visual‐visual, tactual‐tactual) and cross‐modal (visual‐tactual, tactual‐visual) conditions were compared with the corresponding conditions in intraindividual matching. In the first experiment speakers verbally described three‐dimensionakl objects to listeners, who, on the basis of the descriptions, judged the stimuli presented in other modality to be “same” or “different”. The descriptions produced in this experiment were transcribed and use again in the second experiment. In this experiment the listeners judged stimuli on the basis of the descriptions, judged the stimuli on the basis of descriptions originally meant for comparisons in a different modality. In both experiments the communication phase was followed by individual matching. The results are interpreted as showing:first, that verbal communication efficiently reflects the performance in intraindividual matching. Secondly, intramodal descriptions were found to be less useful than cross‐modal descriptions in a modality other than the one in which the descriptions were produced. Contrary ot earlier findings there was no indication of false negative errors beign associated with verbalizatio. The verbal‐perceptual parallellism suggested by these results is discussed.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Molander, Bo" sort="Molander, Bo" uniqKey="Molander B" first="Bo" last="Molander">Bo Molander</name></noCountry></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/Istex/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004B17 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 004B17 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:9E89B00B2836F9AED01BFB9B70DFFFCADA9C5F0E
|texte= Intramodal and crolss‐modal verbal communication of forms: A comparison with intraidividual matching
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |