Comparison of AcrySof MA30BA and Sensar AR40 acrylic intraocular lenses.
Identifieur interne : 001C74 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 001C73; suivant : 001C75Comparison of AcrySof MA30BA and Sensar AR40 acrylic intraocular lenses.
Auteurs : Fabrizio Casprini ; Gian Marco Tosi ; Pier Paolo Quercioli ; Aldo CaporossiSource :
- Journal of cataract and refractive surgery [ 0886-3350 ] ; 2002.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Acrylic Resins, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cataract (etiology), Cataract (pathology), Glare, Humans, Lens Capsule, Crystalline (pathology), Lens Implantation, Intraocular, Lenses, Intraocular, Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction, Phacoemulsification, Postoperative Complications (pathology), Prosthesis Design, Retrospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Visual Acuity.
- MESH :
- chemical : Acrylic Resins.
- etiology : Cataract.
- pathology : Cataract, Lens Capsule, Crystalline, Postoperative Complications.
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Glare, Humans, Lens Implantation, Intraocular, Lenses, Intraocular, Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction, Phacoemulsification, Prosthesis Design, Retrospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Visual Acuity.
Abstract
To compare differences in anterior (ACO) and posterior (PCO) capsule opacification and subjective glare between 2 acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs): AcrySof MA30BA (Alcon) and Sensar AR40 (Allergan).
PubMed: 12106720
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:12106720Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Comparison of AcrySof MA30BA and Sensar AR40 acrylic intraocular lenses.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Casprini, Fabrizio" sort="Casprini, Fabrizio" uniqKey="Casprini F" first="Fabrizio" last="Casprini">Fabrizio Casprini</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology and Neurosurgery, University of Siena, Siena, Italy. caporossi@unisi.it</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Tosi, Gian Marco" sort="Tosi, Gian Marco" uniqKey="Tosi G" first="Gian Marco" last="Tosi">Gian Marco Tosi</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Quercioli, Pier Paolo" sort="Quercioli, Pier Paolo" uniqKey="Quercioli P" first="Pier Paolo" last="Quercioli">Pier Paolo Quercioli</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Caporossi, Aldo" sort="Caporossi, Aldo" uniqKey="Caporossi A" first="Aldo" last="Caporossi">Aldo Caporossi</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2002">2002</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:12106720</idno>
<idno type="pmid">12106720</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001C74</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Comparison of AcrySof MA30BA and Sensar AR40 acrylic intraocular lenses.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Casprini, Fabrizio" sort="Casprini, Fabrizio" uniqKey="Casprini F" first="Fabrizio" last="Casprini">Fabrizio Casprini</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology and Neurosurgery, University of Siena, Siena, Italy. caporossi@unisi.it</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Tosi, Gian Marco" sort="Tosi, Gian Marco" uniqKey="Tosi G" first="Gian Marco" last="Tosi">Gian Marco Tosi</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Quercioli, Pier Paolo" sort="Quercioli, Pier Paolo" uniqKey="Quercioli P" first="Pier Paolo" last="Quercioli">Pier Paolo Quercioli</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Caporossi, Aldo" sort="Caporossi, Aldo" uniqKey="Caporossi A" first="Aldo" last="Caporossi">Aldo Caporossi</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno>
<imprint><date when="2002" type="published">2002</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Acrylic Resins</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Aged, 80 and over</term>
<term>Cataract (etiology)</term>
<term>Cataract (pathology)</term>
<term>Glare</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Lens Capsule, Crystalline (pathology)</term>
<term>Lens Implantation, Intraocular</term>
<term>Lenses, Intraocular</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Patient Satisfaction</term>
<term>Phacoemulsification</term>
<term>Postoperative Complications (pathology)</term>
<term>Prosthesis Design</term>
<term>Retrospective Studies</term>
<term>Surveys and Questionnaires</term>
<term>Visual Acuity</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Acrylic Resins</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="etiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Cataract</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="pathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Cataract</term>
<term>Lens Capsule, Crystalline</term>
<term>Postoperative Complications</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term>
<term>Aged, 80 and over</term>
<term>Glare</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Lens Implantation, Intraocular</term>
<term>Lenses, Intraocular</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Patient Satisfaction</term>
<term>Phacoemulsification</term>
<term>Prosthesis Design</term>
<term>Retrospective Studies</term>
<term>Surveys and Questionnaires</term>
<term>Visual Acuity</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">To compare differences in anterior (ACO) and posterior (PCO) capsule opacification and subjective glare between 2 acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs): AcrySof MA30BA (Alcon) and Sensar AR40 (Allergan).</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">12106720</PMID>
<DateCreated><Year>2002</Year>
<Month>07</Month>
<Day>10</Day>
</DateCreated>
<DateCompleted><Year>2002</Year>
<Month>09</Month>
<Day>09</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2015</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>19</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0886-3350</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>28</Volume>
<Issue>7</Issue>
<PubDate><Year>2002</Year>
