Serveur d'exploration autour du libre accès en Belgique

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index : A comparison between four science disciplines

Identifieur interne : 000067 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000066; suivant : 000068

Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index : A comparison between four science disciplines

Auteurs : Kayvan Kousha ; Mike Thelwall

Source :

RBID : Pascal:09-0110297

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

For practical reasons, bibliographic databases can only contain a subset of the scientific literature. The ISI citation databases are designed to cover the highest impact scientific research journals as well as a few other sources chosen by the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI). Google Scholar also contains citation information, but includes a less quality controlled collection of publications from different types of web documents. We define Google Scholar unique citations as those retrieved by Google Scholar which are not in the ISI database. We took a sample of 882 articles from 39 open access ISI-indexed journals in 2001 from biology, chemistry, physics and computing and classified the type, language, publication year and accessibility of the Google Scholar unique citing sources. The majority of Google Scholar unique citations (70%) were from full-text sources and there were large disciplinary differences between types of citing documents, suggesting that a wide range of non-ISI citing sources, especially from non-journal documents, are accessible by Google Scholar. This might be considered to be an advantage of Google Scholar, since it could be useful for citation tracking in a wider range of open access scholarly documents and to give a broader type of citation impact. An important corollary from our study is that Google Scholar's wider coverage of Open Access (OA) web documents is likely to give a boost to the impact of OA research and the OA movement.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

pA  
A01 01  1    @0 0138-9130
A02 01      @0 SCNTDX
A03   1    @0 Scientometrics : (Print)
A05       @2 74
A06       @2 2
A08 01  1  ENG  @1 Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index : A comparison between four science disciplines
A09 01  1  ENG  @1 9th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators. "New Challenges in Quantitative Science and Technology Research". Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (Belgium), 7-9 September 2006
A11 01  1    @1 KOUSHA (Kayvan)
A11 02  1    @1 THELWALL (Mike)
A12 01  1    @1 GLÄNZEL (Wolfgang) @9 ed.
A14 01      @1 Department of Library and Information Science, University of Tehran @2 Tehran @3 IRN @Z 1 aut.
A14 02      @1 School of Computing and Information Technology, University of Wolverhampton @2 Wolverhampton @3 GBR @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut.
A20       @1 273-294
A21       @1 2008
A23 01      @0 ENG
A43 01      @1 INIST @2 19049 @5 354000161976190070
A44       @0 0000 @1 © 2009 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.
A45       @0 3 p.1/4
A47 01  1    @0 09-0110297
A60       @1 P @2 C
A61       @0 A
A64 01  1    @0 Scientometrics : (Print)
A66 01      @0 NLD
C01 01    ENG  @0 For practical reasons, bibliographic databases can only contain a subset of the scientific literature. The ISI citation databases are designed to cover the highest impact scientific research journals as well as a few other sources chosen by the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI). Google Scholar also contains citation information, but includes a less quality controlled collection of publications from different types of web documents. We define Google Scholar unique citations as those retrieved by Google Scholar which are not in the ISI database. We took a sample of 882 articles from 39 open access ISI-indexed journals in 2001 from biology, chemistry, physics and computing and classified the type, language, publication year and accessibility of the Google Scholar unique citing sources. The majority of Google Scholar unique citations (70%) were from full-text sources and there were large disciplinary differences between types of citing documents, suggesting that a wide range of non-ISI citing sources, especially from non-journal documents, are accessible by Google Scholar. This might be considered to be an advantage of Google Scholar, since it could be useful for citation tracking in a wider range of open access scholarly documents and to give a broader type of citation impact. An important corollary from our study is that Google Scholar's wider coverage of Open Access (OA) web documents is likely to give a boost to the impact of OA research and the OA movement.
C02 01  X    @0 001A01A02
C03 01  X  FRE  @0 Analyse citation @5 05
C03 01  X  ENG  @0 Citation analysis @5 05
C03 01  X  SPA  @0 Análisis citas @5 05
C03 02  X  FRE  @0 Etude comparative @5 06
C03 02  X  ENG  @0 Comparative study @5 06
C03 02  X  SPA  @0 Estudio comparativo @5 06
C03 03  X  FRE  @0 Base de données bibliographiques @5 07
C03 03  X  ENG  @0 Bibliographic database @5 07
C03 03  X  SPA  @0 Base datos bibliografica @5 07
C03 04  X  FRE  @0 Littérature scientifique @5 08
C03 04  X  ENG  @0 Scientific literature @5 08
C03 04  X  SPA  @0 Literatura científica @5 08
C03 05  X  FRE  @0 Recherche scientifique @5 10
C03 05  X  ENG  @0 Scientific research @5 10
C03 05  X  SPA  @0 Investigación científica @5 10
C03 06  X  FRE  @0 Périodique @5 11
C03 06  X  ENG  @0 Periodical @5 11
C03 06  X  SPA  @0 Periódico @5 11
C03 07  X  FRE  @0 Texte intégral @5 12
C03 07  X  ENG  @0 Full text @5 12
C03 07  X  SPA  @0 Texto completo @5 12
C03 08  X  FRE  @0 Facteur impact @5 13
C03 08  X  ENG  @0 Impact factor @5 13
C03 08  X  SPA  @0 Factor impacto @5 13
C03 09  X  FRE  @0 SCI (Science Citation Index) @4 INC @5 27
C03 10  X  FRE  @0 ISI (Institute for Scientific Information) @4 INC @5 28
N21       @1 075
pR  
A30 01  1  ENG  @1 International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators @2 9 @3 Leuven BEL @4 2006-09-07

