Intramodal and crolss‐modal verbal communication of forms: A comparison with intraidividual matching
Identifieur interne : 001F37 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001F36; suivant : 001F38Intramodal and crolss‐modal verbal communication of forms: A comparison with intraidividual matching
Auteurs : Bo MolanderSource :
- Scandinavian Journal of Psychology [ 0036-5564 ] ; 1983-09.
Abstract
In two experiments interindividual communication of forms in intramodal (visual‐visual, tactual‐tactual) and cross‐modal (visual‐tactual, tactual‐visual) conditions were compared with the corresponding conditions in intraindividual matching. In the first experiment speakers verbally described three‐dimensionakl objects to listeners, who, on the basis of the descriptions, judged the stimuli presented in other modality to be “same” or “different”. The descriptions produced in this experiment were transcribed and use again in the second experiment. In this experiment the listeners judged stimuli on the basis of the descriptions, judged the stimuli on the basis of descriptions originally meant for comparisons in a different modality. In both experiments the communication phase was followed by individual matching. The results are interpreted as showing:first, that verbal communication efficiently reflects the performance in intraindividual matching. Secondly, intramodal descriptions were found to be less useful than cross‐modal descriptions in a modality other than the one in which the descriptions were produced. Contrary ot earlier findings there was no indication of false negative errors beign associated with verbalizatio. The verbal‐perceptual parallellism suggested by these results is discussed.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1983.tb00484.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:9E89B00B2836F9AED01BFB9B70DFFFCADA9C5F0ELe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Intramodal and crolss‐modal verbal communication of forms: A comparison with intraidividual matching</title><author><name sortKey="Molander, Bo" sort="Molander, Bo" uniqKey="Molander B" first="Bo" last="Molander">Bo Molander</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Umeå, Swedan</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:9E89B00B2836F9AED01BFB9B70DFFFCADA9C5F0E</idno><date when="1983" year="1983">1983</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-9450.1983.tb00484.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/9E89B00B2836F9AED01BFB9B70DFFFCADA9C5F0E/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001F37</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Intramodal and crolss‐modal verbal communication of forms: A comparison with intraidividual matching</title><author><name sortKey="Molander, Bo" sort="Molander, Bo" uniqKey="Molander B" first="Bo" last="Molander">Bo Molander</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Umeå, Swedan</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Scandinavian Journal of Psychology</title><idno type="ISSN">0036-5564</idno><idno type="eISSN">1467-9450</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1983-09">1983-09</date><biblScope unit="volume">24</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="125">125</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="136">136</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0036-5564</idno></series><idno type="istex">9E89B00B2836F9AED01BFB9B70DFFFCADA9C5F0E</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1467-9450.1983.tb00484.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">SJOP125</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0036-5564</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In two experiments interindividual communication of forms in intramodal (visual‐visual, tactual‐tactual) and cross‐modal (visual‐tactual, tactual‐visual) conditions were compared with the corresponding conditions in intraindividual matching. In the first experiment speakers verbally described three‐dimensionakl objects to listeners, who, on the basis of the descriptions, judged the stimuli presented in other modality to be “same” or “different”. The descriptions produced in this experiment were transcribed and use again in the second experiment. In this experiment the listeners judged stimuli on the basis of the descriptions, judged the stimuli on the basis of descriptions originally meant for comparisons in a different modality. In both experiments the communication phase was followed by individual matching. The results are interpreted as showing:first, that verbal communication efficiently reflects the performance in intraindividual matching. Secondly, intramodal descriptions were found to be less useful than cross‐modal descriptions in a modality other than the one in which the descriptions were produced. Contrary ot earlier findings there was no indication of false negative errors beign associated with verbalizatio. The verbal‐perceptual parallellism suggested by these results is discussed.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>BO MOLANDER</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Umeå, Swedan</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>SJOP125</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><abstract>In two experiments interindividual communication of forms in intramodal (visual‐visual, tactual‐tactual) and cross‐modal (visual‐tactual, tactual‐visual) conditions were compared with the corresponding conditions in intraindividual matching. In the first experiment speakers verbally described three‐dimensionakl objects to listeners, who, on the basis of the descriptions, judged the stimuli presented in other modality to be “same” or “different”. The descriptions produced in this experiment were transcribed and use again in the second experiment. In this experiment the listeners judged stimuli on the basis of the descriptions, judged the stimuli on the basis of descriptions originally meant for comparisons in a different modality. In both experiments the communication phase was followed by individual matching. The results are interpreted as showing:first, that verbal communication efficiently reflects the performance in intraindividual matching. Secondly, intramodal descriptions were found to be less useful than cross‐modal descriptions in a modality other than the one in which the descriptions were produced. Contrary ot earlier findings there was no indication of false negative errors beign associated with verbalizatio. The verbal‐perceptual parallellism suggested by these results is discussed.