Shake, Rattle, and Roles: Lessons from Experimental Earthquake Engineering for Incorporating Remote Users in Large‐Scale E‐Science Experiments
Identifieur interne : 000075 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000074; suivant : 000076Shake, Rattle, and Roles: Lessons from Experimental Earthquake Engineering for Incorporating Remote Users in Large‐Scale E‐Science Experiments
Auteurs : Jeremy P. Birnholtz ; Daniel B. HornSource :
- Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication [ 1083-6101 ] ; 2007-01.
Abstract
While there has been substantial interest in using e‐science and cyberinfrastructure technologies to enable synchronous remote participation in experimental research, the details of such participation are in question. On the one hand, there is a desire to give remote participants the same views and capabilities that they would have as local participants. On the other hand, there are settings where experimental specimens and apparatus are large and difficult to manipulate effectively or view from a remote vantage point. This article argues for more novel forms of remote participation by drawing on exploratory interview and observation data gathered in civil engineering laboratories. It is shown that, while experiments are in progress, the engineers studied focus primarily on detecting and preventing specimen failures, and that their unease about remote participation stems from doubts about the ability of remote participants to detect failures adequately. It is argued that this presents the opportunity to consider novel roles for remote participants that exploit the features of e‐science technologies.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00344.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:63D4855D8B61D8FA8F12A296CE9584901E0F453DLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Shake, Rattle, and Roles: Lessons from Experimental Earthquake Engineering for Incorporating Remote Users in Large‐Scale E‐Science Experiments</title><author><name sortKey="Birnholtz, Jeremy P" sort="Birnholtz, Jeremy P" uniqKey="Birnholtz J" first="Jeremy P." last="Birnholtz">Jeremy P. Birnholtz</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Toronto Knowledge Media Design Institute</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Horn, Daniel B" sort="Horn, Daniel B" uniqKey="Horn D" first="Daniel B." last="Horn">Daniel B. Horn</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>U.S. Army Research Institute</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:63D4855D8B61D8FA8F12A296CE9584901E0F453D</idno><date when="2007" year="2007">2007</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00344.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/63D4855D8B61D8FA8F12A296CE9584901E0F453D/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000075</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Shake, Rattle, and Roles: Lessons from Experimental Earthquake Engineering for Incorporating Remote Users in Large‐Scale E‐Science Experiments</title><author><name sortKey="Birnholtz, Jeremy P" sort="Birnholtz, Jeremy P" uniqKey="Birnholtz J" first="Jeremy P." last="Birnholtz">Jeremy P. Birnholtz</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Toronto Knowledge Media Design Institute</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Horn, Daniel B" sort="Horn, Daniel B" uniqKey="Horn D" first="Daniel B." last="Horn">Daniel B. Horn</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>U.S. Army Research Institute</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication</title><idno type="ISSN">1083-6101</idno><idno type="eISSN">1083-6101</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-01">2007-01</date><biblScope unit="volume">12</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="673">673</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="691">691</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1083-6101</idno></series><idno type="istex">63D4855D8B61D8FA8F12A296CE9584901E0F453D</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00344.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">JCC4344</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1083-6101</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">While there has been substantial interest in using e‐science and cyberinfrastructure technologies to enable synchronous remote participation in experimental research, the details of such participation are in question. On the one hand, there is a desire to give remote participants the same views and capabilities that they would have as local participants. On the other hand, there are settings where experimental specimens and apparatus are large and difficult to manipulate effectively or view from a remote vantage point. This article argues for more novel forms of remote participation by drawing on exploratory interview and observation data gathered in civil engineering laboratories. It is shown that, while experiments are in progress, the engineers studied focus primarily on detecting and preventing specimen failures, and that their unease about remote participation stems from doubts about the ability of remote participants to detect failures adequately. It is argued that this presents the opportunity to consider novel roles for remote participants that exploit the features of e‐science technologies.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Jeremy P. Birnholtz</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Toronto Knowledge Media Design Institute</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Daniel B. Horn</name><affiliations><json:string>U.S. Army Research Institute</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>JCC4344</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>While there has been substantial interest in using e‐science and cyberinfrastructure technologies to enable synchronous remote participation in experimental research, the details of such participation are in question. On the one hand, there is a desire to give remote participants the same views and capabilities that they would have as local participants. On the other hand, there are settings where experimental specimens and apparatus are large and difficult to manipulate effectively or view from a remote vantage point. This article argues for more novel forms of remote participation by drawing on exploratory interview and observation data gathered in civil engineering laboratories. It is shown that, while experiments are in progress, the engineers studied focus primarily on detecting and preventing specimen failures, and that their unease about remote participation stems from doubts about the ability of remote participants to detect failures adequately. It is argued that this presents the opportunity to consider novel roles for remote participants that exploit the features of e‐science technologies.