Serveur d'exploration autour du libre accès en Belgique

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Reporting, access, and transparency : Better infrastructure of clinical trials

Identifieur interne : 000068 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000067; suivant : 000069

Reporting, access, and transparency : Better infrastructure of clinical trials

Auteurs : Massimo Antonelli ; Giovanna Mercurio

Source :

RBID : Pascal:09-0069946

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Open access to information in medical science and adequate reporting of clinical trials may allow investigators and editors to recognize bias in study designs and avoid unnecessary duplication of efforts. Unfortunately, most of clinical trials are very expensive and are often supported by industries that may have financial reasons to hide or partially disclose results. However, investigators and editors have a greater interest in publishing results that can immediately change clinical practice rather than negative results, thus contributing to facilitate publication biases. Several years ago, legislation in several countries mandated the registration of clinical trials as an effective means of promoting information access and full transparency in medical research. However, comprehensive registers have not been adequately supported by law, particularly in Europe, where legislation has ironically contributed to fragmented research, and dampened its competitiveness and productivity. In this context, appropriate strategies help to protect the independence of academic research and ensure full transparency in medical science.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

pA  
A01 01  1    @0 0090-3493
A02 01      @0 CCMDC7
A03   1    @0 Crit. care med.
A05       @2 37
A06       @2 1 @3 SUP
A08 01  1  ENG  @1 Reporting, access, and transparency : Better infrastructure of clinical trials
A09 01  1  ENG  @1 Improving Clinical Trials in the Critically Ill: Proceedings of a Roundtable Conference in Brussels, Belgium, March 2008
A11 01  1    @1 ANTONELLI (Massimo)
A11 02  1    @1 MERCURIO (Giovanna)
A12 01  1    @1 ANGUS (Derek C.) @9 ed.
A12 02  1    @1 MIRA (Jean-Paul) @9 ed.
A14 01      @1 Istituto di Anestesiologia e Rianimazione, Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore @2 Rome @3 ITA @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut.
A15 01      @1 CRISMA Laboratory, Department of Critical Care medicine, University of Pittsburgh @2 Pittsburgh, PA @3 USA @Z 1 aut.
A20       @2 S178-S183
A21       @1 2009
A23 01      @0 ENG
A43 01      @1 INIST @2 17751 @5 354000184061330250
A44       @0 0000 @1 © 2009 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.
A45       @0 43 ref.
A47 01  1    @0 09-0069946
A60       @1 P @2 C
A61       @0 A
A64 01  1    @0 Critical care medicine
A66 01      @0 USA
C01 01    ENG  @0 Open access to information in medical science and adequate reporting of clinical trials may allow investigators and editors to recognize bias in study designs and avoid unnecessary duplication of efforts. Unfortunately, most of clinical trials are very expensive and are often supported by industries that may have financial reasons to hide or partially disclose results. However, investigators and editors have a greater interest in publishing results that can immediately change clinical practice rather than negative results, thus contributing to facilitate publication biases. Several years ago, legislation in several countries mandated the registration of clinical trials as an effective means of promoting information access and full transparency in medical research. However, comprehensive registers have not been adequately supported by law, particularly in Europe, where legislation has ironically contributed to fragmented research, and dampened its competitiveness and productivity. In this context, appropriate strategies help to protect the independence of academic research and ensure full transparency in medical science.
C02 01  X    @0 002B27B
C02 02  X    @0 002B02A06
C03 01  X  FRE  @0 Industrie @5 09
C03 01  X  ENG  @0 Industry @5 09
C03 01  X  SPA  @0 Industria @5 09
C03 02  X  FRE  @0 Réanimation @5 10
C03 02  X  ENG  @0 Resuscitation @5 10
C03 02  X  SPA  @0 Reanimación @5 10
C03 03  X  FRE  @0 Soin intensif @5 11
C03 03  X  ENG  @0 Intensive care @5 11
C03 03  X  SPA  @0 Cuidado intensivo @5 11
N21       @1 054
N44 01      @1 OTO
N82       @1 OTO
pR  
A30 01  1  ENG  @1 Improving Clinical Trials in the Critically Ill: Proceedings of a Roundtable Conference @3 Brussels BEL @4 2008-03

Format Inist (serveur)