<Month>Jul</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>J Cataract Refract Surg</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Comparison of AcrySof MA30BA and Sensar AR40 acrylic intraocular lenses.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>1130-4</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<Abstract><AbstractText Label="PURPOSE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">To compare differences in anterior (ACO) and posterior (PCO) capsule opacification and subjective glare between 2 acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs): AcrySof MA30BA (Alcon) and Sensar AR40 (Allergan).</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="SETTING" NlmCategory="METHODS">Department of Ophthalmology and Neurosurgery, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">This retrospective study comprised 100 cataract patients who had phacoemulsification and IOL implantation. Fifty eyes of 50 patients received an MA30BA and 50 eyes of 50 patients, an AR40. The mean postoperative follow-up was 25 months (range 20 to 31 months) and 22 months (range 19 to 29 months), respectively. Examiners subjectively evaluated ACO, and a photographic image-analysis system was used to assess PCO. All patients received a questionnaire to evaluate the incidence of subjective photic phenomena.</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">In the MA30BA group, 60% had no ACO, 19% had mild ACO, and 21% had anterior capsule fibrosis. In the AR40 group, 55% had no ACO, 27% had mild ACO, and 18% had anterior capsule fibrosis. In the MA30BA group, the mean PCO score measured by image-analysis was 0.043 (range 0.000 to 0.084) at 1 year and 0.125 (range 0.000 to 0.197) at 2 years and in the AR40 group, 0.071 (range 0.000 to 0.157) and 0.230 (range 0.091 to 0.628), respectively. Although the ACO percentages and the PCO scores at 1 year were not statistically different between the 2 groups (P >.05), the MA30BA group had statistically less PCO at 2 years (P <.05). In the MA30BA group, 36 patients had trouble reading in a dim environment, 25 had difficulty driving at night, 25 were mildly bothered by the lights of other vehicles, and 17 saw halos when looking at the lights of other vehicles and 17, when looking at lights at night. In the AR40 group, 7 patients had trouble reading in a dim environment and 11 had difficulty driving at night. At 6 months, the AR40 group had a statistically significantly lower incidence of photic phenomena than the MA30BA group (P <.05). In the MA30BA group 1 year after surgery, 13 patients had trouble reading in a dim environment and 12 had difficulty driving at night. In the AR40 group, 5 patients had trouble reading in a dim environment and 8 had difficulty driving at night. One year after surgery, the difference between the 2 groups in photic phenomena was not statistically significant (P >.05).</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">The findings indicate that the AcrySof MA30BA has a lower incidence of PCO than the Sensar AR40. The AR40 IOL induced less glare; however, the glare phenomena did not disturb those with an MA30BA lens and the symptoms decreased by 1 year after surgery. These results suggest that both optic design and haptic material influence postoperative clinical results.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Casprini</LastName>
<ForeName>Fabrizio</ForeName>
<Initials>F</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology and Neurosurgery, University of Siena, Siena, Italy. caporossi@unisi.it</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Tosi</LastName>
<ForeName>Gian Marco</ForeName>
<Initials>GM</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Quercioli</LastName>
<ForeName>Pier Paolo</ForeName>
<Initials>PP</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Caporossi</LastName>
<ForeName>Aldo</ForeName>
<Initials>A</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country>
<MedlineTA>J Cataract Refract Surg</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>8604171</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0886-3350</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D000180">Acrylic Resins</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
</ChemicalList>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D000180">Acrylic Resins</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000368">Aged</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000369">Aged, 80 and over</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D002386">Cataract</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000209">etiology</QualifierName>
<QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000473">pathology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D019466">Glare</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D007903">Lens Capsule, Crystalline</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000473">pathology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D019654">Lens Implantation, Intraocular</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D007910">Lenses, Intraocular</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008875">Middle Aged</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D017060">Patient Satisfaction</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D018918">Phacoemulsification</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D011183">Postoperative Complications</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000473">pathology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011474">Prosthesis Design</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D012189">Retrospective Studies</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011795">Surveys and Questionnaires</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D014792">Visual Acuity</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2002</Year>
<Month>7</Month>
<Day>11</Day>
<Hour>10</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2002</Year>
<Month>9</Month>
<Day>11</Day>
<Hour>10</Hour>
<Minute>1</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2002</Year>
<Month>7</Month>
<Day>11</Day>
<Hour>10</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12106720</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pii">S088633500201427X</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001C74 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001C74 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Ticri/CIDE |area= HapticV1 |flux= PubMed |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= pubmed:12106720 |texte= Comparison of AcrySof MA30BA and Sensar AR40 acrylic intraocular lenses. }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:12106720" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. | ![]() |