Format Inist (serveur)

NO : PASCAL 09-0110297 INIST
ET : Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index : A comparison between four science disciplines
AU : KOUSHA (Kayvan); THELWALL (Mike); GLÄNZEL (Wolfgang)
AF : Department of Library and Information Science, University of Tehran/Tehran/Iran (1 aut.); School of Computing and Information Technology, University of Wolverhampton/Wolverhampton/Royaume-Uni (1 aut., 2 aut.)
DT : Publication en série; Congrès; Niveau analytique
SO : Scientometrics : (Print); ISSN 0138-9130; Coden SCNTDX; Pays-Bas; Da. 2008; Vol. 74; No. 2; Pp. 273-294; Bibl. 3 p.1/4
LA : Anglais
EA : For practical reasons, bibliographic databases can only contain a subset of the scientific literature. The ISI citation databases are designed to cover the highest impact scientific research journals as well as a few other sources chosen by the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI). Google Scholar also contains citation information, but includes a less quality controlled collection of publications from different types of web documents. We define Google Scholar unique citations as those retrieved by Google Scholar which are not in the ISI database. We took a sample of 882 articles from 39 open access ISI-indexed journals in 2001 from biology, chemistry, physics and computing and classified the type, language, publication year and accessibility of the Google Scholar unique citing sources. The majority of Google Scholar unique citations (70%) were from full-text sources and there were large disciplinary differences between types of citing documents, suggesting that a wide range of non-ISI citing sources, especially from non-journal documents, are accessible by Google Scholar. This might be considered to be an advantage of Google Scholar, since it could be useful for citation tracking in a wider range of open access scholarly documents and to give a broader type of citation impact. An important corollary from our study is that Google Scholar's wider coverage of Open Access (OA) web documents is likely to give a boost to the impact of OA research and the OA movement.
CC : 001A01A02
FD : Analyse citation; Etude comparative; Base de données bibliographiques; Littérature scientifique; Recherche scientifique; Périodique; Texte intégral; Facteur impact; SCI (Science Citation Index); ISI (Institute for Scientific Information)
ED : Citation analysis; Comparative study; Bibliographic database; Scientific literature; Scientific research; Periodical; Full text; Impact factor
SD : Análisis citas; Estudio comparativo; Base datos bibliografica; Literatura científica; Investigación científica; Periódico; Texto completo; Factor impacto
LO : INIST-19049.354000161976190070
ID : 09-0110297