NO : PASCAL 09-0069946 INIST
ET : Reporting, access, and transparency : Better infrastructure of clinical trials
AU : ANTONELLI (Massimo); MERCURIO (Giovanna); ANGUS (Derek C.); MIRA (Jean-Paul)
AF : Istituto di Anestesiologia e Rianimazione, Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore/Rome/Italie (1 aut., 2 aut.); CRISMA Laboratory, Department of Critical Care medicine, University of Pittsburgh/Pittsburgh, PA/Etats-Unis (1 aut.)
DT : Publication en série; Congrès; Niveau analytique
SO : Critical care medicine; ISSN 0090-3493; Coden CCMDC7; Etats-Unis; Da. 2009; Vol. 37; No. 1 SUP; S178-S183; Bibl. 43 ref.
LA : Anglais
EA : Open access to information in medical science and adequate reporting of clinical trials may allow investigators and editors to recognize bias in study designs and avoid unnecessary duplication of efforts. Unfortunately, most of clinical trials are very expensive and are often supported by industries that may have financial reasons to hide or partially disclose results. However, investigators and editors have a greater interest in publishing results that can immediately change clinical practice rather than negative results, thus contributing to facilitate publication biases. Several years ago, legislation in several countries mandated the registration of clinical trials as an effective means of promoting information access and full transparency in medical research. However, comprehensive registers have not been adequately supported by law, particularly in Europe, where legislation has ironically contributed to fragmented research, and dampened its competitiveness and productivity. In this context, appropriate strategies help to protect the independence of academic research and ensure full transparency in medical science.
CC : 002B27B; 002B02A06
FD : Industrie; Réanimation; Soin intensif
ED : Industry; Resuscitation; Intensive care
SD : Industria; Reanimación; Cuidado intensivo
LO : INIST-17751.354000184061330250
ID : 09-0069946