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.956</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>504 x 720 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><keywordCount>0</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>1116</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>7542</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>46407</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>19</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>163</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Shake, Rattle, and Roles: Lessons from Experimental Earthquake Engineering for Incorporating Remote Users in Large‐Scale E‐Science Experiments</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>12</volume><publisherId><json:string>JCC4</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>19</total><last>691</last><first>673</first></pages><issn><json:string>1083-6101</json:string></issn><issue>2</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1083-6101</json:string></eissn><title>Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1083-6101</json:string></doi></host><publicationDate>2007</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2007</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00344.x</json:string></doi><id>63D4855D8B61D8FA8F12A296CE9584901E0F453D</id><score>0.39461976</score><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/63D4855D8B61D8FA8F12A296CE9584901E0F453D/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><extension>zip</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/63D4855D8B61D8FA8F12A296CE9584901E0F453D/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/63D4855D8B61D8FA8F12A296CE9584901E0F453D/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Shake, Rattle, and Roles: Lessons from Experimental Earthquake Engineering for Incorporating Remote Users in Large‐Scale E‐Science Experiments</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace><availability><p>WILEY</p></availability><date>2007</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Shake, Rattle, and Roles: Lessons from Experimental Earthquake Engineering for Incorporating Remote Users in Large‐Scale E‐Science Experiments</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Jeremy P.</forename><surname>Birnholtz</surname></persName><note type="biography">Note: The author listing is alphabetical. This was an entirely collaborative effort.</note><note type="biography">Jeremy P. Birnholtz is a postdoctoral fellow in the Knowledge Media Design Institute at the University of Toronto. His research interests are in the area of improving communication and collaboration tools for workgroups. Address: University of Toronto, Knowledge Media Design Institute, 40 St. George St., Room 7204, Toronto, Ontario M5S 2E4, Canada</note><affiliation>Note: The author listing is alphabetical. This was an entirely collaborative effort.</affiliation><affiliation>Jeremy P. Birnholtz is a postdoctoral fellow in the Knowledge Media Design Institute at the University of Toronto. His research interests are in the area of improving communication and collaboration tools for workgroups. Address: University of Toronto, Knowledge Media Design Institute, 40 St. George St., Room 7204, Toronto, Ontario M5S 2E4, Canada</affiliation><affiliation>University of Toronto Knowledge Media Design Institute</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">Daniel B.</forename><surname>Horn</surname></persName><note type="biography">Note: The views, opinions, and/or findings contained in this article are solely those of the authors and should not be construed as an official Department of the Army or DOD position, policy, or decision, unless so designated by other documentation.</note><note type="biography">Daniel B. Horn is a Research Psychologist at the U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences in Arlington, VA. He has conducted research on video‐mediated communication, the usability of speech recognition software, geographically distributed scientific collaboration, and the use of videogame technology for training. Address: U.S. Army Research Institute, 2511 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 22202‐3926 USA</note><affiliation>Note: The views, opinions, and/or findings contained in this article are solely those of the authors and should not be construed as an official Department of the Army or DOD position, policy, or decision, unless so designated by other documentation.</affiliation><affiliation>Daniel B. Horn is a Research Psychologist at the U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences in Arlington, VA. He has conducted research on video‐mediated communication, the usability of speech recognition software, geographically distributed scientific collaboration, and the use of videogame technology for training. Address: U.S. Army Research Institute, 2511 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 22202‐3926 USA</affiliation><affiliation>U.S. Army Research Institute</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication</title><idno type="pISSN">1083-6101</idno><idno type="eISSN">1083-6101</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1083-6101</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-01"></date><biblScope unit="volume">12</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="673">673</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="691">691</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">63D4855D8B61D8FA8F12A296CE9584901E0F453D</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00344.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">JCC4344</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2007</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>While there has been substantial interest in using e‐science and cyberinfrastructure technologies to enable synchronous remote participation in experimental research, the details of such participation are in question. On the one hand, there is a desire to give remote participants the same views and capabilities that they would have as local participants. On the other hand, there are settings where experimental specimens and apparatus are large and difficult to manipulate effectively or view from a remote vantage point. This article argues for more novel forms of remote participation by drawing on exploratory interview and observation data gathered in civil engineering laboratories. It is shown that, while experiments are in progress, the engineers studied focus primarily on detecting and preventing specimen failures, and that their unease about remote participation stems from doubts about the ability of remote participants to detect failures adequately. It is argued that this presents the opportunity to consider novel roles for remote participants that exploit the features of e‐science technologies.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2007-01">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/63D4855D8B61D8FA8F12A296CE9584901E0F453D/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisherName><publisherLoc>Malden, USA</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1083-6101</doi><issn type="print">1083-6101</issn><issn type="electronic">1083-6101</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JCC4"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION">Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="01002"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/jcmc.2007.12.issue-2</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="12">12</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="2">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2007-01">January 2007</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="17" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00344.