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:09-0110297

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index : A comparison between four science disciplines</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kousha, Kayvan" sort="Kousha, Kayvan" uniqKey="Kousha K" first="Kayvan" last="Kousha">Kayvan Kousha</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Library and Information Science, University of Tehran</s1>
<s2>Tehran</s2>
<s3>IRN</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>School of Computing and Information Technology, University of Wolverhampton</s1>
<s2>Wolverhampton</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Thelwall, Mike" sort="Thelwall, Mike" uniqKey="Thelwall M" first="Mike" last="Thelwall">Mike Thelwall</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>School of Computing and Information Technology, University of Wolverhampton</s1>
<s2>Wolverhampton</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">09-0110297</idno>
<date when="2008">2008</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 09-0110297 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:09-0110297</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000067</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index : A comparison between four science disciplines</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kousha, Kayvan" sort="Kousha, Kayvan" uniqKey="Kousha K" first="Kayvan" last="Kousha">Kayvan Kousha</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Library and Information Science, University of Tehran</s1>
<s2>Tehran</s2>
<s3>IRN</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>School of Computing and Information Technology, University of Wolverhampton</s1>
<s2>Wolverhampton</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Thelwall, Mike" sort="Thelwall, Mike" uniqKey="Thelwall M" first="Mike" last="Thelwall">Mike Thelwall</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>School of Computing and Information Technology, University of Wolverhampton</s1>
<s2>Wolverhampton</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Scientometrics : (Print)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Scientometrics : (Print)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0138-9130</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2008">2008</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">Scientometrics : (Print)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Scientometrics : (Print)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0138-9130</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Bibliographic database</term>
<term>Citation analysis</term>
<term>Comparative study</term>
<term>Full text</term>
<term>Impact factor</term>
<term>Periodical</term>
<term>Scientific literature</term>
<term>Scientific research</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Analyse citation</term>
<term>Etude comparative</term>
<term>Base de données bibliographiques</term>
<term>Littérature scientifique</term>
<term>Recherche scientifique</term>
<term>Périodique</term>
<term>Texte intégral</term>
<term>Facteur impact</term>
<term>SCI (Science Citation Index)</term>
<term>ISI (Institute for Scientific Information)</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">For practical reasons, bibliographic databases can only contain a subset of the scientific literature. The ISI citation databases are designed to cover the highest impact scientific research journals as well as a few other sources chosen by the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI). Google Scholar also contains citation information, but includes a less quality controlled collection of publications from different types of web documents. We define Google Scholar unique citations as those retrieved by Google Scholar which are not in the ISI database. We took a sample of 882 articles from 39 open access ISI-indexed journals in 2001 from biology, chemistry, physics and computing and classified the type, language, publication year and accessibility of the Google Scholar unique citing sources. The majority of Google Scholar unique citations (70%) were from full-text sources and there were large disciplinary differences between types of citing documents, suggesting that a wide range of non-ISI citing sources, especially from non-journal documents, are accessible by Google Scholar. This might be considered to be an advantage of Google Scholar, since it could be useful for citation tracking in a wider range of open access scholarly documents and to give a broader type of citation impact. An important corollary from our study is that Google Scholar's wider coverage of Open Access (OA) web documents is likely to give a boost to the impact of OA research and the OA movement.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>0138-9130</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01">
<s0>SCNTDX</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>Scientometrics : (Print)</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>74</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06>
<s2>2</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index : A comparison between four science disciplines</s1>
</fA08>
<fA09 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>9th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators. "New Challenges in Quantitative Science and Technology Research". Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (Belgium), 7-9 September 2006</s1>
</fA09>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>KOUSHA (Kayvan)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>THELWALL (Mike)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA12 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>GLÄNZEL (Wolfgang)</s1>
<s9>ed.</s9>
</fA12>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Library and Information Science, University of Tehran</s1>
<s2>Tehran</s2>
<s3>IRN</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02">
<s1>School of Computing and Information Technology, University of Wolverhampton</s1>
<s2>Wolverhampton</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20>
<s1>273-294</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2008</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>19049</s2>
<s5>354000161976190070</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2009 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>3 p.1/4</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>09-0110297</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