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.612</score><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>504.239 x 692.159 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><keywordCount>0</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>1315</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>6718</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>41839</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>12</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>176</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Intramodal and crolss‐modal verbal communication of forms: A comparison with intraidividual matching</title><genre.original><json:string>article</json:string></genre.original><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>24</volume><publisherId><json:string>SJOP</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>12</total><last>136</last><first>125</first></pages><issn><json:string>0036-5564</json:string></issn><issue>1</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1467-9450</json:string></eissn><title>Scandinavian Journal of Psychology</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1467-9450</json:string></doi></host><publicationDate>1983</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1983</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1467-9450.1983.tb00484.x</json:string></doi><id>9E89B00B2836F9AED01BFB9B70DFFFCADA9C5F0E</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9E89B00B2836F9AED01BFB9B70DFFFCADA9C5F0E/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><extension>zip</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9E89B00B2836F9AED01BFB9B70DFFFCADA9C5F0E/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/9E89B00B2836F9AED01BFB9B70DFFFCADA9C5F0E/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Intramodal and crolss‐modal verbal communication of forms: A comparison with intraidividual matching</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>WILEY</p></availability><date>1983</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Intramodal and crolss‐modal verbal communication of forms: A comparison with intraidividual matching</title><author><persName><forename type="first">BO</forename><surname>MOLANDER</surname></persName><note type="correspondence"><p>Correspondence: Department of Psychology, University of Umeå, S‐90187 Umeå, Sweden.</p></note><affiliation>University of Umeå, Swedan</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Scandinavian Journal of Psychology</title><idno type="pISSN">0036-5564</idno><idno type="eISSN">1467-9450</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-9450</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1983-09"></date><biblScope unit="volume">24</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="125">125</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="136">136</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">9E89B00B2836F9AED01BFB9B70DFFFCADA9C5F0E</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1467-9450.1983.tb00484.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">SJOP125</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1983</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>In two experiments interindividual communication of forms in intramodal (visual‐visual, tactual‐tactual) and cross‐modal (visual‐tactual, tactual‐visual) conditions were compared with the corresponding conditions in intraindividual matching. In the first experiment speakers verbally described three‐dimensionakl objects to listeners, who, on the basis of the descriptions, judged the stimuli presented in other modality to be “same” or “different”. The descriptions produced in this experiment were transcribed and use again in the second experiment. In this experiment the listeners judged stimuli on the basis of the descriptions, judged the stimuli on the basis of descriptions originally meant for comparisons in a different modality. In both experiments the communication phase was followed by individual matching. The results are interpreted as showing:first, that verbal communication efficiently reflects the performance in intraindividual matching. Secondly, intramodal descriptions were found to be less useful than cross‐modal descriptions in a modality other than the one in which the descriptions were produced. Contrary ot earlier findings there was no indication of false negative errors beign associated with verbalizatio. The verbal‐perceptual parallellism suggested by these results is discussed.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1983-09">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9E89B00B2836F9AED01BFB9B70DFFFCADA9C5F0E/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-9450</doi><issn type="print">0036-5564</issn><issn type="electronic">1467-9450</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="SJOP"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL PSYCHOLOGY">Scandinavian Journal of Psychology</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="09001"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/sjop.1983.24.issue-1</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="24">24</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="1">1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="1983-09">September 1983</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0012500" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1467-9450.1983.tb00484.