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:09-0069946

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Reporting, access, and transparency : Better infrastructure of clinical trials</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Antonelli, Massimo" sort="Antonelli, Massimo" uniqKey="Antonelli M" first="Massimo" last="Antonelli">Massimo Antonelli</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Istituto di Anestesiologia e Rianimazione, Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore</s1>
<s2>Rome</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Mercurio, Giovanna" sort="Mercurio, Giovanna" uniqKey="Mercurio G" first="Giovanna" last="Mercurio">Giovanna Mercurio</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Istituto di Anestesiologia e Rianimazione, Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore</s1>
<s2>Rome</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">09-0069946</idno>
<date when="2009">2009</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 09-0069946 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:09-0069946</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000068</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Reporting, access, and transparency : Better infrastructure of clinical trials</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Antonelli, Massimo" sort="Antonelli, Massimo" uniqKey="Antonelli M" first="Massimo" last="Antonelli">Massimo Antonelli</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Istituto di Anestesiologia e Rianimazione, Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore</s1>
<s2>Rome</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Mercurio, Giovanna" sort="Mercurio, Giovanna" uniqKey="Mercurio G" first="Giovanna" last="Mercurio">Giovanna Mercurio</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Istituto di Anestesiologia e Rianimazione, Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore</s1>
<s2>Rome</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Critical care medicine</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Crit. care med.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0090-3493</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2009">2009</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">Critical care medicine</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Crit. care med.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0090-3493</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Industry</term>
<term>Intensive care</term>
<term>Resuscitation</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Industrie</term>
<term>Réanimation</term>
<term>Soin intensif</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Open access to information in medical science and adequate reporting of clinical trials may allow investigators and editors to recognize bias in study designs and avoid unnecessary duplication of efforts. Unfortunately, most of clinical trials are very expensive and are often supported by industries that may have financial reasons to hide or partially disclose results. However, investigators and editors have a greater interest in publishing results that can immediately change clinical practice rather than negative results, thus contributing to facilitate publication biases. Several years ago, legislation in several countries mandated the registration of clinical trials as an effective means of promoting information access and full transparency in medical research. However, comprehensive registers have not been adequately supported by law, particularly in Europe, where legislation has ironically contributed to fragmented research, and dampened its competitiveness and productivity. In this context, appropriate strategies help to protect the independence of academic research and ensure full transparency in medical science.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>0090-3493</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01">
<s0>CCMDC7</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>Crit. care med.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>37</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06>
<s2>1</s2>
<s3>SUP</s3>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Reporting, access, and transparency : Better infrastructure of clinical trials</s1>
</fA08>
<fA09 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Improving Clinical Trials in the Critically Ill: Proceedings of a Roundtable Conference in Brussels, Belgium, March 2008</s1>
</fA09>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>ANTONELLI (Massimo)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>MERCURIO (Giovanna)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA12 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>ANGUS (Derek C.)</s1>
<s9>ed.</s9>
</fA12>
<fA12 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>MIRA (Jean-Paul)</s1>
<s9>ed.</s9>
</fA12>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Istituto di Anestesiologia e Rianimazione, Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore</s1>
<s2>Rome</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA15 i1="01">
<s1>CRISMA Laboratory, Department of Critical Care medicine, University of Pittsburgh</s1>
<s2>Pittsburgh, PA</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA15>
<fA20>
<s2>S178-S183</s2>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2009</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>17751</s2>
<s5>354000184061330250</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2009 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>43 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>09-0069946</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
<s2>C</s2>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>Critical care medicine</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>Open access to information in medical science and adequate reporting of clinical trials may allow investigators and editors to recognize bias in study designs and avoid unnecessary duplication of efforts. Unfortunately, most of clinical trials are very expensive and are often supported by industries that may have financial reasons to hide or partially disclose results. However, investigators and editors have a greater interest in publishing results that can immediately change clinical practice rather than negative results, thus contributing to facilitate publication biases. Several years ago, legislation in several countries mandated the registration of clinical trials as an effective means of promoting information access and full transparency in medical research. However, comprehensive registers have not been adequately supported by law, particularly in Europe, where legislation has ironically contributed to fragmented research, and dampened its competitiveness and productivity. In this context, appropriate strategies help to protect the independence of academic research and ensure full transparency in medical science.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X">
<s0>002B27B</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X">
<s0>002B02A06</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Industrie</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Industry</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Industria</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Réanimation</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Resuscitation</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Reanimación</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Soin intensif</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Intensive care</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Cuidado intensivo</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21>
<s1>054</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01">
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82>
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
<pR>
<fA30 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Improving Clinical Trials in the Critically Ill: Proceedings of a Roundtable Conference</s1>
<s3>Brussels BEL</s3>
<s4>2008-03</s4>
</fA30>
</pR>
</standard>
<server>
<NO>PASCAL 09-0069946 INIST</NO>
<ET>Reporting, access, and transparency : Better infrastructure of clinical trials</ET>
<AU>ANTONELLI (Massimo); MERCURIO (Giovanna); ANGUS (Derek C.); MIRA (Jean-Paul)</AU>
<AF>Istituto di Anestesiologia e Rianimazione, Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore/Rome/Italie (1 aut., 2 aut.); CRISMA Laboratory, Department of Critical Care medicine, University of Pittsburgh/Pittsburgh, PA/Etats-Unis (1 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Congrès; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Critical care medicine; ISSN 0090-3493; Coden CCMDC7; Etats-Unis; Da. 2009; Vol. 37; No. 1 SUP; S178-S183; Bibl. 43 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Open access to information in medical science and adequate reporting of clinical trials may allow investigators and editors to recognize bias in study designs and avoid unnecessary duplication of efforts. Unfortunately, most of clinical trials are very expensive and are often supported by industries that may have financial reasons to hide or partially disclose results. However, investigators and editors have a greater interest in publishing results that can immediately change clinical practice rather than negative results, thus contributing to facilitate publication biases. Several years ago, legislation in several countries mandated the registration of clinical trials as an effective means of promoting information access and full transparency in medical research. However, comprehensive registers have not been adequately supported by law, particularly in Europe, where legislation has ironically contributed to fragmented research, and dampened its competitiveness and productivity. In this context, appropriate strategies help to protect the independence of academic research and ensure full transparency in medical science.</EA>
<CC>002B27B; 002B02A06</CC>
<FD>Industrie; Réanimation; Soin intensif</FD>
<ED>Industry; Resuscitation; Intensive care</ED>
<SD>Industria; Reanimación; Cuidado intensivo</SD>
<LO>INIST-17751.354000184061330250</LO>
<ID>09-0069946</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Belgique/explor/OpenAccessBelV2/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000068 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000068 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Belgique
   |area=    OpenAccessBelV2
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:09-0069946
   |texte=   Reporting, access, and transparency : Better infrastructure of clinical trials
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25.
Data generation: Thu Dec 1 00:43:49 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 14:51:30 2024