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JCC4344"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="19"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2007-02-28"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2007-02-28"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-03-10"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-29"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-30"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="673">673</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="691">691</numbering></numberingGroup><objectNameGroup><objectName elementName="appendix">Appendix</objectName></objectNameGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JCC4.JCC4344.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="1"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="1"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="43"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="0"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Shake, Rattle, and Roles: Lessons from Experimental Earthquake Engineering for Incorporating Remote Users in Large‐Scale E‐Science Experiments</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" noteRef="#fn1 #fn3"><personName><givenNames>Jeremy P.</givenNames><familyName>Birnholtz</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2" noteRef="#fn2 #fn4"><personName><givenNames>Daniel B.</givenNames><familyName>Horn</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation>University of Toronto Knowledge Media Design Institute</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2"><unparsedAffiliation>U.S. Army Research Institute</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p> <i>While there has been substantial interest in using e‐science and cyberinfrastructure technologies to enable synchronous remote participation in experimental research, the details of such participation are in question. On the one hand, there is a desire to give remote participants the same views and capabilities that they would have as local participants. On the other hand, there are settings where experimental specimens and apparatus are large and difficult to manipulate effectively or view from a remote vantage point. This article argues for more novel forms of remote participation by drawing on exploratory interview and observation data gathered in civil engineering laboratories. It is shown that, while experiments are in progress, the engineers studied focus primarily on detecting and preventing specimen failures, and that their unease about remote participation stems from doubts about the ability of remote participants to detect failures adequately. It is argued that this presents the opportunity to consider novel roles for remote participants that exploit the features of e‐science technologies.</i> </p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Shake, Rattle, and Roles: Lessons from Experimental Earthquake Engineering for Incorporating Remote Users in Large‐Scale E‐Science Experiments</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Shake, Rattle, and Roles: Lessons from Experimental Earthquake Engineering for Incorporating Remote Users in Large‐Scale E‐Science Experiments</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Jeremy P.</namePart><namePart type="family">Birnholtz</namePart><affiliation>University of Toronto Knowledge Media Design Institute</affiliation><description>Note: The author listing is alphabetical. This was an entirely collaborative effort.</description><description>Jeremy P. Birnholtz is a postdoctoral fellow in the Knowledge Media Design Institute at the University of Toronto. His research interests are in the area of improving communication and collaboration tools for workgroups. Address: University of Toronto, Knowledge Media Design Institute, 40 St. George St., Room 7204, Toronto, Ontario M5S 2E4, Canada</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Daniel B.</namePart><namePart type="family">Horn</namePart><affiliation>U.S. Army Research Institute</affiliation><description>Note: The views, opinions, and/or findings contained in this article are solely those of the authors and should not be construed as an official Department of the Army or DOD position, policy, or decision, unless so designated by other documentation.</description><description>Daniel B. Horn is a Research Psychologist at the U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences in Arlington, VA. He has conducted research on video‐mediated communication, the usability of speech recognition software, geographically distributed scientific collaboration, and the use of videogame technology for training. Address: U.S. Army Research Institute, 2511 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 22202‐3926 USA</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Malden, USA</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2007-01</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2007</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="figures">1</extent><extent unit="tables">1</extent><extent unit="references">43</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">While there has been substantial interest in using e‐science and cyberinfrastructure technologies to enable synchronous remote participation in experimental research, the details of such participation are in question. On the one hand, there is a desire to give remote participants the same views and capabilities that they would have as local participants. On the other hand, there are settings where experimental specimens and apparatus are large and difficult to manipulate effectively or view from a remote vantage point. This article argues for more novel forms of remote participation by drawing on exploratory interview and observation data gathered in civil engineering laboratories. It is shown that, while experiments are in progress, the engineers studied focus primarily on detecting and preventing specimen failures, and that their unease about remote participation stems from doubts about the ability of remote participants to detect failures adequately. It is argued that this presents the opportunity to consider novel roles for remote participants that exploit the features of e‐science technologies.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1083-6101</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1083-6101</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1083-6101</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JCC4</identifier><part><date>2007</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>12</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>673</start><end>691</end><total>19</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">63D4855D8B61D8FA8F12A296CE9584901E0F453D</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00344.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JCC4344</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Inc</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><enrichments><json:item><type>multicat</type><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/63D4855D8B61D8FA8F12A296CE9584901E0F453D/enrichments/multicat</uri></json:item></enrichments><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/CyberinfraV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000075 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000075 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= CyberinfraV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:63D4855D8B61D8FA8F12A296CE9584901E0F453D
|texte= Shake, Rattle, and Roles: Lessons from Experimental Earthquake Engineering for Incorporating Remote Users in Large‐Scale E‐Science Experiments
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25. |  |