<s2>C</s2>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>Scientometrics : (Print)</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>NLD</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>For practical reasons, bibliographic databases can only contain a subset of the scientific literature. The ISI citation databases are designed to cover the highest impact scientific research journals as well as a few other sources chosen by the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI). Google Scholar also contains citation information, but includes a less quality controlled collection of publications from different types of web documents. We define Google Scholar unique citations as those retrieved by Google Scholar which are not in the ISI database. We took a sample of 882 articles from 39 open access ISI-indexed journals in 2001 from biology, chemistry, physics and computing and classified the type, language, publication year and accessibility of the Google Scholar unique citing sources. The majority of Google Scholar unique citations (70%) were from full-text sources and there were large disciplinary differences between types of citing documents, suggesting that a wide range of non-ISI citing sources, especially from non-journal documents, are accessible by Google Scholar. This might be considered to be an advantage of Google Scholar, since it could be useful for citation tracking in a wider range of open access scholarly documents and to give a broader type of citation impact. An important corollary from our study is that Google Scholar's wider coverage of Open Access (OA) web documents is likely to give a boost to the impact of OA research and the OA movement.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X">
<s0>001A01A02</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Analyse citation</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Citation analysis</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Análisis citas</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Etude comparative</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Comparative study</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Estudio comparativo</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Base de données bibliographiques</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Bibliographic database</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Base datos bibliografica</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Littérature scientifique</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Scientific literature</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Literatura científica</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Recherche scientifique</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Scientific research</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Investigación científica</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Périodique</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Periodical</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Periódico</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Texte intégral</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Full text</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Texto completo</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Facteur impact</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Impact factor</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Factor impacto</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>SCI (Science Citation Index)</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>27</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>ISI (Institute for Scientific Information)</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>28</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21>
<s1>075</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
<pR>
<fA30 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators</s1>
<s2>9</s2>
<s3>Leuven BEL</s3>
<s4>2006-09-07</s4>
</fA30>
</pR>
</standard>
<server>
<NO>PASCAL 09-0110297 INIST</NO>
<ET>Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index : A comparison between four science disciplines</ET>
<AU>KOUSHA (Kayvan); THELWALL (Mike); GLÄNZEL (Wolfgang)</AU>
<AF>Department of Library and Information Science, University of Tehran/Tehran/Iran (1 aut.); School of Computing and Information Technology, University of Wolverhampton/Wolverhampton/Royaume-Uni (1 aut., 2 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Congrès; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Scientometrics : (Print); ISSN 0138-9130; Coden SCNTDX; Pays-Bas; Da. 2008; Vol. 74; No. 2; Pp. 273-294; Bibl. 3 p.1/4</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>For practical reasons, bibliographic databases can only contain a subset of the scientific literature. The ISI citation databases are designed to cover the highest impact scientific research journals as well as a few other sources chosen by the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI). Google Scholar also contains citation information, but includes a less quality controlled collection of publications from different types of web documents. We define Google Scholar unique citations as those retrieved by Google Scholar which are not in the ISI database. We took a sample of 882 articles from 39 open access ISI-indexed journals in 2001 from biology, chemistry, physics and computing and classified the type, language, publication year and accessibility of the Google Scholar unique citing sources. The majority of Google Scholar unique citations (70%) were from full-text sources and there were large disciplinary differences between types of citing documents, suggesting that a wide range of non-ISI citing sources, especially from non-journal documents, are accessible by Google Scholar. This might be considered to be an advantage of Google Scholar, since it could be useful for citation tracking in a wider range of open access scholarly documents and to give a broader type of citation impact. An important corollary from our study is that Google Scholar's wider coverage of Open Access (OA) web documents is likely to give a boost to the impact of OA research and the OA movement.</EA>
<CC>001A01A02</CC>
<FD>Analyse citation; Etude comparative; Base de données bibliographiques; Littérature scientifique; Recherche scientifique; Périodique; Texte intégral; Facteur impact; SCI (Science Citation Index); ISI (Institute for Scientific Information)</FD>
<ED>Citation analysis; Comparative study; Bibliographic database; Scientific literature; Scientific research; Periodical; Full text; Impact factor</ED>
<SD>Análisis citas; Estudio comparativo; Base datos bibliografica; Literatura científica; Investigación científica; Periódico; Texto completo; Factor impacto</SD>
<LO>INIST-19049.354000161976190070</LO>
<ID>09-0110297</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Belgique/explor/OpenAccessBelV2/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000067 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000067 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Belgique
   |area=    OpenAccessBelV2
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:09-0110297
   |texte=   Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index : A comparison between four science disciplines
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25.
Data generation: Thu Dec 1 00:43:49 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 14:51:30 2024