Difference between revisions of "DC 2010 Pittsburgh"

From Wicri ICS
imported>Jacques Ducloy
(Program)
(Program)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 169: Line 169:
  
 
;Session (reports) Metadata at Work:
 
;Session (reports) Metadata at Work:
Yunyun Shen, Long Xiao, Ying Feng: Building Metadata Application Framework for Chinese Digital Library: A Case Study of National Digital Library of China
+
Yunyun Shen, Long Xiao, Ying Feng: [https://doi.org/10.23106/dcmi.952109981 Building Metadata Application Framework for Chinese Digital Library: A Case Study of National Digital Library of China]
 
*Sarah Buchanan : Use of Community Metadata: Public Policy Research in Policy Archive
 
*Sarah Buchanan : Use of Community Metadata: Public Policy Research in Policy Archive
 
* Myung-Ja K. Han, Sheila Bair, Jason Lee: Creating Metadata Best Practices for CONTENTdm Users
 
* Myung-Ja K. Han, Sheila Bair, Jason Lee: Creating Metadata Best Practices for CONTENTdm Users

Latest revision as of 00:01, 31 March 2024

DC2010Banner.jpg
DC 2010 Pittsburgh
Series : DC Conference
Start : Oct 20 2010
Homepage : www.asis.org/ ... /DC2010
City : Pittsburgh
Country : United States
Important dates
Papers due : Apr 9 2010
Making Metadata Work Harder:
Celebrating 15 Years of Dublin Core

Conference Theme

DC-2010 marks the 15th anniversary of Dublin Core and the 10th year of the Annual Conference. To celebrate and reflect on the past and future, conference participants will engage in investigations in both research and application entailing advances that make metadata work harder in ways beyond the originally identified need for better resource discovery. The DCMI Abstract Model, the refined concept of Application Profiles and the initial Description Set Profile specification, represent an inflection point in the trajectory of metadata design and deployment in the service of human information needs. But all is not perfect and we have much to learn from sharing experience. DC-2010, will take stock of progress, look to the future and celebrate the broad scope of research and applied work in making metadata work harder.

Beyond the conference theme, papers, reports, and poster submissions are welcome on a wide range of metadata topics, such as:

  • Metadata principles, guidelines, and best practices
  • Metadata quality, normalization, improvement and mapping
  • Conceptual models and frameworks (e.g., RDF, DCAM, OAIS)
  • Application profiles
  • Metadata interoperability across domains, languages, time, structures, and scales.
  • Cross-domain metadata uses (e.g., recordkeeping, preservation, curation, institutional repositories, publishing)
  • Domain metadata (e.g., for corporations, cultural memory institutions, education, government, and scientific fields)
  • Bibliographic standards (e.g., RDA, FRBR, subject headings) as Semantic Web vocabularies
  • Accessibility metadata
  • Metadata for scientific data, e-Science and grid applications
  • Social tagging and user participation in building metadata
  • Knowledge Organization Systems (e.g., ontologies, taxonomies, authority files, folksonomies, and thesauri) and Simple Knowledge Organization Systems (SKOS)
  • Ontology design and development
  • Integration of metadata and ontologies
  • Metadata generation (methods, tools, and practices)
  • Search engines and metadata
  • Semantic Web metadata and applications
  • Vocabulary registries and registry services

Submissions

Authors wishing to submit papers, reports, or poster proposals may do so through the DCMI Peer Review System at http://dcpapers.dublincore.org/index.php/pubs/. Author registration and instructions for the submission process appear under the “Information for Authors” link. Author Guidelines for full papers, project reports and posters/demonstrations are available through the DCMI Peer Review System. All submissions to the DC-2010 Conference Proceedings will be peer-reviewed by the International Program Committee. All submissions must be in English. Accepted submissions will be published in the official electronic Conference Proceedings. Unless previously arranged, accepted papers, project reports and posters must be presented in Pittsburgh by at least one of their authors.

All submitting authors must provide basic information regarding current professional positions and affiliations as a condition of acceptance and publication.