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="SJOP125"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="12"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Article</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2008-05-01"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2008-05-01"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.5 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-04-07"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-02-08"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-11-03"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="125">125</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="136">136</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><sup>2</sup> Department of Psychology, University of Umeå, S‐90187 Umeå, Sweden.</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:SJOP.SJOP125.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="referenceTotal" number="32"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="2"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Intramodal and crolss‐modal verbal communication of forms: A comparison with intraidividual matching</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>BO</givenNames><familyName>MOLANDER</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation>University of Umeå, Swedan</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>In two experiments interindividual communication of forms in intramodal (visual‐visual, tactual‐tactual) and cross‐modal (visual‐tactual, tactual‐visual) conditions were compared with the corresponding conditions in intraindividual matching. In the first experiment speakers verbally described three‐dimensionakl objects to listeners, who, on the basis of the descriptions, judged the stimuli presented in other modality to be “same” or “different”. The descriptions produced in this experiment were transcribed and use again in the second experiment. In this experiment the listeners judged stimuli on the basis of the descriptions, judged the stimuli on the basis of descriptions originally meant for comparisons in a different modality. In both experiments the communication phase was followed by individual matching. The results are interpreted as showing:first, that verbal communication efficiently reflects the performance in intraindividual matching. Secondly, intramodal descriptions were found to be less useful than cross‐modal descriptions in a modality other than the one in which the descriptions were produced. Contrary ot earlier findings there was no indication of false negative errors beign associated with verbalizatio. The verbal‐perceptual parallellism suggested by these results is discussed.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Intramodal and crolss‐modal verbal communication of forms: A comparison with intraidividual matching</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Intramodal and crolss‐modal verbal communication of forms: A comparison with intraidividual matching</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">BO</namePart><namePart type="family">MOLANDER</namePart><affiliation>University of Umeå, Swedan</affiliation><description>Correspondence: Department of Psychology, University of Umeå, S‐90187 Umeå, Sweden.</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1983-09</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1983</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="references">32</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">In two experiments interindividual communication of forms in intramodal (visual‐visual, tactual‐tactual) and cross‐modal (visual‐tactual, tactual‐visual) conditions were compared with the corresponding conditions in intraindividual matching. In the first experiment speakers verbally described three‐dimensionakl objects to listeners, who, on the basis of the descriptions, judged the stimuli presented in other modality to be “same” or “different”. The descriptions produced in this experiment were transcribed and use again in the second experiment. In this experiment the listeners judged stimuli on the basis of the descriptions, judged the stimuli on the basis of descriptions originally meant for comparisons in a different modality. In both experiments the communication phase was followed by individual matching. The results are interpreted as showing:first, that verbal communication efficiently reflects the performance in intraindividual matching. Secondly, intramodal descriptions were found to be less useful than cross‐modal descriptions in a modality other than the one in which the descriptions were produced. Contrary ot earlier findings there was no indication of false negative errors beign associated with verbalizatio. The verbal‐perceptual parallellism suggested by these results is discussed.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Scandinavian Journal of Psychology</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0036-5564</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1467-9450</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-9450</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">SJOP</identifier><part><date>1983</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>24</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>125</start><end>136</end><total>12</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">9E89B00B2836F9AED01BFB9B70DFFFCADA9C5F0E</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1467-9450.1983.tb00484.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">SJOP125</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001F37 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001F37 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:9E89B00B2836F9AED01BFB9B70DFFFCADA9C5F0E
|texte= Intramodal and crolss‐modal verbal communication of forms: A comparison with intraidividual matching
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |