Shake, Rattle, and Roles: Lessons from Experimental Earthquake Engineering for Incorporating Remote Users in Large‐Scale E‐Science Experiments
Identifieur interne : 000F33 ( Main/Curation ); précédent : 000F32; suivant : 000F34Shake, Rattle, and Roles: Lessons from Experimental Earthquake Engineering for Incorporating Remote Users in Large‐Scale E‐Science Experiments
Auteurs : Jeremy P. Birnholtz ; Daniel B. HornSource :
- Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication [ 1083-6101 ] ; 2007-01.
Abstract
While there has been substantial interest in using e‐science and cyberinfrastructure technologies to enable synchronous remote participation in experimental research, the details of such participation are in question. On the one hand, there is a desire to give remote participants the same views and capabilities that they would have as local participants. On the other hand, there are settings where experimental specimens and apparatus are large and difficult to manipulate effectively or view from a remote vantage point. This article argues for more novel forms of remote participation by drawing on exploratory interview and observation data gathered in civil engineering laboratories. It is shown that, while experiments are in progress, the engineers studied focus primarily on detecting and preventing specimen failures, and that their unease about remote participation stems from doubts about the ability of remote participants to detect failures adequately. It is argued that this presents the opportunity to consider novel roles for remote participants that exploit the features of e‐science technologies.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00344.x
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000075
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000075
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000596
- to stream Main, to step Merge: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000F40
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:63D4855D8B61D8FA8F12A296CE9584901E0F453DCuration
No country items
Jeremy P. Birnholtz<affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="no comma">University of Toronto Knowledge Media Design Institute</wicri:noCountry></affiliation><affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="no comma">U.S. Army Research Institute</wicri:noCountry></affiliation>Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Shake, Rattle, and Roles: Lessons from Experimental Earthquake Engineering for Incorporating Remote Users in Large‐Scale E‐Science Experiments</title><author><name sortKey="Birnholtz, Jeremy P" sort="Birnholtz, Jeremy P" uniqKey="Birnholtz J" first="Jeremy P." last="Birnholtz">Jeremy P. Birnholtz</name></author><author><name sortKey="Horn, Daniel B" sort="Horn, Daniel B" uniqKey="Horn D" first="Daniel B." last="Horn">Daniel B. Horn</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:63D4855D8B61D8FA8F12A296CE9584901E0F453D</idno><date when="2007" year="2007">2007</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00344.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/63D4855D8B61D8FA8F12A296CE9584901E0F453D/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000075</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000075</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000596</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">1083-6101:2007:Birnholtz J:shake:rattle:and</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000F40</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000F33</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Shake, Rattle, and Roles: Lessons from Experimental Earthquake Engineering for Incorporating Remote Users in Large‐Scale E‐Science Experiments</title><author><name sortKey="Birnholtz, Jeremy P" sort="Birnholtz, Jeremy P" uniqKey="Birnholtz J" first="Jeremy P." last="Birnholtz">Jeremy P. Birnholtz</name><affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="no comma">University of Toronto Knowledge Media Design Institute</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Horn, Daniel B" sort="Horn, Daniel B" uniqKey="Horn D" first="Daniel B." last="Horn">Daniel B. Horn</name><affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="no comma">U.S. Army Research Institute</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication</title><idno type="ISSN">1083-6101</idno><idno type="eISSN">1083-6101</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-01">2007-01</date><biblScope unit="volume">12</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="673">673</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="691">691</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1083-6101</idno></series><idno type="istex">63D4855D8B61D8FA8F12A296CE9584901E0F453D</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00344.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">JCC4344</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1083-6101</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">While there has been substantial interest in using e‐science and cyberinfrastructure technologies to enable synchronous remote participation in experimental research, the details of such participation are in question. On the one hand, there is a desire to give remote participants the same views and capabilities that they would have as local participants. On the other hand, there are settings where experimental specimens and apparatus are large and difficult to manipulate effectively or view from a remote vantage point. This article argues for more novel forms of remote participation by drawing on exploratory interview and observation data gathered in civil engineering laboratories. It is shown that, while experiments are in progress, the engineers studied focus primarily on detecting and preventing specimen failures, and that their unease about remote participation stems from doubts about the ability of remote participants to detect failures adequately. It is argued that this presents the opportunity to consider novel roles for remote participants that exploit the features of e‐science technologies.</div></front></TEI></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/CyberinfraV1/Data/Main/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000F33 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000F33 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= CyberinfraV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:63D4855D8B61D8FA8F12A296CE9584901E0F453D
|texte= Shake, Rattle, and Roles: Lessons from Experimental Earthquake Engineering for Incorporating Remote Users in Large‐Scale E‐Science Experiments
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25. |  |