Full papers (8-10 pages)

Full papers either describe innovative work in detail or provide critical, well-referenced overviews of key developments or good practice in the areas outlined above. Full papers will be assessed using the following criteria:

  • Originality of the approach to implementation
  • Quality of the contribution to the implementation community
  • Significance of the results presented
  • Clarity of presentation

Project reports (4-5 pages)

Project reports describe a specific model, application, or activity in a concise, prescribed format. Project reports will be assessed using the following criteria:

  • Conciseness and completeness of technical description
  • Usability of the technical description by other potential implementers
  • Clarity of presentation

Posters & demonstrations (1-2 pages)

Posters are for the presentation of projects or research under development or late-breaking results. Poster proposals should consist of a one-two page extended abstract. Posters will be assessed using the following criteria:

  • Concise statement of research or project goals and milestones
  • Significance of the research or project
  • Framing of key barriers and future research
  • Statement of results and accomplishments
  • Clarity of presentation

Accepted posters will be published in the Conference Proceedings and displayed at the conference. Unless otherwise arranged, accepted posters must be presented in Pittsburgh by at least one of their authors. However, with prior arrangement, posters may be included in the proceedings and presented by means of video ranging from 4-10 minutes in length and uploaded to YouTube with the link supplied at the time the poster is submitted. Asynchronous mechanisms for participant/author communications will be provided.

Committees

Organization

Comittees

Conference Committee Chair
Conference Committee Co-chairs ,
Pour les workshops 
Pour les tutoriaux 
Program Committee

Program

invited speakers
  • Stu Weibel: A Metadata Trajectory: What 15 years of Dublin Core tells us about our future.
  • Mike Bergman: Bridging the Gaps: Adaptive Approaches to Data Interoperability.
Session Principles and Innovations
  • Emma Tonkin, Andrew Hewson: Building blocks of metadata: What can we learn from Lego™?
  • Sherry Koshman: Visualizing Metadata for Environmental Datasets
Session Libraries and the FRBR Model 
  • Maja Zumer, Marcia Lei Zeng, Athena Salaba: FRBR: A Generalized Approach to Dublin Core Application Profiles
  • Jenn Riley: Enhancing Interoperability of FRBR-Based Metadata
  • Jennifer B. Bowen: Moving Library Metadata Toward Linked Data: Opportunities Provided by the eXtensible Catalog
Session Communities and Metadata 
  • Marie-Claude Côté, Margaret Devey, Lynne McAvoy, Leigh Bain : Celebrating 10 Years of Government of Canada Metadata Standards
  • Paul Asman, San Cannon, Christine Sommo: Extending RSS to Meet Central Bank Needs
  • Jian Qin, Miao Chen, Xiaozhong Liu, Andrea Kathleen Wiggins: Linking Entities in Scientific Metadata
Session DC in Practice
  • Carol Jean Godby: From records to streams: Merging library and publisher metadata
  • Steven J. Miller: The One-To-One Principle: Challenges in Current Practice
  • Hannah Tarver: Better Guidelines, Better Functionality: How Metadata Supports the Cycle of System Improvement at UNT
Session (reports) Metadata at Work

Yunyun Shen, Long Xiao, Ying Feng: Building Metadata Application Framework for Chinese Digital Library: A Case Study of National Digital Library of China

  • Sarah Buchanan : Use of Community Metadata: Public Policy Research in Policy Archive
  • Myung-Ja K. Han, Sheila Bair, Jason Lee: Creating Metadata Best Practices for CONTENTdm Users
Session (reports) New Directions in Metadata
  • Stephanie Ogeneski Christensen, Douglas Donald Dunlop: The Case for Implementing Core Descriptive Embedded Metadata at the Smithsonian
  • James E. Andrews, Denise Shereff, Timothy Patrick, Rachel Richesson: The Question about Questions: Is DC a Good Choice to Address the Challenges of Representation of Clinical Research Questions and Value Sets?
  • Jacques Ducloy, Thierry Daunois, Muriel Foulonneau, Alice Hermann, Jean-Charles Lamirel, Stéphane Sire, Jean-Pierre Thomesse, Christine Vanoirbeek: Metadata for WICRI, a Network of Semantic Wikis for Communities in Research and Innovation.
Tutorials
  • Jane Greenberg, Jon Phipps : Dublin Core: History, Key Concepts, and Evolving Context
  • Karen Coyle, Ron Daniel : A SAFARI from the Dublin Core to the Semantic Web
Working groups